Every year I do a bottom-up analysis of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. This is not the usual "I think the Dow goes to 14,000 by year-end" kind of prediction, because I believe that has little value and is just thumb-sucking. All my investing career, I have preferred looking at projections for each individual stock and then adding up what they produce as a return to find out what the percentage gained or loss might be.
This year will be particularly difficult to divine, in part because I believe that it will be split between two halves: the pre-bottom in housing and the post-bottom. The post-bottom, with interest rates that I believe are going to 4.5% for conforming loans and 5% for jumbos and a decline of another 20% in home prices, may not leave people in existing homes happy about their situation -- and therefore their wealth -- but it will certainly flush out the millions of people who have been waiting on the sidelines, and very few new homes are being built.
Of course that's a huge positive.
The other imponderable is unemployment. We are blessed with a new president who has an understanding of economics and recognizes that there is an "all bets are off" level of unemployment -- a 10% job loss -- that would render many of my predictions too bullish. I believe, though, that 10% can be taken off the table with aggressive stimulus and a big tax credit for housing (also part of my housing-bottom thesis) as well as a weak dollar, all of which I believe is in the cards but not in the stocks.
So I am using a positive prism in my bottom-up analysis, particularly because it looks as though we were more victimized by tax-loss selling and hedge fund closings than we had been in years. I believe that abatement more than offsets the belief from individuals that the market has become corrupt and that buying stocks is simply not investing anymore but pure gambling.
I am also factoring in the 3.6% average dividend yield of the 30 stocks, something that's of immense help when you are starting from such a low level -- the Dow lost 34% last year. And every bit of percentage matters.
This brings us to my total for 2009. My analysis brings me to a 13.1% gain for the Dow 30 in 2009 from the 2008 close and a 9.8% gain from Friday's close. Also, we are not piercing 10,000 with this analysis, so some would say this is not much to write about. I say, better than a sharp stick in the eye.
As a reminder, my predictions were based on the existing 30 components of the Dow. That includes General Motors (NYSE: GM) (Cramer's Take), whose equity has become irrelevant, and Alcoa (NYSE: AA) (Cramer's Take), another incredibly shrinking stock, which may also be replaced by a stronger company before the year is through.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
--------------
Alcoa: This company requires a major turn in the world's economic fortunes, and I don't see it happening in time to save the company's dividend or maybe even its coveted position in the Dow. Its high debt load doesn't help.
There are two hopes here:
- China comes back, boosting aluminum demand.
- The company's equity shrinks to such a level that Alcoa is at last taken over.
With all of those goodies, you could see Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE: FCX) (Cramer's Take) effect, a stock that rallies hard after a dividend cut, and a potential for the stock to rally to $15. If credit markets come back, it would not be surprising if we saw someone take a swing at Alcoa, but I am not counting on it, so $15 it is.
----------------
American Express (NYSE: AXP) (Cramer's Take): It is hard for me to believe, with the credit markets frozen and with individuals being strapped and the poorly managed nature of the company -- going full bore into consumer lending just at the absolute wrong time -- that American Express can do much of anything. But it has TARP money, and that will allow it to get through this terrible period.
I also believe that the consumer, once buoyed by a better stock market and a stabilizing house price, will do some spending per the nationwide wealth improvement. It could go back to $22, a decent return, and the dividend is not in jeopardy because of TARP's easy terms. What a shame that management got into consumer lending at the top of the cycle. The government's bailout will let it ride through the tough period, though.
----------------
AT&T (NYSE: T) (Cramer's Take): This is one of my favorite stocks in the Dow and one that I suspect can raise its dividend again in 2009. And that dividend will be very, very valuable as a source of protection for the equity in a world starved for yield. I believe the stock will trade back under a 5% yield and could see it rallying to $35, where all the fears were first voiced that the dividend and the pension woes would compromise things.
Randall Stephenson, the CEO, is very aggressive; remember, he did the Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) (Cramer's Take) iPhone deal sight unseen, and that could produce still more market-share gains. The man is not to be underestimated. My target price will be too low if Sprint (NYSE: S) (Cramer's Take) fails; AT&T and Verizon (NYSE: VZ) (Cramer's Take) would have a field day splitting up the country. Its U-Verse TV gambit is working out well, too.
