Speaker Pelosi offers stronger public option than Sen. Reid's 'flex-pub'


Just call it a 'moderate public option.' Sort of. U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, Thursday unveiled a revised, $894 billion health care reform bill that would provide insurance to up to 36 million more Americans while cutting the budget deficit by $30 billion over 10 years.

The bill's key elements: subsidies offered to moderate-income Americans to buy insurance either from private carriers or a new, government-run program, an expansion of Medicaid to insure the poor, and an income tax increase on upper income Americans -- individuals earning more than $500,000 per year and couples earning more than $1 million.

The bill's government run insurance program, also called the public option, eliminates cost controls that had been a key support point for liberals, The Los Angeles Times reported Thursday. Moderates, who won that important concession, had feared cost controls would hurt local hospitals: the bill now calls for rates to be negotiated between the government and hospitals.

Fiscal Analysis: Speaker Pelosi's bill comes a few days after U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's, D-Nevada, reform bill that will include a flexible public option -- one where states can opt-out of the federal insurance plan. As of now, it looks like Reid's 'flex-pub' will prevail in the House/Senate conference committee, but it remains an open question concerning whether a state will face penalties if it doesn't participate in the federal public option, then subsequently doesn't implement their own state-level plan to achieve 100% insurance by a given year. That's a major issue, and look for moderate and liberal Congressional Democrats to go to the mat on it to defend their positions.

The likely outcome for that plank? If federalism is any guide, look for very low penalties for states who opt-out, then don't insure. In other words, after the bill is passed, liberal states like New York, California, Massachusetts, Oregon etc. are likely to be states where one can obtain health insurance at a moderate price; conservative states like Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi are likely to offer the fewest options for moderate-income residents, and consequently are likely to have the lowest percentage of citizens with health insurance.

Concerning the income tax increase on high-income Americans, that most likely will not be included in the conference committee bill. Most Senate Democrats oppose it. There is the possibility of a small income tax increase/surcharge for health care, but it will pass only if it applies to middle-income Americans as well as upper-income citizens.

- -

Financial Editor Joseph Lazzaro is writing a book on the U.S. presidency and the U.S. economy.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA-89.2312,801.23
NASDAQ-23.352,903.88
S&P 500-9.311,342.64

Last updated: February 13, 2012: 06:04 AM

Hot Stocks

General Electric

18.875-0.255(-1.33)

Alcoa

10.29-0.35(-3.29)

Apple Inc

493.42+0.25(+0.05)

Google Inc 'A'

605.91-5.55(-0.91)

Bank of America

8.07-0.11(-1.34)

Wal-Mart Stores

61.90-0.06(-0.10)

Exxon Mobil Corp

83.80-1.08(-1.27)

Ford

12.44-0.25(-1.97)

Citigroup

32.925-0.735(-2.18)

IBM

192.42-0.71(-0.37)

Yahoo

16.14+0.14(+0.88)

Starbucks

48.82-0.38(-0.77)

Microsoft

30.495-0.275(-0.89)

Home Depot

45.33+0.06(+0.13)

DailyFinance Headlines

Benzinga Headlines

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

BioHealth Investor Headlines

WalletPop Headlines

DailyFinance BlackBerry App

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

BioHealth Investor Headlines

Page Loaded in 1329131092308 ms.