To say current economic conditions are challenging the acumen of those who are charged with adjusting to them or planning for them would be an understatement.
And it goes without saying that in these volatile times, investors, like business executives, have to keep an eye on the near-term and the long-term.
The U.S. Federal Reserve has embarked on various liquidity measures, including quantitative easing. Meanwhile, the U.S. Treasury, as a result of $350 billion in deployed TARP money (and another $350 billion available to be deployed if Congress approves), has stabilized the financial system, at least for the time being. And if economic history is any indicator, look for the bulk of the Fed's monetary stimulus to begin to take effect within three months of deployment.
Meanwhile, the Obama Administration and new U.S. Congress are expected to act quickly on a large fiscal stimulus package that could pump an additional $800 billion into the U.S. economy over two years. And if economic history is valid here, as well, look for the fiscal stimulus to begin to take effect within six months.
Will demand-based growth rev up, as usual?
But with near-term and longer-term stimulus in place, from a policy standpoint, what should the United States do, particularly after the Obama Administration's 2009 stimulus package has been passed? Just sit back and let the U.S. economy work its magic?
Not quite, says economist Richard Felson, as the great demand-centered U.S. economic cycle may not return in the decade ahead.
For one thing, asset price damage (housing, stocks, private equity, related investments, commodities) means that the economy almost certainly will require a second fiscal stimulus package in 2010, or perhaps as early as Q3/Q4 2009, Felson said. In other words, the Bush housing boom that fed GDP growth earlier is not returning. "The housing sector will recover, but the nation will still need to make up for that slower growth via another growth engine," Felson said
Contemplating the "Wal-Mart model"
Historically, that engine of growth would be the U.S. consumer. However, as economist David H. Wang observed, the recovery ahead will be the first following the start of the globalization era. "This will not be your father's economic recovery. 'The consumer' that we used to know from previous economic expansions is a smaller percent of the adult population," Wang said.
Further, while research is by no means complete on the above -- economists are just beginning to assemble and analyze data on the impact of globalization on the U.S. workforce -- if the "Wal-Mart model" has prevailed (at present, the data is inconclusive), this will be a recovery like no others, Wang said.
"The Wal-Mart model, and comparable models, offer the benefit of lower-priced goods," Wang said. "The problem is the wage structure of the Wal-Mart model conflicts with the U.S. consumption model. There is a contradiction, the two cannot exist simultaneously, certainly not exist and achieve the level of GDP growth the U.S. did previously, other factors being equal. Most investors, and even some business executives, don't see this."
Further, if one adds the U.S.'s existing service sector workforce and its permanent underclass (lingering poverty rates are higher in the U.S. than in other industrialized nations) to the Wal-Mart model, the prospects for U.S. GDP growth look even more subdued, says economist Peter Dawson.
Education, worker retraining deemed keys
"If we are in a 'Wal-Mart world,' for lack of a better metaphor, that further muddles the U.S. GDP growth forecast," Dawson said. "It would also place more emphasis on the need for education and worker retraining, which would then become a pillar of real wage growth and a return to adequate U.S. GDP growth. And that speaks to large public investment in education."
At least initially, the Obama Administration will emphasize infrastructure spending over education, as it will jump-start the economy quicker, Dawson said. "That focus may have to shift to education and retraining, if in fact the United States has entered this 'brave new world' projected by the Wal-Mart model," Dawson added. "But right now, it's just too soon to tell whether we've entered it."
Economic Analysis: Compelling questions from economists Felson, Wang, and Dawson, and ones for which there are no quick and simple answers, at present. But one thing is certain: the U.S. economic recovery is not likely to amount to a "one-and-done" fiscal stimulus task.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
12-23-2008 @ 9:25PM
JERRY said...
A natural economy just like the old days which id based hard work and NOT CREDIT. The paper and evil eazy credit economy of the past has done just what I siad it would. I distroyed itself. Ha, Ha, Ha, Libe within your means or die on the vine ! LOL
12-23-2008 @ 9:25PM
Jerry said...
A crash is underway caused by the vainity and greed of UNRESTRAINED CAPITALISM of Wall Street. A guys once said "Give me control of there money and I will control the people." With 95% of the wealth in the hands of 5% (I will not call them the top five percent since they are really the scum of the earth) America is no longer the land of the free. IT IS THE LAND OF THE CONTROLED ! IT IS TIME ! ! ! ! ! ! !
