AOL Money & Finance

JockStocks: Jersey sponsors, a necessary evil or the work of the devil?

More

It has been a busy week in the world of sports business, with several stories vying for the spot as the big story of the week. That said, let's take a look at the news that surfaced.

First, Manchester United Football Club (that's soccer ladies and gents) announced that it will replace American International Group on its shirts with Aon in 2010. The agreement is called a basic 20-million-pound-a-year rights fee. Supposedly, the soccer team received bids from three or four different companies, but settled on Aon. Supposedly the deal includes Aon paying commissions to the club from the sale of insurance policies to the club's fan base along with match-related bonuses. It appears that Manchester United will make an extra five million pounds a year from this deal.

This news was followed by a report that the NFL decided (earlier this year) to allow NFL teams to sell sponsorship patches on their practice jerseys. Although these patches are only allowed on practice jerseys, it seems that the demand for this advertising space will be high. As Rovell notes, the biggest benefit for the companies may come from local TV stations that can't broadcast game footage and continually shows practice video. Supposedly, several teams are close to deals. Furthermore, teams will be allowed to sell advertising rights to a different sponsor if they make the postseason (I guess my Cincinnati Bengals won't have to worry about that strategy). This is a major move, as the NFL has always kept advertising separate from the uniforms. In addition, this is a chance for local teams to cash in on the NFL. When you think of NFL advertisers, you think of big companies - the beer companies, the car companies, the major players. Now the mom and pop store on the corner could try to take out an ad on the hometown team.

Of course, this is all building up to the big news of the week, which was that the Phoenix Mercury (of the WNBA) has sold their jersey naming rights to Lifelock. That is right ladies and gents, the team's jerseys will not say Phoenix or Mercury - the name of a company will be on the front of the jersey. And now all of my worst dreams have come true. In the pantheon of major American sports (which I don't consider the WNBA part of, sorry fans) the front of the jersey has been a sacred spot, reserved for the team's home city or its nickname. However, now that this can of worms has opened up, is a sponsor's name on the front of an NFL team's jersey that far away? I mean, they are selling ad space on practice jerseys - the next logical step is game jerseys. I just don't think Carson Palmer should take the field on Sundays looking like Jeff Gordon's car.

Perhaps you don't agree with my opinion, but that is why we have an area for you to comment. Discuss this amongst yourselves gang, but make sure to play nice.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA-17.2410,433.71
NASDAQ-6.832,169.18
S&P 500-0.591,105.65

Last updated: November 25, 2009: 08:36 AM

BloggingStocks Exclusives

Hot Stocks

DailyFinance Headlines

Latest from BloggingBuyouts

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

BioHealth Investor Headlines

WalletPop Headlines

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

WalletPop Headlines