Welcome to Way Off Wall Street, a column dedicated to providing Main Street opinions on topics of interest to investors. Each installment highlights the views of Americans who are far removed from the canyons of Wall Street -- and who often see things more clearly as a result.
This is the second part of a two part report in which I have examined current retirement attitudes. In Part One, I revealed some of the current thoughts and concerns that were expressed to me by people who are already retired, and by people who expect to retire within the next five years. In Part Two, I present the thoughts and attitudes of people who expect to retire more than ten years from now, and people who believe that the concept of a traditional, full retirement cannot be applied to their lives.
When examining the attitudes of people who will reach the retirement stage of life more than a decade from now, I found it difficult to form a well-rounded picture. I had expected that I would encounter numerous strategies and "secret formulas" for retirement success. However, what I actually encountered was a vast swamp of bewilderment, misinformation, and noncommittal apathy. I'm still rather stunned by it. These are people generally ranging in age from 45 to 60. I find it quite distressing that most of these people don't have a solid grasp on their own retirement planning. An article presented by redwoodage.com quotes Peter Smyth, executive vice president of The Hartford's International Markets, as stating: "The overall level of financial preparedness globally remains low and is deteriorating."
Most of these distant retirees seem totally blind to their own retirement financing. They complain that it's going to be difficult and expensive, but then they defer the responsibilities of their future financial security to employer-provided savings plans and government entitlement programs, including Social Security. Rare was the person I found who was involved in creating their own independent retirement nest egg. Additionally, I never expected to encounter such a stark contrast between this group and the people who are only about ten years older than they are.
Of this distant retirement group, those people who are actually taking an active hand in planning for their own financial futures seemed to favor two particular strategies. The first strategy encompasses those people who have engaged a professional financial planner for guidance in retirement planning and those who are utilizing their own skills and knowledge to actively develop a retirement portfolio on their own. The second active planning strategy is generally defined by a slow, and sometimes questionable, accumulation of tangible assets.
The people who are utilizing financial planning, either with professional assistance or on their own, are mainly seeking asset accumulation and protection through diversification while also requiring adequate asset growth. They generally favor stocks in long-standing companies with large global footprints; they also like high-quality, long-term bonds. Those who are a bit more aggressive with their money, and who focus more on the production of future income, seem keen on the acquisition of rental properties and in venture capitalism.
These portfolio builders comprise a thoughtful and patient group, not much shaken by the current economic tide. Because their outlooks stretch over a decade or more, they hold fast to the belief that economies go through cycles. For the most part, they feel that our economic downturn simply signals an opportunity to buy now while waiting for the inevitable rebound. They are classic, long-term investors, and I fear they are a dying breed.
The second ten-year personal retirement strategy group could possibly be best defined with the term eclectic collections. These well meaning people seem to believe that they each have found those special tangible items that will gain in value and that the world shall always want. Whether it's Beanie Babies, electric trains, Barbie dolls, or buffalo nickels, these people are seemingly convinced that their slowly amassed collections of baubles and trinkets will someday pay their bills. Notably, the majority of these people seem almost oblivious to current economic trends unless they've been negatively and directly affected.
Some of these private curators actually do have meritorious collections. Take for instance the fellow who for decades has spent his hobby budget purchasing low-quality silver dollar coins. While he may not have built up a collection of truly valuable collectible coins, he now personally holds hundreds of pounds of fairly high-grade silver. On the other hand, the fellow who has spent thousands of dollars over the years purchasing postal commemorative first day covers or collectors plates may be disturbed to find that these items will probably liquidate for only pennies on the dollar. The problem with large collections of anything is that they are only worth what someone is willing to pay for them in the end. Even the rarest of items are eventually subject to the whims of their respective markets.
I don't begrudge these people their wonderful collections. In fact the field of collectibles has created some truly massive fortunes. However, I am concerned that many of these people will find that they would have done much better, in relation to inflation and taxation, if they had just put that money into IRA accounts and CDs instead.
The last group that I'll present in this report is perhaps the most interesting to me because I am one of them. This is the group of future retirees who believe that the word retirement will never truly apply to them. For some people in this group, the attitude stems from a belief that financial conditions won't allow them to ever step away from the daily grind. They believe that the expense of medical insurance and/or escalated living costs will require that they remain fully employed as long as they possibly can. Sadly enough, I believe that under current conditions many of these people may unfortunately be correct. It appears that pressures from the insurance and medical industries have painted them into a corner that they cannot escape. However, the government and senior activist groups are rigorously addressing these problems. In ten years time, that landscape could look quite a bit different, if not better.
