Starbucks CEO gives himself $1.3 million: So that's why coffee costs so much


I have had my problem with Starbucks (SBUX) CEO Howard "Schultzie" Schultz in the past, but his latest little stunt has really ticked me off.

First things first, I will enjoy the occasional cup of Starbucks coffee, but the price has put a venti mocha-frappa-latte-chino out of my budget so I have started making my own at home. The company's product is good, but its competitors -- namely McDonald's (MCD) and Dunkin' Donuts -- offer a comparable product at a fraction of the price. I have long thought that Starbucks' saturation business model has been its biggest fault, with Schultzie's leadership running a close second.

Back in August, Starbucks warned that it would raise its prices on a nationwide basis in a "slow and deliberate" fashion. Most of these price increases were in the 10-to-15 cent range. Here is the rub, this news was piggybacked on news that the coffee king was going to lower some of its prices -- on smaller-sized drinks. So your small (or whatever baristas call it) black coffee costs 15 cents less, but the guy buying the large behind you is making that up and more by buying some candy-flavored concoction. Yes, I understand business and I know why Starbucks does this, but it has many coffee drinkers upset and the latest Schultzie stunt may push them over the top.

Want to know where the extra 15 cents on your drink is going? How about right into Schultzie's pocket. Back in January, Schultzie was lauded by analysts (including me, I believe) when he cut his base pay to the minimum required to maintain his benefits in the face of slumping first-quarter sales and the economic crunch. Well, that $10,000 must have made it hard to make ends meet, as Schultzie has decided to reward three solid quarters with a raise to $1.3 million.

My question is, will he lower his salary again once lower sales crop back up and hit the firm's bottom line? Let's see if he is as quick to lower his salary (again) if need be. Now, I understand business practices, but I am not sure that a major pay raise at this time is the best move.

Nevertheless, should Starbucks continue to turn in solid quarterly performances then Schultzie's move was good.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA+33.0712,878.20
NASDAQ+2.092,904.08
S&P 500+2.721,347.05

Last updated: February 07, 2012: 11:58 PM

Hot Stocks

General Electric

19.18+0.13(+0.68)

Alcoa

10.67-0.065(-0.61)

Apple Inc

468.83+4.86(+1.05)

Google Inc 'A'

606.77-2.32(-0.38)

Bank of America

7.85-0.12(-1.51)

Wal-Mart Stores

61.69-0.19(-0.31)

Exxon Mobil Corp

86.34+0.59(+0.69)

Ford

12.88-0.08(-0.62)

Citigroup

33.07-0.23(-0.69)

IBM

193.35+0.53(+0.27)

Yahoo

15.83+0.01(+0.06)

Starbucks

48.41+0.12(+0.25)

Microsoft

30.35+0.15(+0.50)

Home Depot

45.46+0.26(+0.58)

DailyFinance Headlines

Benzinga Headlines

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

BioHealth Investor Headlines

WalletPop Headlines

DailyFinance BlackBerry App

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

BioHealth Investor Headlines

Page Loaded in 1328677125983 ms.