A spokesman for JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) Thomas Kelly said his firm has not disclosed what it did with the $25 billion in emergency bailout money it has received. In fact, JPMorgan Chase is declining to provide any such disclosure.
AP has reported that none of the 21 banks that received $1 billion or more from taxpayers is tracking, or at least willing to disclose how they are using the money. Let me be clear -- THIS STINKS TO THE HIGH HEAVENS!
What kind of deals did Treasury Secretary Paulson make with these favored financial institutions? The money would be very easy to track. Why wouldn't that be a part of the bargain?
Paulson obviously did not read Conservative bankers? Surely you jest!, but he should have. Of course, having former Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) CEO Paulson negotiate with his Wall Street buddies on behalf of the taxpayer is highly suspect. At a minimum we have the good 'ol boy network operating in full form.
The banks simply are avoiding what should be required scrutiny by pleading ignorance. I don't believe the money can't be tracked, or even traced now after the fact. What happened to the idea of more transparency? More cover up I fear!
The banks should be subject to full disclosure. The use of the funds should be subject to review. Government money should be subject to the Freedom of Information Act. Why all the secrecy?
PS: Personal emails I have been receiving and the initial comments indicate strong sentiment about this issue. I encourage those that care to forward this story to their elected officials and friends encouraging full disclosure -- as promised! Obama used the internet to help win the White House, lets use it to get someone to listen with an internet blast from all over the country!
Sheldon Liber is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture and planning firm. He writes the columns Chasing Value and Serious Money.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-26-2008 @ 6:51PM
DCW said...
There probably isn't a good honest answer the banks can give unless they were really keeping track of what they were doing and what they were doing was proper and productive in the publics view.
I'm surprised the answer they gave hasn't had a more negative impact on the capital markets. This scenario is tetering on the brink of an unthinkable meltdown.
Here's to hoping things get better for everyone.
12-22-2008 @ 12:39PM
robert said...
what the hell is going on????????
12-22-2008 @ 12:48PM
Iridium said...
Because the money went to fund purchases of other institutions and bonuses.
You don't think that those who run the banks would actually use it for what they said they would, do you?
Time to demand action. Time to throw them all out on the street. Time to make these CEOs really feel what it is like to lose everything.
12-22-2008 @ 12:51PM
BHarrison said...
"Secrecy" is the screen behind which MASSIVE FRAUDS are committed. All of these corporations are attempting to "game" the bailout system.
This secrecy undermines any illusion of INTEGRITY of whatever Paulson does. Congress promised FULL DISCLOSURE and TRANSPARENCY to the distribution and use of the $700 BILLION Bailout funds . . . ANY FAILURE to provide this IS the responsibility of CONGRESS.
The American people should hold CONGRESS FULLY RESPONSIBLE for ANY FRAUDS that occur in any of these matters. (And they in turn, should hold responsible for any FRAUD and/or misuse of these funds)
12-22-2008 @ 1:06PM
Sheldon L said...
DCW, Robert, Iridium, BH...
Thank you for taking the time to comment. This is not a controversial issue and BH is right.
When the biggest problem in Washington and Wall Street is lying, cheating, and stealing you would think they would recognize the importance of building back a little trust.
It is bad faith on their parts not to be completely transparent and forthcoming. This has to change!
12-22-2008 @ 1:40PM
ceo0797 said...
The reason we will be given for not knowing where OUR taxpayer money went on the bailout: "You poor undereducated souls aren't smart enough to understand how this works".
Translated into Common English: Paulson is taking our money and giving it to his buddies on Wall Street to allow them to continue their lifestyles of conspicuous consumption while we all default on our mortgages and can not buy food.
Hold Paulson and Bush accountable for this!
12-22-2008 @ 2:02PM
DeepEnder said...
The money is going to pay off the "bad bets" credit default swaps and derivative bets that went south - banks have been operating as hedge funds for years - if the public knew the truth they would be matching on Washington - tax payers are bailing out banks that made lousy bets - the bookies want their money.
12-22-2008 @ 2:23PM
Dino said...
This is just another example of how we are being manipulated every day.We have no say anymore, as the common citizen in this country. How many of us were in favor of this bailout? But we are now the ones paying for those grossly over paid CEO salaries, bonuses, etc. They are squeezing blood from a turnip, and the grip is killing us.
12-22-2008 @ 2:23PM
Kent said...
I hope Congress and our future presidents have learned a lesson about approving and appointing, respectively, people to the Secretary Treasury position with Wall Street backgrounds. For effective oversight, it's far better to appoint people from economic academia or even from the Fed who have no invested interests or significant stake in FI's. Avoid the Paulson's and Rubin's in the future for that sensitive and critical position. They will always be looked upon with suspicion. If I am aware of it, I am sure Congress and current/future presidents are.
12-22-2008 @ 3:04PM
Jessica said...
Has anyone seen JPM derivative exposure?
Not pretty, but people keep hailing it like it is
12-22-2008 @ 3:39PM
william lindblad said...
Who will listen? Who cares?
Pertinent questions.
The members of Congress are not of mind to listen as they had a deluge of calls and emails against bailing out the banking industry. I was just one of many against it.
Rewarding bad judgment, incompetence and corruption at the taxpayers expense was borne of fear of a financial collapse. While I am sure that had government intervention been minimal, there would have been rough times in the banking industry world wide. That's the bad side. On the good side we would have been rid of those responsible for initiating this economic debacle. It is a debacle, for as they have been allowed to remain, they continue to compound the problem. Congress acted in haste, without the proper precautions and without any recourse against the bail out being abused. The first thing that the recipients did was have a party. Hurrah! It pays to contribute politically.
Moral: Those that are supposed to be the publics guardians and representatives often have need of a hearing aid.
That takes care of who is going to listen - obvious answer - not those in charge.
Who cares? Another story. Not the people. Shame on you. You became sh wrapped up in the presidential race that all of those in Congress that were responsible, are still there.
Yes, we do need change. However, I do not intend to hold my breath waiting.
12-22-2008 @ 6:31PM
r reiser said...
It is amazing that this lameduck congress that promised us strict oversight has one woman and five support people to be in charge of the oversight of this bailout fraud and that her first complaint was that she can't get any imformation form Paulson or the banks about any of it!
12-26-2008 @ 7:53PM
bill miller said...
it will end up in some thiefs pocket but the goverment is in on it all politicans wwill get there share,