AOL Money & Finance

Should Congress start a 'U.S. Society Bank'?

More

With the U.S. Treasury's $700 billion intervention bill -- commonly called the bailout bill -- nearing President Bush's desk for review and signature into law, a compelling question has risen in economic and taxpayer circles.

Given that the U.S taxpayer is funding the recovery, if not the bailout, of financial institutions and banks, are banks and financial institutions doing enough to show their gratitude to the people of the United States, the banking sector's lender -- and investor -- of last resort?

One standpoint argues they aren't, so says economist Richard Felson, and here's what Felson would like to see: In addition to equity stakes in each company that receives taxpayer assistance, the U.S Congress should require the company/bank to pay an annual fee to fund the administrative costs of a bank for low-income citizens and senior citizens.


Felson said a good name for this public bank, a non-profit bank, would be the "United States Society Bank" or "U.S. Society Bank."

This bank would offer free checking, savings accounts, ATM access and other services for the poor and senior citizens, Felson said. There would be no monthly, management, or transaction fees. Further, the bank would pay a modest interest rate on savings and checking accounts, he said, and have branches throughout the United States, particularly in low-income neighborhoods and other areas where private banks don't have branches. All accounts would be FDIC insured.

"Here we have this enormous outlay of U.S. taxpayer dollars to support the banking sector and financial institutions after their gross mistakes and failures," Felson said. "Isn't it time the U.S. taxpayer got something in return? The U.S. taxpayer is the lender. And the first rule of lending is 'the borrower is servant to the lender.' Well, in my view it's high time the banks started serving the taxpayer. Their paying the administrative costs for this non-profit bank for the poor and senior citizens would be one way to accomplish that."

Felson said only U.S. citizens with low incomes, as determined by tax reports, and senior citizens over age 60 would be eligible to open an account at the bank.

Keeping in mind that Congress is not likely to approve a policy the public does not support, it makes sense to find out what U.S. taxpayers/readers think.

In your view, should the U.S. Congress create a non-profit "U.S. Society Bank," funded by banks and financial institutions who received U.S. taxpayer money under the $700 billion bailout bill?

a) Yes. - - It's a great idea. The U.S. taxpayer isn't getting enough under the current plan for the use of tax dollars to bail out the banks and financial institutions.

b) No. - - It's a bad idea. The banks and financial institutions will pay back enough under the current bailout plan, and Americans have plenty of banking options.

c) I'm not sure.

d) None of the above / something else.


**

Let us know what you think.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA-14.2810,318.16
NASDAQ-10.782,146.04
S&P 500-3.521,091.38

Last updated: November 22, 2009: 09:44 PM

BloggingStocks Exclusives

Hot Stocks

DailyFinance Headlines

Latest from BloggingBuyouts

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

BioHealth Investor Headlines

WalletPop Headlines

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

WalletPop Headlines