Big US companies must not think much of their own prospects. With many stocks at multi-year lows, firms are not stepping up to buy their own shares. That seems odd because a number of the largest corporations are sitting on billions of dollars in cash. The lack of buybacks may be as bearish a sign as investors can find.
According to the FT, "Regulators have sought to encourage companies to buy shares in the open market by easing restrictions on corporate buy-backs as part of emergency measures introduced last month." But, no dice.
It is understandable the forums with modest cash balances would not be in the buyback market, but that leaves a number of very large, cash-rich corporations from Altria (NYSE:MO) to Google (NASDAQ:GOOG). They almost certainly have excess capital that they will not need, even in a deep recession.
The lack of buybacks leads to only one conclusion. Company managements and boards think their stocks will go much lower. They do not want to look foolish if they put capital into falling shares But, over a long period of time America's large corporations should hold their value. Too bad even insiders do not look at it that way.
Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.
Why is gold making a new high, trading at $1,118.00 per ounce?
Chasing Value: Ten stocks for 2010 -- Part 1 
Closing Bell: A six-day rally (AIG, REGN, M, MOT, PALM, RIMM)
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-15-2008 @ 1:54PM
Kent said...
I was thinking the same thing about this inactivity of buy-backs the other day. Holding a company captive to aggressive shareholders is incentive enough to buy-back as many shares as possible to give it time to look forward long-term rather than short-term. Good question posed by Doug.
10-16-2008 @ 10:48AM
Anemone said...
Companies *already* look foolish for having bought back shares when they were high, and halting buybacks now that the prices are low. How does this create shareholder value again? At least with a dividend the shareholder is free to make their own purchase-timing mistakes.