-------------
Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) (Cramer's Take): This company's dividend seems to be very much in doubt, and CEO Ken Lewis has truly bet the company on a turn in housing for 2009. I believe housing will turn, but not before I see much more pain for shareholders, as this company has so much exposure to the consumer -- which truly worries me -- although I like the Merrill acquisition very much. I prefer JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) (Cramer's Take) in the Dow as a way to play any stabilization in banks.
When TARP was first proposed, when you could sell whole loans to the federal government, this stock took off, deservedly so. Now its bad loans could swamp the equity. The stock is telegraphing a rough road ahead. But by year-end, with real estate bottoming and house-price depreciation stopping - remember, I am saying that we could get a bottom in housing by June 30 -- and with aggressive staff cuts at Merrill Lynch and an improvement in the servicing business it got at Countrywide, you could see a post-dividend-cut rally to $18.
I am feeling even more optimistic about this stock after Steve Mnuchin, a bright guy I have followed for years, decided, with some other smart fellas, to buy Indymac, a terrible lender. I also like the California market after visiting the hardest-hit area, the Palm Springs part of the Inland Empire, in November, and finding very little for sale. That was when rates were at 6%, albeit with the average home falling about 40%. The rates, the price cuts, the lack of new building, will mean that California is back. And with it will be this stock. I also believe that China will rally hard and that Bank of America will be able to make a lot of money with the TARP money it invested there, although that was a pretty darned outrageous bet.
-----------
Boeing (NYSE: BA) (Cramer's Take): Other than General Motors, this is the stock I am most concerned about in the Dow Jones average, even more than Alcoa. I know the company just raised its dividend by 5%, but I believe that was a major mistake, and the company should have preserved cash. It would not surprise me if Boeing didn't have to cut the darned thing next year because of its labor problems and order cancellations -- let alone problems building its new planes.
However, the recent decline in oil has given the airlines new life, and with that, the possibility of a level of solvency that will give this company a second wind in the second half of the year. I believe it will give up its early gains in the year and trade back to lows where it will be a buy up to $42 by year-end. Estimates are way too high, so I would sell it into this rally and pick it up lower later in the year.
-----------
Citigroup (NYSE: C) (Cramer's Take): The government's plan to bolster Citigroup's capital should work, and I find it the best of the TARP investments because it gives investors some upside along with the government. Citigroup didn't get killed like the other major investments, as this could easily have been an AIG (NYSE: AIG) (Cramer's Take) if the government wanted it to be, if not a Lehman, although the feds figured out that Lehman was not such a great idea, literally a few hours after it said a rescue wasn't possible. Of course, we know anything is possible.
Under CEO Vikram Pandit, who still has not been there a year, the company has shrunk the balance sheet dramatically, and it will continue to do so. I believe that there are a ton of asset sales ahead. But it has a huge exposure to the consumer. It can rally to where the government's warrants kick in. I see it going to $9 but not much further, unless head count shrinks to 300,000 from 360,000 and the credit markets start a bit of a revival. Again, percentage-wise, that makes the stock a buy, but not as much as one for JPMorgan Chase.
Be sure to check back all week for the rest of Jim Cramer's 2009 predictions for the Dow components.
Jim Cramer is co-founder and chairman of TheStreet.com. He contributes daily market commentary for TheStreet.com's sites and serves as an adviser to the company's CEO. At the time of publication, Cramer was long JPMorgan Chase, Freeport-McMoRan and the iShares FTSE/Xinua ETF.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
1-05-2009 @ 7:11PM
Kaiser said...
I am getting really tired of your politically biased articles. I come here to read about stocks not to watch you give Obama a reach-around at every paragraph.
Examples: "We are blessed with a new president who has an understanding of economics "
Oh really? How do you know this? Does this include his understanding that high taxes for business and job-creators is good for the economy? Or his support of home loans to the poor and the uncreditworthy via ACORN (the very thing that got us into this mess)?
Look you have a right to write whatever you want on your blog, but once you put it out there and have a comments section, I have a right to gripe about things that are starting to bug me.
1-05-2009 @ 7:51PM
peter booth said...
no no no no no
1-05-2009 @ 9:28PM
Mel said...
So what! He was touting buy, buy, buy last year. What part of shill don't people understand?
1-05-2009 @ 10:45PM
art said...
