AOL Money & Finance

Warner Music Group and Live Nation: Two melodious investments?

More

I thought I'd take a look at two companies that reported earnings earlier in the week that share a couple things in common. First, they deal with music. Second, their prospects have been defined, in part, by the surge of Apple's (NASDAQ: AAPL) iPod/iTunes zeitgeist.

Let's begin with Warner Music Group (NYSE: WMG). According to Reuters, Warner Music Group lost 25 cents per share from continuing businesses in Q3. Analysts wanted to see a loss of only 16 cents per share. In last year's Q3, the company lost 6 cents per share. Not a good trend. Warner Music Group's management unfortunately fails to impress.

Now, let's hear how Live Nation (NYSE: LYV) did in the company's second quarter. It did terrible: the concert promoter lost 33 cents per share on a reported basis. Twelve months ago, only a single penny was lost. On an adjusted basis, Live Nation lost 15 cents per share. What were analysts hoping for? Would you believe a 17 cent per-share profit? Big differential there, guys.

Live Nation, which is combining forces with Ticketmaster Entertainment (NASDAQ: TKTM), produced a decent cash-flow statement, though, judging by the earnings press release. I wasn't too taken by Warner Music Group's cash flow, however. It's an interesting situation because, as I alluded to before, digital music downloads as promoted by companies such as Apple and Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) have severely altered the music-selling model. Warner Music Group can't really grow on sales of tunes stored on physical media. Instead, it has to focus on building its digital business (and management obviously has to do a better job on that count). Live Nation, on the other hand, is something of a beneficiary of the new culture. Famous artists are flocking to this company because they realize that you've got to have a strong promoter backing up both your ticket sales and your merchandise grosses to offset the lackluster revenues being generated by physical media. Both businesses should make greater efforts at reducing costs. And they must do what they can to make more economically feasible contracts with talent.

So, which one appears to be the better investment? Well, the answer is really neither. If I were forced to pick between the two, I might give the edge to Live Nation, just based on the cash flow. Both stocks, however, are highly speculative, and both quarterly reports didn't do much for me.

Warner Music Group and Live Nation are basically lottery tickets. If you look at their respective charts, you might conclude that they'd be attractive bets as the economy gets better. Hey, they both might indeed rise as the headlines on macro data improve. Still, I'd rather go with stronger, less chancy situations.

Disclosure: I don't own any company mentioned; positions can change without notice.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA-154.4810,309.92
NASDAQ-37.612,138.44
S&P 500-19.141,091.49

Last updated: November 27, 2009: 11:47 PM

BloggingStocks Exclusives

Hot Stocks

DailyFinance Headlines

Latest from BloggingBuyouts

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

BioHealth Investor Headlines

WalletPop Headlines

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

WalletPop Headlines