Tourism: not a small sector

Becker says global tourism, which accounts for $1.2 trillion of the $13 trillion U.S. economy, is polluting land and sea, destroying wildlife/natural habit, and depleting energy and natural resources, among other ills.

Included in those other ills is the traveler's lament: due to globalization and cheap transportation, it's getting harder and harder to find an isolated, unique/exotic spot, because many are being overrun with tourists, the way Paris is occupied by international visitors each year in August. For Becker, the world is not only flat, it's become a very small world, after all.

Becker's tonic? Although she does not specifically advocate national and international (United Nations) tourism regulation, that's the direction she implies is necessary: an effort to reduce tourism in resource-stressed areas, and lower/eliminate pollution from tourism (including from cruise ships), with the goal of making the industry much more environment-friendly, among other benefits.

Economic Analysis: Becker's analysis provides considerable fodder for further review, particularly regarding ways we can make both international and domestic travel more environmentally-friendly, but the author goes too far and is too negative on travel. The view from here is that the global travel business, which now involves roughly 1 billion people annually, is highly net-positive. The cross-cultural linkages represent a civilization/societal advance, not a burden, under the thesis that argues that nations with economic linkages and public connections are less likely to treat each other with disrespect.

Further, while also advocating local attractions, yours truly certainly wants to encourage residents of other nations to visit the United States, and vice-versa, with the hope that these connections between nations might grow and strengthen.