<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Starbucks CEO gives himself $1.3 million: So that's why coffee costs so much]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/starbucks-ceo-gives-himself-1-3-million-so-thats-why-coffee-c/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/starbucks-ceo-gives-himself-1-3-million-so-thats-why-coffee-c/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/starbucks-ceo-gives-himself-1-3-million-so-thats-why-coffee-c/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/06/starbucks-200a0929.jpg" alt="" />I have had my problem with Starbucks (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>) CEO Howard "Schultzie" Schultz in the past, but his latest little stunt has really ticked me off. </p>
<p>First things first, I will enjoy the occasional cup of Starbucks coffee, but the price has put a venti mocha-frappa-latte-chino out of my budget so I have started making my own at home. The company's product is good, but its competitors -- namely McDonald's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">MCD</a>) and Dunkin' Donuts -- offer a comparable product at a fraction of the price. I have long thought that Starbucks' saturation business model has been its biggest fault, with Schultzie's leadership running a close second.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/starbucks-ceo-gives-himself-1-3-million-so-thats-why-coffee-c/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Starbucks CEO gives himself $1.3 million: So that's why coffee costs so much</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/starbucks-ceo-gives-himself-1-3-million-so-thats-why-coffee-c/">Starbucks CEO gives himself $1.3 million: So that's why coffee costs so much</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/starbucks-ceo-gives-himself-1-3-million-so-thats-why-coffee-c/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19247636/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/starbucks-ceo-gives-himself-1-3-million-so-thats-why-coffee-c/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>caffeine</category><category>coffee</category><category>executive pay</category><category>executives</category><category>featured</category><category>Howard Schultz</category><category>inthenews</category><category>SBUX</category><category>Starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs shareholders want less bonuses, more of the profit]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/goldman-sachs-shareholders-want-less-bonuses-more-of-the-profit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/goldman-sachs-shareholders-want-less-bonuses-more-of-the-profit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/goldman-sachs-shareholders-want-less-bonuses-more-of-the-profit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/200px-goldman_sachs_logo.jpg" />According to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, some of Goldman Sachs's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) largest shareholders are petitioning the company to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704533904574545981008841004.html?mod=rss_Deals_and_Deal_Makers">lower the size of its bonus pool</a>. These shareholders feel that GS should be passing along more of its earnings to investors. According to "people familiar with the situation," these investors hold "tens of millions" of GS shares and are complaining in private conversations at GS's annual analyst meetings.<br /><br />With GS raking in record net income and compensation, the shareholders believe that the benefits should be shared among them rather than in compensation and benefit for the employees. The shareholders are also concerned about a minute change in the firm's financial statements regarding how the company counts the number of employees.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/goldman-sachs-shareholders-want-less-bonuses-more-of-the-profit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Sachs shareholders want less bonuses, more of the profit</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/goldman-sachs-shareholders-want-less-bonuses-more-of-the-profit/">Goldman Sachs shareholders want less bonuses, more of the profit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/goldman-sachs-shareholders-want-less-bonuses-more-of-the-profit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19247685/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/goldman-sachs-shareholders-want-less-bonuses-more-of-the-profit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonus</category><category>featured</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GS</category><category>pay</category><category>payout</category><category>shareholders</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JockStocks: Tailgating policies won't affect 'real' fans]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/jockstocks-tailgating-policies-wont-affect-real-fans/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/jockstocks-tailgating-policies-wont-affect-real-fans/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/jockstocks-tailgating-policies-wont-affect-real-fans/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of sports</a></p><p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="183" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/budweiser_drrt_240.jpg" alt="" />You know, it figures that this would be the year that I give up my Bengals season tickets. I suffered   <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/football/NFL_tailgating_policies_won_t_affect_real_fans'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>  through three years of horrid football and decided that I was not going to renew my tickets for financial reasons or as a protest against the team's (mis)management in the past 19 years.</p>
