One doesn't need a Copenhagen Summit to make U.S. cars more efficient


The Copenhagen Summit sometimes gives observers the impression that elaborate formulas and systems are needed to reduce greenhouse gases.

And, to be sure, a cap-and-trade system (or an equivalent) at the national level, and then coordinated at the international level, will be needed to ensure that nations are reforming their climate changing ways.

However, the above does not mean substantive greenhouse gas reductions cannot occur outside of the Copenhagen framework. They can, and one obvious way is: reduce the weight of vehicles.

The use OF plastics, aluminum, composites, and other lighter-weight materials -- often replacing steel -- can reduce vehicle weight by more than 20%. True, there are areas -- for safety and strength -- where steel must continue to be used, but there are many areas in which manufacturers can 'get the weight out.' For most cars, the largest amount of fuel is used when accelerating from a stop, and a reduction in weight would yield large benefits. At speeds above 30 mph and at highway speeds (+55 mph), a vehicle's aerodynamics become a major factor in fuel consumption, along with weight.

U.S. auto fuel efficiency: A lost decade

Unfortunately, weight is an area U.S. automakers dropped the ball on, for basically an entire decade -- an astounding and costly oversight, in retrospect. For reasons that mystify many Americans, Detroit did not do enough to reduce vehicle weight, and it was one reason for Detroit's often below-competitor mile-per-gallon fuel efficiency during the current decade. Further, inadequate fuel efficiency was a factor in Detroit's near-total-collapse: it certainly hurt General Motors' sales.

Some theorize that Detroit didn't do much to reduce vehicle weight for safety reasons: all other factors being equal, when a heavy car meets a light car, the heavy car does not bear the brunt of the energy force/damage. But that light car disadvantage is being lessened by safety features, including multiple air bag systems, crumple zones, and safer interior materials.

Of course, there is one environmental qualifier when increasing per-car MPG - - people in more fuel-efficient cars tend to drive more than in their previous lower MPG cars -- but that's usually more than offset by the reduction in fuel -- and overall greenhouse gases -- of the higher MPG vehicle.

Hence, along with adhere to commitments at Copenhagen, the United States should implement policies that encourage another, big, long-overdue energy-saver: reducing vehicle weight, where possible.

Energy/Auto Sector Analysis: The nation does not have to await the arrival of the 'perfect' electric car in 10 years to reduce emissions from autos: considerable emission reductions can be achieved by getting the weight out! And, of course, more-efficient vehicles will have another advantage -- reduced gasoline expenses -- when $4 per gallon gasoline gets here, later if not sooner.

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA-89.2312,801.23
NASDAQ-23.352,903.88
S&P 500-9.311,342.64

Last updated: February 10, 2012: 04:28 PM

Hot Stocks

General Electric

18.875-0.255(-1.33)

Alcoa

10.29-0.35(-3.29)

Apple Inc

493.54+0.37(+0.08)

Google Inc 'A'

605.70-5.76(-0.94)

Bank of America

8.07-0.11(-1.34)

Wal-Mart Stores

61.75-0.21(-0.34)

Exxon Mobil Corp

83.80-1.08(-1.27)

Ford

12.44-0.25(-1.97)

Citigroup

32.925-0.735(-2.18)

IBM

192.42-0.71(-0.37)

Yahoo

16.13+0.13(+0.81)

Starbucks

48.78-0.42(-0.85)

Microsoft

30.455-0.315(-1.02)

Home Depot

45.33+0.06(+0.13)

DailyFinance Headlines

Benzinga Headlines

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

BioHealth Investor Headlines

WalletPop Headlines

DailyFinance BlackBerry App

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

BioHealth Investor Headlines

Page Loaded in 1328909303565 ms.