TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says the end-of-day bounce was just shorts afraid of a worldwide rate cut. The shorts must have just gone on "ease watch." You can tell what that is. Some devastating news will come out, say, about once-proud Royal Bank of Scotland (NYSE: RBS) (Cramer's Take), some ratings downgrade, and boom, Britain is hit for a full percentage point decline. Then, as if by magic, it rallies almost back to unchanged as the shorts don't want to be hung before worldwide rate cuts.
I always thought this behavior was curious because I don't know of a short-seller who thinks that intervention even matters, or says it doesn't matter, for that matter!
In fact, though I think it can matter not so much to our country, it does matter to those countries in Europe that really would be doing well if money weren't so tight. Our markets lost a ready source of cash and business when Europe went away, particularly upon the disappearance of China from the world's economies.
Now, of all of the new measures I like hearing, the commercial paper intervention is intriguing as the government substitutes itself for buyers for this important funding. But again, I come back to the notion that we can't really be two sides of everything, can we?
Can we really have the Fed define all markets? Look, I get the real estate market because the risk there is that the Fed owns the house and sits on it or owns the CDO until it works its way out of being a CDO.
But we can't restore confidence in commercial paper until we restore confidence that solvency and seizing are off the table. I thought it unconscionable that the FDIC didn't come out Monday and say, "We are not going to seize Sovereign (NYSE: SOV) (Cramer's Take) or Nat City (NYSE: NCC) (Cramer's Take) or anyone else for that matter, because we are going to let TARP take care of it."
Until we get seizures off the table, everything is going to be Lehman Brothers or Fannie (NYSE: FNM) (Cramer's Take) and Freddie (NYSE: FRE) (Cramer's Take) preferred and Washington Mutual debt. That's the way it is; there was too much in the system and it is still not worked through.
Same with the hedge fund redemptions. There is no magic amount there that finishes and the world goes on. Should the Fed take the other side of dying hedge funds?
What are the real endgames here? We cut rates, restore some confidence, provide some short-term funding until long-term funding can take its place wherever that is feasible and we begin to rebuild.
Or we crater the whole thing and start over.
What's the latter look like? OK, take Iceland. The Iceland banks, which all seem insolvent, own a huge amount of real estate. You seize, have the banks go belly-up, the real estate is auctioned off at dramatically lower prices and you start all over again.
Big annihilations, but then the system is built on less debt.
Tell me that isn't what you are thinking could happen at, say, a Ford (NYSE: F) (Cramer's Take) or a GM (NYSE: GM) (Cramer's Take), now that it looks like Toyota (NYSE: TM) (Cramer's Take) is in trouble and Volkswagen is the world's largest automaker by market cap.
So, those are the two solutions. In the interim, it is all short and cover and squeeze and sell until this miserable period finds a level where the selling exhausts itself and I do not believe it found that level Monday. All it did was find the level where the hedge funds had raised enough cash for that day's margin calls and the short-sellers feared leaving a tremendous trading profit on the table.
Random musings: Congrats to Dan Dicker for advancing the CDS plan that caused CME (NYSE: CME) (Cramer's Take) to rally. I think it's great because the CME has enough political clout -- unlike the NYSE -- to get something done. Doug's got a bead on the hedge fund hedge game that I think is playing out. ... There is still vast confusion on a point that I have made endlessly here -- things are too dicey to let short-term money run on this market. We know that stocks can come back, but I am now using a 2000-2002 model, Nazz-style, to come to grips with the tape where solvency of many companies was on the line.
----------------------
RELATED LINKS:
Fed Mulls Plan to Buy Commercial Paper
Asia Stocks End Mixed On Australia Rate Cut
----------------------
Jim Cramer is a director and co-founder of TheStreet.com. He contributes daily market commentary for TheStreet.com's sites and serves as an adviser to the company's CEO. At the time of publication, Cramer had no positions in the stocks mentioned.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-07-2008 @ 11:21AM
GEORGE HILL said...