<p>That said, one reason that did not attribute to my giving up the tickets was the NFL's new tailgating rules. In an article Darren Rovell put on Twitter this morning (featured in <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/2009-11-18-1a-cover-nfl-fans_N.htm"><em>USAToday</em></a>), a New York Jets fan says that the tailgating rules (that limit tailgating to 3.5 hours before kickoff) may be the "final nail" that forces him to give up his season tickets. The new tailgating rules are supposed to help "crack down on drunken and disruptive fans" by limiting the time fans can tailgate. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/jockstocks-tailgating-policies-wont-affect-real-fans/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JockStocks: Tailgating policies won't affect 'real' fans</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/jockstocks-tailgating-policies-wont-affect-real-fans/">JockStocks: Tailgating policies won't affect 'real' fans</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/jockstocks-tailgating-policies-wont-affect-real-fans/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19246056/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/jockstocks-tailgating-policies-wont-affect-real-fans/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>beer</category><category>Budweiser</category><category>ESPN</category><category>Miller Lite</category><category>New York Jets</category><category>NFL</category><category>Philadelphia Eagles</category><category>tailgate parties</category><category>tailgate party</category><category>tailgating</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NetApp reports healthy quarterly earnings on strong equipment sales]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/netapp-reports-healthy-quarterly-earnings-on-strong-equipment-sa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/netapp-reports-healthy-quarterly-earnings-on-strong-equipment-sa/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/netapp-reports-healthy-quarterly-earnings-on-strong-equipment-sa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/ntap-netapp-logo.jpg" />On Wednesday afternoon, NetApp (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netapp-inc/ntap/nas">NTAP</a>) announced that its second-quarter profit came in more than twice that from the same period a year ago. The company raked in <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/netapp-earnings-surge-on-strong-equipment-sales-2009-11-18">27 cents per share</a> during the quarter, compared to 13 cents per share a year ago. Excluding items, the tech firm would have pulled in 37 cents per share. Expectations called for earnings of 30 cents per share on revenue of $881.6 million. Actual revenue came in at $910 million, handily topping the consensus estimate.<br /><br />NTAP's CFO, Steve Gomo, attributed the far better-than-expected earnings to improved sales of the company's main storage-area-networking. This product helps businesses build their data storage operations.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/netapp-reports-healthy-quarterly-earnings-on-strong-equipment-sa/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NetApp reports healthy quarterly earnings on strong equipment sales</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/netapp-reports-healthy-quarterly-earnings-on-strong-equipment-sa/">NetApp reports healthy quarterly earnings on strong equipment sales</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/netapp-reports-healthy-quarterly-earnings-on-strong-equipment-sa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19245991/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/netapp-reports-healthy-quarterly-earnings-on-strong-equipment-sa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>data</category><category>data management</category><category>data storage</category><category>DataManagement</category><category>DataStorage</category><category>earnings</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NetApp</category><category>NTAP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[President Obama cautions against double-dip recession]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/obama_speaking.jpg" />Although some members of his administration don't hold Fox News in too high of regard, President Barack Obama did sit down with the news outlet to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN188108620091118">discuss the economy</a>. In the interview, President Obama offered what some are calling his "sternest warning" about containing deficits. President Obama believes that a further compilation of government debt could lead to a double-dip recession. </p>
<p>The president believes that his administration faces a "delicate balance of trying to boost the economy and spur job creation," but the administration has to set the economy on "a path toward long-term deficit reduction." He noted that it is important "to recognize ... that at some point, people could lose confidence in the U.S. economy in a way that could actually lead to a double-dip recession."