Much of the trouble with the financials at the New York Times (NYSE: NYT) is blamed on overexpansion in the newspaper industry just as falling advertising and rising prices for newsprint and editor staffs were headed through the roof. By many accounts, the Boston Globe is only worth $50 million. Two years ago, Jack Welch and a group of businessmen approached the New York Times about paying $550 million for the paper.
Now, the New York Times, facing debt payments of $400 million next year, is trying to sell its 17.5% stake in the parent of the Boston Red Sox, and perhaps its 100% ownership in the Globe. It may have found one of those suckers who are born every minute.
According to the Financial Times, "The company began discussions two weeks ago with Jack Connors, a former advertising executive in Boston, to sell the Globe and its 17.5 per cent stake in the Red Sox."
While having a piece of a successful sports franchise may be a good way to make money, owning the Globe is an outstanding way to lose it. The Boston paper has lost more than 20% of its advertising revenue this year, and its circulation is falling. The Globe almost certainly loses money, and that is bound to get worse in 2009 as the recession deepens. As classified advertising, one of the cash cows for newspapers, moves to competitors on the internet, the Globe may never see a penny of improvement in its revenue when the economy recovers.
If the New York Times can get a dollar for the Globe, it is much better off than it is now.
Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor for 247wallst.com.
The Money Man Behind Rick Santorum: Who Is Foster S. Friess?
5 Signs You're Getting Robbed at the Hospital


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-27-2008 @ 5:20PM
Kent said...
Lessons learned to these high profile newspapers - steer away from liberal views and return to conservatism to stay in business. If I were the owner of the NYT, I'd prostitute the paper no matter how unpalatable it is.
12-27-2008 @ 7:09PM
Matt said...
I hear so much about NYT's liberal slant, but I love their content. They really need to cut costs and cancel the dividend.
12-28-2008 @ 9:22AM
Dan said...
The paper has a lot of problems right now, liberalism just being one of them. They have lost a lot of respect the last few years with their arrogance, corrupt reporters and leftist writing. But this recession is the most damaging to their current financial health.
12-28-2008 @ 6:07AM
al coholic said...
A few years from now when there are virtually no printed newspapers people will wonder, "Why did it take so long to happen?"
12-28-2008 @ 10:28AM
TX CHL Instructor said...
The demise of newspapers has much less to do with the economy than it does with lack of relevance.
--
www.chl-tx.com The COTUS is not yet a dead letter. But Obama can change that.
12-28-2008 @ 8:59PM
painting said...
mm, quite resonable.