The recent announcement by the New York Times (NYT) that it would start to require subscriptions next year has drawn no shortage of attention and commentary. It has tried to put content behind a pay wall before (and failed), as have other newspapers.
Almost universally, newspapers have struggled with online subscriptions, with the Financial Times and Wall Street Journal, a News Corp (NWS) property, the only two that have really delivered results better than awful. Whether the New York Times can operate at that level is in doubt, particularly given the stunning realization about Long Island daily newspaper Newsday.
Late last October, Newsday put its content behind a pay wall, making it the first non-business newspaper to do this, according to the New York Observer (which isn't exactly true -- several newspapers have played with this, though mostly in part). Three months later, its results are telling: 35 people. are willing to pay up to $5 a week to read Newsday on the Web.
Imagine going to a strip club at 3:00 in the afternoon. That's how many people pay for Newsday on the Web.
To make matters worse, the newspaper paid $4 million to redesign and relaunch the website. The revenue it has generated is estimated at $9,000.
Fortunately, we're talking about the newspaper "business," so there's always a way to rationalize the results. Not included in the results are print subscribers who also have free access to the website. Optimum Cable users also have online access to Newsday. And, in true newspaper form, the company emphasizes its reach -- which comes to 75% of Long Island through its print and Optimum channels.
So, this leads to a new layer of stupidity. If you already "own" 75% of a market, why would you spend $4 million to reach the other 25%. Isn't 75% close enough to a monopoly that paying a fortune for the remainder isn't worth it? The net difference for $4 million is a mere 35 people.
There's no way to spin this one into a success story. According to the Observer, a staffer at Newsday, offers this simple assessment of the new initiative: "It's an abomination." Says another: "The view of the newsroom is the web site sucks."
Well, at least there's consensus. Seventy-five percent of Long Island (minus 35 people) feels the same way.
The Money Man Behind Rick Santorum: Who Is Foster S. Friess?
5 Signs You're Getting Robbed at the Hospital


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-27-2010 @ 12:43PM
Kevin said...
Some important facts were omitted from this blog report. First of all, anyone who has a Newsday newspaper subscription is allowed free access to the website.
Secondly, anyone who has "Optimum Cable," which is owned by the Dolans and Cablevision, also gets it free. Newsday claims that 75 percent of Long Island either has a subscription or Optimum Cable.
1-27-2010 @ 12:50PM
Kevin said...
Nevermind. I overlooked the reporting. However, I can see a redesign if they're interested in keeping the 75% market hold they currently say they have. Afterall, since more and more people are flocking to the Internet for news ... why not improve their offering.