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>President Obama cautions against double-dip recession</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/">President Obama cautions against double-dip recession</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19244302/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>double-dip recession</category><category>employees</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>President Obama</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boeing receives yet another big plane order]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/boeing-receives-yet-another-big-plane-order/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/boeing-receives-yet-another-big-plane-order/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/boeing-receives-yet-another-big-plane-order/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a></p><img hspace="4" height="146" align="right" width="200" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/james-mcnerney-boeing.jpg" alt="" />Late Tuesday, aerospace firm Boeing (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">BA</a>) announced its <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/boeing-wins-900-million-deal-at-dubai-but-still-trails-airbus-2009-11-17?siteid=aolRss">first major deal at the Dubai Airshow</a>. While this is good news for BA, the bad news is that the majority of the $2 billion of deals available at the show went to rival Airbus. BA revealed nearly $900 million of deals with Algerian airlines, while Airbus announced $1.25 billion of confirmed orders.<br /><br />These orders bring the total dollar amount of orders at the Airshow to $5.67 billion for 42 aircraft. This total is a mere pittance compared to the $155.5 billion worth of deals scored in 2007. BA's Randy Tinseth noted, "it's a completely different market from two years ago," sentiment agreed upon by Airbus's CEO Tom Enders. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/boeing-receives-yet-another-big-plane-order/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Boeing receives yet another big plane order</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/boeing-receives-yet-another-big-plane-order/">Boeing receives yet another big plane order</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/boeing-receives-yet-another-big-plane-order/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19244276/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/boeing-receives-yet-another-big-plane-order/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airbus</category><category>airlines</category><category>ba</category><category>Boeing</category><category>boeing 757</category><category>Boeing757</category><category>Dubai Airshow</category><category>DubaiAirshow</category><category>eads</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Home Depot tops Q3 estimates, but bad news drags the stock lower]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/home-depot-tops-q3-estimates-but-bad-news-drags-the-stock-lower/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/home-depot-tops-q3-estimates-but-bad-news-drags-the-stock-lower/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/home-depot-tops-q3-estimates-but-bad-news-drags-the-stock-lower/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/08/home-depot-200,-rich-pedroncelli,-ap.jpg" alt="" />Also reporting earnings Tuesday morning was home-improvement retailer Home Depot (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">HD</a>). The company announced that <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/home-depot-3rd-qtr-earnings-fall-89/489053?v=aolrss">third-quarter earnings dropped 8.9%</a> to 41 cents per share thanks to weak housing and home renovation markets. That was a nickel better than analysts' expectations. </p>
<p>Revenue dropped from a year ago as well, but the $16.36 billion in revenue was better than the expected $16.27 billion. The company also expects full-year earnings of $1.55 per share, which is better than the forecast $1.52 per share.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/home-depot-tops-q3-estimates-but-bad-news-drags-the-stock-lower/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Home Depot tops Q3 estimates, but bad news drags the stock lower</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/home-depot-tops-q3-estimates-but-bad-news-drags-the-stock-lower/">Home Depot tops Q3 estimates, but bad news drags the stock lower</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/home-depot-tops-q3-estimates-but-bad-news-drags-the-stock-lower/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19242887/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/home-depot-tops-q3-estimates-but-bad-news-drags-the-stock-lower/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Home Depot</category><category>home improvement</category><category>home repair</category><category>inthenews</category><category>retail</category><category>retail earnings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Target tops Q3 expectations, introduces 'low-price promise']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/target-tops-q3-expectations-introduces-low-price-promise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/target-tops-q3-expectations-introduces-low-price-promise/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/target-tops-q3-expectations-introduces-low-price-promise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/target.jpg" />U.S. mega-retailer Target (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys">TGT</a>) stepped into the earnings spotlight Tuesday morning, and the company had a <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/target-posts-better-than-expected-18-net-rise-2009-11-17?siteid=aolRss">nice surprise for investors</a>. </p>