Finally, you have the folks like me, who see ourselves working right through our retirement years because that's simply the way we're made. We're the people like my father-in-law who ran his sawmill until he was 72 years old, or the former Marine sergeant who lives down my street and who still farms beef cattle at the age of 63, or my dear mother who at 70 years of age still changes bed linens in a nursing home, not because she has to, but because it keeps her feeling young, fit, and useful. Yes, people like us often do drop off of the traditional payrolls, making way for a younger and stronger crowd, but you'll not often find us on a golf course in Arizona or on a cruise ship off the coast of Mexico, because we're busy working for ourselves.
Like myself, many people in this group who shall never fully retire still need to follow a regimen of responsible retirement planning. We know that there may be some future income gaps to fill. We know that there may be insurance deductibles, drug co-pays, or other unforeseen expenses. The key is to start saving at as young an age as possible, and to put away some money each week in an appropriate retirement plan. We may each make a timely investigation of our retirement funding options, or we may allow our retirement years to come crashing down on us. The choice is clearly our own. Either way, I believe that we shouldn't depend on the government to finance our entire retirement for us. We need to take as much active control of our future financial success as we now take with our careers.
When it comes to retirement planning, I highly recommend that everyone consider seeking the advice of a retirement funding professional. There are too many tax angles for the average person to keep track of. There are too many investment vehicles for each consumer to examine them all. Investment professionals, while not perfect, spend their careers investigating and evaluating all the available options. I suggest that you make an appointment to discuss your future financial security with someone who works in that field. It's never too soon to get started on a secure retirement. Please take some steps today to help protect your own golden years.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-02-2008 @ 12:17AM
falsehood said...
On this whole mess. You must remember that we as a nation have deregulated banking, loan and accounting and market rules and regulations and oversite that would have protected the investor with these rules and would have stoped this mess from happening in the first place. Until they bring back safty rules and regulations to stop profit taking like a slot machine. Hedge funds with out any rules and over site have done damage to our nation. When they can use rumors to create an environment to manipulate the market. It is called legalized thievery of your 401-K Plan. I would not invest in to any market that has no rules, regulations and or oversite at all. When a hedge fund bets, it's hedging on that your investment will loose and they take it form betting on it. The sub prime, hedge funds, no rules, deregulation and what has it done to our nation. So lets give this bail out to the ones that are stealing it. That is what we are doing. And we call this a free and open market. For who? Do not put any more money in to a system that is broken. Has any one gone to jail yet? A depression is coming. And that is not a rumor. Fix it or let it fall. Demand it form our Government. If not, I will bet on your lose.
12-02-2008 @ 12:29AM
JCH said...
If they drop the SS max and tax people on their entire salary, their retirement dreams would suddenly be enhanced.
No reason for average Americans to give their hard-earned money to a bunch of skunks who did nothing but recklessly buy and sell credit swaps and derivatives and such.
The market crashed; your social security benefits did not.
12-02-2008 @ 12:29AM
Doris Burleson said...
These days one cannot save enough money for retirement very easy. The above story is correct but I would not invest in anything except a good work credit union. One visit for me to ER cost $3500.00. Burl
12-02-2008 @ 10:52AM
BHarrison said...
Quote from article": 'I suggest that you make an appointment to discuss your future financial security with someone who works in that field."
================
The week BEFORE the failure of AIG, I had set up an appointment with several financial advisors when I returned from a business trip. During the trip, AIG failed; however, the financial advisors were still eager to help me with some investments. Fortunately, I postponed making any of those investments . . . I could have (and probably would have) lost an appreciable amount of money if I had followed the advice of these financial advisors.
One just needs to remember that financial advisors are like attorneys, real estate agents, etc. . . . their primary INTERESTS is in getting you to do something that ENABLES THEM TO EARN COMMISSIONS and/or FEES for THEMSELVES more than whatever your best interests might be.
And as we all can see, this type of "advice" is not so "cheap", relatively speaking, esp. in tough economic times.
12-02-2008 @ 10:53AM
beachpaul said...
Buy and hold strategies don't seem to work so well in the digital age. If one had built a traditional portfolio of stocks and bonds, not mutual funds, and programed in a sell order at, say, a 10% drop in valuation of each holding, the pain wouldn't ache as much. This is what the large funds do. One has to be responsible for ones own financial future. A ten year plan didn't help Japan very much, did it?