<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[World Series trade #5: Sonosite (SONO)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/world-series-trade-5-sonosite-inc-sono/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/world-series-trade-5-sonosite-inc-sono/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/world-series-trade-5-sonosite-inc-sono/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="World Series Trade #5 - Sonosite Inc. (SONO)" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/sonogram.jpg" width="160" height="213" />The Yankees are led by a core of four men -- Derek Jeter, Andy Pettitte, Jorge Posada, and Mariano Rivera -- who all came to the club in 1995. </p>
<p>They're no spring chickens, that's for sure. Thankfully, the players are supported by a great organization, which includes top-notch medical care, oftentimes right there in the clubhouse, which is equipped with X-ray and sonogram equipment.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/world-series-trade-5-sonosite-inc-sono/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Series trade #5: Sonosite (SONO)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/world-series-trade-5-sonosite-inc-sono/">World Series trade #5: Sonosite (SONO)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/world-series-trade-5-sonosite-inc-sono/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19215613/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/world-series-trade-5-sonosite-inc-sono/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>options trades</category><category>SONO</category><category>Sonosite</category><category>top trades</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Series trade #2: ResMed (RMD)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/31/world-series-trade-2-resmed-rmd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/31/world-series-trade-2-resmed-rmd/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/31/world-series-trade-2-resmed-rmd/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="World Series Trade #2 - ResMed (RMD)" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/sleep-apnea.jpg" width="160" height="213" />New York and Philadelphia have some of the most hardcore fans in Major League Baseball. These fans don't just get excited about a game as big as the World Series, they get stressed out. </p>
<p>And stress isn't good for anyone's health, and neither are the hot dogs New York fans will gorge themselves on, or the cheese steaks the Philadelphia fans will wolf down. Plus, fans in both cities are going to be washing that heart-attack-waiting-to-happen chow down with too much beer. No doubt many of them will be suffering from sleep apnea.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/31/world-series-trade-2-resmed-rmd/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Series trade #2: ResMed (RMD)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/31/world-series-trade-2-resmed-rmd/">World Series trade #2: ResMed (RMD)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/31/world-series-trade-2-resmed-rmd/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19215636/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/31/world-series-trade-2-resmed-rmd/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>options trades</category><category>ResMed</category><category>RMD</category><category>top trades</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #10: Take a good look around]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-10-take-a-good-look-around/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-10-take-a-good-look-around/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-10-take-a-good-look-around/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #10 why the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame11.jpg" width="160" height="213" />Do you see a rebound? </p>
<p>The Mall of America would be a great practice field for the Minnesota Vikings, fall and winter clothes are already 40% off at Macy's, and the Palms in Vegas is mailing me coupons.</p>
<p>Recently, I went out to eat with some friends: One owns a construction business that has come to a standstill; two are media types out of work; and one is the owner of a small manufacturing company, who is laying people off as fast as she can and is now worried about her own survival. And I'm sure you've heard similar tales of woes from your family, friends and neighbors.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-10-take-a-good-look-around/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #10: Take a good look around</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-10-take-a-good-look-around/">Reason #10: Take a good look around</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-10-take-a-good-look-around/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207493/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-10-take-a-good-look-around/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>GDP</category><category>michael shulman</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #9: The Fed can't do it either]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-9-the-fed-cant-do-it-either/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-9-the-fed-cant-do-it-either/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-9-the-fed-cant-do-it-either/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #9 the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame10.jpg" width="160" height="213" />Historically, the Fed has lowered interest rates to spur spending and investment. </p>
<p>Well, the Fed has already cut interest rates to banks down to essentially zero. The media are screaming about potential inflation due to the trillion dollars the Fed put into the system, but that trillion has simply replaced the trillion written down by the banks, which have another trillion and a half in write-downs to go.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-9-the-fed-cant-do-it-either/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #9: The Fed can't do it either</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-9-the-fed-cant-do-it-either/">Reason #9: The Fed can't do it either</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-9-the-fed-cant-do-it-either/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207502/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-9-the-fed-cant-do-it-either/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>interest rates</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #8: Uncle Sam can't bail us out]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #8 the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame9.jpg" width="160" height="213" />In the past, the government has increased spending and cut taxes to spur spending during times of economic crisis.</p>
