The Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (FOMC) issued its statement indicating again that interest rates will remain low for an extended period of time. The decision was not unanimous with one dissenting vote.
The Fed continues to avoid any potential language which could disrupt the financial markets. Chairman Bernanke, a student of the Great Depression, does not want to do anything to damage the current stabilization in the economy. This is particularly true with a controversial vote on the Chairman's confirmation coming soon.
Politically, it will also be extremely difficult for the Fed to tighten monetary policy until the employment situation improves as long as inflation remains subdued. This is especially true with mid-term elections in 2010.
The FOMC's decision to phase out the extraordinary programs utilized last year is not necessarily significant in light of the Fed leaving rates unchanged. It can always extend these funds with the discount window through the banking system.
However, the news that the Fed may considering targeting the interest rate paid by the Fed on excess reserves held at the Federal Reserve instead of the Fed Funds rate may be more important. If the Fed does this, it may be going back to its prior policy of injecting excess liquidity through the banking system instead of open market operations.
This allows the Fed to target liquidity injections to an area over which it can exercise greater control and oversight than to the general economy as a whole. Prior to the 1990's, the FOMC used the discount rate, the interest rate that it loaned money directly to member banks, as its primary benchmark. This devil of course will be in the details when the Fed does release a statement.
There does not appear to be monetary tightening on the near-term horizon. The types of programs used to inject money into the economy are more a question of form rather than substance.
The Fed will most likely utilize speeches by Fed officials to telegraph any significant changes in monetary policy to minimize the chances of confusion and disruption in the market. This has been and will continue be the pattern for the near future.
The focus now shifts back to earnings and other economic news such as GDP and of course the President's State of the Union address.
Doug Roberts is the Founder and Chief Investment Strategist for ChannelCapitalResearch.com, an independent research firm focusing on investment strategies using the Federal Reserve's impact on the stock prices.
The 20 Most Valuable Brands In The World
Score a Great Deal During Memorial Day Sales -- Savings Experiment


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-27-2010 @ 10:01PM
catherine pierce said...
join these movements to take the power and money away from Washington:
auditthefed.com
endthefed.us
fairtax.org
1-28-2010 @ 5:40AM
Dan Barnett said...
catherine pierce,
The issue of a "progressive" income tax was settles about 100 years ago in the US. The concept is much older. Paraphrasing the Bible, "From those who have much, much is expected". Worked then. Works now.
The "end the Fed"/Ayn Rand libertarianism arguments have been around for a while too. Many years ago, in school, we labeled them Anarcho-selfish-ism. They tend to be long on "anti-anger" and short of workable solutions.