<p>The firm reported third-quarter earnings of 58 cents per share, topping both the consensus estimate (50 cents per share) and last year's results (49 cents per share). Quarterly sales totaled $14.8 billion, matching the consensus estimate. For those who do not remember, analysts upped their estimates for Target after the company announced that it would beat its estimate of 43 cents per share.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/target-tops-q3-expectations-introduces-low-price-promise/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Target tops Q3 expectations, introduces 'low-price promise'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/target-tops-q3-expectations-introduces-low-price-promise/">Target tops Q3 expectations, introduces 'low-price promise'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/target-tops-q3-expectations-introduces-low-price-promise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19242791/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/target-tops-q3-expectations-introduces-low-price-promise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>P-Fresh</category><category>retail</category><category>retail earnings</category><category>retail reports</category><category>Target</category><category>TGT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ReneSola turns in a third-quarter loss]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/renesola-turns-in-a-third-quarter-loss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/renesola-turns-in-a-third-quarter-loss/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/renesola-turns-in-a-third-quarter-loss/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/renesola-logo-200.jpg" alt="" />Perhaps a bit of the shine is wearing off of solar stocks. Solar panel company ReneSola (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/renesola-ltd/sol/nys">SOL</a>) turned in a <a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/renesola-swings-loss/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxbusiness%2Flatest+%28FOXBusiness.com+-+Latest+News%29">third-quarter loss of $10.2 million</a>, or seven cents per share, compared to earnings of 23 cents per share ($32.4 million) a year ago. Quarterly revenue fell to $141 million from $216 million a year ago. Expectations called for a loss of eight cents per share on revenue of $135.5 million.</p>
<p>The company stated, "We witnessed a strong rebound in customer demand for our quality products in the third quarter of 2009 and reached a corporate landmark as ReneSola achieved the highest quarterly shipments of solar products in its history." I'm not buying it. SOL saw earnings and revenue walk off a cliff when compared to a year ago ... so let's make sure that we talk about great customer demand. Of course, customer demand wasn't good enough to help you swing to a third-quarter profit.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/renesola-turns-in-a-third-quarter-loss/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>ReneSola turns in a third-quarter loss</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/renesola-turns-in-a-third-quarter-loss/">ReneSola turns in a third-quarter loss</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/renesola-turns-in-a-third-quarter-loss/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19240911/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/renesola-turns-in-a-third-quarter-loss/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>inthenews</category><category>ReneSola</category><category>SOL</category><category>solar energy</category><category>solar power</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lowe's third-quarter profit falls]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/lowes-third-quarter-profit-falls/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/lowes-third-quarter-profit-falls/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/lowes-third-quarter-profit-falls/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/low/" rel="tag">Lowe's Cos (LOW)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/05/lowes.jpg" />Lowe's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lowe-s-companies-inc/low/nys">LOW</a>) kicked off the week's earnings reports by posting <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Earnings/Lowes+%28LOW%29+Reports+In-Line+Q3/5109920.html">third-quarter earnings of 24 cents per share</a>, matching the consensus estimate. Revenue checked in at $11.4 billion, which -- while 3% lower than a year ago -- was better than the expected revenue of $11.28 billion. LOW's same-store sales dropped 7.5%.</p>
<p>Looking ahead, Lowe's forecast fourth-quarter earnings between nine and 13 cents per share and full-year earnings between $1.16 and $1.20 per share. Both of those forecast ranges surround the expected 10 cents per share and $1.20 per share, respectively. Lowe's also noted that it seems that some of the home markets feeling the biggest crunch in the economic crisis are stabilizing. Nevertheless, the home-improvement firm was negatively hit as customers were putting off larger purchases thanks to the economic situation.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/lowes-third-quarter-profit-falls/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lowe's third-quarter profit falls</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/lowes-third-quarter-profit-falls/">Lowe's third-quarter profit falls</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/lowes-third-quarter-profit-falls/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19240958/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/lowes-third-quarter-profit-falls/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>home improvement</category><category>inthenews</category><category>LOW</category><category>Lowes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Burger King franchisees sue over $1 burgers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/burger-king-franchisees-sue-over-1-burgers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/burger-king-franchisees-sue-over-1-burgers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/burger-king-franchisees-sue-over-1-burgers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bkc/" rel="tag">Burger King Hldgs (BKC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/bkc-logo-200.jpg" alt="" />Interesting little battle shaping up in the fast-food realm, and it isn't between restaurants -- it is within one. According to the Associated Press, Burger King (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/burger-king-holdings-inc/bkc/nys">BKC</a>) franchisees are <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_BURGER_KING_LAWSUIT_FLOL-?SITE=FLPET&amp;SECTION=HOME">suing the company</a> over its recent $1 double cheeseburger promotion.</p>
