BloggingStocks

Cramer on BloggingStocks: Fix the home glut

Posted Nov 12th 2008 9:30AM by Jim CramerJim Cramer RSS Feed
Filed under: Market matters, Citigroup Inc. (C), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Federal Natl Mtge (FNM), Amer Intl Group (AIG), Wells Fargo (WFC), Housing, Cramer on BloggingStocks, MBIA Inc (MBI)

More

TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says that's the real problem, and every little bit helps.

Many are decrying that the AIG (NYSE: AIG) (Cramer's Take) bailout now helps the holders of the collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) who bought insurance against them from AIG. The idea is simple: These CDOs are worth, in many cases, next to nothing depending upon the vintages, geographies and FICO scores, but they will now be paid back at pretty much face value -- AIG CEO Ed Liddy said the prices will be negotiated, but I don't see how they can get any less because AIG guaranteed it and the U.S. is not abrogating any of these guarantees.

It's an obvious windfall and still one more piece of the stinking puzzle that involves unwinding the bogus real estate finance that prevailed from 2004 to 2007. The bigger issue, though, is whether the government will then take over MBIA (NYSE: MBI) (Cramer's Take) and Ambac (NYSE: ABK) (Cramer's Take) -- I know people at those companies say they don't need it, so OK, they don't ... but let's say they do for the purposes of reality -- and have them make good on all of the credit default swaps they wrote against bad CDOs.

If the government is willing, they can buy several trillion dollars of these easily through this method and then sit on them and hopefully they will come back to some value.


It's another way to solve the problem -- a more expensive way than just giving homeowners $50,000 apiece, even -- but it does make the banks whole.

Of course, it does nothing to solve the actual problem of foreclosures, because even if you own the CDO outright you can't open it up and renegotiate the loans. It is a true bailout for the CDO buyers -- hedge funds, pension funds, banks -- even though it does not address the root cause.

Nothing's easy with this stuff. There are a lot more insurance policies written on this stuff then there is stuff. It is not at all clear why you can legally pay off the policyholder with an economic interest and not pay off the policyholder who just bet against it because it was a piece of junk. They both will be paid. That would probably add at least another trillion dollars to this new bailout proposal.

I continue to think that all of these are a big joke. We have to stop foreclosures, and everything else will take care of itself. We do not have the ability to get at the roughly 10 million home mortgages that I think are in the CDO system, but the 4 million that are still whole loans, either held at banks or at Fannie (NYSE: FNM) (Cramer's Take) and Freddie (NYSE: FRE) (Cramer's Take) (again we don't have real numbers, but those are my own calculations looking through the NAR data), can be redone.

If you have a neighborhood of 100 homes of which say, 30% are being foreclosed upon or will be soon -- a decent guesstimate for many parts of California, Florida, Arizona and Nevada -- you will be able to keep some of them from happening with workouts for Fannie and Freddie and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) (Cramer's Take) and JPMorgan (NYSE: JPM) (Cramer's Take) and Citi (NYSE: C) (Cramer's Take), and every little bit helps.

One thing is certain: We still don't have a clue about how to stop home price declines. The CDOs are just intractable and can't be reversed, broken up or unwound, which is what is really needed.

So what we have to take it one piece at a time. It would help immensely if we did a couple of meat-ax things:

1. force the banks to stop supporting homebuilders so they can stop adding to the supply,
2. buy vacant homes and give them to municipalities, which might be in touch with prospective buyers who can work out long-term borrowings, and
3. create a big tax credit for anyone buying a home.

These address inventory, which is the real problem.

Remember this: The easiest way to fix this problem would be to literally torch all the excess homes. That's actually, in a weird way, the obvious but of course ridiculously unpalatable action plan. But it's the excess inventory that is the enemy, whether it be from new homes being built or inventory of foreclosed homes, and as long as it stays high, the price of the other homes goes down and there are more and more foreclosures, more lower prices for homes and more CDOs that go bust.

The cycle must be broken somehow. All of these are little ways to make that happen. They can't hurt, they can help.

Jim Cramer is co-founder and chairman of TheStreet.com. He contributes daily market commentary for TheStreet.com's sites and serves as an adviser to the company's CEO. At the time of publication, Cramer was long JPMorgan.

Tags: abk, aig, c, featured, fnm, fre, housing, jim cramer, JimCramer, jpm, mbi, wfc

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

All contents copyright © 2003-2009, Weblogs, Inc. All rights reserved

BloggingStocks is a member of the Weblogs, Inc. Network. Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, Notify AOL