<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Cash for Clunkers data paints a murky picture]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/cash-for-clunkers-data-paints-a-murky-picture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/cash-for-clunkers-data-paints-a-murky-picture/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/cash-for-clunkers-data-paints-a-murky-picture/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/04/car-lot-sale-200rb100407.jpg" />Data analysis of the government's Cash for Clunkers program is beginning to surface. That analysis, coupled with some not too impressive projections, is beginning to paint a murky, if not dismal, picture of the auto industry's future. I read an excellent break down of the data, which was provided by <a href="http://www.autoobserver.com/2009/09/cash-for-clunkers-boosted-economy-prompted-lower-car-prices.html">Michelle Krebs via Edmunds Automotive Network</a>.</p>
<p>First off, some analysts are claiming that while the Clunkers program did boost auto sales for the month of August, those sales were most likely moved forward on the calendar by auto buyers who were already contemplating a purchase. The supposition is that these consumers simply bought earlier to reap their government vouchers (you're welcome). <a href="http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/edmundscom-analyzes-september-auto-pricing-and-sales-trends-predicts-saar,964994.shtml">Dismal September sales numbers are being projected</a> for auto makers.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/cash-for-clunkers-data-paints-a-murky-picture/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cash for Clunkers data paints a murky picture</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/cash-for-clunkers-data-paints-a-murky-picture/">Cash for Clunkers data paints a murky picture</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/cash-for-clunkers-data-paints-a-murky-picture/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19166918/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/cash-for-clunkers-data-paints-a-murky-picture/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto sales</category><category>autos</category><category>Cash for Clunkers</category><category>Edmunds</category><category>Ford</category><category>GM</category><category>Michelle Krebs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary E. Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[American Apparel CEO puts big ugly foot in his mouth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/american-apparel-ceo-puts-big-ugly-foot-in-his-mouth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/american-apparel-ceo-puts-big-ugly-foot-in-his-mouth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/american-apparel-ceo-puts-big-ugly-foot-in-his-mouth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="American Apparel" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/american-apparel.jpg" />We might be tempted to think, in this day and age, that a move as stupid as this one could not happen in our enlightened business world. However, the CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-apparel-inc/app/ase">American Appare</a>l (AMEX: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-apparel-inc/app/ase">APP</a>), seems to think otherwise.<br /><br />According to a <a href="http://gawker.com/5323472/we-predict-more-lawsuits-in-dov-charneys-future">story provided by Gawker.com</a>; "American Apparel's ... madman CEO, Dov Charney is demanding the firing of employees he deems unattractive and thus detrimental to the "AA aesthetic." <br /><br />It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that people (especially in America) are ultra sensitive to negative comments about appearance. It also does not take a great deal of intelligence to recognize that the firing of employees based on their looks is a stupidly discriminatory practice. So, being that this project is being undertaken at the sole direction of CEO Charney, one does not have to spend much time analyzing exactly who is the stupid one over there.<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/american-apparel-ceo-puts-big-ugly-foot-in-his-mouth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>American Apparel CEO puts big ugly foot in his mouth</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/american-apparel-ceo-puts-big-ugly-foot-in-his-mouth/">American Apparel CEO puts big ugly foot in his mouth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://gawker.com/5323472/we-predict-more-lawsuits-in-dov-charneys-future>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/american-apparel-ceo-puts-big-ugly-foot-in-his-mouth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19110663/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/american-apparel-ceo-puts-big-ugly-foot-in-his-mouth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>American Apparel</category><category>AmericanApparel</category><category>APP</category><category>appearance</category><category>Dov Charney</category><category>DovCharney</category><category>lawsuits</category><category>ugly</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary E. Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IMF bond sale: Would that be a good thing?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/imf-bond-sale-would-that-be-a-good-thing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/imf-bond-sale-would-that-be-a-good-thing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/imf-bond-sale-would-that-be-a-good-thing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brazil/" rel="tag">Brazil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/imf.jpg" alt="" />What does it mean when the International Monetary Fund (IMF) considers issuing bonds to raise cash? Obviously, the organization would be seeking more money to pursue its agenda, but what else could be inferred by this? How would the dynamics of world economic power wielding be affected? What effect could this have on the natural ebb and flow of free market capitalism? How would U.S. Treasuries be affected?</p>
<p>This possible bond issue was <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=ai8Eko7vcXBk&amp;refer=home">examined recently by Bloomberg.com</a>. The Bloomberg article points to what I think is the most significant aspect that an IMF bond issue would present. I'm concerned that IMF bonds would directly compete with U.S. Treasury bonds. That possibility is fodder for a great deal of speculation.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/imf-bond-sale-would-that-be-a-good-thing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>IMF bond sale: Would that be a good thing?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/imf-bond-sale-would-that-be-a-good-thing/">IMF bond sale: Would that be a good thing?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=ai8Eko7vcXBk&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/imf-bond-sale-would-that-be-a-good-thing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1528462/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/imf-bond-sale-would-that-be-a-good-thing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bloomberg</category><category>Bloomberg.com</category><category>IMF</category><category>international monetary fund</category><category>US Treasuries</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary E. Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[China seeks to cap and trade the American consumer]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/china-seeks-to-cap-and-trade-the-american-consumer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/china-seeks-to-cap-and-trade-the-american-consumer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/china-seeks-to-cap-and-trade-the-american-consumer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/china-flag.jpg" alt="chinese flag" />Here's the tip: It might be time to pull investments from Chinese manufacturing and export interests. <br /><br />According to <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CLIMATE_TREATY_CHINA?SITE=ININS&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT">an Associated Press report</a>, which features some mind numbing quotes from Li Gao, China's chief climate negotiator, it may soon become far more economically practical to manufacture products here, at home, in the good old USA.<br /><br />It seems that the obviously arrogant Mr. Gao, and the communist nation that he represents, have decided that we, consumers, should bear the brunt of the expense for that nation's carbon emission load. The logic used to back this assertion, while certainly passing as logic, serves as nothing more than a spotlight on the fundamentally flawed "cap and trade" carbon emissions boondoggle that is slowly unfolding.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/china-seeks-to-cap-and-trade-the-american-consumer/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>China seeks to cap and trade the American consumer</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/china-seeks-to-cap-and-trade-the-american-consumer/">China seeks to cap and trade the American consumer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CLIMATE_TREATY_CHINA?SITE=ININS&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/china-seeks-to-cap-and-trade-the-american-consumer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1490017/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/china-seeks-to-cap-and-trade-the-american-consumer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cap and trade</category><category>CapAndTrade</category><category>carbon emissions</category><category>carbon footprint</category><category>CarbonEmissions</category><category>CarbonFootprint</category><category>china</category><category>greenhouse gasses</category><category>GreenhouseGasses</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Kyoto Protocol</category><category>KyotoProtocol</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary E. Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft accounting error shows up as huge PR blunder]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/microsoft-accounting-error-shows-up-as-huge-pr-blunder/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/microsoft-accounting-error-shows-up-as-huge-pr-blunder/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/microsoft-accounting-error-shows-up-as-huge-pr-blunder/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/workspace/" rel="tag">Workspace</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/steve-ballmer-msft.jpg" alt="Steve Ballmer" />Things have again become spicy in the world of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>). Reports are circulating that Microsoft miscalculated the severance payouts to some of the approximately 1,400 employees that the company recently laid off. </p>
<p>According to <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-10169119-75.html">CNET News</a>, Microsoft Corp. has sent out letters requesting a return of funds from those former employees who received apparent overpayment of severance benefits.The report also indicates that some of the laid off workers may have received severance underpayments.<br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/microsoft-accounting-error-shows-up-as-huge-pr-blunder/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft accounting error shows up as huge PR blunder</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/microsoft-accounting-error-shows-up-as-huge-pr-blunder/">Microsoft accounting error shows up as huge PR blunder</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-10169119-75.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/microsoft-accounting-error-shows-up-as-huge-pr-blunder/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1467995/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/microsoft-accounting-error-shows-up-as-huge-pr-blunder/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>layoffs</category><category>microsoft accounting</category><category>MicrosoftAccounting</category><category>overpaid</category><category>severance</category><category>underpaid</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary E. Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can anything save Playboy? Don't bet your booty on it.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/can-anything-save-playboy-dont-bet-your-booty-on-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/can-anything-save-playboy-dont-bet-your-booty-on-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/can-anything-save-playboy-dont-bet-your-booty-on-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and advertising</a></p>The rumor mill announced yesterday that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">Playboy Enterprises</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">PLA</a>) is going to suck it up, pull out, and move its entire operation to its home port of Chicago. According to <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/01222009/gossip/pagesix/leaving_town_151258.htm">a blurb in The New York Post</a>, "Playboy is combining its Web site and magazine staff into one editorial organization." Evidently, the company is feeling the squeeze from 1.5 million free internet porn sites, give or take several million. <br /><br />In the matter of nudity as entertainment, has the adage "sex sells" been supplanted by the new phase of "sex is free for the taking?" In the world of high gloss paper media, such would seem to be the case. So, what is a gnarly old, skin peddling millionaire to do? Whatever shall become of our most familiar white bunny head? <br /><br />Hugh Hefner is still smiling, and it seems obvious that he still has some faith in his production staff. However, getting a continuing rise out of the public, and getting them to continue opening their wallets, is quite another matter. The company is <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/10/playboy-starts-to-realize-there-s-no-future-in-charging-money-to-se-naked-girls-pla-">doing fairly well in it's non-media operations</a>, but in the world of cheesecake, it looks pretty much all down hill.<br /><br />I'm guessing that in the halls of Playboy there have been some extremely hot and sweaty brain storming sessions going on. There is one thing in this situation that I'm almost absolutely certain of: If the gang at Playboy Enterprises can't continue to do something to stimulate some growth, we're sure to see some serious bunny fur fly.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/can-anything-save-playboy-dont-bet-your-booty-on-it/">Can anything save Playboy? Don't bet your booty on it.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nypost.com/seven/01222009/gossip/pagesix/leaving_town_151258.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/can-anything-save-playboy-dont-bet-your-booty-on-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1438324/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/can-anything-save-playboy-dont-bet-your-booty-on-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cheesecake</category><category>Chicago</category><category>erotic media</category><category>EroticMedia</category><category>leaving</category><category>magazine</category><category>moving</category><category>New York</category><category>NewYork</category><category>Playboy</category><category>sex sells</category><category>SexSells</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary E. Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bank of England lowers interest rates to lowest point since The Revolution]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/bank-of-england-lowers-interest-rates-to-lowest-point-since-the/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/bank-of-england-lowers-interest-rates-to-lowest-point-since-the/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/bank-of-england-lowers-interest-rates-to-lowest-point-since-the/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>You read that right. <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=avTXAfm9.vhM&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg.com has reported</a> that The bank of England has lowered it's benchmark interest rate to it's lowest point since the bank was founded in 1694. How much more proof is needed to make obvious the fact that people and businesses just aren't borrowing money any more?<br /><br />Even if some stalwart soul had the inclination to borrow some money, are there banks out there which are lending it? In the face of unemployment levels which some say <a href="http://img0.fark.net/images/2002/links/reuters.gif"><em>honest </em>calculations put up as high as 16%</a>, banks are becoming adverse to lending money to anyone who might actually need it. Of course I can get you credit card applications all day long, if you're willing to pay upwards of 19% interest on new money.<br /><br />So you have to wonder, when is it all going to break loose. Honestly folks, if the promise of increased revenue reserves was in any way going to help us, don't you think the contraction would have slowed by now? The only way additional cash will correct anything is if that cash is put directly into the hands of the people who pay the bills. Of course, we all know that will never happen. Our government will continue to drop wads of our yet unpaid tax dollars into the laps of their corporate sponsors. That, for now, is where the buck now stops.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/bank-of-england-lowers-interest-rates-to-lowest-point-since-the/">Bank of England lowers interest rates to lowest point since The Revolution</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=avTXAfm9.vhM&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/bank-of-england-lowers-interest-rates-to-lowest-point-since-the/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1424991/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/bank-of-england-lowers-interest-rates-to-lowest-point-since-the/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bank of England</category><category>BankOfEngland</category><category>borrowing</category><category>dollar</category><category>euro</category><category>interest rates</category><category>InterestRates</category><category>lending</category><category>pound</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary E. Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Way Off Wall Street: The public responds to the Madoff scandal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/way-off-wall-street-the-public-responds-to-the-madoff-scandal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/way-off-wall-street-the-public-responds-to-the-madoff-scandal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/way-off-wall-street-the-public-responds-to-the-madoff-scandal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual funds</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/blogginggary.jpg" alt="G.E.Sattler" /><em>Welcome to Way Off Wall Street, a column dedicated to providing Main Street opinions on topics of interest to investors. Each installment highlights the views of Americans who are far removed from the canyons of Wall Street -- and who often see things more clearly as a result.</em><br /><br />After reading nearly 400 publicly posted reader comments regarding the Bernard Madoff Ponzi scandal, I believe that I may have a good feel for the grass roots mood on the subject. In a nutshell, the average American internet crawler is thoroughly disgusted with our financial system and its regulatory agencies. They are fed up, strung out and unequivocally irate. As for Bernard Madoff himself, the overwhelming assertion is that he should be strung up immediately. That sentiment is not meant in a figurative sense either. People want Bernard Madoff publicly hanged, and they want it done with much fanfare in a place such as New York City's Central Park. Yes, this sounds rather coarse. Perhaps it's even uncivilized, but as the internet is my witness, this is what people are saying.<br /><br />Very few of the comments I have read indicate a feeling that Madoff's investors simply got what they deserved. I did, however, read many statements regarding the fact that high level greed obviously forced many large eggs into one very questionable basket. I myself have not much pity for those investors who lost "everything" to Madoff's twisted dealings. It is my opinion that if investors don't have the sense to diversify, and thereby somewhat protect themselves, they are not very deserving of much wealth. Even my own paltry savings reside in no less than five separate accounts, however paltry.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/way-off-wall-street-the-public-responds-to-the-madoff-scandal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Way Off Wall Street: The public responds to the Madoff scandal</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/way-off-wall-street-the-public-responds-to-the-madoff-scandal/">Way Off Wall Street: The public responds to the Madoff scandal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/madoff-reveals-assets-to-regulators/290508#Comments>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/way-off-wall-street-the-public-responds-to-the-madoff-scandal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1416548/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/way-off-wall-street-the-public-responds-to-the-madoff-scandal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>assets</category><category>Bernard Madoff</category><category>BernardMadoff</category><category>crime</category><category>madoff</category><category>mutual fund</category><category>MutualFund</category><category>Ponzi</category><category>punishment</category><category>SEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary E. Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[American Small Business League cries foul on Obama team]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/american-small-business-league-cries-foul-on-obama-team/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/american-small-business-league-cries-foul-on-obama-team/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/american-small-business-league-cries-foul-on-obama-team/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small business</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/barack-obama.jpg" alt="" />A press release that was sent out by the American Small Business League (ASBL) in late December 2007 is pitting American small businesses against the interests of large and wealthy venture capitalists. The press release states that indicated potential policy changes and Obama administrative appointments are sending a clear message that when it comes to government monies, small businesses should brace themselves for being left out in the cold.<br /><br />The PR Newswire press release, which I encountered <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=LVBPVEN.story&amp;STORY=/www/story/12-23-2008/0004946277&amp;EDATE=TUE+Dec+23+2008,+08:00+AM">at the Las Vegas Business Press website</a>, claims that potential Obama policy seeks to rewrite the federal definition of a small business. Currently, that definition describes small businesses as being independently owned. The release indicates a belief that by changing that technical definition, the doors shall then be thrown open for a small group of wealthy venture capital firms to compete head to head against small businesses in bidding on billions of dollars worth of contracts which have traditionally been reserved specifically for small businesses. Additionally, the ASBL release hints at some favorable reductions in capital gains taxation for these venture capital firms.