This should be the new mantra for all investors: show me the money. In other words, companies can talk all they want about cutting costs or new products or turning the corner or slicing dividends. What investors need to see is profits. Until those start showing up, investors will mostly stay on the sidelines.
There's plenty of talk, very little proof, that stocks might be able to do better. We've seen a decent rally lately. There's piles of cash at venture firms or equity funds, just sitting, waiting to pounce on bargains. But until that money is put to work, it's all talk, no action. Until institutions start moving their money into this market by buying stocks or outright purchases of companies, many individual investors will be interested observers, not participants. They want to see money move from the bench into the game. Then they'll follow suit.
And it would be folly to try to guess which companies will be bought with mergers and acquisitions (m&a) money. That's a fool's game. Buying a stock because it might be bought out by another firm isn't investing, it's gambling. In that vein, if investors want to play, then they need to buy several possible candidates, not just one, and hope for the best. Too often, deals are announced and never consummated, especially in this environment. There are too many slips 'tween cups and lips on buyouts for most investors to feel comfortable. Leave the arbitrage in m&a deals and guessing which companies will be bought to the pros. Even they get burned, but they have lots more money to play with.
While mutual funds dedicated to stocks are always in the market, they don't have to be fully invested if managers don't feel the timing is right. Many funds saw huge redemptions at the end of last year, requiring large sales of stock to meet cash demands. Managers are loathe to repeat that nightmare, and many are sitting on unusual amounts of cash, hoping the redemptions stop and performance improves. When mutual funds are fully invested (not with all their cash...they always keep some out for redemptions), individual investors will jump in as well.
What will make institutions, the big money at insurance companies and bank trust departments as well as mutual funds, get back in the market? Earnings. Plain and simple. They're waiting to see earnings, earnings earned from ongoing business, not earnings from acquisitions or tax carry forwards or extraordinary events like the sale of a division. Not all profits are equal in the eyes of investors. They want to see a company growing from the core business. When that's happening, investors will gladly buy stocks again.
But if you wait until earnings show, won't you miss out on the biggest moves? Most likely, yes. If a stock is selling for less than a dollar now and starts to move up in anticipation of earnings, it could go to $2 or $3 a share before earnings arrive. That's great. Investors willing to take the risk of those earnings not appearing have been rewarded. That doesn't mean there isn't plenty of room left for the stock to continue moving higher.
If a company has finally turned the corner (think of homebuilders or autos) and is reporting solid earnings (from the core business), it will most likely continue to grow, selling more of what it makes, creating more earnings. Just as bad things only got worse as the recession crashed upon us, when good things start to happen, more good things will most likely be added as the economy recovers and moves ahead. That's what happened after every other recession the U.S. has had.
Sure, you'll miss the high multiples of returns that come from taking a position before earnings come out. But you'll also miss the devastation if those anticipated earnings are reported as losses. No stock goes down faster than one where expected earnings don't appear. Better to miss the first upward moves than to participate in the large downward ones. There's still plenty of money to be made once a company leaves the land of losses and enters the land of profits. You may not make as much, but you certainly have better odds of making something.
Don't be too quick to get fully invested in this market, even after the recent rally. We haven't seen the money yet.
Ted Allrich is the founder of The Online Investor and Allrich Investment Management LLC. He is also the author of the book: Comfort Zone Investing: Build Wealth and Sleep Well at Night. In this weekly column, he'll offer advice to investors who are just getting started.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-21-2009 @ 3:45PM
Robert said...
Energy Deregulation is occurring across the United States
What does that mean?
...It means that consumers will actually choose their Electric and Natural Gas providers!
Ambit Energy
(Electric & Natural Gas Provider)
Has put together an amazing opportunity for anyone who is looking to supplement their current incomes!
The good news is the earning potential is Unlimited! There is no cap on what you can earn!
It is set up so that you get paid, month after month, when customers pay their Gas and Electric bills.
There are also many other ways we get paid such as referral, and leadership bonuses!
Ambit Energy offers Electric and Gas in 3 States at this time, with more to follow!
The TEXAS, ILLINOIS & NEW YORK areas, in addition to Long Island, are all open.
Ambit is looking expand into 2-3 states per year.
Ambit Energy is a 2 year old company that did $400 Million in annual revenue for 2008.
Ambit Energy has partnered with Royal Dutch Shell Corp. (Shell Oil), which is the 3rd largest company in the World and 2nd most profitable!
This is reason enough to at least check this out!
Watch the full business presentation, contact me if you understand the potential opportunity!!
http://www.rpmpower.energy526.com - Presentation
http://www.rpmpower.goambit.com - Home site
Let me share the opportunity with you, there is no pressure from me, you decide if this is for you or if it is not for you!
Call or E-mail anytime...
God Bless,
Robert
321-426-6120
email- rpmfireguy@aol.com
3-22-2009 @ 9:23AM
BHarrison said...
As DeepThroat said in the WaterGate scandal: "Follow the money . . . follow the money to find the guilty parties.
Well, similarly, as stated in the article: "Show us the money . . . to prove the profitability and the value of investment.
The market isn't moving yet, it is still declining because of the lack of faith and confidence in the INTEGRITY of the financial reports and operations of the corporations. They're apparently trimming the losses by trimming the overhead; but where is there any proof of the corporations having a solid core value? The government, the news media, and the corporations keep talking about "toxic assests" . . . but are they still "off-the-books assets" or "what".
If a corporation is not lending and conducting "normal business" it can only be assumed that they are still awash in those "toxic owrthless assests" and "holding on for their dear lives".
If they can't or won't provide loans and conduct business Then we can assume that they are not a viable investment. They should be forced to file either Chapater 7 or 11 bankruptcy. Meanwhile, who is going to be foolish enough to invest in them until full disclosures are provided in their financial reports.