<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Why is gold marching higher? Ask the central bankers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/why-is-gold-marching-higher-ask-the-central-bankers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/why-is-gold-marching-higher-ask-the-central-bankers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/why-is-gold-marching-higher-ask-the-central-bankers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p><img border="1" align="right" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/gold_coin200.jpg" alt="" />The rally in gold just doesn't want to quit. You are probably wondering what is going on. Central banks around the world hold gold reserves. Periodically, they buy or sell gold, depending on how they view world markets. Right now, central banks are <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/34062427">net buyers</a>, the first time since 1988.</p>
<p>A weak US dollar is the main stimulus for central bankers' gold purchases. India just bought 200 metric tons from the International Monetary Fund. Central bankers in Mexico, Russia, the Philippines, all have increased their gold purchases.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/why-is-gold-marching-higher-ask-the-central-bankers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why is gold marching higher? Ask the central bankers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/why-is-gold-marching-higher-ask-the-central-bankers/">Why is gold marching higher? Ask the central bankers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/34062427>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/why-is-gold-marching-higher-ask-the-central-bankers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19248396/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/why-is-gold-marching-higher-ask-the-central-bankers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>central banks</category><category>CentralBanks</category><category>featured</category><category>gold</category><category>us dollar</category><category>UsDollar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Manufacturing in the Philadelphia area grows at a faster pace]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/manufacturing-in-the-philadelphia-area-grows-at-a-faster-pace/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/manufacturing-in-the-philadelphia-area-grows-at-a-faster-pace/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/manufacturing-in-the-philadelphia-area-grows-at-a-faster-pace/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/new_chart.jpg" />What is the Philly/Fed Index and why is it important? <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&amp;sid=a72.Kby_nbZk">The Philly/Fed Index measures manufacturing activity in the Philadelphia area. </a>While it measures only one area of the country, over the years it has been a leading index for manufacturing overall.
<p>Why bother measuring the manufacturing sector? The main reason is that manufacturing accounts for 12% of our GDP. Growth in manufacturing indicates that orders are picking up. If orders are picking up, the next step is to hire more workers. Hiring more workers speeds the growth of our economy and at the same time puts unemployed persons back to work.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/manufacturing-in-the-philadelphia-area-grows-at-a-faster-pace/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Manufacturing in the Philadelphia area grows at a faster pace</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/manufacturing-in-the-philadelphia-area-grows-at-a-faster-pace/">Manufacturing in the Philadelphia area grows at a faster pace</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&amp;sid=a72.Kby_nbZk>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/manufacturing-in-the-philadelphia-area-grows-at-a-faster-pace/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19247139/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/manufacturing-in-the-philadelphia-area-grows-at-a-faster-pace/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GDP</category><category>inthenews</category><category>PhillyFed Index</category><category>PhillyfedIndex</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Uncle Sam has a $4.8 trillion dollar interest payment!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/uncle-sam-has-a-4-8-trillion-dollar-interest-payment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/uncle-sam-has-a-4-8-trillion-dollar-interest-payment/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/uncle-sam-has-a-4-8-trillion-dollar-interest-payment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/100dollar.jpg" alt="" />Here's a shocker! <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/11/19/news/economy/debt_interest/index.htm">Over the next decade the U.S. government is expected to rack up $9 trillion in debt.</a> More than half that amount, $4.8 trillion, will be in interest payments.
