Tessera (NASDAQ: TSRA) (Cramer's Take) and SBA Communications (NASDAQ: SBAC) (Cramer's Take) "blow up" last night and you have to think, "The tsunami's over," that the smartphone revolution's not occurring.
To which I say, no one likes the blowups, no one likes the guidedowns, but, like Qualcomm (NASDAQ: QCOM) (Cramer's Take), these are all multiyear stories that can't be judged on a quarter. The idea that we do not need more cell towers with smartphone data hogs like the iPhone out there, and the idea that miniaturization and cooler computers (Tessara's strengths) are played out, makes no sense to me.
When you have the multiyear theme, you have to look at these bumps in the road that give you a chance to get in that you would otherwise not have. Do you buy this morning?
You have to wait, because there is no way that people won't react in fear (the way they did when they first heard that the fourth quarter with Qualcomm would not be that strong). But you can see that things have already bottomed with the Qualcomm. The same will occur with these stocks, too.
Jim Cramer is co-founder and chairman of TheStreet.com. He contributes daily market commentary for TheStreet.com's sites and serves as an adviser to the company's CEO. At the time of publication, Cramer was long Qualcomm.
Comfort Zone Investing: It's the revenues that count
Black Friday busy, but momentum may not hold
Six Thanksgiving trades for tasty profits
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-30-2009 @ 11:04AM
Beltway Greg said...
Fine example you set. Buy, buy, buy, sell, sell ,sell.
CNBC should be taken off of the air. The channel should run with a 24 disclaimer. I'd love to go on Fast Money and play for real money. The only reason why most fund mangers make money is because people give them money.
With their personal funds? Most are in treasuries.
10-30-2009 @ 12:07PM
ebrandler34 said...
I hear what you're saying, and I assume you are implying that this "mobile internet tsunami" is more of an investment strategy, rather than a "trade".
I would ask, however, "If it is that obvious, don't you think the growth potential has already been priced in?"
You and I both know that money is made off the "unexpected". It's like with AAPL...so many people brag about their returns since March, but let's get real ... NYT, GE, BAC, CE, OMX, CAR, FLS, PCLN .....I could go on and on. They all outperformed AAPL because Apple's success and market dominance is priced into the stock. Sure, it's reliable and safe, just like betting the favorite to 'show' at your local racetrack...