AOL Money & Finance

Tell-tale stat: Broadest U.S. unemployment rate hit 17.5% in October

More

We can now say that the current recession has sunk to a level even worse than the horrible early 1980s recession, as measured by one indicator: The broadest measure of U.S. unemployment -- which includes unemployed and underemployed Americans, as well as discouraged workers -- rose to 17.5% in October, according to data compiled by the U.S. Labor Department. The previous high was 17.1% in December 1982, The New York Times reported.

The index, statistically known as "U-6," totaled 17.0% in September and 16.8% in August; that's up from 12.0% a year ago, in October 2008.

The official U.S. unemployment rate rose to 10.2% in October from 9.8% in September. There are now roughly 17 million Americans unemployed; about 7.6 million have lost their jobs during the recession that started in December 2007.

The U.S. economy has started to recover -- Q3 GDP totaled 3.5% -- but one can understand why the nation's outlook remains cautious and muted at best. Historically, unemployment, a lag indicator, tends to drop after the economic recovery has notched a quarter or two. That means the unemployment rate will likely rise at least through Q1 2010, perhaps longer. How high will unemployment go? Perhaps 11%. However, a more important question concerns when net, monthly job growth will resume? Based on current U.S. economic fundamentals and demand characteristics, the nation will be fortunate to see job losses end and job growth resume by March 2010; but job growth may not start until June 2010, or even later.

Economic Analysis: Two variables are making it hard for economists to project future job gains in the U.S. as it comes out of the pronounced recession: 1) uncertainty regarding U.S. consumer spending habits and 2) structural, cyclical, and technological factors acting on the U.S. economy. Historically, consumer spending could be counted on to rev-up, adding lots of jobs as the recovery progressed, but the new "frugal consumer" era is casting doubt on that correlation. Second, the Internet and globalization are changing productive processes so much and so quickly that it's hard to predict which industries will retain jobs, and which will lose them, via transfer to lower-cost production centers overseas or technological advances.

Given the above conditions, it goes without saying that the U.S. will need to create new sectors -- new engines of growth -- to create the roughly 7 million to 9 million jobs it will need to get the nation back to full employment. (And those job figures assume a "new normal" full employment rate of roughly 5.0% to 5.5% U.S. unemployment.)

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA+132.7910,450.95
NASDAQ+29.972,176.01
S&P 500+14.861,106.24

Last updated: November 24, 2009: 04:24 AM

BloggingStocks Exclusives

Hot Stocks

DailyFinance Headlines

Latest from BloggingBuyouts

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

    BioHealth Investor Headlines

    WalletPop Headlines

    My Portfolios

    Track your stocks here!

    Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

    BloggingStocks Partners

    More from AOL Money & Finance

    WalletPop Headlines