<p>To further emphasize the depth of the problem, in 2015 interest due will be $533 billion, equal to 1/3 of the federal income taxes!</p>
<p>Right now, the Treasury is in a sweet spot with regards to interest payments. With interest rates at near zero, we are able to finance trillions of dollars of debt with practically no interest payments. That scenario is about to change. The change could be rather quick. If the economy heats up, interest rates will rise and so too will interest payments. Because the debt is so large, only a small rise in interest payments could increase the interest burden by a large amount.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/uncle-sam-has-a-4-8-trillion-dollar-interest-payment/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Uncle Sam has a $4.8 trillion dollar interest payment!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/uncle-sam-has-a-4-8-trillion-dollar-interest-payment/">Uncle Sam has a $4.8 trillion dollar interest payment!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2009/11/19/news/economy/debt_interest/index.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/uncle-sam-has-a-4-8-trillion-dollar-interest-payment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19247879/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/uncle-sam-has-a-4-8-trillion-dollar-interest-payment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>federal deficit</category><category>FederalDeficit</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. housing starts fall sharply in October as inflation rises]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/u-s-housing-starts-fall-sharply-in-october-as-inflation-rises/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/u-s-housing-starts-fall-sharply-in-october-as-inflation-rises/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/u-s-housing-starts-fall-sharply-in-october-as-inflation-rises/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN189935320091118">The U.S. housing market continued to show weakness</a> in the latest reading. Here are the Commerce Department's latest numbers:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Housing starts dropped 10.5% to 529,000 units. The expected number was 600,000. </li>
    <li>Groundbreaking for single family homes fell 6.8% last month to an annual rate of 476,000 units. </li>
    <li>Starts for multifamily homes fell sharply to a 53,000 annual pace, a drop of 34.6%. </li>
    <li>Compared to October last year, housing starts fell 30.7%.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/u-s-housing-starts-fall-sharply-in-october-as-inflation-rises/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. housing starts fall sharply in October as inflation rises</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/u-s-housing-starts-fall-sharply-in-october-as-inflation-rises/">U.S. housing starts fall sharply in October as inflation rises</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/u-s-housing-starts-fall-sharply-in-october-as-inflation-rises/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19244351/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/u-s-housing-starts-fall-sharply-in-october-as-inflation-rises/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Consumer Price Index</category><category>housing starts</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why is Pellegrini calling Bernanke's easy money policy 'sheer lunacy'?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/why-is-pellegrini-calling-bernankes-easy-money-policy-sheer-lu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/why-is-pellegrini-calling-bernankes-easy-money-policy-sheer-lu/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/why-is-pellegrini-calling-bernankes-easy-money-policy-sheer-lu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="146" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/ben-bernanke.jpg" alt="" />Who is Paolo Pellegrini? <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/investing/wall_street_news_blog/archives/2009/11/man_who_called.html">Pellegrini is a Rome-born analyst</a> who helped hedge fund operator John Paulson make tons of money in the subprime crash of 2007-2008.</p>
<p>It was Pellegrini who led the number crunching on mortgages and home prices and came to the conclusion that housing prices were about to collapse. Paulson's hedge fund took advantage of this data and proceeded to make $3.5 billion on his trades.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/why-is-pellegrini-calling-bernankes-easy-money-policy-sheer-lu/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why is Pellegrini calling Bernanke's easy money policy 'sheer lunacy'?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/why-is-pellegrini-calling-bernankes-easy-money-policy-sheer-lu/">Why is Pellegrini calling Bernanke's easy money policy 'sheer lunacy'?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/investing/wall_street_news_blog/archives/2009/11/man_who_called.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/why-is-pellegrini-calling-bernankes-easy-money-policy-sheer-lu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19242913/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/why-is-pellegrini-calling-bernankes-easy-money-policy-sheer-lu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>asset bubble</category><category>bear market rally</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Pellegrini</category><category>PSQR Capital</category><category>PsqrCapital</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Retail sales up, manufacturing down in October]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/retail-sales-up-manufacturing-down-in-october/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/retail-sales-up-manufacturing-down-in-october/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/retail-sales-up-manufacturing-down-in-october/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/shops.jpg" width="200" height="147" alt="" />Separate reports showed <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/33962572">simultaneous improvements and declines in the U.S. economy</a>.</p>
<p>First the good news. The Commerce Department reported that retail sales rose 1.4% in October, after falling 2.3% in September. It must be noted that September sales were revised downward from a previous -1.5%.</p>
