This post was written by Minyanville contributor Minyan Peter.
I realize that these are very difficult times for financial services companies, but I learned a long time ago that the only route to progress is dealing with reality.
With that as background I would offer to any number of regional banks who reported earnings this week that the correct disclosure when writing off goodwill is not "This is a non-cash charge which should be ignored because it does not effect cash or regulatory capital" but "In hindsight we overpaid for an acquisition and based on lower forecast earnings from this business in the future, we need to write down most of the purchase price."
Similarly, all statements that include the use of "pre" or "excluding" bad things must immediately cease. As the following statement from Huntington (NASDAQ: HBAN) this morning on "Pre-tax, Pre-provision Income Trends" reveals, these statements border on delusion:
One performance metric that Management believes is useful in analyzing performance in times of economic stress is the level of earnings adjusted to exclude provision expense and other volatile items not considered to represent core, noncredit related banking activities. Provision expense is excluded because its absolute level is elevated and volatile in times of economic stress. We also exclude securities gains or losses since in times of economic stress investment securities market valuations also may become particularly volatile. This has been the case over the last several quarters. Lastly, we exclude amortization of intangibles expense because the size of this quarter's goodwill impairment is unusually magnified in times of severe stock valuation pressure and is not indicative of future performance trends.
Maybe management should just have said "Taking out all the bad things that happened, we had a great quarter!"
You can't make this stuff up.
Closing Bell: Dubai sends jitters throughout the market (S, BBY)
Heinz looking good after the second quarter?
Why isn't Bank of America updating its shareholders on CEO situation?
