Bloomberg L.P., where I worked for seven years as a reporter for Bloomberg News, has announced plans for its first-ever corporate layoffs, proving that the media empire founded by New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg in 1981 is not immune to the economic slowdown.The cuts, 100 in total, were in the company's radio and TV operations. They are not surprising. Both Bloomberg TV and radio station WBBR have been poorly managed for years. Many of CNBC's biggest stars, including Dylan Ratigan, started their careers at Bloomberg TV. They no doubt went to the General Electric Co. (NYSE:GE)-owned network for bigger money and bigger audiences. The reorganization that the New York Times refers to may include the end of non-English language programming. It also means getting rid off high-priced talent.
Radio has not been a great business for Bloomberg. Someone yelling over a megaphone in New York City's Time Square could probably attract a bigger audience than WBBR. Don't be surprised if Bloomberg exits radio entirely as it is a poor medium for financial news.
Though the media part gets all the sizzle, the core of Bloomberg remains a data business. It provides prices on everything from gold to oil to pork bellies. Bloomberg terminals can spit out data on stocks and bonds with such variety and volume that many analysts and portfolio managers simply cannot live without them.
When I started with the company, Wall Streeters proudly boasted of having their own terminals. Now, they are lucky if they get to share one as financial services firms under pressure from their new government masters cut costs. Bloomberg is no doubt feeling the impact of these changes.
For years, the company operated pretty freely, worrying about any payoff later. Those days are clearly over. Though Bloomberg says it plans to hire 1,000 people in its news and finance departments over the next year, you have to wonder if other jobs are going to be cut in other departments or if the hiring plans will be scaled back.
Bloomberg News also hired many high-priced journalists such as Albert Hunt of the Wall Street Journal and Margaret Carlson of Time magazine over the past few years. Their contracts may have to be renegotiated. Bloomberg Markets, the company's glossy monthly magazine, could be feeling the heat as well. The well-regarded publication will face difficulty surviving as a stand-alone entity.
Though the cuts represent less than 1 percent of Bloomberg's workforce, they underscore how the severity of the downturn in advertising, particularly from financial companies, is hurting media companies.
Speculation about whether Mike Bloomberg will retain a controlling interest in the company that made him a billionaire will only intensify.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-05-2009 @ 7:43PM
marymunster said...
Could I have a job at your company? I found grammar errors in this article without really trying. Reading your writing aloud is an easy trick to make sure that what you write is gramatically correct.
2-05-2009 @ 4:27PM
bob nash said...
Another free enterprise story that
releases more hot air about doing
it my way.
The almighty dollar is fizzling like
a hot air leak in a blimp, it seems.
2-05-2009 @ 5:41PM
Courtney said...
It is unfortunate about Bloomberg, but isn't that the way of Free-market Capitalism. The only thing that this shows is that no one seems to be immune to the worsening economy. What I want to know is, why does this author refer to government as Wall Street's "new government masters" as if Bloomberg's downfall is partly their fault? If the corporations are going to take the money, then they should have no problem accepting the conditions. As for Bloomberg, they are just another casualty. Maybe they should ask for some money, too.
2-05-2009 @ 5:49PM
bob said...
when a ship is sinking what do you do, throw everything overboard? pump the water out and patch up the whole? pray that you dont sink? all of the above?my point is if you throw everything overboard you will still sink, wake up american companies. im an average joe and i can figure this economy out
2-05-2009 @ 5:55PM
Jiggy said...
ITS OBAMAS FAULT !
2-06-2009 @ 11:51PM
me said...
Bloomberg layoffs were not because of the economy.. They are actually planning on hiring more than 1000 people in other departments. Working there, Im sure you know how redundant TV and Radio has always been, many different departments for the same thing, different language channels, same programming, etc. Just restructuring, preparing for media to actually make money. Very unfortunate for everyone let go worldwide, but Ive seen way worse ideas in the past.