<p>The boost came for auto sales, which rose 7.4%, after a drop of 14.4% in September. The sharp drop in September was mainly due to the termination of the "cash for clunkers" program.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/retail-sales-up-manufacturing-down-in-october/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Retail sales up, manufacturing down in October</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/retail-sales-up-manufacturing-down-in-october/">Retail sales up, manufacturing down in October</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/retail-sales-up-manufacturing-down-in-october/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19241033/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/retail-sales-up-manufacturing-down-in-october/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>manufacturing</category><category>retail sales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[UK regulators will have the power to 'tear up' bank bonus contracts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/uk-regulators-will-have-the-power-to-tear-up-bank-bonus-contra/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/uk-regulators-will-have-the-power-to-tear-up-bank-bonus-contra/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/uk-regulators-will-have-the-power-to-tear-up-bank-bonus-contra/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/investing.jpg" />We've got to congratulate Britain's prime minister, Gordon Brown, for his tough <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aBUoJS0091Ew&amp;pos=2">stand on bank bonuses</a>. He plans to make some bank bonuses illegal, according to a Bloomberg article.<br /></p>
<p>Regulators will be given "powers if necessary to tear up contracts that would result in payments being made that would cause instability," according to the Sunday Telegraph. Not only that, but the paper reports that City Minister Paul Myners told Sky News that "if those contracts are written, they will be voided under law."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/uk-regulators-will-have-the-power-to-tear-up-bank-bonus-contra/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>UK regulators will have the power to 'tear up' bank bonus contracts</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/uk-regulators-will-have-the-power-to-tear-up-bank-bonus-contra/">UK regulators will have the power to 'tear up' bank bonus contracts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aBUoJS0091Ew&amp;pos=2>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/uk-regulators-will-have-the-power-to-tear-up-bank-bonus-contra/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19240279/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/uk-regulators-will-have-the-power-to-tear-up-bank-bonus-contra/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking</category><category>bonus</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gold blasts to another record high of $1,133.07 per ounce]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/gold-blasts-to-another-record-high-of-1133-07-per-ounce/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/gold-blasts-to-another-record-high-of-1133-07-per-ounce/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/gold-blasts-to-another-record-high-of-1133-07-per-ounce/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a></p><p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/gold_200mw_mf021506.jpg" />It's Monday morning. Looking at the boards, the dollar is weaker and <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704431804574539160726487446.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_markets">gold climbs to another record high</a>. Spot gold in London traded at $1,133.07 per ounce. The December gold futures contract traded at $1,133.50 per ounce. </p>
<p>Again today, the dollar traded down, with the December dollar contract trading at <a href="http://www2.barchart.com/mktcom.asp?code=BSTK">75.105, down 32</a> (prices as of 8:39 EDT). The other precious metals followed gold higher. December silver traded at $17.815 per ounce up 43.5 cents. Platinum was at $1,428.90 per ounce, up $41.20. Palladium traded at $365.15, up $8.40</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/gold-blasts-to-another-record-high-of-1133-07-per-ounce/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Gold blasts to another record high of $1,133.07 per ounce</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/gold-blasts-to-another-record-high-of-1133-07-per-ounce/">Gold blasts to another record high of $1,133.07 per ounce</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704431804574539160726487446.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_markets>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/gold-blasts-to-another-record-high-of-1133-07-per-ounce/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19240969/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/gold-blasts-to-another-record-high-of-1133-07-per-ounce/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>carry trade</category><category>CarryTrade</category><category>commodities</category><category>dollar</category><category>gold</category><category>inthenews</category><category>precious metals</category><category>stocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Weak dollar adds $20 to the price of oil]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/weak-dollar-adds-20-to-the-price-of-oil/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/weak-dollar-adds-20-to-the-price-of-oil/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/weak-dollar-adds-20-to-the-price-of-oil/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/oil.jpg" />The price of oil has risen from about $30 per barrel at the height of the economic recession to the present $77 per barrel. Much of the increase is due to the weakness in the U.S. dollar. Rex Tillerson, CEO of Exxon Mobil (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">XOM</a>) <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/33905331">told CNBC</a>: "If you put the price of oil, which is priced in dollars around the world, and if you look at what some effects are with the weak dollar -- in our view that is contributing $20 to $25 dollars per barrel to the price."</p>
<p>Globally, Tillerson said, oil is well supplied with historic high inventory levels, especially in the U.S. This is causing the market to be a "bit soft," according to Tillerson.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/weak-dollar-adds-20-to-the-price-of-oil/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Weak dollar adds $20 to the price of oil</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/weak-dollar-adds-20-to-the-price-of-oil/">Weak dollar adds $20 to the price of oil</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/33905331>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/weak-dollar-adds-20-to-the-price-of-oil/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19239917/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/weak-dollar-adds-20-to-the-price-of-oil/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dollar</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil</category><category>oil inventories</category><category>OilInventories</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JP Morgan's Dimon says: 'We should be allowed to fail']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/jp-morgans-dimon-says-we-should-be-allowed-to-fail/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/jp-morgans-dimon-says-we-should-be-allowed-to-fail/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/jp-morgans-dimon-says-we-should-be-allowed-to-fail/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline news</a></p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/blog-money-winners-jamie-dimon-200x267.jpg" />There is legislation in both the House and Senate aimed at breaking up large banks that are deemed: "Too big to fail."