<br /><br />The ASBL press release states, in part: "The Obama Administration's new pro-venture capital policy could virtually repeal the Small Business Act for legitimate American small businesses... Under the proposed Obama Administration policy, "independently owned" will be changed to include firms that are not independently owned, but are actually controlled by wealthy investors and possibly some of the nation's largest venture capital firms."<br /><br />It remains to be seen whether or not ASBL advocates are indeed correctly interpreting these potentially devastating changes. However, one thing appears to be quite clear already; with President-elect Obama's appointment of wealthy venture capitalist Karen Mills to the lead position of the Small Business Administration, it would appear that Mr. Obama intends to put small businesses well under the thumb of big business. This revelation certainly shall not make many of our next president's middle class supporters very happy.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/american-small-business-league-cries-foul-on-obama-team/">American Small Business League cries foul on Obama team</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=LVBPVEN.story&amp;STORY=/www/story/12-23-2008/0004946277&amp;EDATE=TUE+Dec+23+2008,+08:00+AM>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/american-small-business-league-cries-foul-on-obama-team/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1418277/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/american-small-business-league-cries-foul-on-obama-team/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>American Small Business League</category><category>AmericanSmallBusinessLeague</category><category>capital gains tax</category><category>CapitalGainsTax</category><category>government contracts</category><category>GovernmentContracts</category><category>Karen Mills</category><category>KarenMills</category><category>Obama</category><category>Small Business Administration</category><category>SmallBusinessAdministration</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary E. Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hawaii breaks out Obama-era stimulus projects]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/27/hawaii-breaks-out-obama-era-stimulus-projects/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/27/hawaii-breaks-out-obama-era-stimulus-projects/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/27/hawaii-breaks-out-obama-era-stimulus-projects/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/housing.jpg" alt="" />In the month of December alone, the state of Hawaii has raised $226 million through the sale of tax-free bonds to investors. These bond sales are to help underwrite over $1.8 billion in statewide infrastructure development projects. Slated improvement projects for the island state include port development, widening of a major highway, various housing projects and even termite treatments for local schools.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.hawaiitribune-herald.com/articles/2008/12/16/local_news/local02.txt">The Hawaii Tribune-Herald reported:</a> "<span>Hawaii County Mayor Billy Kenoi said he's "very grateful" hundreds of millions of dollars will flow into Hawaii Island's economy "so we can keep our workers working."<br /><br />Hawaii Governor, Linda Lingle indicates her intent to keep her state's economy healthy by keeping its construction industry busy. Working with a consortium of contractors, developers, labor interests and government agencies, Hawaii has no less than <a href="http://hawaii.gov/cip">1,500 capital improvement projects</a> now in various stages of progress. In all, Hawaii is committed to initiating $1,865,522,037 worth of new development and improvement projects. Bidding for much of the project volume stretches through 2009, and into the first quarter of 2010.<br /><br />These are the type of capital investments that President-elect Barack Obama has been telling us about. The possible difference here is that Hawaii is using an investment strategy, rather than a taxation strategy, to generate the needed capital. Kudos to Hawaii Governor Linda Lingle, for overseeing the infusion of large amounts of new capital into her state, without placing the entire burden upon the taxpayers there.<br /><br /><br /></span><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/27/hawaii-breaks-out-obama-era-stimulus-projects/">Hawaii breaks out Obama-era stimulus projects</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.hawaiitribune-herald.com/articles/2008/12/16/local_news/local02.txt>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/27/hawaii-breaks-out-obama-era-stimulus-projects/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1411284/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/27/hawaii-breaks-out-obama-era-stimulus-projects/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bond sale</category><category>BondSale</category><category>Hawaii</category><category>infrastructure development</category><category>InfrastructureDevelopment</category><category>Linda Lingle</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary E. Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money losers of 2008: Jessica Simpson, the minx with the jinx]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/money-losers-of-2008-jessica-simpson-the-minx-with-the-jinx/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/money-losers-of-2008-jessica-simpson-the-minx-with-the-jinx/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/money-losers-of-2008-jessica-simpson-the-minx-with-the-jinx/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/comic-relief/" rel="tag">Comic Relief</a></p><p><em><img  alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/money-losers-12-jessica-simpson-200cm121808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our feature on <strong><a href="http://www.walletpop.com/specials/money-losers">Money Losers of 2008</a></strong>. See all 20.</em></p>
<p>It's hard to dispute the fact that 2008 has been a lousy year for singer/actress, Jessica Simpson. She entered the year with her new beau, Tony Romo of the Dallas Cowboys, and was immediately blamed for his troubling performance on the field. The release of her feature movie, <em>Blonde Ambition,</em> went straight to DVD without even blinking. Her debut into the country music realm has all but fallen flat. The kindest professional critique of her maiden country album, <em>Do You Know, </em>referred to that effort as "solid yet simple." The reviews go steeply downward from there.</p>
<p>In defense of the minx with the jinx, I think Jessica Simpson has been mistreated a bit. I mean, blaming her for the <a href="http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2008/09/12/jessica-simpson-tells-letterman-she-doesnt-jinx-tony-romo-he-d/">flat performance of Romo's Cowboys</a> just isn't fair. But then again, we Packer fans know that those Cowboys are just loaded with handy excuses. It's just a powerful shame that they had to make Jessica Simpson one. Perhaps it's due to the shock of no longer finding Brett Favre at Lambeau Field.</p>