12-23-2008 @ 11:35PM
Iridium said...
If you work at Walmart you can barely afford to shop at Walmart.
If you make products to sell to Walmart you can't make them in the USA and stay in business.
SO if all products are made in China and those that work for the only major retailer left can't even afford to shop there, what do you have?
You have a total economic collapse. Exactly what we have here today. Retailers force suppliers down to razor thin margins that force them out of business. The lack of well paid employees force retailers to sell products for less to even get them out the door. They need workers who will work for less and the cycle continues until we all make minimum wage.
Still the greatest problem is the insanity of the big box profit margin. They need the margin just to keep the giant stores open that are far too big to service the population of the area. They need 20% just to pay the electric bill. Best Buy begins to compete with Best Buy, Walmart with Walmart. Because of this they all go down.
12-24-2008 @ 1:03AM
Sheldon L said...
I believe every company that has competed on price as its primary attribute has failed.
Fedco gone, Whitefront gone, 5 & Dime gone, K-Mart-Sears soon to be gone, Woolworths gone, JJ Newberries Gone...its an endless list.
12-24-2008 @ 12:29AM
Danny L. McDaniel said...
The economy is in a slow burn mode which most people in Washington or Wall Street haven't the first clue to correct. Most Americans will have to learn "Back to the Future" basic economics; that is, save before you spend.
The main problem with the bailout was its' trickle down premise that went horizonal rather than vertical. What Washington should have done was go straight to the consumer for credit card, college loan, and mortgage forgiveness, instead of giving the money to banks no questions asked.
Credit cards and easy loans should be outlawed. It is a sin how much Americans have leveraged themselves to a piece of plastic. College should be more affordable, roll back tuition to 1970's levels, nationalize healthcare, and get rid of some of this "Green" bumper slogans that passes for geniune political rhetoric. If not, America's economic system will resemble that of airport screeners.
Danny L. McDaniel
Lafayette, Indiana
12-24-2008 @ 7:19AM
sgentilejr said...
All of YOu have the power to stop the economic slide. BUY AMERICAN MADE products, it's really that simple.
It's YOUR choice. Be Patriotic and BUY American or give Osama bin Laden his wish of Destroying the American economy.
12-24-2008 @ 8:03AM
ken said...
HAVE YOU NOT HEARD, OUR SO CALLED REPRESENTATIVES WHICH ARE HIGHLY OVERPAID AND UNDER WORKED ARE TRYING TO FORCE THE AUTO INDUSTRY
TO WORK FOR LESS WAGES.THE SENATE AND HOUSE MEMBERS ONLY KNOW ONE THING AND THAT IS" GET MINE WHILE I CAN"....THEY ARE WORTHLESS BAS"TURDS"
12-24-2008 @ 8:20AM
tom said...
Ever notice how we have regulations and recalls in everything from autos, food to toys. We have no recalls in the financial field and yet the regulations get longer and longer, oh yea, to benefit the financial institutions and not the consumer. Republican economics do not work.
12-24-2008 @ 8:47AM
j terry said...
Siince the busting of the air controllers strike during the Reagan era, big business has been busting unions, hiring illegals and such to lower labor costs.Cutting costs in labor aka the consumer aka the buyer of your product is not the answer Wake up. In the words of Henry Ford and I quote--I want every man that works for me to afford to buy my product. Now come on all you top dollar analysts. Any action If it be cutting costs in the labor force, raising taxes whatever takes away the buying power of the consumer, Is another nail in the coffin.
12-24-2008 @ 8:53AM
Garry said...
I am always amazed at the comments when I work through a story such as this. It is the Republicans fault; it is the Democrats fault and so on. Truth of the matter is, it is the fault of everybody. We have become a society of "give me everything" but of course "we don't care who pays for it as long as I don't have to" cry babies. The Congress and the White House are reflections of our society and we elect them. You have a Congress now controlled by socialists who paint the wealthy and those who made it as "evil" and "greedy." And the lazy give me everything for nothing crowd are simply innocent victims of the greed and should not be held accountable for often poor decisions but who are pandered to for votes which in the end only serves to perpetuate their slavery to the government. The whole Obama "share the wealth" mentality will ultimately lead to more misery then it will ever cure. Soak the rich and they will take their money and investment elsewhere and we will be left with a society of do-nothings and if you think the economy is bad now, you have not seen anything yet. Remember Jimmy Carter - Mortgage rates where in the 12-14% range and a car loan cost you up to 25%. All we have done is turn the asylum over to the inmates and crazy will be the order of the day. When Obama, Pulosi and Reid are finished the American Dream will cease to exist as we know it. Sadly, they will never accept responsibility for what they have caused, but will blame the Bush Administration for everything that goes sour and since the American people are growing more ignorant and government dependant by the day, we will go right along and never question a thing
Sadly, our kids and grandkids will really be left holding the bag and it will be a fiscal ball and chian around there necks weighing tons form which they never break free from.
