Newsday Shows Future of Online Subscription Model


The recent announcement by the New York Times (NYT) that it would start to require subscriptions next year has drawn no shortage of attention and commentary. It has tried to put content behind a pay wall before (and failed), as have other newspapers.

Almost universally, newspapers have struggled with online subscriptions, with the Financial Times and Wall Street Journal, a News Corp (NWS) property, the only two that have really delivered results better than awful. Whether the New York Times can operate at that level is in doubt, particularly given the stunning realization about Long Island daily newspaper Newsday.

Late last October, Newsday put its content behind a pay wall, making it the first non-business newspaper to do this, according to the New York Observer (which isn't exactly true -- several newspapers have played with this, though mostly in part). Three months later, its results are telling: 35 people. are willing to pay up to $5 a week to read Newsday on the Web.

Imagine going to a strip club at 3:00 in the afternoon. That's how many people pay for Newsday on the Web.

To make matters worse, the newspaper paid $4 million to redesign and relaunch the website. The revenue it has generated is estimated at $9,000.

Fortunately, we're talking about the newspaper "business," so there's always a way to rationalize the results. Not included in the results are print subscribers who also have free access to the website. Optimum Cable users also have online access to Newsday. And, in true newspaper form, the company emphasizes its reach -- which comes to 75% of Long Island through its print and Optimum channels.

So, this leads to a new layer of stupidity. If you already "own" 75% of a market, why would you spend $4 million to reach the other 25%. Isn't 75% close enough to a monopoly that paying a fortune for the remainder isn't worth it? The net difference for $4 million is a mere 35 people.

There's no way to spin this one into a success story. According to the Observer, a staffer at Newsday, offers this simple assessment of the new initiative: "It's an abomination." Says another: "The view of the newsroom is the web site sucks."

Well, at least there's consensus. Seventy-five percent of Long Island (minus 35 people) feels the same way.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA+5.7512,883.95
NASDAQ+11.782,915.86
S&P 500+2.911,349.96

Last updated: February 09, 2012: 08:51 AM

Hot Stocks

General Electric

19.24+0.06(+0.31)

Alcoa

10.670.00(0.00)

Apple Inc

476.68+7.85(+1.67)

Google Inc 'A'

609.85+3.08(+0.51)

Bank of America

8.13+0.28(+3.57)

Wal-Mart Stores

61.62-0.07(-0.11)

Exxon Mobil Corp

85.32-0.55(-0.64)

Ford

12.84-0.04(-0.31)

Citigroup

34.23+1.16(+3.51)

IBM

192.95+0.35(+0.18)

Yahoo

15.78-0.05(-0.32)

Starbucks

48.72+0.31(+0.64)

Microsoft

30.66+0.31(+1.02)

Home Depot

45.17-0.29(-0.64)

DailyFinance Headlines

Benzinga Headlines

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

BioHealth Investor Headlines

WalletPop Headlines

DailyFinance BlackBerry App

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

BioHealth Investor Headlines

Page Loaded in 1328795498850 ms.