<p>Against this backdrop, Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM)</a> said "<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5AC2Z920091113">If some unforeseen circumstance should put this firm at risk of collapse, we should be allowed to fail."</a></p>
<p>Dimon went on to say writing in Friday's <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/12/AR2009111209924.html"><em>Washington Post</em></a>: "The term 'too big to fail' must be excised from our vocabulary." Dimon also argued against limiting banks' size saying that increased scale can benefit customers.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/jp-morgans-dimon-says-we-should-be-allowed-to-fail/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JP Morgan's Dimon says: 'We should be allowed to fail'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/jp-morgans-dimon-says-we-should-be-allowed-to-fail/">JP Morgan's Dimon says: 'We should be allowed to fail'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5AC2Z920091113>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/jp-morgans-dimon-says-we-should-be-allowed-to-fail/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19236582/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/jp-morgans-dimon-says-we-should-be-allowed-to-fail/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>banks too big to fail</category><category>BanksTooBigToFail</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jamie dimon</category><category>JamieDimon</category><category>jpm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Federal deficit sets October record of $176.4 billion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/federal-deficit-sets-october-record-of-176-4-billion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/federal-deficit-sets-october-record-of-176-4-billion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/federal-deficit-sets-october-record-of-176-4-billion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p>The federal budget year ended in October. The October deficit number set <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9BU69E80.htm">a record of $176.4 billion</a>, which was higher than the $150 billion economists had predicted. </p>
<p>For the budget year 2009, the deficit reached $1.42 trillion. That too was an all-time record. This year's deficit was $958 billion above the 2008 deficit. October was the 13th straight month to show a deficit.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/federal-deficit-sets-october-record-of-176-4-billion/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Federal deficit sets October record of $176.4 billion</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/federal-deficit-sets-october-record-of-176-4-billion/">Federal deficit sets October record of $176.4 billion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9BU69E80.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/federal-deficit-sets-october-record-of-176-4-billion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19235567/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/federal-deficit-sets-october-record-of-176-4-billion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailouts</category><category>budget deficits</category><category>inthenews</category><category>tax receipts</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA['CoCos' are a new way to protect banks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/the-fed-has-a-new-way-to-protect-banks-with-cocos-what-are-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/the-fed-has-a-new-way-to-protect-banks-with-cocos-what-are-they/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/the-fed-has-a-new-way-to-protect-banks-with-cocos-what-are-they/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/df-epicharmus.jpg" width="200" height="111" />The Federal Reserve and Wall Street executives are discussing a new way to provide bank capital in times of crisis. <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/07b43f1a-cf04-11de-8a4b-00144feabdc0.html">They want to issue a new security called a contingent convertible (CoCo)</a>. </p>
<p>What is a CoCos and how does it work? CoCos are hybrid securities, In normal times they operate like a bond and pay coupons to investors. However, in times of crisis they automatically convert into equity. If bank capital fell below prescribed limits they would trigger the conversion from bonds to equity.