12-24-2008 @ 8:52AM
doug said...
the bailout of wall street and mortage and insuranse companys is all wrong handing more money to the rich SOB'S it should be in our future which would be mainly in education. come on this not rocket science get it done and done right and now!
12-24-2008 @ 8:55AM
john quay said...
Forget everything that you have heard about economics in the last twenty-eight years. Supply side economics does not work. There is not one shred of evidence that tax cuts for the rich have led to any sustained economic growth. However, there is hard evidence that it has led to not only economic depressions but also recessions, including the current meltdown. In fact there is evidence to support raising taxes on the wealthy has led to economic growth. We cannot survive without a strong middle class. We need higher wages for working class Americans and higher taxes for the wealthy. That is the only way to pull out of the current economic malaise.
12-24-2008 @ 9:07AM
BHarrison said...
Basically, we went from our wealth being based on "manufacturing" to being "gaming" the systems . . . "working" the system on paper by manipulated and inflated "paper value" of "investments".
When we substantially lost our manufacturing base, the "powers that be" had to shift "the game" to have an "income producing" economy. So, they fabricated all of the "paper wealth" to keep the economy going. And the American people were bullible enough and foolish enough to buy into it all.
With CEOs and other ultra wealthy bleeding the system by taking TENS and HUNDREDS of MILLIONS of dollars out of the sytem every year via pyramid and Ponze scams, they slowly totally destroyed our true economic bases and structures until, like a Ponzi scheme, it all collapsed.
AND the American people and the investors are STILL tolerating these CRIMES and ripoffs. The $700 BILLION "Bailout" is nothing more than a scam to minimize any losses to the special interest groups; and to allow them to maximize their positions for the future. None of this "TRICKLE DOWN MEASURES" is significantly helping the average American family.
All that the BAILOUT has done so far is to shift (create) money investments into the major Financial Institutions; and they have not, in essence, done anything significant to help the American people or small businesses. The Bailout is ANOTHER RIP OFF of the American people.
12-24-2008 @ 9:17AM
Joe said...
If you really want to know what's happening read "The Creature From Jekyll Island". It explains how our economy and the Federal Reserve really work.
12-24-2008 @ 9:29AM
jon said...
The greedy ones are training us to work for minimum wage.Once we do they will bring the jobs back to this country.
12-24-2008 @ 9:32AM
gary said...
We are truly headed for a crash.. We cannot compete with other nations now... How can we raise wages when others will do it for less???? The arrogance and stupidity of the people in this country is just overwhelming.... Hold your hats people.
12-24-2008 @ 9:35AM
kevin said...
Everyone wants to own a home and always be driving a new car while doing stupid, repetitive jobs like checking groceries and stocking shelves. As a consumer I won't pay those prices. Get real.
12-24-2008 @ 9:44AM
j terry said...
In the opening statement of this article it says investors as well as business executives have to keep an eye on the near term and long term. So true. You now have to look further than 2 inches in front of your nose. Everyone bought into Roony Reagans answer. He did increase jobs. Low wage jobs of course due to union busting and the likes. And by cooking the books. One hell of an actor...I wonder how many of those new jobs were in child care,now that many women had to start working to supplement their husbands losses?
12-24-2008 @ 9:46AM
Michael said...
We the people must get off our collective asses and get those worthless greedy slimes out of Congress, and take America back and work under the Constitution.
12-24-2008 @ 9:50AM
j terry said...
Sorry, I should have explained how Ron Reagan cooks books lol. He changed the way the census was taken for one. Certain members of the armed forces were never included in the employment rolls per se. That changed and lo and behold unemploymen levels dropped. I would have to liken that to Al Gore telling that old sun to cool it and golly gee then came winter.