An interesting piece of legislation is now blasting its way through the chambers of the Maryland legislature. This legislation threatens to lay waste to Internet social networking as we know it, if not for the inclusion of one solitary line of text.
While it appears honorable and well-intentioned on it's face, Maryland's HB65 (pdf file) is meant to place severe restrictions on the practice of international marriage brokering. If signed into law, the bill will place strict and deeply invasive disclosure requirements on the clients and providers of international match making services. This legislation does not bode well for the likes of eHarmony and Match.com.
In terms of strict legalese, the bill defines an international marriage broker as "a corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, or other legal entity that does business in the United States and offers to Maryland residents ... social referral services involving recruits by (exchanges of personal information) or otherwise facilitating communication between a client and a recruit."
By the above definition, your favorite social networking sites could be considered international marriage brokers as soon as you make contact with a person beyond our borders, if your intent might include future matrimony. The reason being that the legislation defines a recruit as "an individual who is not a citizen or resident of the United States and who uses the services of ... an international marriage broker for ... social referral services."
The verbiage of the legislation is incredibly obtuse and ill-defined, although it does make perfectly clear that if you want to find yourself a spouse from another country, you had better be prepared for a background check that is deep and thorough enough to qualify you to be president of the United States.
The single line of text that temporarily protects sites such as Facebook and MySpace, but that may ultimately condemn the dating sites so many people are familiar with reads: "International marriage broker does not include: an organization that does not charge a fee based on gender or country of origin to any party for the services provided."
So for now, social networking for international romance is safe. However, by the language of the Maryland state legislature, that's only because we're not yet being charged the indicated fees for the use of those sites.
The Money Man Behind Rick Santorum: Who Is Foster S. Friess?
Savings Experiment: Snow Removal


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-28-2010 @ 2:20PM
Sheldon L said...
The first court to hear this case, and there most assuredly will be one, will toss this law in the waste bin of historically ill-conceived restrictions on personal liberty.
2-28-2010 @ 10:53PM
Bryan said...
You've got this wrong. The bill is targeted very specifically at human trafficking. As you quote, the bill states that "International marriage broker does not include: an organization that does not charge a fee based on gender or country of origin to any party for the services provided."
eHarmony, Match, etc. would not fall in this category - they charge the same fee for anyone who joins their site. Their fee is not different based on gender or country of origin. This is targeted at sites that charge creepy old men in America looking for a young sex toy that is dependent on them once she gets to America.
3-01-2010 @ 12:09AM
CAPTAIN scholten said...
I'm glad they are wasting time and money making these laws. Are mail order brides really that big of an issue?