AOL Money & Finance

Congress should cancel Paulson's $810 billion bailout plan

More

Back in September, Hank Paulson urged swift passage of the now $810 billion bank bailout bill by citing heavenly retribution if it did not pass. Paulson succeeded in getting his money. But after spending nearly $300 billion there's scant evidence that it's helping. Congress was clearly wrong to put its faith in Paulson and it should cancel the plan and replace it with one that clearly defines the problem and demonstrates how the plan will solve that problem.

One piece of good news is that the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor) has declined from 4.82% to 2.15% -- but lending still remains extremely tight. And it's possible that other programs, such as the Fed's plan to purchase $50 billion in commercial paper (CP), contributed to that Libor decline rather than Paulson's. Even more outrageous than the failure of Paulson's plan to fix the problems is that there is nothing to stop our money from paying $26.6 billion worth of banker bonuses.

Given this colossally wrong-headed plan, how did Paulson get his way? Not surprisingly, Congress has a weak understanding of economics and global finance. According to a Washington reporter I spoke with last month, Congress approved the Paulson plan because it believed that the former CEO of Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE: GS) must have known what he is talking about. They believed that if he was advocating a reverse auction plan to buy toxic waste that it must be the right thing to do. Unfortunately, faith is not a strategy.

Despite its flaws, about which I posted, Congress decided that its reelection depended on doing something. But Wednesday Paulson decided the reverse auction was not such a good idea after all. With no evidence that the plan is working and limited U.S. resources, Congress should cancel the plan and start with a new approach in January.

How so? We still have a problem which is getting worse. And Washington will have to do something to fix it. Since I believe that it would be a serious mistake to accept the conventional wisdom that led to this failed bailout plan, Barack Obama's economic team should conduct an independent analysis of how we got into the current situation. It should then develop a plan that will produce short-, medium- and long-term improvements in economic performance.

Rather than developing this plan in secret and announcing it to great fanfare on inauguration day, President-elect Obama should engage in a dialog with the American people to explain the problems we face and to describe how the plan will fix these problems. With consumer spending accounting for 70% of economic growth, Obama must restore America's confidence in the future of our economic and financial institutions if we are to climb out of this ditch.

Accomplishing this will demand the outstanding communications skills that won him the election. If nothing else, Obama won because he represented a chance to turn the page on a secretive, boastful, and ineffective approach to governing that got us into this catastrophic situation.

Now America needs a 21st century version of FDR's fireside chats. And it's up to Obama to deliver them.

Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College. His eighth book, You Can't Order Change: Lessons From Jim McNerney's Turnaround at Boeing, will be published by Portfolio on December 26, 2008. He has no financial interest in Goldman securities.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA+17.4610,023.42
NASDAQ+7.122,112.44
S&P 500+2.671,069.30

Last updated: November 08, 2009: 10:34 PM

BloggingStocks Exclusives

Hot Stocks

DailyFinance Headlines

Latest from BloggingBuyouts

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

BioHealth Investor Headlines

WalletPop Headlines

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

WalletPop Headlines