AOL Money & Finance

10 more banks get $18 billion of our money; three are money losers

More

Who knows why the Treasury gives our money to some banks and not to others. That comes to mind when considering that we just gave $18 billion to 10 regional banks -- three of which are unprofitable. Why does this matter? Because giving taxpayer money to an unprofitable bank could be as good as flushing it away. I guess Treasury figures it can always get more where that came from, so why not?

Here are the lucky winners of the government bailout lottery that earned a profit and their pre-market stock price change:

And here are the three that lost money but still got taxpayer capital -- the amount of their latest loss is in parentheses:

Is there any logic to why the U.S. is giving taxpayer money to banks that are losing money? Wouldn't it be better to merge the money-losing banks with profitable ones? And does the government know whether the ones that are currently profitable will stay that way over the next year?

The secretive process will continue as long as these "folks" are in power. But if they were doing it right, they would make it clear how they were deciding which banks to capitalize and which to cull. And that does not look like it is in the cards.

Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA+17.4610,023.42
NASDAQ+7.122,112.44
S&P 500+2.671,069.30

Last updated: November 08, 2009: 07:40 PM

BloggingStocks Exclusives

Hot Stocks

DailyFinance Headlines

Latest from BloggingBuyouts

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

BioHealth Investor Headlines

WalletPop Headlines

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

WalletPop Headlines