A strange piece of news made it out just as the market closed yesterday, Citigroup (NYSE: C) is considering a joint venture to put its brokerage unit, Smith Barney, together with the similar unit from Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS).
According to The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), "Uniting the brokerage units of Citigroup and Morgan Stanley would represent another dramatic turn in the reshaping of Wall Street since the credit crisis erupted in 2007." Citi may be under pressure from the federal government to do a deal to monetize some of the bank's assets.
The possible deal raises two questions. The first is how does Citi benefit from the arrangement? The answer is that it may not benefit at all. One of the rumors related to the deal is that Morgan Stanley would pay Citi over a billion dollars to own the majority of the joint venture, but if that is true, why is Citi simply not selling the entire division?
The other relevant issue is why this action was not taken months ago, if not with Morgan Stanley then with another financial firm? The answer may be that Morgan was having trouble of its own, but there were banks in Japan and China that may well have been purchasers.
Vikram Pandit, Citi's CEO, has proven something about himself: he is remarkably slow to act. The value of Smith Barney has certain come down over the past year. He is getting cents on the dollar for a valuable asset.
Douglas A. McIntyre
Will Rich Ross really have a positive impact on Disney's movie operations?
Consumers sick of recession, may spend extra on holidays
Corrections, seasonality and Santa Claus
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-10-2009 @ 7:56AM
musa mon said...
A move to eliminate half the brokers in both firms and give assts under management to the very top producers all to cut costs, the hell with the people and families that will be affected