<p>The reason for the lawsuit is that the franchisees are losing money on the deal because the company is setting maximum menu prices, which Burger King is not allowed to do. The National Franchise Association (NFA), which represents more than 80% of Burger King's U.S. franchise owners, says that the promotion is forcing restaurant owners to sell the quarter-pound burger at a 10-cent loss. One Burger King franchisee said that the burger in question typically costs franchisees $1.10.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/burger-king-franchisees-sue-over-1-burgers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Burger King franchisees sue over $1 burgers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/burger-king-franchisees-sue-over-1-burgers/">Burger King franchisees sue over $1 burgers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/burger-king-franchisees-sue-over-1-burgers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19236202/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/burger-king-franchisees-sue-over-1-burgers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Burger King</category><category>cheeseburger</category><category>double cheeseburger</category><category>franchise</category><category>franchisees</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lawsuit</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Target's Black Friday prices are leaked]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/targets-black-friday-prices-are-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/targets-black-friday-prices-are-leaked/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/targets-black-friday-prices-are-leaked/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/black-friday/" rel="tag">Black Friday</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/nick-target-200cs080708.jpg" />Black Friday, as the day after Thanksgiving has come to be known, is the day when most retailers get themselves back into the black. It is also a bargain-hunter's delight. In the age of Internet, several websites emerged dedicated to helping shoppers decide in front of which store to pitch their tents. One of those sites, <a href="http://gottadeal.com/">GottADeal.com</a>, has reportedly landed Target's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys">TGT</a>) <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/11/11/news/companies/retail_holidayshopping_blackfriday_target/">Black Friday ad</a>. Target, it appears, is taking a rather aggressive approach to the upcoming Holiday shopping season.  <br /><br />According to the website, the retailer will offer a 32-inch Westinghouse LCD HDTV for $246, which GottADeal.com's founder Brad Olson calls the "lowest price that we've ever seen for that model." The ad also touts $3 toasters and coffeemakers, and 50% discount on kids' clothes and toys. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/targets-black-friday-prices-are-leaked/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Target's Black Friday prices are leaked</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/targets-black-friday-prices-are-leaked/">Target's Black Friday prices are leaked</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/targets-black-friday-prices-are-leaked/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19236144/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/targets-black-friday-prices-are-leaked/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Black Friday</category><category>Black Friday 2009</category><category>Black Friday deals</category><category>BlackFriday</category><category>BlackFriday2009</category><category>BlackFridayDeals</category><category>featured</category><category>HDTV</category><category>holiday shopping</category><category>HolidayShopping</category><category>LCD</category><category>shopping</category><category>Target</category><category>tgt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barrick Gold shuts hedge book over world gold supply]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/barrick-gold-shuts-hedge-book-over-world-gold-supply/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/barrick-gold-shuts-hedge-book-over-world-gold-supply/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/barrick-gold-shuts-hedge-book-over-world-gold-supply/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/abx/" rel="tag">Barrick Gold (ABX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/barrick_gold-logo.gif" alt="" />Late in the evening of November 11, <em>The Daily Telegraph</em> reported that Barrick Gold (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barrick-gold-corporation/abx/nys">ABX</a>) has shut its hedge book because the <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/industry/mining/6546579/Barrick-shuts-hedge-book-as-world-gold-supply-runs-out.html">world gold supply is running out</a>. Barrick Gold's president, Aaron Regent, told the periodical that global output has been shrinking at a pace for nearly 1 million ounces a year since the start of the decade.</p>
