Meltdown in financials serves top value investors a slice of humble pie
So what happened? Basically, the pessimistic majority was 100% right on the future of many of these financial firms and the contrarians were completely wrong. But I think there was a larger problem for many of these top value investors: they abandoned their principles and bought big into companies they didn't understand, with risks and balance sheets that no one understands.
Eugene Fama told (subscription required) The Wall Street Journal that it's "not true" that value investing is safer than other forms of investing.
I disagree. What's risky is investing in stocks that you don't understand based on superficial analysis, and that's what got people like Bill Miller in trouble.
Related Posts
- Chasing Value: Apple may be one again (3 days ago - 6 Comments)
- Coach (COH): Value investor sees 'handsome rewards' (22 days ago - 0 Comments)
- Three rules for value investors (41 days ago - 2 Comments)
- Stay away from Citigroup (C) (6 days ago - 11 Comments)
- Allegheny Technologies (ATI): A 'Dreman style' contrarian buy (9 days ago - 0 Comments)










Add your comments