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/the-fed-has-a-new-way-to-protect-banks-with-cocos-what-are-they/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'CoCos' are a new way to protect banks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/the-fed-has-a-new-way-to-protect-banks-with-cocos-what-are-they/">'CoCos' are a new way to protect banks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/the-fed-has-a-new-way-to-protect-banks-with-cocos-what-are-they/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19233957/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/the-fed-has-a-new-way-to-protect-banks-with-cocos-what-are-they/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank bailouts</category><category>banks</category><category>CoCos securities</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New jobless claims fall for the second week, but picture still gloomy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/new-jobless-claims-fall-for-the-second-week-but-picture-still-g/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/new-jobless-claims-fall-for-the-second-week-but-picture-still-g/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/new-jobless-claims-fall-for-the-second-week-but-picture-still-g/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/job_fair.jpg" />A small ray of light was visible on the unemployment front. Government data showed that <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSN0243717320091112">initial claims for unemployment fell</a> to 502,000 on a seasonally adjusted basis. The prior weeek's reading was 514,000. Analysts had expected this week's number to be about 512,000.</p>
<p>The four-week moving average decreased to 519,000, the lowest since a matching level on November 29, 2008</p>
<p>The number of persons collecting long term unemployment benefits also fell to 5.631 million, but this number is meaningless because it doesn't count those who have exhausted their benefits.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/new-jobless-claims-fall-for-the-second-week-but-picture-still-g/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New jobless claims fall for the second week, but picture still gloomy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/new-jobless-claims-fall-for-the-second-week-but-picture-still-g/">New jobless claims fall for the second week, but picture still gloomy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSN0243717320091112>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/new-jobless-claims-fall-for-the-second-week-but-picture-still-g/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19234552/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/new-jobless-claims-fall-for-the-second-week-but-picture-still-g/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>initial claims</category><category>inthenews</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why is gold making a new high, trading at $1,118.00 per ounce?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/why-is-gold-making-a-new-high-trading-at-1-118-00-per-ounce/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/why-is-gold-making-a-new-high-trading-at-1-118-00-per-ounce/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/why-is-gold-making-a-new-high-trading-at-1-118-00-per-ounce/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/ubs-gold-bricks.jpg" alt="" /> A wise trader once told me: "It's all in the price. All the thoughts, ideas and emotions of all the traders throughout the world are in that one number."
<p> <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9BTEE9O0.htm">Gold is trading at $1,118.00 per ounce</a>. What is that number telling us? Pure and simple, the market is telling us that inflation is on the way. The Indian government just bought 200 tons of gold valued at over $7 trillion dollars. In other words they exchanged $7 trillion US dollars for the 200 tons of gold.</p>
<p>At the same time the December US dollar contract traded below 75.00 on a trade-weighted basis. What is that number telling us? Traders are turning in dollars for other investments, mainly stocks and commodities.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/why-is-gold-making-a-new-high-trading-at-1-118-00-per-ounce/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why is gold making a new high, trading at $1,118.00 per ounce?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/why-is-gold-making-a-new-high-trading-at-1-118-00-per-ounce/">Why is gold making a new high, trading at $1,118.00 per ounce?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9BTEE9O0.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/why-is-gold-making-a-new-high-trading-at-1-118-00-per-ounce/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19233143/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/why-is-gold-making-a-new-high-trading-at-1-118-00-per-ounce/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>gold</category><category>inflation</category><category>US dollar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner wants a strong dollar]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/us-treasury-secretary-geithner-wants-a-strong-dollar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/us-treasury-secretary-geithner-wants-a-strong-dollar/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/us-treasury-secretary-geithner-wants-a-strong-dollar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/dollar-bill.jpg" />Treasury Secretary Geithner, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5AA0HH20091111?sp=true">speaking from Tokyo</a>, said that he wants a strong dollar and that the United States is determined to bring budget deficits down.