HOW DOES G.E. KEEP THIS CLOWN WITH NO CREDIBILITY ON CNBC?
10-07-2008 @ 11:32AM
Thomas said...
I don't trust Cramer's predictions about the stock market. Beware of listening to those who have been proven to be wrong.
10-07-2008 @ 11:32AM
nick said...
Time to dump GE stock, this company is so corrupt right now, the CEO is driving the company in the ditch. They are too invoved with Obama.
10-07-2008 @ 11:46AM
think said...
if you haven't sold by now it's to late. Be greedy when others are fearful and fearful when others are greedy. if you sell now the buyer will win and you will loose.
10-07-2008 @ 12:41PM
pigdogsam said...
Cramer is an alarmist who shouldn't be allowed to spew his negativity on a national broadcast. We have quit watching MSNBC as well as NBC because of his spewing, and also because of his irritable personality! Take him off and take him off now!
10-07-2008 @ 1:10PM
Hal said...
So which of Cramer's 2 solutions is it?
Or does anyone really get to choose?
Seems solution 1 requires a lot of coordinated activity -- and some luck to execute.
Looks like solution 2 will be what happens.
10-07-2008 @ 1:26PM
Warren Blowit said...
GE is "too involved with Obama"? Nick, you are obviously smoking crack and not the good kind of crack, the BAD kind of crack like the one that runs through your walnut sized head!
Do us a favor and dont interject your lame-ass Republican spin on an already awful problem. I think you forgot about the God of Republicans-Ronald Raygun and his theory of "trickle down" economics. The way it actually works is this: you deregulate the rich crooks on Wall St and they go crazy with greed and bankrupt the country with phony derivitaves and other illegal tools whereby they can buy another yacht to park in the Hamptons. The only thing that "trickles down" is debt! "Too involved with Obama" man are you a fucking idiot!
10-07-2008 @ 2:43PM
kathy said...
This is the same yahoo that said "Don't buy a house" - I wish they would take him off the air - what a knucklehead!
10-07-2008 @ 4:38PM
Allen walters said...
Hi Jim
whats your take on Bush/MCain plan to privatize social security,still a good option?????
10-07-2008 @ 5:14PM
Jerry said...
With people like Cramer on the air waves the market will never recover, him and his kind are just milking the working class out of there retirement savings talking about all this doom and gloom while short selling the market. This was all planed to insure the baby boomers would be forced to stay in the work force till they are unable to work since opening up our boarders didn't work like they planed to reduce income and rasie health care cost enough. These people need investigated and publicly procecuted, then band from trading stocks for life then they will speek the truth. This is no different then a pro athelete betting with the Odds makers in Vegas.
10-07-2008 @ 11:49PM
Shelley said...
Who's watching out for the retail investor? Who's teaching them that buy&hold is one of the riskiest strategies around and that with $3Trillion running through an unregulated hedge fund industry their investments need constant protection? If nothing else, let's hope this latest crisis (as if 2000-2002 didn't do the trick) teaches all investors to always have an intelligent exit strategy in place from the start. One that continually adjusts itself to the stock's behavior and overall market conditions. http://www.smartstops.net
10-08-2008 @ 6:33AM
Bobby Dee said...
Well, Cramer has been saying for years that buy & hold is risky and that one needs an exit strategy. Is that where your link leads?
10-08-2008 @ 8:35PM
Ozzie said...
I agree with Jerry, this is a hold em by their ankles and shake the boomer until they sell. Boomers have fueled this market since the 80's. Nobody invested in the market before the advent of the boomer generation, my old man didn't and neither did any other middle class working family. Only the blue bloods did. The market has hit us in 87, so-called dot com selloff and now this "mortgage mess" inspired selloff. If I survive this one (we've lost almost $200,000 so far) I'll NEVER get in this crooked, rigged bullshit ever again.
10-09-2008 @ 11:10PM
think said...
if you haven't sold by now it's to late. Be greedy when others are fearful and fearful when others are greedy. if you sell now the buyer will win and you will loose.