Reuters reports that EADS, the parent of Airbus, has suggested it may not bid for the $35 billion Air Force contract for airborne refueling tankers. Reuters quotes a senior EADS manager as saying, "We will only bid if we can be sure that we stand a fair chance." This threat mirrors the one that Boeing Inc. (NYSE: BA) made recently -- a threat that paid off for Boeing when the Secretary of Defense announced this week that the tanker competition would be canceled and rebid sometime after the November election.
This puts a French company as a player in this November's election. How so? Because one of the candidates, John McCain, is rooting for an EADS victory. That's because his former chief of finance, Tom Loeffler, is a lobbyist for EADS whose employees have contributed $14,000 to McCain's campaign. And those ties likely corrupted the previous bidding process that led the General Accounting Office (GAO) in June to report that the process was flawed -- leading to a rebid. It is too early to know whether EADS money will pay off in an election victory for McCain.
However, for Boeing, the news of EADS copying its tactic of threatening to withdraw its bid is the sincerest form of flattery. Meanwhile, Boeing's victory in getting the bid delayed could be a Pyrrhic one -- in other words it could win a short-term battle and lose the war as did "King Pyrrhus of Epirus, whose army suffered irreplaceable casualties in defeating the Romans at Heraclea in 280 BC and Asculum in 279 BC during the Pyrrhic War," according to Wikipedia.
That's because if McCain wins in November, his financial ties to EADS could corrupt the process. How so? It's unclear whether the time McCain spent in August 2006 on a yacht rented by Raffaello Follieri -- who pleaded guilty to "conspiracy to commit wire fraud, eight counts of wire fraud and five counts of money laundering," according to The Nation -- has influenced his actions.
But it is known that McCain has used his power to benefit people who gave him money at least six times in the past -- remember the $3.4 billion the U.S. paid to bail out Charles Keating's savings and loan in the 1980s? And it appears that the GAO's conclusion that the tanker bid was flawed could be another case of such corruption.
To avoid a repeat, we'll just have to pray it rains on McCain's parade.
Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-13-2008 @ 9:30AM
MyKisa said...
no need for lobbyists with HR25, but that should not be mentioned because it is easier to point the finger of blame
9-13-2008 @ 11:52AM
solid said...
so the final verdict should be Please dont elect MCCAIN.... why do you want a corrupt politician? Americans are smarter than that.
9-13-2008 @ 1:08PM
sgentilejr said...
It is sad indeed...but this is totally normal and business as usual. BOTH McCain and Obama have very close ties with Frreddie and Fannie and both of them supported their bailout.
Honestly...the real problem is that "WE the people" have allowed the corporate world to take over politics because "WE the people" do not make enough political contributions as indivuals for any candidate to run a viable campaign...so they have turned to and become loyal pupets to those corporations who actually support their campaigns.
9-13-2008 @ 2:18PM
Chris K. said...
You lie. Repeating a lie over and over does not make it true.
You also omit all the campaign contributions and conflicts of interest between Boeing and Democrats.
It's a shame that AOL gives you a forum for your propaganda.
9-18-2008 @ 1:25AM
Tristano Caracciolo said...
Be clear about the fact that an Air Force officer did time in jail and a Boeing manager (I believe the CEO) was forced to resign over severe irregularities at the expense of the taxpayers.
Mc Cain stopped such illegal acts as he is an honest person. Personally I believe we should buy a Boeing product: is built in the USA and it is a better airplane.