<p>However, Uncle Sam is now in so much debt that this is no longer a serious option. And it looks like we are going to spend another $900 billion-plus on health care reform over 10 years (a lot of money, sure, but about a third less than what Wall Street will spend on bonuses).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #8: Uncle Sam can't bail us out</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/">Reason #8: Uncle Sam can't bail us out</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207507/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailouts</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>health care reform</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #7: Businesses aren't spending]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-7-businesses-arent-spending/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-7-businesses-arent-spending/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-7-businesses-arent-spending/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #7 the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame8.jpg" width="160" height="213" />Businesses do not see a turnaround in 2010. Even with public figures talking up the economy (and who can blame them, it's practically in their job description) businesses are not listening. If consumers aren't spending, why should businesses? </p>
<p>For example, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) said the year will close strong, although it still will be down compared to 2008. This end-of-the-year optimism is being driven by a once-in-five-year change in the <a href="http://www.investorplace.com/experts/jim_woods/windows-7-msft-dell-hpq-stocks.html?cp=bloggingstocks&amp;cc=synd&amp;cs=investorplace" target="_blank">Windows operating system</a> -- something that should have created booming demand, not a modest uptick.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-7-businesses-arent-spending/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #7: Businesses aren't spending</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-7-businesses-arent-spending/">Reason #7: Businesses aren't spending</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-7-businesses-arent-spending/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207514/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-7-businesses-arent-spending/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>INTC</category><category>Intel</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><category>WIndows</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #6: Excess capacity]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-6-excess-capacity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-6-excess-capacity/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-6-excess-capacity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #6 the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame7.jpg" width="150" height="200" />Excess capacity is everywhere -- we have more than enough people, factories, stores, and so on to meet current demand. </p>
<p>Want to buy an indoor mall? You can get one in North Myrtle Beach for $3.3 million -- less than the previous value of many homes in that area.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-6-excess-capacity/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #6: Excess capacity</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-6-excess-capacity/">Reason #6: Excess capacity</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-6-excess-capacity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207516/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-6-excess-capacity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>manufacturing</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #5: The credit crunch will continue]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-5-the-credit-crunch-will-continue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-5-the-credit-crunch-will-continue/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-5-the-credit-crunch-will-continue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #5 the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame6.jpg" width="160" height="213" />By year-end 2009, we will see a more than $4 trillion pullback in credit lines. And we are a country that runs on credit. In fact, the entire growth in consumer spending from 1997 to 2008 was paid for with home equity lines and credit cards. </p>
<p>Credit standards are already impossibly high. My credit lines literally shrink every month because I do not use them. But what if I needed them? And I almost couldn't get a lease for a new car even though I have never missed a bill payment. The majority of people cannot borrow money and, therefore, cannot spend. This will not change in 2010.</p>
<p><strong>Next: Reason #6: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-6-excess-capacity/">Excess capacity </a></strong></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-5-the-credit-crunch-will-continue/">Reason #5: The credit crunch will continue</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-5-the-credit-crunch-will-continue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207521/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-5-the-credit-crunch-will-continue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>credit</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #4: Changing consumer attitudes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-4-changing-consumer-attitudes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-4-changing-consumer-attitudes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-4-changing-consumer-attitudes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #4 the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame5.jpg" width="160" height="213" />Not only are consumers not spending, their actual attitudes toward spending have changed. </p>
<p>Even for the six people on the block who are flush with cash, <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/stocks-to-buy-in-a-recession.html?cp=bloggingstocks&amp;cc=synd&amp;cs=optionszone" target="_blank">frugality is the new chic</a>. My neighbors, high-end Saab and Volkswagen types, just bought a Kia Sportage for their daughter (nice car, by the way).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-4-changing-consumer-attitudes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #4: Changing consumer attitudes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-4-changing-consumer-attitudes/">Reason #4: Changing consumer attitudes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-4-changing-consumer-attitudes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207527/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-4-changing-consumer-attitudes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>frugality</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #3: Consumers are afraid to spend money]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-3-consumers-are-afraid-to-spend-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-3-consumers-are-afraid-to-spend-money/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-3-consumers-are-afraid-to-spend-money/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #3 the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame4.jpg" width="160" height="213" />A fear of a loss of income will continue to squelch consumer spending. Most people I know are fearful about their futures -- i.e., losing their jobs or seeing a cut in commissions, profits, or wages. This means they will hang on to their pennies in 2010. </p>
