The Congressional Oversight Panel (COP) reports today that Hank Paulson's Troubled Asset Recovery Plan (TARP) stole $78 billion of our money. This sounds like a huge under count to me -- I would put the figure at much closer to $350 billion. The questions now are what to do about TARP and whether similar waste can be prevented for the next $350 billion.
How did COP arrive at the $78 billion? It claims that TARP received bank assets worth $176 billion in exchange for capital purchases of $254 billion. Two hundred banks have gotten TARP money so far. In addition to assets, TARP has gotten preferred stock and warrants in exchange for its cash. And I would guess that the amount taxpayers have lost is well in excess of the $78 billion.
How so? First, the assets probably do not trade, therefore they could be worth much less than models estimate. And second, the COPs' calculations appear to exclude the decline in value of the preferred stock and warrants that has probably occurred since bank stocks have fallen so much in the last several months. Moreover, the bigger question that remains unanswered is this: What specific benefits, if any, has the global financial system gotten as a result of the $350 billion already spent -- (a fraction of the $9 trillion in capital outlays and guarantees made so far)?
The standard answer appears to be that the system would have collapsed without TARP. While this "argument" seems to "work" for some people, I find it completely unconvincing. I have not heard one specific explanation that connects the TARP money to blocking the failure of the financial system.
What would help convince me is if someone could demonstrate that a specific part of the financial system -- say an individual bank -- would have failed if it had not received the TARP money. Moreover, I would like to see an explanation of how that bank failure would have caused the entire financial system to collapse along with that bank. Finally, I would like to understand how getting that money would be more cost-effective for taxpayers than an orderly bankruptcy filing.
Meanwhile, the question remains of what to do with the next $350 billion. As I posted, I would like to put the money into my colleague's plan -- to let the FDIC buy the, say, 15% of bad mortgages out of Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBSs) and Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs). This FDIC buy would let those MBSs and CDOs trade at 90% of their face value and would relieve financial institutions of their hundreds of billions of Level 3 assets which are dragging down the system. The FDIC could then use its control of the mortgages and its skill at restructuring to help struggling homeowners.
The $78 billion taxpayer ripoff on TARP I is on Hank Paulson, let's hope Tim Geithner does not make the same mistakes with TARP II.
Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College. His eighth book is You Can't Order Change: Lessons from Jim McNerney's Turnaround at Boeing.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-06-2009 @ 10:22AM
Lela Hayes said...
We keep talking about the banks' losses in bad mortgages, but let's not forget that they get the property when the loan goes into forclosure and the only real loss should be the difference in the loan balance and the net sale of the real estate. If real estate has gone down in value, which it has, then they may have losses there, but it is not 100% of the loan by any stretch of the imagination.
2-06-2009 @ 1:41PM
CR said...
Our new Treas. Sec. (Tim G.) helped Paulson in the TARP 1. program. The fox(tax cheat) is already in the hen house. With the new transperancy Obama has proclaimed, who got the 2 Trillion the Fed reserve loaned out and would not tell Bloomberg News who got it.
2-15-2009 @ 4:24AM
Jim T said...
What in the hell is wrong with people in the US? Wake up a scream your bloody heads off! You just got ripped off to the tune of $78 BILLION DOLLARS by Henry Paulson (He should be jailed) and his friends at the banks. I'm pretty sure Henry covered his ass and exempted himself from any prosecution with his handling of TARP proceeds, but the banks have no such protection. I want someone in Government to go back to the banks and get our $78 Billion Dollars worth of their stock. If they don't want to give it to us then they get cut off from any additional TARP funding!
And I don't want Henry to walk away unscaved either. Maybe we can't prosecute him at this point, but we most curtainly can bring him back in front of Congress and ask him how a banker of his experience (Ex-CEO of Goldman Sachs) could possibly over pay by $78 Billion Dollars? That is so huge of an error, it could not possibly be an error and if in fact that is the case then it could only be FRAUD! And he needs to wear that so he doesn't become the next CEO somewhere else.