Some big companies have already gone bankrupt. The Tribune Company is the most recent. But, one of the trend's earliest victims was Lehman.
At the economy goes deeper into Hell with each passing month, bankruptcy attorneys will become the richest lawyers in America.
According to MarketWatch, "A sour economy and tight credit market clearly are just the right ingredients to bring about a wave of bankruptcies." There is no shame in it. Airlines have been doing it for decades.
Chapter 11 is actually a nifty way to stiff debt holders and employees. If a company can find an investor who wants to gamble they can get most of a bankrupt firm's assets in court, a debtor-in-possession, a judge can void loans and employment contracts in the name of keeping a troubled firm alive.
All of that may be good for the operations who seek court protection, but the trend would do further damage to the economy. Many of the firms who financed companies that are in trouble are banks. More losses for them will lead to more write-downs. And, that leads to more shareholder dilution and more government aid. On the employment side, cutting big numbers of people increases joblessness. That, in turn, ratchets down consumer spending and pushes up government costs to support those without work.
Otherwise, Chapter 11 is a great idea for companies in peril.
Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-09-2008 @ 12:47PM
BHarrison said...
A couple of years ago Congress passed laws that substantially changed and made filing for bankruptcy much more difficult for the American people . . . this was, in part, necessitated by too many people "gaming" the personal bankruptcy system; something that they had, in essence, been taught by attorneys.
Shouldn't similar changes be made in the laws in regard to business corporations? Basically, Chapter 11 is actually a nifty way to stiff debt holders and employees. Some bankruptcies are legitimate; and some are merely "gaming" the system also.
Congress didn't hesitate to make the changes towards individuals, will they be as eager to do it for businesses?
A pathtic aspect to all of this is that it generates obnoxiously exorbitant incomes for CORRUPT attorneys . . . and attorneys have become a bain of our society. It just seems that "the people" simply can't "win" in any of this. The wealthy just get more wealthy at the disadvantage of "the people".