Jim Cramer is a certified trading idiot. He knows absolutely nothing about the direction of the market or individual stocks. Why does CNBC allow such stupidity on the air?
Oh yeah, he is entertaining to watch.
1-05-2009 @ 10:47PM
Frankie D said...
Kaiser, Very well said. Thank you.
1-05-2009 @ 11:18PM
nancy said...
So should I sell my ford stocks or not?
What about abat? cpstn?
1-05-2009 @ 11:51PM
Vince said...
Looks like cramer is up to his old tricks again trying to make like a stockpicking guru. Anyone with a little bit of analysis skill and some experience in the market can do the same thing as Cramer does and achieve the same dismal success rate. I have found that Cramer does pretty well when the entire market is exploding and not so well when it isn't. The only good thing about him is that nobody has to pay.
1-06-2009 @ 12:08AM
Surfdeep said...
Cramer is the Oprah of personal finance.
He knows as much about making money as Oprah knows about fitness. Cramer was advising VERY bad plays deep into the recession, costing the impressionable great sums of their hard and long earned money.
Impeach him !!!!
1-06-2009 @ 11:15AM
robert stanley said...
Remember folks, in order for the stock market to rise, there must be more buyers than sellers. Since millions of people cashed out of their mutual funds due to crowd behavior and several fund managers did the same, how long will it take for the majority of such sellers to re-enter the market if at all?
1-06-2009 @ 12:28AM
David said...
Jim Cramer called Wachovia a fortress bank that would prosper from the bail-out, recommended the stock at 22 and 16, boy was I glad I listened to cramer and bought the stock on friday the day before the shennanigans with citi group and wells fargo, bought 900 shars at 11 dollars on friday woke up on monday when citi group was told to be buying the firm at 1 dollar a share and then was stop-lossed at 1.24 BEFORE MARKET, great stock market manipulation and bullcrap. GLAD I LISTENED TO CRAMER, lost 8 thousand dollars in a matter of 2 days.
1-06-2009 @ 1:22AM
Jose said...
Keep up the good blog. By the way the best person was elected President.
1-06-2009 @ 1:43AM
Jim Cram It! said...
Cramer says invest in Prozac stock because that's what he's on lately.
1-06-2009 @ 4:06AM
Ted said...
It is better to be thought a fool, than open your mouth, (Write), and remove all doubt. Cramer has removed any doubt I had a long time ago. I still think he is a good contra indicator.
1-06-2009 @ 4:17AM
ted said...
Einstein said that insanity was doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting different results. I think Cramer MUST be insane. He is the typical generalist, knows absolutely nothing about everything.
1-06-2009 @ 4:41AM
ALAN said...
Mr Cramer...I don't know what you were looking at in the Palm Springs market but is a disaster...The owners are giving away homes. Prices are down by 40/50% from 2 yrs ago...It is horrible
1-06-2009 @ 6:07AM
heymoore said...
Cramer is in the tank for Obama
1-06-2009 @ 6:31AM
BHarrison said...
Cramer's "redeeming value" is that he at least partially exposes, to some degree, what the insiders are doing; that helps to put a little pressure on them.
Otherwise, Cramer notes that the value of housing will probably drop another 20%, and other are projecting an additional 20% - 40% "decline in the overall market".
That doesn't bode well for anyone to be "investing" in a declining market, does it? I think that you can (and should) anticipate brash and harsh actions by Obama upon his being sworn into office.
A key question is whether Obama is, in essence, going to allow the CEOs and the "insiders" and the ultra-wealthy to continue to rake in enormous compensations and profits "off the top" of the Billions of "bailout monies" that are being passed out. If Obama can't get Congress, the Fed, the SEC, etc. to address these matters, then these FRAUDS will continue, as they continue to "game" the bailout system.
Ethical and fiscal INTEGRITY has to be implemented to affect any real changes "at the top" of the economic system.
1-06-2009 @ 9:08AM
hugh said...
cramers just a snake oil salesman for the big money corporations
1-06-2009 @ 9:09AM
hugh said...
cramer is just a snakeoil salesman for the big money corporations
1-06-2009 @ 9:26AM
Joe said...
Hank Paulson is from Goldman Sachs. The guy he put in charge of TARP is from Goldman. The guy they put in charge of AIG is from Goldman. Cramer is from Goldman. Any questions?