if the ring cost 12,000g's the cost to replace it would bring the total to 24,000 g's I'll bet he postponed the wedding indefinately.LOL

Dumbass.

112-26-2008 @ 8:24AM

tt-rexxx said...
if the ring cost 12,000g's the cost to replace it would bring the total to 24,000 g's I'll bet he postponed the wedding indefinately.LOL
--------------------------------------------------------The ring cost $12,000 not 12000g's that would be $12,000,000 . I bet your math teachers are really proud of you .

what would jeff dunham's walter say, "DUMBASS"

rule 1#

if you are going to do this have a gun at your side to shot the dam thing down


rule 2#

put a fake ring in the balloon & the real one in your pocket

rule 3#

put Inc. on the ring before you do a dumass move like putting a $ 12,000.00 RING in a balloon

What a dumbass, did he think she was going to pop it and the ring would just land in her hand?

Typo Dumbarsss I just flushed more brains then you woke up with

If he was smart, he would of put a dummy ring in the balloon and given her the real one on ground. I'm sure some nice patron will find the ring and return it and it will be a very happy ending.

I hope that someone honest finds the ring and tries to find a way to return it to the rightful owner! I hope they say, "Hey, I found an expensive-looking ring in an unusual spot - if you can name it, it's probably yours". I hope it's found soon. In reality? My seven-year-old forgot to tell me he put a frog in his pocket (I found out by washing it - I forgot to check his pockets [you'd think I would have learned when I washed a permanant marker once]). Said child would also toss the ring aside "Ew! Girly-stuff!" and keep the balloon shards to use as part of the robots or aliens he builds (yes, I allow my son to play with non-toxic garbage, it's just as fun as toys, there's no rules and it costs me zilch). Anyhow, I really am keeping my fingers crossed for Dude that he gets the ring back. The mean part of me thinks he would have learned the first time it happened. Sounds mean but I've also read (from what may or may not be a reliable source) that a person who has been struck by lightening is more likely to be struck again than a person who hasn't been struck at all.

my ring was attaced to a dozen roses and the fake chocolate one was the one with the ring on it. dont you think that there would be a better way to do it. and maybe try to do it inside or something dumbass

that sux 4 h!mm.....

Hahahaha....sorry but it is funny!!!

Poor guy.....I bet he learned a valuable lesson.
If I find it I promise I will return it to you.
I mean it.....I will!!!!

Ü

12-26-2008 @ 8:30AM

aaron012345 said...
Dumbass.////
AARON, PROBABLY THE MOST APPROPRIATE ONE WORD REPLY THERE COULD EVER BE....

12-26-2008 @ 8:30AM

aaron012345 said...
Dumbass.////
AARON, PROBABLY THE MOST APPROPRIATE ONE WORD REPLY THERE COULD EVER BE....

HA HA HA HAAA (ROTFL) The idiot deserves it for being stupid.

After checking the stats on prevailing winds, I did a little math, some simple aerodynamics calculations, tensile strength of balloon material, I went directly to the place it had to come down but it wasn't there. Somebody got there first!