<p>Bottom line: Consumers drive 70% of GDP, and a meaningful recovery will not happen without their dollars.</p>
<p><strong>Next: Reason #4: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-4-changing-consumer-attitudes/">Changing consumer attitudes</a></strong></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-3-consumers-are-afraid-to-spend-money/">Reason #3: Consumers are afraid to spend money</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-3-consumers-are-afraid-to-spend-money/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207530/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-3-consumers-are-afraid-to-spend-money/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>GDP</category><category>income</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #2: The jobless recovery]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-2-the-jobless-recovery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-2-the-jobless-recovery/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-2-the-jobless-recovery/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #2 the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame3.jpg" width="160" height="213" />The pundits on CNBC get all giggly when we lose "only" 550,000 jobs -- a true sign of the times. Uber analyst Meredith Whitney, one of the few people on Wall Street who has been worth listening to during the past three years, is forecasting 13% unemployment in 2010 or 2011.</p>
<p>Officially, unemployment currently stands at 9.8%. But if you add in part-time workers wanting more work and the people who are so discouraged they have stopped looking, the number is a shocking 20%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-2-the-jobless-recovery/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #2: The jobless recovery</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-2-the-jobless-recovery/">Reason #2: The jobless recovery</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-2-the-jobless-recovery/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207542/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-2-the-jobless-recovery/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>employment</category><category>end of recession</category><category>jobs</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #1: Dramatic loss of wealth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-1-dramatic-loss-of-wealth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-1-dramatic-loss-of-wealth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-1-dramatic-loss-of-wealth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #1 the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame2.jpg" width="160" height="213" />People not only feel poorer, they are poorer. Personal wealth will continue to decline in 2010, as home prices fall even further, fueled by a wave of 7 million homes that will go into foreclosure in the next 12 to 18 months. And foreclosure rates will remain above historical norms well beyond that. </p>
<p>More foreclosures mean more downward price pressure in the housing market. And homeowners will experience a commensurate loss of wealth as the value of their homes decline. And this is on top of all the money that had previously been lost in the stock market -- as much as 40% of accumulated consumer wealth.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-1-dramatic-loss-of-wealth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #1: Dramatic loss of wealth</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-1-dramatic-loss-of-wealth/">Reason #1: Dramatic loss of wealth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-1-dramatic-loss-of-wealth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207549/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-1-dramatic-loss-of-wealth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>housing</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ten reasons the economy won't recover in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/10-reasons-the-economy-wont-recover-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/10-reasons-the-economy-wont-recover-in-2010/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/10-reasons-the-economy-wont-recover-in-2010/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img width="160" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="213" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame1.jpg" alt="10 Reasons the Economy Won't Recover In 2010" />Think the economy is recovering? Think again.</p>
<p>Forget the noise and statistics thrown around by the politicos and pundits. We are not at the end of this recession -- we are in the middle of it.</p>
<span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/10_reasons_the_economy_won_t_recover_in_2010'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>
<p>This will not be a V-shaped recession and recovery, folks. It is a U-shaped one at best, meaning we have a while to go before things truly pick up. But, more than likely, we are dealing with a W-shaped recession, and we are near the end of the second leg ... and then down we go.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/10-reasons-the-economy-wont-recover-in-2010/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ten reasons the economy won't recover in 2010</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/10-reasons-the-economy-wont-recover-in-2010/">Ten reasons the economy won't recover in 2010</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/10-reasons-the-economy-wont-recover-in-2010/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207593/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/10-reasons-the-economy-wont-recover-in-2010/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>featured</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sign #10: An eerie similarity]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-10-an-eerie-similarity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-10-an-eerie-similarity/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-10-an-eerie-similarity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="october market crash" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/sams-chart.png" width="160" height="121" />The eeriest reason you should be wary of a pullback in October is the similarity between the chart of the rally that began March 9 and the 1937-1938 rally, which was followed by a sharp pullback.</p>
<p>They are practically identical -- seriously, check it out.</p>