<p>At RBC's annual gold conference in London, Regent noted that "There is a strong case to be made that we are already at 'peak gold.'" Regent believes that production peaked around 2000 and has dropped ever since, he adds that Barrick Gold believes the decline will continue because "It is increasingly difficult to find ore."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/barrick-gold-shuts-hedge-book-over-world-gold-supply/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Barrick Gold shuts hedge book over world gold supply</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/barrick-gold-shuts-hedge-book-over-world-gold-supply/">Barrick Gold shuts hedge book over world gold supply</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/barrick-gold-shuts-hedge-book-over-world-gold-supply/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19234616/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/barrick-gold-shuts-hedge-book-over-world-gold-supply/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABX</category><category>American dollar</category><category>Barrick Gold</category><category>China</category><category>dollar</category><category>gold</category><category>gold supply</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Foreclosures fall, but are still higher than a year ago]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/foreclosures-fall-but-are-still-higher-than-a-year-ago/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/foreclosures-fall-but-are-still-higher-than-a-year-ago/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/foreclosures-fall-but-are-still-higher-than-a-year-ago/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img height="NaN" align="right" width="200" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/foreclosure.jpg" />According to RealtyTrac, the number of homeowners facing foreclosure <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/11/12/foreclosures-fall-for-third-straight-month-but-still-up-19-perc/">dropped during October</a>, thanks in part to foreclosure prevention programs that helped borrowers. RealtyTrac stated that more than 332,000 households (one in every 385 homes) were recipients of either a notice of default or a trustee's sale. This number is 3% lower than September, making October the third-straight month with a drop in the number of homeowners facing foreclosure. As for homes actually repossessed, the number dropped to 77,000 in October from 88,000 in September. <br /><br />RealtyTrac noted that one reason for the lower number of foreclosures is new state programs that require a bank to try and work with the homeowner before seizing property. In addition, some lenders are staving off foreclosures by evaluating which of their close-to-default borrowers may qualify for the new federal loan modification program.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/foreclosures-fall-but-are-still-higher-than-a-year-ago/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Foreclosures fall, but are still higher than a year ago</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/foreclosures-fall-but-are-still-higher-than-a-year-ago/">Foreclosures fall, but are still higher than a year ago</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/foreclosures-fall-but-are-still-higher-than-a-year-ago/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19234452/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/foreclosures-fall-but-are-still-higher-than-a-year-ago/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank foreclosures</category><category>BankForeclosures</category><category>featured</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>home payments</category><category>HomePayments</category><category>house payments</category><category>HousePayments</category><category>RealtyTrac</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JockStocks: Could something fishy be happening in Cleveland? ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/jockstocks-could-something-fishy-be-happening-in-cleveland/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/jockstocks-could-something-fishy-be-happening-in-cleveland/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/jockstocks-could-something-fishy-be-happening-in-cleveland/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of sports</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/11/escalator200.jpg" />You all know that I love to cover the business of sports, so I was particularly interested when stories about <a href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/11/11/mangini-claims-he-didnt-know-about-quinns-escalators/">Mangini</a> and <a href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/11/11/mangini-knew-about-quinns-incentives/">Quinn</a> crossed my Twitter feed. </p>
<p>Here is the situation: the Cleveland Browns have benched quarterback Derek Anderson in favor of Brady Quinn for the Browns' upcoming Monday Night tilt against the Baltimore Ravens. Thing is, this is the second quarterback benching new head coach Eric Mangini has made -- he benched Quinn in week three in favor of Anderson. I am not going to discuss the merit of either of the starting quarterbacks (as neither has done well), but I want to take a look at the idea that Brady Quinn may have been benched in week three so the Browns wouldn't have to pay the escalators built in to Quinn's contract.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/jockstocks-could-something-fishy-be-happening-in-cleveland/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JockStocks: Could something fishy be happening in Cleveland? </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/jockstocks-could-something-fishy-be-happening-in-cleveland/">JockStocks: Could something fishy be happening in Cleveland? </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/jockstocks-could-something-fishy-be-happening-in-cleveland/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19232550/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/jockstocks-could-something-fishy-be-happening-in-cleveland/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Brady Quinn</category><category>Cleveland Browns</category><category>Drew Rosenhaus</category><category>Eric Mangini</category><category>football