Did you know that we have a watchdog in charge of overseeing the TARP program? Yes, we have such a person and his name is Neil Barofsky.
Today the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve said that the group of financial programs undertaken have had a significant impact on our financial markets.
That may be true, but Mr. Barofsky reported that the sum total of these programs is exposing federal agencies to a staggering $23.7 trillion.
Listen carefully to what Mr. Barofsky says about the Treasury's scheme of shifting toxic assets: He said that "disagreements remain" and there are "fundamental vulnerabilities ... relating to conflicts of interest, and collusion, transparency, performance measures and anti money laundering." It can be inferred from these words that the Treasury and the Fed are hand-picking the firms that they are working with without an "arms-length" relationship.
Now enter the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF). This is a $1 trillion program in which the Treasury and the Fed lend money to hand-picked firms to buy toxic assets for pennies on the dollar. The Fed has done this for buying toxic consumer loans and toxic mortgages, again for pennies on the dollar.
The TALF program is little known outside financial circles and does not receive the publicity that the TARP program received.
The Treasury and the Fed dismissed Mr. Barofsky's report as "inflated and not useful."
Now the Treasury is worried about toxic commercial mortgages and wants to expand TALF to buy up commercial mortgages that are going bad at a rapid rate.
What does all this mean? It means simply that banks and financial institutions are still hiding billions if not trillions of dollars of toxic assets "off the books" to such a large amount that Mr. Barofsky is sounding a warning bell.
Mr. Barofsky is scheduled to testify before Congress this week. Whether his words will give us a wake up call or be dismissed as the Treasury and Fed wants remains to be seen.
After all, committing $23.7 trillion of taxpayer money by the Treasury and the Fed isn't just chump change.
Should Congress rein in this huge and dangerous debt burden?











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-21-2009 @ 12:44PM
alan d said...
IF A BANKER IS MOVING HIS LIPS,,,HES LYING,,,IF A FED MOVES HIS LIPS,,WERE GONNNA BE TAXED TO DEATH,,COVIL WAR IS INEVITABLE!!!
7-21-2009 @ 3:13PM
ij70 said...
Exciting!
7-21-2009 @ 5:18PM
clikdawg said...
"Civil war is inevitable."
Maybe.
But it won't be The Blue and The Gray this time -- certainly not at the outset.
It will be civil war on the Iraqi Model: IED's, not banner-waving armies; a sprawling, disorganized shadow war of individuals settling scores in the night, unsure who the enemy really is; and will scarcely touch The Bankers -- it'll more'n likely be middle- vs. under-class with emphasis along ethnic fault-lines, since those are the groups with enough proximity to one another to make a good, old-fashioned bloodbath cheap, easy, and mindless.
Think "Bloody Kansas" during ol' Honest Abe's Civil War for a good preview.
Which way would our armed forces jump? And just exactly who would they jump to if they declined to support the present Gummint?
Who would be leading the insurrection? How would you know who she or he was? News media gonna tell you?
Once started, compadres, there would never, ever be an end to it: That is neither a judgement for or against a revolution -- just a simple statement of fact.