<p>Mr Geithner has made this statement several times in the past. Yet, this year the dollar has fallen 7.6% and hit a 15 month low of 74.889 on Wednesday.</p>
<p>You are probably wondering why his words are being discounted. The dollar keeps falling. Let's look at the underlying conditions in the US economy that are working against a strong dollar.</p>
<p>Geithner cited unemployment as one factor. He said: "Unemployment is really very, very high, exceptionally higher in the United States. It is still rising. It's probably going to rise for a bit longer, until you see a longer period of growth take hold."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/us-treasury-secretary-geithner-wants-a-strong-dollar/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner wants a strong dollar</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/us-treasury-secretary-geithner-wants-a-strong-dollar/">U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner wants a strong dollar</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5AA0HH20091111?sp=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/us-treasury-secretary-geithner-wants-a-strong-dollar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19232697/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/us-treasury-secretary-geithner-wants-a-strong-dollar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>private sector</category><category>strong dollar</category><category>StrongDollar</category><category>tim geithner</category><category>TimGeithner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tesla Roadster sets a record -- travels 313 miles on a single charge]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/tesla-roadster-sets-a-record-travels-313-miles-on-a-single-ch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/tesla-roadster-sets-a-record-travels-313-miles-on-a-single-ch/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/tesla-roadster-sets-a-record-travels-313-miles-on-a-single-ch/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/tesla.jpg" />Here's a stunning accomplishment. The <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/lifestyle/content/nov2009/bw2009113_893430.htm">Tesla Roadster set a record</a> by traveling 313 miles on one electric charge. The new record was set at the 2009 Global Green Challenge in Australia.</p>
<p>The competition was over an 1,800 mile course. The Tesla Roadster reportedly had three miles worth of charge to spare. This was well above the average 244 miles per charge it mentions in its specs. </p>
<p>The winning driver was Simon Hackett, managing director of Australian national broadcasting company. He owns the only Tesla Roadster in Australia and now holds the world's record, having beaten the previous record of 241 miles set in April at Rallye Monte Carlo of Energies Alternatives.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/tesla-roadster-sets-a-record-travels-313-miles-on-a-single-ch/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tesla Roadster sets a record -- travels 313 miles on a single charge</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/tesla-roadster-sets-a-record-travels-313-miles-on-a-single-ch/">Tesla Roadster sets a record -- travels 313 miles on a single charge</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/lifestyle/content/nov2009/bw2009113_893430.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/tesla-roadster-sets-a-record-travels-313-miles-on-a-single-ch/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19231974/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/tesla-roadster-sets-a-record-travels-313-miles-on-a-single-ch/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>electric car</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>new record</category><category>tesla</category><category>tesla roadster</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why do we have a weak dollar?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/why-do-we-have-a-weak-dollar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/why-do-we-have-a-weak-dollar/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/why-do-we-have-a-weak-dollar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/india/" rel="tag">India</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><p><img border="1" align="right" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/dollar-bill.jpg" alt="" />The stock market is rallying. Commodities are on a tear. Yet the dollar is falling. Why? </p>
<p>There are several <a href="http://money.cnn.com/?cnn=yes">reasons for the drop in the dollar</a>, but the most obvious and simple answer is that investors around the world are selling dollars and using the money to buy stocks and commodities, particularly oil and gold.</p>
<p>Last week India announced that it had bought 200 tons of gold from the International Monetary Fund (IMF.) At an average of say $1000.00 per ounce, the transaction amounted to about $7 trillion dollars. Chances are that India sold dollars from their sovereign fund to buy the gold.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/why-do-we-have-a-weak-dollar/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why do we have a weak dollar?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/why-do-we-have-a-weak-dollar/">Why do we have a weak dollar?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/?cnn=yes>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/why-do-we-have-a-weak-dollar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19231148/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/why-do-we-have-a-weak-dollar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>commodities</category><category>currencies</category><category>featured</category><category>stocks</category><category>US dollar</category><category>UsDollar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is the recession still alive?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-the-recession-still-alive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-the-recession-still-alive/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-the-recession-still-alive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" align="right" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/bankers.jpg" alt="" />Monday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average set a new 2009 high, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/closing-bell-bulls-gutting-bears-atvi-ewbc-ge-jaso-enzn-m/">trading above 10,225</a>. GDP growth came in at <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/third-quarter-gdp-shows-growth-is-the-recession-over/">3.5% for the third quarter</a>.</p>
