U.S. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner said he's expecting net, monthly U.S. job growth to resume by spring. "Most economists would say that, by the spring, we'll have positive job growth," Geithner said in an interview Wednesday on ABC's "Good Morning America," while adding that it's unlikely there was any job growth in December.
Geithner also emphasized that the U.S. economy is "growing, it's getter better, getting stronger," while underscoring that the big variable in the expansion concerns when the U.S. economy starts adding jobs again.
The 2008-2009 recession has resulted in the loss of a staggering 7.6 million jobs, with the U.S. unemployment rate rising to 10.0%. However, job lay-offs have been trending lower for roughly a half-year, with the economy losing just 11,000 jobs in November.
Economic/Political Analysis: As noted, job growth remains the key for a sustained U.S. economic recovery. Although the U.S. economy can grow for several quarters without job growth -- as it did during 2002 -- long-term, a 2-3 year expansion is not possible without a net increase in jobs, and the increase in household formation it implies.
Further, job growth will also likely determine the fate of the Democratic Party's majority status in Congress, and, down the road, the fate of the Obama administration. Other issues can always pop up (inflation, unforeseen international events/crises etc.), but historically the economy -- and in particular the unemployment rate -- has correlated with how the American people rate the majority party's performance in Congress, and the president's performance. Lack of job growth would result in a failing grade for the Democrats and would result in the party losing more than the 10-14 House seats the party in power typically loses in an off-year Congressional election. The Democrats would also likely lose at least 1-2 Senate seats.
Conversely, strong job growth will result in a good grade for the Democrats, and the loss of only a few House seats -- or perhaps none -- during the off-year election up ahead in 2010. Under this scenario, the Democrats would also retain their current 58-seat majority in the Senate, and perhaps gain a seat.
Hence, the advise to Secretary Geithner and the Democrats is obvious: after the passage of health care reform, job growth should become the Democrats' No. 1 task.
Financial Editor Joseph Lazzaro is writing a book on the U.S. presidency and the U.S. economy.
Economic/Political Analysis: As noted, job growth remains the key for a sustained U.S. economic recovery. Although the U.S. economy can grow for several quarters without job growth -- as it did during 2002 -- long-term, a 2-3 year expansion is not possible without a net increase in jobs, and the increase in household formation it implies.
Further, job growth will also likely determine the fate of the Democratic Party's majority status in Congress, and, down the road, the fate of the Obama administration. Other issues can always pop up (inflation, unforeseen international events/crises etc.), but historically the economy -- and in particular the unemployment rate -- has correlated with how the American people rate the majority party's performance in Congress, and the president's performance. Lack of job growth would result in a failing grade for the Democrats and would result in the party losing more than the 10-14 House seats the party in power typically loses in an off-year Congressional election. The Democrats would also likely lose at least 1-2 Senate seats.
Conversely, strong job growth will result in a good grade for the Democrats, and the loss of only a few House seats -- or perhaps none -- during the off-year election up ahead in 2010. Under this scenario, the Democrats would also retain their current 58-seat majority in the Senate, and perhaps gain a seat.
Hence, the advise to Secretary Geithner and the Democrats is obvious: after the passage of health care reform, job growth should become the Democrats' No. 1 task.
Financial Editor Joseph Lazzaro is writing a book on the U.S. presidency and the U.S. economy.
Savings Experiment: Snow Removal
The Money Man Behind Rick Santorum: Who Is Foster S. Friess?


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-23-2009 @ 10:17PM
ij70 said...
Hm, I guess he is betting on infrastructure construction and fixing jobs. Not bad, very politically well played.
12-24-2009 @ 8:30AM
Taylor said...
for those looking for employment right now, Salary For.com http://www.salaryfor.com/ has career advice, job listings and a huge database of real salaries that companies are paying for any position. you can post your own salary or view others for free.