<p>As far as Jessica Simpson's acting career, I thought we had settled that issue with <em>The Dukes of Hazard.</em> As a matter of fact, I thought we settled it with her Pizza Hut commercial. You know, that's the commercial where they made her come out and say "Hi, Yaw" as if it was something she would normally say. Worst of all, they used the cut where her telltale neck tick makes her whole head jerk to the side. I suppose I need to reissue my "Jessica is not an actress" memo to Hollywood.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/money-losers-of-2008-jessica-simpson-the-minx-with-the-jinx/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money losers of 2008: Jessica Simpson, the minx with the jinx</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/money-losers-of-2008-jessica-simpson-the-minx-with-the-jinx/">Money losers of 2008: Jessica Simpson, the minx with the jinx</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 25 Dec 2008 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/money-losers-of-2008-jessica-simpson-the-minx-with-the-jinx/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1404636/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/money-losers-of-2008-jessica-simpson-the-minx-with-the-jinx/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Blonde Ambition</category><category>country debut</category><category>Dallas Cowboys</category><category>featured</category><category>Jessica Simpson</category><category>Money Losers 2008</category><category>Tony Romo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary E. Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Way Off Wall Street: Can labor unions help stabilize the economy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/way-off-wall-street-can-labor-unions-help-stabilize-the-economy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/way-off-wall-street-can-labor-unions-help-stabilize-the-economy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/way-off-wall-street-can-labor-unions-help-stabilize-the-economy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/blogginggary.jpg" alt="Gary E. Sattler" />Welcome to Way Off Wall Street, a column dedicated to providing Main Street opinions on topics of interest to investors. Each installment highlights the views of Americans who are far removed from the canyons of Wall Street -- and who often see things more clearly as a result.</em><br /><br />Now that the dust has settled, it's nice to see that the factory sit-in at Republic Doors and Windows in Chicago was successfully resolved. The fact that the tumultuous event was dealt with in such a solid and peaceful manner speaks well of modern organized labor. It cannot be denied that the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America union, played a large part in bringing an acceptable resolution to the matter. This raises an important question: can and should America's labor unions find ways to be more deeply engaged in the current attempts to fix what is wrong with our nation's economy? It seems to me, in this time of great economic turmoil, that America's labor unions have stayed conspicuously on the sidelines.<br /><br />The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that in 2007 the number of Americans belonging to labor unions totaled approximately 15.7 million. I expect that for 2008 that total has declined a bit, but not much. This means labor unions watch over about 12% of our nation's hourly and salaried workers. Those aren't numbers to be taken lightly. The question is, how much of that union clout exists simply to compel corporate America to conform to it's whims, and how much of it is dedicated to particularly benefiting the overall good of the labor force without deference to what form that good might take? Labor unions exist, in essence, to protect laborers from oppression and exploitation. What is a union's part when that oppression is brought on by the larger global economy, and that exploitation is perpetrated by governments, rather than by a particular employer?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/way-off-wall-street-can-labor-unions-help-stabilize-the-economy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Way Off Wall Street: Can labor unions help stabilize the economy?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/way-off-wall-street-can-labor-unions-help-stabilize-the-economy/">Way Off Wall Street: Can labor unions help stabilize the economy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.gallup.com/poll/12751/Labor-Unions.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/way-off-wall-street-can-labor-unions-help-stabilize-the-economy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1399089/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/way-off-wall-street-can-labor-unions-help-stabilize-the-economy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>EconomicRecovery</category><category>labor unions</category><category>LaborUnions</category><category>National Labor Relations Board</category><category>NationalLaborRelationsBoard</category><category>UAW</category><category>United Auto Workers</category><category>UnitedAutoWorkers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary E. Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money winners of 2008: Miley Cyrus, pop star phenomenon]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/money-winners-of-2008-miley-cyrus-pop-star-phenomenon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/money-winners-of-2008-miley-cyrus-pop-star-phenomenon/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/money-winners-of-2008-miley-cyrus-pop-star-phenomenon/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/blog-money-winners-miley-cyrus-200x267.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our feature on <strong><a href="http://www.walletpop.com/specials/money-winners">Money Winners of 2008</a></strong>. See all 20.</em></p>
<p>As far as pop star phenomenons go, Miley Cyrus, aka Destiny Hope Cyrus, certainly is one. At just 16 years of age, the bright personality of this moderately talented female offspring of Billy Ray Cyrus has been effectively parlayed into a several-million-dollar property by none other than media giant <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>). She is being exploited in classic Hollywood style, right down to her "morning after" bed sheet clad, <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2008/06/miley200806?currentPage=2"><em>Vanity Fair</em> photo shoot.</a> Smile pretty baby, and say <em>cha ching!</em></p>
<p>The question is, how much is Miley Cyrus really worth? With earnings of $25 million from June 2007 to June 2008, Cyrus is listed as <a href="http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/53/celebrities08_Miley-Cyrus_EB0C.html">#35 on the Forbes Celebrity 100</a>. Somehow though, that figure seems just a bit misleading. With concert appearances that have tickets selling out in minutes, a hit television show, multiple albums, movie deals, guest appearances, and a host of other deals pending, it's virtually impossible to place a true monetary value on the girl. It is speculated that the Hannah Montana franchise, which features Miley Cyrus, will net Disney in excess of $1 billion. <a href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/bal-to.worth08jan08,0,5859326.story"><em>The Baltimore Sun</em></a> recently reported that Miley Cyrus is currently out-earning names as big as Sandra Bullock and Jennifer Aniston. Her concerts are reported to be out-drawing Bruce Springsteen. Who's the boss now, baby.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/money-winners-of-2008-miley-cyrus-pop-star-phenomenon/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money winners of 2008: Miley Cyrus, pop star phenomenon</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/money-winners-of-2008-miley-cyrus-pop-star-phenomenon/">Money winners of 2008: Miley Cyrus, pop star phenomenon</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/money-winners-of-2008-miley-cyrus-pop-star-phenomenon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1393671/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/money-winners-of-2008-miley-cyrus-pop-star-phenomenon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Billy Ray Cyrus</category><category>Destiny Hope Cyrus</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>Hannah Montana</category><category>Miley Cyrus</category><category>Money Winners 2008</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary E. Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: As-seen-on-TV product]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-as-seen-on-tv-product/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-as-seen-on-tv-product/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-as-seen-on-tv-product/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and advertising</a></p><p><em>This post is part of AOL Money &amp; Finance's <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2008">Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008</a></strong> feature.</em></p>
