Is Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke stoking inflation? Of course he is. Anyone with common sense knows that if you give $600 billion cash to the banks with no qualifications -- as he did with the second round of quantitative easing -- they will use it to speculate in the markets. JPMorgan Chase (JPM) just bought $1 billion of copper.
Bernanke's fatal mistake was that he placed no restrictions on what the banks would do with his $600 billion. If you opened the banks' books, you can bet that they've invested in commodities, currencies and foreign equities and bonds.
What Bernanke should have done was to sit down with the bankers and say: "Look boys, I'm giving you $600 billion, but you must lend it to U.S. businesses to stimulate our economy. None of this money is to be used for speculation or gambling in the markets." It's not too late to do this because QE2 runs until June.
But for Bernanke to say that inflation is not his fault is just nonsense. The idea of the $600 billion stimulus was a good one but it was botched from the beginning. You simply cannot give out $600 billion and let the bankers have a field day. That policy certainly is not helping to create jobs.
If you are running the largest central bank in the world, you need accountability. This, Bernanke does not have in QE2. When will we get a report on exactly what the $600 billion was used for? That's what the American people and leaders around the world want to know.
Score a Great Deal During Memorial Day Sales -- Savings Experiment
A $12,000 Smartphone May Already Be in Your Pocket


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-04-2011 @ 4:24PM
william lindblad said...
Fat chance on getting disclosure from the Fed but the primary inflation areas will be food and fuel and the Fed's decisions will have little impact in either area.
Bernanke threw money at the banks to keep the stock market rolling along and as such it probably has a 10% inflation value built in. I see this more as building a false confidence value than anything else and I am sure that the general public takes the same view, i.e. - it's stable and not spooking a shakey economy.
My view is that the real problem is volcanic. Over the last 10 years there have been eruptions all over the world and it appears that we are in a very active geological cycle with tons of ash being put into the atmosphere. While none have been on the large side there has been plenty of small to medium, which when combined, tend to create a small scale Mt. Tambora effect. I believe that our current winter is a "poster child" for what I say. I don't think that anyone is going to dispute that weather events are impacting the food supply. This causes problems which in turn effect the oil supply.
Since this is an investment page I would add that even though they just had the sugar beet crop freeze in the U.K, the remain the best equipped to handle both food and fuel rises. I would hesitate to invest in Estonia. There are plenty more on the list and anyone with smarts better look around.