Welcome to the 77th installment of The Wal-Mart Weekly, a column dedicated to bringing you insight, wit, facts, results, opinions, and just a bit of everything else when it comes to a very hot topic these days: Wal-Mart.
This week, I'll be taking a look at Wal-Mart Stores Inc.'s (NYSE: WMT) policy on recalling products known to be dangerous to the public. Case in point: Blitz brand plastic gas cans with extendable spouts that can explode in the face of customers. I'm not kidding, folks. This week's topic is personal, since I own one of the offending products myself. And yes, I can see how this product could explode if not used carefully.
But what this is really about is Wal-Mart's refusal to pull this product from its shelves, even after hard evidence that the offending product caused severe burns on a small boy who, admittedly, was using the gas can outside its intended use. Is that any excuse for being disfigured as a result of an explosion from a gas container? You be the judge.
Wal-Mart's image is only as good as its weakest link
After seeing the report by Dan Rather above, it's hard not to be perplexed by Wal-Mart's flippant stance on something as serious as a product that could cause severe bodily harm. The Blitz brand gas can in the above report has a spout that is stored inside the body of the gas can itself. Without the inclusion of a flame arrestor device, flames can get back into the gas can itself and igniting the entire thing. So, who checks items from Wal-Mart's supply side to ensure products dealing with such serious situations like gas and fire aren't dangerous? Apparently, nobody.
According to experts, the inclusion of a flame arrestor device on this particular type of Blitz can would cost about one dollar. Either Wal-Mart doesn't know that this is needed by its vendor (Blitz USA in this case) or doesn't want to present a higher price to the Wal-Mart shopper for a lowly gas can. From what I can tell, both Wal-Mart and Blitz USA are denying that a problem even exists with this product.
As I said, I own one of these and I can easily see how a flame could catch on the extendable gas spout and ignite the entire can. It's not really safe to have a gas-coated, extendable spout protruding from a gas can, especially if you're pouring gas on an existing flame. But that's just what happened to some customers of this product, and they were burned as a result.
Anything can end up on YouTube
The professionally-produced Wal-Mart video above is just amazing. It really does seem that those customers who were harmed using this Blitz gas container product were being severely mocked here. Surely this was not done for showing at a Wal-Mart manager's meeting. But that's precisely what it is.
Do Wal-Mart executives have a clue here, or was this video production merely coincidental? Even so, it's in extremely poor taste and it's easy to see that Wal-Mart could appear callous and harsh here. After all, was there any educational value at all in the video? Even the entertainment value is pretty low here. And naming this skit the "iGas" in the style of iPod commercials by Apple, Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) is appalling.
Doesn't any relationship exist between vendor and retailer?
It's just amazing that consumer feedback and safety aren't the first priorities of any company. But the reality is that profits and shareholder returns are the order of the day. As we've seen with multiple food recalls, safety recalls and other problems, consumer protection is the last thing on the mind of many huge manufacturers and global retailers. In other words, form product safety committees that explore how certain products could be used -- not how they are supposed to be used -- and ensure that consumers can't be harmed by slightly abnormal product use.
Sticking one's finger into a gas-coated gas container spout and expecting there not to be possible safety issues sound absurd, right? That's not on the mind of many consumers, though. After watching the above video and seeing how some Wal-Mart executives plainly made fun of the very consumers that keep the retailer afloat, one has to wonder what kind of elitists can't possibly anticipate the various scenarios some products could be used under. The YouTube video above that contains footage from previous Flagler promotional video from Wal-Mart management meetings speaks for itself, though. It's as if these Wal-Mart execs have contempt for their own consumers. If you own a business, would you last long if you made fun of your consumers over something as important as a vital product safety problem? Thought not.
As for the Blitz gas container in my garage, it has been emptied, cleaned and had made its way to the recycling bin for proper disposal. After examining the goofy design of the thing, it was a no-brainer to toss it out completely. But, as we've seen from many companies that are detached from the real world of the consumer, product design that may be intended for convenience can easily be trumped by unintended consumer use and consequences. It's unfortunate when those consequences cause severe bodily harm.
Stay tuned right here this time next week for another edition of The Wal-Mart Weekly. Until then, be careful out in that garage when filling that lawnmower or other yard tool, okay?
Walmart's New Health Food Push: Is It Too Hard to Swallow?
Bonds Are a 'Safe' Investment: A Big Lie Gets Even Bigger


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-24-2008 @ 2:49AM
Co-manager said...
Thank you, but that is only a small venue of the mockery of WMT exec's portrayal of the public's IQ. With the cost of overseas merchandise increasing, the profound edge of savings will increasingly be more evident, which has always been a hidden risk to WMT's customers. Feeding on the less fortunate. Very closely related to the question to a tobacco founder years ago when asked if he smokes, and his answer was no, I only sell to the young, the colored and the stupid.
9-24-2008 @ 10:34AM
eric said...
Don't be a hapless fool. Blaming walmart, or anybody else but oneself, for getting burned while pouring gasoline on an open flame is flatly irresponsible. It's also further evidence that personal reponsibility is a thing of the past if we let whining blamiacs like you vote. Even the biggest, most powerful retailer in the world can't save idiots (or idiot's children) from themselves. Instead of voting this year, just sit home and blog.
10-17-2008 @ 2:36PM
Jeff Hess said...
Shalom Brian,
You use the plural when referring to burn victims in this case.
"But that's just what happened to some customers of this product, and they were burned as a result."
Do you have a link to the list of anyone burned other than the boy in the video?
B'shalom,
Jeff Hess
http://www.thewritingonthewal.net
http://www.havecoffeewillwrite.com
9-25-2008 @ 9:47PM
Bill said...
Blitz gas cans are an American made product. How can you bash Wal-Mart for buying American made products that are not used for their intended purpose? How many gas cans are designed for pouring gas on an open flame and why would that be a recommend use for gas in the first place?
10-08-2008 @ 11:34PM
DaveStraitjacket said...
Wow.
After watching the CBS video, that's my only reaction. Although it wasn't to what CBS showed. It was that CBS put that bit of lazy journalism and agenda driven reporting on the air.
The "smoking gun" video clip. Laughable. The woman Rather interviewed. I didn't think a human being that far out of the womb was capable of that level of whining and crying. The idea that Wal-Mart is in -any way- responsible for what happened to that kid is astounding. Am I the only person who was yelling at the screen when they revealed that a 12 year old was handling gasoline? If the gas can had been empty would his parents let him drive down to the gas station to buy more?
Is Auto Zone included in the lawsuit? Advance Auto Parts? K-Mart? O'reilly's Auto Parts? Because you can find Blitz gas cans there too. What about the maker of the gasoline? BP, Shell, Chevron? I mean, come on! Who knew gasoline was flammable??? Oh yeah...EVERYBODY!
Gas cans generally don't explode. It's usually the contents that do that. The only thing this report reveals is Dan Rather's hatred of Wal-Mart. Why? Who knows? Maybe he owns stock in Target and is trying to improve his position.