AOL Money & Finance

IMF bond sale: Would that be a good thing?

More

What does it mean when the International Monetary Fund (IMF) considers issuing bonds to raise cash? Obviously, the organization would be seeking more money to pursue its agenda, but what else could be inferred by this? How would the dynamics of world economic power wielding be affected? What effect could this have on the natural ebb and flow of free market capitalism? How would U.S. Treasuries be affected?

This possible bond issue was examined recently by Bloomberg.com. The Bloomberg article points to what I think is the most significant aspect that an IMF bond issue would present. I'm concerned that IMF bonds would directly compete with U.S. Treasury bonds. That possibility is fodder for a great deal of speculation.


According to the Bloomberg article, China and Brazil have already expressed interest in IMF bonds. For me, this immediately brings U.S. Treasury bonds into the picture. Let's just suppose that IMF bonds went to market with a 1% higher dividend available than the competing U.S. Treasuries rate. Would this instigate some immediate liquidation of American debt securities? Would this require the U.S. Treasuries dividend rate to go up? One thing is certain, just the mention of a possible IMF bond sale will tend to force some hands.

I believe that therein lies the gambit, because the Bloomberg article makes a few things quite clear. First, although the article suggests that Brazil is interested in IMF bonds, it quotes Brazilian Finance Minister Guido Mantega as calling the idea "insufficient" and "premature."

Secondly, Bloomberg revealed that the IMF feels its current capital desires are not being efficiently serviced by its members. Like any economic-political organization, the IMF wants its clout and it wants it now. By putting pressure on the status quo in the form of leverage sloughing via zero responsibility bonds, the IMF can gain significant sway over world development. The best part for the IMF is that their members would be footing the bill. Remember, the IMF is truly responsible for nothing.

It's no wonder that U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner is pressuring the Obama administration to seek approval from Congress to contribute up to $100 billion to the IMF. Obviously, Mr. Geithner would prefer that our U.S. Treasuries continue to dominate the world bond market. An IMF-instigated bond issue could change the balance of world economic power in the blink of an eye.They've been telling you for decades that the U.S. government could never go bankrupt.

You would still like to believe that, wouldn't you?

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA+132.7910,450.95
NASDAQ+29.972,176.01
S&P 500+14.861,106.24

Last updated: November 24, 2009: 09:01 AM

BloggingStocks Exclusives

Hot Stocks

DailyFinance Headlines

Latest from BloggingBuyouts

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

BioHealth Investor Headlines

WalletPop Headlines

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

WalletPop Headlines