contracts</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NFL</category><category>Randy Lerner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tyson Foods downgraded by JPMorgan]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/tyson-foods-downgraded-by-j-p-morgan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/tyson-foods-downgraded-by-j-p-morgan/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/tyson-foods-downgraded-by-j-p-morgan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst upgrades and downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tsn/" rel="tag">Tyson Foods'A' (TSN)</a></p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/tyson_logo.gif" />Bright and early on this fine Wednesday morning, JPMorgan <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/permalinks/entry.php/TSNid1162519">downgraded</a> Tyson Foods (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tyson-foods-inc/tsn/nys">TSN</a>) to Neutral from Overweight. The brokerage gave <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/tyson-foods-downgraded-to-neutral-at-jp-morgan-2009-11-11-73950">four reasons</a> for the downgrade: valuation, recent rises in corn and hog prices, a looming supply increase from competitor Sanderson Farms (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sanderson-farms-inc/safm/nas">SAFM</a>), and uncertainty from Pilgrim's Pride. <br /><br />All of these reasons are perfectly valid for the downgrade, but I want to focus on the valuation aspect of the downgrade. Technically, TSN faces overhead resistance in the $14 region, which is significant as the shares are currently ascending through the upper $12 region. The $14 level spurned the shares earlier this year, sending them into a steady decline back to support at the $11 region.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/tyson-foods-downgraded-by-j-p-morgan/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tyson Foods downgraded by JPMorgan</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/tyson-foods-downgraded-by-j-p-morgan/">Tyson Foods downgraded by JPMorgan</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/tyson-foods-downgraded-by-j-p-morgan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19232450/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/tyson-foods-downgraded-by-j-p-morgan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>downgrade</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Pilgrims Pride</category><category>safm</category><category>Sanderson Farms</category><category>tsn</category><category>Tyson Foods</category><category>valuation</category><category>valuation concerns</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IEA: Global energy use to resume an upward trend]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/iea-global-energy-use-to-resume-an-upward-trend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/iea-global-energy-use-to-resume-an-upward-trend/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/iea-global-energy-use-to-resume-an-upward-trend/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/oil_rigs.jpg" alt="" />According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), global energy use is <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story//iea-sees-global-energy-use-resuming-upward-trend-2009-11-10">going to fall this year</a>. That said, the group also believes that energy use will resume its upward trend, should government policies remain the same. </p>
<p>Looking far ahead, the IEA believes that the world's demand is projected to rise by 40% between now and 2030, when demand is estimated to hit 16.8 billion tons of oil equivalent.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/iea-global-energy-use-to-resume-an-upward-trend/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>IEA: Global energy use to resume an upward trend</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/iea-global-energy-use-to-resume-an-upward-trend/">IEA: Global energy use to resume an upward trend</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/iea-global-energy-use-to-resume-an-upward-trend/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19230468/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/iea-global-energy-use-to-resume-an-upward-trend/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fuel use</category><category>gasoline</category><category>IEA</category><category>International Energy Agency</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil</category><category>oil demand</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dr. Doom Nouriel Roubini believes the bubble is about to burst]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nouriel-roubini-believes-the-bubble-is-about-to-burst/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nouriel-roubini-believes-the-bubble-is-about-to-burst/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nouriel-roubini-believes-the-bubble-is-about-to-burst/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/roubini.jpg" />Dr. Doom is back. Last week, New York University economist Nouriel Roubini decided to speak out about the current economic recovery, warning that it <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9a5b3216-c70b-11de-bb6f-00144feab49a.html?nclick_check=1">cannot last</a>. I'm not quite sure how this blog missed my radar screen, so I must thank Robert J. Samuelson for <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/08/AR2009110817806.html">bringing it to my attention yesterday</a>.</p>