<p>Does it say something about American society when we consider the broad acceptance of the infomercial? At the very least, it says quick-hit, impulse item merchandising is alive and doing well. It also tells us that potential snake oil salesmen will always find their marks. What was once a marketing style reserved for county fairs and roadside stands is now considered to be mainstream business as usual.</p>
<p>Which of the following infomercial offerings made you sit up and take notice this past year? Did <a href="http://www.pedegg.com/">PedEggs</a> get you up on your feet? Did you give in to a <a href="https://www.shamwow.com/index.asp">ShamWow</a> craving and find yourself all wet, or did you buy some <a href="https://www.buyaquaglobes.com/">Aqua Globes</a> and find yourself a bit dried out? Did <a href="https://www.greenbags.com/">Green Bags</a> make you green behind the gills, wishing you had kept your greenbacks to your self? In the video marketing temple of Billy Mays On High, we must be careful whence our consumerist tithes may flow.</p>
<p>There are a few things about these product offerings that I want to know. Such as, why does that ShamWow barker have a head set on anyway? Who are we supposed to believe that he's talking to? Why would I need a PedEgg to accomplish what a little sandpaper can do? Wouldn't letting the ethylene gas from a banana escape into the atmosphere preserve the fruit just as long as sucking that gas into the interior of a Green Bag? How does an Aqua Globe measure the percentage of water in the soil that surrounds it?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-as-seen-on-tv-product/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: As-seen-on-TV product</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-as-seen-on-tv-product/">Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: As-seen-on-TV product</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 07 Dec 2008 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-as-seen-on-tv-product/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1385235/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-as-seen-on-tv-product/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Aqua Globe</category><category>Best and Worst 2008</category><category>ethylene gas</category><category>Green Bags</category><category>infomercial</category><category>Ped Egg</category><category>Pedegg</category><category>Sham Wow</category><category>Shamwow</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary E. Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Most in need of a makeover]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a></p><p><em><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/best-worst-200x267-need-of-a-makeover.jpg" alt="" />This post is part of AOL Money &amp; Finance's <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2008">Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008</a></strong> feature.</em></p>
<p>As we undertake a hasty exit from the tumult of 2008 and plunge headlong into the mysteries of 2009, we might find it interesting to consider some business entities that could benefit from a little "freshening up." Four familiar names; Kmart, Playboy, Starbucks, and Wall Street, are each in need of a timely makeover, to varying degrees. But if you could chose just one of these big name operations to fix up for 2009, which one would it be, and how would you fix it?</p>
<p><iframe height="200" frameborder="0" align="right" width="205" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1512&amp;view=157423&amp;pollId=157703&amp;channel=aol_us_personalfinance"></iframe>First let's consider Kmart, the adopted son of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">Sears Holdings Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">SHLD</a>). What are the changes that Kmart might need to remain competitive going into 2009? Should the company try playing the boutique angle, which failed to work for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart Stores Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>)? Should the company tighten up and consolidate, while pursuing a deeper product value play, or should it attempt to spread out its market coverage and work over its wholesale vendors, while engaging Wal-Mart in a game of cut-throat retail price points? If you were CEO of Kmart, what would you change?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Most in need of a makeover</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/">Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Most in need of a makeover</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1385236/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Best and Worst 2008</category><category>featured</category><category>Kmart</category><category>makeover</category><category>merchandising</category><category>playboy</category><category>playboy magazine</category><category>playboy tv</category><category>retail</category><category>Sears Holdings</category><category>Spice Channel</category><category>Starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary E. Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Big sucking sound as WaMu white collars get the axe in Seattle]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/03/big-sucking-sound-as-wamu-white-collars-get-the-axe-in-seattle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/03/big-sucking-sound-as-wamu-white-collars-get-the-axe-in-seattle/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/03/big-sucking-sound-as-wamu-white-collars-get-the-axe-in-seattle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a></p>All is not well in Seattle for executives at Washington Mutual. The Seattle Times has reported that some 3,400 WaMu employees, mostly from the company's headquarters, are to be let go by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>). The good news for workers is, it appears that employees at WaMu's branch operations will, for the most part, be spared the ax. <br /><br />These types of staff dismissals should come as no surprise in an era when companies are quickly consolidating just to survive. I suppose that it's fairly standard practice for an acquiring company to thin out the executive herd of any distressed company which it has recently purchased. In regard to this particular instance, The Seattle Times quotes JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon as stating: "We are going to build a great company for the long run. Unfortunately, that entails tough decisions in the short run." Tough decisions always tend to ooze downward.