The Wall Street Journal reports (subscription required) that the company has agreed to pay the employee $1.3 million to settle the claim with one catch -- that she keep the settlement a secret "and instead participate in an arbitration proceeding, with a preordained outcome" so that Charney could publicly declare victory.
The woman refused to participate in the arbitration and the matter ended up in court. Last week, a three judge panel of California's Second Appellate District in Los Angeles said that the woman's alleged breach of the agreement should be reviewed by independent arbitrators.
However, the court added that it was concerned about the "potential illegality of the 'arbitration' clause ... with its goal of issuing a press release for the purpose of misleading journalists and the public."
With the appearance of efforts to mislead investors about the nature of the case, this fiasco moves beyond the realm of the hanky panky that has been part of Mr. Charney's behavior and his company since it went public. Now you have to wonder about integrity.
Savings Experiment: Snow Removal
The Money Man Behind Rick Santorum: Who Is Foster S. Friess?


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-14-2008 @ 1:52AM
Stan Merkowitz said...
Honestly, this one too. This is exhausting. Can we settle one thing before moving onto the next, Fink?
I believe American Apparel on this one, though I don't think that they were too intelligent in ever listening to this guy. The money was never paid because he breached the agreement and I'd put money down that he's going to have to pay the company money for damages. Maybe they throw him some back to make him go away indefinitely, but it'll probably end up as a stalemate and Mr. Fink will grin and mark it up as a win for him.
Could he have a slimier name?