<p>Roubini contends that while there was a massive rally in "all sorts of risky assets" has caused the dollar had weakened sharply and government bond yields have "increased but stayed low and stable." These risky assets that Roubini discusses are equities, oil, energy, and commodity. Dr. Doom believes that the prices for these risky assets have risen too far and too fast compared to macroeconomic fundamentals.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nouriel-roubini-believes-the-bubble-is-about-to-burst/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dr. Doom Nouriel Roubini believes the bubble is about to burst</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nouriel-roubini-believes-the-bubble-is-about-to-burst/">Dr. Doom Nouriel Roubini believes the bubble is about to burst</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nouriel-roubini-believes-the-bubble-is-about-to-burst/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19230331/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/nouriel-roubini-believes-the-bubble-is-about-to-burst/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bubble</category><category>dotcom</category><category>Dr. Doom</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>housing bubble</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Nouriel Roubini</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nike's new marketing campaign may be a bit insensitive]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/nikes-new-marketing-campaign-may-be-a-bit-insensitive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/nikes-new-marketing-campaign-may-be-a-bit-insensitive/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/nikes-new-marketing-campaign-may-be-a-bit-insensitive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nke/" rel="tag">NIKE, Inc'B' (NKE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of sports</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/nike-logo-200.jpg" />I promised myself that I wasn't going to give Nike (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nike-inc/nke/nys">NKE</a>) the publicity that it wants with its new rivalry uniforms. You see, the company has decided that 10 colleges will wear specially designed uniforms for their big rivalry games this year, assigning the slogan "<a href="http://www.nike.com/nikeos/p/usnikefootball/en_US/">Prepare for Combat</a>" to the program. </p>
<p>For example, The Ohio State University will wear <a href="http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/7830/osuuni.jpg">"retro-inspired" uniforms</a> when it takes the field against that team from up north (Michigan). I was worried when I heard that Nike was designing this uniform; Ohio State doesn't do alternate uniforms -- they never have. Honestly, it isn't all that bad; the jersey leaves a little to be desired, but perhaps that is just me.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/nikes-new-marketing-campaign-may-be-a-bit-insensitive/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nike's new marketing campaign may be a bit insensitive</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/nikes-new-marketing-campaign-may-be-a-bit-insensitive/">Nike's new marketing campaign may be a bit insensitive</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/nikes-new-marketing-campaign-may-be-a-bit-insensitive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19228741/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/nikes-new-marketing-campaign-may-be-a-bit-insensitive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>college football</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Nike</category><category>Ohio State University</category><category>rivalry</category><category>viral advertising</category><category>Virginia Tech</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kraft launches hostile takeover of Cadbury]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/kraft-launches-hostile-takeover-of-cadbury/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/kraft-launches-hostile-takeover-of-cadbury/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/kraft-launches-hostile-takeover-of-cadbury/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kft/" rel="tag">Kraft Foods'A' (KFT)</a></p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/new-kraft-logo-200.jpg" alt="" />Ahead of the pre-determined deadline, Kraft (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kraft-foods-inc/kft/nys">KFT</a>) decided to launch its <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/permalinks/entry.php/KFT;CBYid1161230">formal offer</a> for U.K.-based chocolate maker Cadbury (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cadbury-plc/cby/nys">CBY</a>). KFT announced that the cash-and-stock bid is worth $16.46 billion (9.8 billion pounds) or 717 pence per U.K.-listed CBY share. <br /><br />At that rate, KFT said the bid is 37% higher than CBY's July 3 close. KFT added that no other potential buyer has declared interest in CBY. KFT is offering CBY shareholders $5 in cash and 0.26 share in KFT. For each American CBY share, KFT is offering $20 cash and 1.04 shares.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/kraft-launches-hostile-takeover-of-cadbury/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Kraft launches hostile takeover of Cadbury</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/kraft-launches-hostile-takeover-of-cadbury/">Kraft launches hostile takeover of Cadbury</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/kraft-launches-hostile-takeover-of-cadbury/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19228704/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/kraft-launches-hostile-takeover-of-cadbury/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cadbury</category><category>CBY</category><category>chocolate</category><category>hostile takeover</category><category>HostileTakeover</category><category>inthenews</category><category>KFT</category><category>Kraft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:50:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>