<br /><br />To the credit of JP Morgan &amp; Chase, the executives who are to receive their walking papers at WaMu, will apparently be sent off with moderate severance packages. However, this does little to lessen the pain of good jobs lost. Additionally, <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2008457902_wamu02.html">The Seattle Times article</a> opens a discussion about the ramifications of this deep payroll cut and operations consolidation upon the local commercial lease space market in a city with an impending surplus of commercial office space. <br /><br />Preliminary indications are that JPMorgan's consolidation of WaMu in to the 42-story WaMu Center will put approximately 500,000 square feet of commercial lease space back into the hands of Seattle landlords. At least one commercial real estate broker in Seattle indicated that WaMu's withdrawal from commercial space there could lead to slight downward pressure on rents. However, citing a rental office inventory of approximately 37 million square feet, Oscar Oliveira, a senior vice president with brokerage Colliers International, is quoted by The Seattle Times as stating: "It adds a couple percentage points to the vacancy rate... The bank's moves alone won't push lease rates down..."<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/03/big-sucking-sound-as-wamu-white-collars-get-the-axe-in-seattle/">Big sucking sound as WaMu white collars get the axe in Seattle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2008457902_wamu02.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/03/big-sucking-sound-as-wamu-white-collars-get-the-axe-in-seattle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1389557/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/03/big-sucking-sound-as-wamu-white-collars-get-the-axe-in-seattle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>jpmorgan chase</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><category>Seattle</category><category>Seattle Times</category><category>SeattleTimes</category><category>WaMu</category><category>Washington Mutual</category><category>WashingtonMutual</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary E. Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Way Off Wall Street: Retirement dreams fade for younger workers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/way-off-wall-street/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/way-off-wall-street/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/way-off-wall-street/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><em><img alt="Gary E. Sattler" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/blogginggary.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Welcome to Way Off Wall Street, a column dedicated to providing Main Street opinions on topics of interest to investors. Each installment highlights the views of Americans who are far removed from the canyons of Wall Street -- and who often see things more clearly as a result.</em></p>
<p>This is the second part of a two part report in which I have examined current retirement attitudes. In <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/15/way-off-wall-street-those-near-retirement-are-growing-increasin/">Part One</a>, I revealed some of the current thoughts and concerns that were expressed to me by people who are already retired, and by people who expect to retire within the next five years. In Part Two, I present the thoughts and attitudes of people who expect to retire more than ten years from now, and people who believe that the concept of a traditional, full retirement cannot be applied to their lives.</p>
<p>When examining the attitudes of people who will reach the retirement stage of life more than a decade from now, I found it difficult to form a well-rounded picture. I had expected that I would encounter numerous strategies and "secret formulas" for retirement success. However, what I actually encountered was a vast swamp of bewilderment, misinformation, and noncommittal apathy. I'm still rather stunned by it. These are people generally ranging in age from 45 to 60. I find it quite distressing that most of these people don't have a solid grasp on their own retirement planning. An article presented by <a href="http://redwoodage.com/content/view/154313/45">redwoodage.com</a> quotes Peter Smyth, executive vice president of The Hartford's International Markets, as stating: "The overall level of financial preparedness globally remains low and is deteriorating."</p>
<p>Most of these distant retirees seem totally blind to their own retirement financing. They complain that it's going to be difficult and expensive, but then they defer the responsibilities of their future financial security to employer-provided savings plans and government entitlement programs, including Social Security. Rare was the person I found who was involved in creating their own independent retirement nest egg. Additionally, I never expected to encounter such a stark contrast between this group and the people who are only about ten years older than they are.</p>
<p>Of this distant retirement group, those people who are actually taking an active hand in planning for their own financial futures seemed to favor two particular strategies. The first strategy encompasses those people who have engaged a professional financial planner for guidance in retirement planning and those who are utilizing their own skills and knowledge to actively develop a retirement portfolio on their own. The second active planning strategy is generally defined by a slow, and sometimes questionable, accumulation of tangible assets.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/way-off-wall-street/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Way Off Wall Street: Retirement dreams fade for younger workers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/way-off-wall-street/">Way Off Wall Street: Retirement dreams fade for younger workers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://redwoodage.com/content/view/154313/45>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/way-off-wall-street/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1380883/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/way-off-wall-street/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>collections</category><category>investing</category><category>retirement</category><category>retirement planning</category><category>retirement savings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary E. Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Service employees union boss takes it on the chin]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/27/service-employees-union-boss-takes-it-on-the-chin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/27/service-employees-union-boss-takes-it-on-the-chin/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/27/service-employees-union-boss-takes-it-on-the-chin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline news</a></p>An internal probe and preliminary criminal investigation, regarding alleged misappropriation of funds, has resulted in a <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-union27-2008nov27,0,3955075.story">lifetime ban against Tyrone Freeman</a>, now the former head of United Long-Term Care Workers Union. Freeman, who had ostensibly served the interests of approximately 190,000 union members, who each earn an average wage of about $9 per hour, has also been ordered to repay more than $1 million of allegedly misdirected funds.<br /><br />Some of the indicated misappropriations involved Freeman's directing of questionable payments to the businesses of both his spouse and her mother, among others. Additionally, some of the transactions which are being investigated involve payments which Freeman had allegedly directed to himself.