<p>However, what we are experiencing is a disconnect between Wall Street and Main Street. Last Friday, the Labor Department reported that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/jobless-rate-jumps-to-10-2-during-october/">unemployment is now above 10%</a>. <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/10/30/consumer-spending-falls-employment-costs-hit-record-low/">Consumer spending for September</a> fell .5%, the biggest drop since December 2008.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-the-recession-still-alive/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is the recession still alive?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-the-recession-still-alive/">Is the recession still alive?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/11/07/earth-to-economists-recession-isnt-over/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-the-recession-still-alive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19230500/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-the-recession-still-alive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GDP</category><category>recession</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nationwide home prices fall in 123 of 153 metro areas]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nationwide-home-prices-fall-in-123-of-153-metro-areas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nationwide-home-prices-fall-in-123-of-153-metro-areas/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nationwide-home-prices-fall-in-123-of-153-metro-areas/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/icelandhouse.png" alt="" />The housing market is still mired in price declines during the third quarter. Prices declined in 80% of metro areas.<a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/33826643"> Of the 153 metro areas surveyed, 123 still saw price declines, while 30 saw price increases. Overall, the national median price has fallen 11.2% from last year.</a>
<p>Let's look at specific towns and cities with the highest price declines and the highest price increases:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Fort Myers, Florida tops the list with a 40% decline. Median home prices were $98,000.00</li>
    <li>Las Vegas, Nevada saw a 35% decline. Median home prices were $138,500.00</li>
    <li>On the up side, Cumberland Maryland saw a price increase of 19% Median home prices rose to $122,100.00</li>
    <li>Davenport, Iowa was next with a 14% increase. Median home prices were $115,600.00.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nationwide-home-prices-fall-in-123-of-153-metro-areas/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nationwide home prices fall in 123 of 153 metro areas</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nationwide-home-prices-fall-in-123-of-153-metro-areas/">Nationwide home prices fall in 123 of 153 metro areas</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/33826643>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nationwide-home-prices-fall-in-123-of-153-metro-areas/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19230785/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nationwide-home-prices-fall-in-123-of-153-metro-areas/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>first time home buyer credit</category><category>home prices</category><category>HomePrices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>median home price</category><category>MedianHomePrice</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Long dated oil contracts surge to almost $100 per barrel]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/long-dated-oil-contracts-surge-to-almost-100-per-barrel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/long-dated-oil-contracts-surge-to-almost-100-per-barrel/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/long-dated-oil-contracts-surge-to-almost-100-per-barrel/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/oilprices.jpg" width="200" height="130" />Sometimes you can get an indication of market trend by looking at the prices of futures contracts in the forward months. Oil futures contracts trade out as far a 2017. <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0534ae8a-cc95-11de-8e30-00144feabdc0.html">Oil futures contracts for the year 2017 are trading a just a shade under $100 per barrel</a>, while spot crude was trading at $77.65 per barrel (spot prices are cash prices.)</p>
<p>The International Energy Agency has said that last year's spike of oil prices to $147 per barrel was a contributing factor in tipping the world into recession. It damaged trade balances, reduced household income and dampened growth, putting pressure on inflation and interest rates.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/long-dated-oil-contracts-surge-to-almost-100-per-barrel/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Long dated oil contracts surge to almost $100 per barrel</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/long-dated-oil-contracts-surge-to-almost-100-per-barrel/">Long dated oil contracts surge to almost $100 per barrel</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0534ae8a-cc95-11de-8e30-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/long-dated-oil-contracts-surge-to-almost-100-per-barrel/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19228990/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/long-dated-oil-contracts-surge-to-almost-100-per-barrel/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>commodities</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil futures contracts</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>