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-union27-2008nov27,0,3955075.story" style="font-style: italic;">The Los Angeles Times</a>, which originally broke this story in August, outlines the results of an internal probe which has been conducted by Service Employees International Union (SEIU). <span style="font-style: italic;">LA Times</span> reports: "The SEIU's inquiry included hearings conducted by former California Supreme Court Justice Joseph Grodin. His report to (SEIU President, Andy Stern) stated that Freeman had engaged in a pattern of financial malpractice and self-dealing."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/27/service-employees-union-boss-takes-it-on-the-chin/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Service employees union boss takes it on the chin</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/27/service-employees-union-boss-takes-it-on-the-chin/">Service employees union boss takes it on the chin</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-union27-2008nov27,0,3955075.story>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/27/service-employees-union-boss-takes-it-on-the-chin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1384583/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/27/service-employees-union-boss-takes-it-on-the-chin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Andy Stern</category><category>AndyStern</category><category>inquiry</category><category>investigation</category><category>LA Times</category><category>LaTimes</category><category>Los Angeles Times</category><category>LosAngelesTimes</category><category>SEIU</category><category>Service Employees International Union</category><category>ServiceEmployeesInternationalUnion</category><category>Tyrone Freeman</category><category>TyroneFreeman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary E. Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Manufacturing bright spot: Pierce Manufacturing Inc.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/manufacturing-bright-spot-pierce-manufacturing-inc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/manufacturing-bright-spot-pierce-manufacturing-inc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/manufacturing-bright-spot-pierce-manufacturing-inc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.piercemfg.com/News.Releases.html?PressReleaseId=346be338-efbb-4ab9-9cee-4cbea247e0e1"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Pierce Quantum" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/fire-truck-pierce-quantum.jpg" /></a>Pierce Manufacturing is a member of the family of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oshkosh-corporation/osk/nys">Oshkosh Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oshkosh-corporation/osk/nys">OSK</a>), formerly the Oshkosh Truck Corporation. For the second month in a row, Pierce Manufacturing has announced another major equipment building contract. <br /><br />In October, Pierce Mfg. announced that it had been awarded a $10.7 million contract to provide 68 fire rescue vehicles for the United States Army. This time around, the new contract is not quite as large, but it comes from a first time customer, the city of Phoenix, Arizona. The company issued a <a href="http://www.piercemfg.com/News.Releases.html?PressReleaseId=346be338-efbb-4ab9-9cee-4cbea247e0e1">news release</a> about this new contract for nine new fire rescue vehicles yesterday.<br /><br />Representatives for the Phoenix Fire department put the Pierce Quantum pumpers through rigorous testing. The Quantum designation, which refers to the vehicle's chassis design, was met with full approval. The unit proved itself particularly well in regard to the aspects of ride and vehicle control. John Simmons, acting division chief for fleet management of the Phoenix Fire Department, indicated that those features were an important focus for his committee, and that they were duly impressed. <br /><br />The nine units to be delivered will be customized to serve the Phoenix department's particular needs. The Phoenix Fire Department operates 53 fire stations and protects 1.47 million citizens in our nation's fifth largest city.<br /><br /><em>Disclosure: My brother is an electronic component installer, employed by Pierce Manufacturing. </em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/manufacturing-bright-spot-pierce-manufacturing-inc/">Manufacturing bright spot: Pierce Manufacturing Inc.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.piercemfg.com/News.Releases.html?PressReleaseId=346be338-efbb-4ab9-9cee-4cbea247e0e1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/manufacturing-bright-spot-pierce-manufacturing-inc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1383520/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/manufacturing-bright-spot-pierce-manufacturing-inc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Oshkosh</category><category>Oshkosh Corporation</category><category>Oshkosh Truck</category><category>OshkoshCorporation</category><category>OshkoshTruck</category><category>Phoenix</category><category>Pierce</category><category>Pierce Manufacturing</category><category>PierceManufacturing</category><category>pumper</category><category>Quantum</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary E. Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Finally, they'll come for NASCAR]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/23/finally-theyll-come-for-nascar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/23/finally-theyll-come-for-nascar/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/23/finally-theyll-come-for-nascar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of sports</a></p><p><a href="http://www.nascar.com/2008/news/opinion/11/14/splash.go.rswan.ford.hybrid/index.html" target="_blank"><img alt="NASCAR pace car" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/pace.car.193.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></a>Many of today's "investors" place their bets on the stock market's wheel of fortune. They hope that their number will come up. I have news for those stock players: the majority of their ranks are no longer true investors. They are gamblers, plain and simple.</p>
<p>Would those gamblers like a hot tip? Here's one in keeping with today's economic defeatist attitude. I suggest that they immediately dump shares they hold in anything that's associated with motor racing. The reasoning for my saying this is simple: NASCAR has a measurable carbon footprint.</p>
<p>Please understand that I'm playing the devil's advocate here. I myself have nothing against motor sports.</p>
<p>NASCAR has already made one move towards a green future by introducing <a href="http://www.nascar.com/2008/news/opinion/11/14/splash.go.rswan.ford.hybrid/index.html">a new hybrid pace car</a>. However, that's not going to cut it for the peak oil crowd. Additionally, this week the government announced its disdain for corporate America, with the curt dismissal of Detroit executives by a Pelosi-led crowd. We must also consider that advertising money is drying up, and with that, may go some sponsorships. NASCAR is in dangerous waters, and I believe that the sharks are circling.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/23/finally-theyll-come-for-nascar/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Finally, they'll come for NASCAR</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/23/finally-theyll-come-for-nascar/">Finally, they'll come for NASCAR</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/23/finally-theyll-come-for-nascar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1380319/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/23/finally-theyll-come-for-nascar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>carbon footprint</category><category>Ford</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>hybrid</category><category>NASCAR</category><category>sponsor</category><category>sponsorship</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary E. Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>