<p>This could be a harbinger of a major slide beginning no later than December, but probably starting in October.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-10-an-eerie-similarity/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sign #10: An eerie similarity</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-10-an-eerie-similarity/">Sign #10: An eerie similarity</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-10-an-eerie-similarity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19165302/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-10-an-eerie-similarity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>michael shulman</category><category>october market crash</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sign #9: Short covering and money managers looking to bank profits]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-9-short-covering-and-money-managers-looking-to-bank-profi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-9-short-covering-and-money-managers-looking-to-bank-profi/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-9-short-covering-and-money-managers-looking-to-bank-profi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="october market crash" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/frame1.jpg" width="160" height="213" />Two key elements of the market's rise -- <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/learn-more/jim-woods/short-squeeze.html?cp=bloggingstocks&amp;cc=synd&amp;cs=optionszone" target="_blank">short-sellers covering their positions</a> and money managers looking for quick profits -- are waning, reducing buy-side volume. </p>
<p>This will eventually impair the market's ability to sustain itself as more shorts are entering the market and more managers are preparing to bank profits before the end of their year on Nov. 1.</p>
<p><strong>Next: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-10-an-eerie-similarity/" target="_blank">Sign #10: An eerie similarity</a></strong></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-9-short-covering-and-money-managers-looking-to-bank-profi/">Sign #9: Short covering and money managers looking to bank profits</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-9-short-covering-and-money-managers-looking-to-bank-profi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19165333/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-9-short-covering-and-money-managers-looking-to-bank-profi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>michael shulman</category><category>October market crash</category><category>short selling</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sign #8: Light volume]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-8-light-volume/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-8-light-volume/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-8-light-volume/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="october market crash" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/test_tube.jpg" width="160" height="213" />Market volume is so light that many technicians do not see the rise in the indices as "real." They want to see increased <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/learn-more/john-lansing/trading-volume.html?cp=bloggingstocks&amp;cc=synd&amp;cs=optionszone" target="_blank">buying volume</a> to confirm another upward leg in the rally.</p>
<p>While volume may increase in the short term, it still will be considered light, as many investors are very cautious (and should be) about getting in after a 40% rise in the markets. Without heavier volume, the market is very vulnerable to a downturn.</p>
<p><strong>Next: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-9-short-covering-and-money-managers-looking-to-bank-profi/" target="_blank">Sign #9: Short covering and money managers looking to bank profits</a></strong></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-8-light-volume/">Sign #8: Light volume</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-8-light-volume/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19165343/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-8-light-volume/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>buying volume</category><category>michael shulman</category><category>October market crash</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sign #7: An indiscriminate rally]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-7-an-indiscriminate-rally/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-7-an-indiscriminate-rally/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-7-an-indiscriminate-rally/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="october market crash" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/businesstarget.jpg" width="160" height="213" />The market has been indiscriminate in this rally, pushing up 487 out of 500 S&amp;P stocks. This level of irrationality is ending, and certain segments are going to take a hit.</p>
<p>Once this happens, the broad-based support for the S&amp;P 500 will erode brick by brick.</p>
<p><strong>Next: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-8-light-volume/" target="_blank">Sign #8: Light volume</a></strong></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-7-an-indiscriminate-rally/">Sign #7: An indiscriminate rally</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-7-an-indiscriminate-rally/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19165349/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-7-an-indiscriminate-rally/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>michael shulman</category><category>October market crash</category><category>SP 500</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sign #6: The market is overbought]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-6-the-market-is-overbought/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-6-the-market-is-overbought/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-6-the-market-is-overbought/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="october market crash" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/pen.jpg" width="160" height="213" />Now that we've covered a few of the fundamental reasons the market is likely headed down in October, let's turn to some of the technical reasons.</p>
<p>First, the market is overbought by almost historical norms. And the rally, which began March 9, is having more and more trouble piercing technical ceilings. </p>
<p>Major resistance levels are 1,045, 1,075 and 1,110 on the S&amp;P 500. And a major failure at one of these levels could be a tip-off that the slide has begun.</p>
<p><strong>Next: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-7-an-indiscriminate-rally/" target="_blank">Sign #7: An indiscriminate rally</a></strong></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-6-the-market-is-overbought/">Sign #6: The market is overbought</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 20 Sep 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-6-the-market-is-overbought/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19165356/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/sign-6-the-market-is-overbought/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic data</category><category>michael shulman</category><category>October market crash</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sign #5: Earnings will disappoint]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/sign-5-earnings-will-disappoint/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/sign-5-earnings-will-disappoint/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/sign-5-earnings-will-disappoint/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="october market crash" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/piggybank.jpg" width="160" height="213" />The market is radically overvalued based on current earnings. Historical norms say the S&amp;P 500 should be at 850, not 1,065.</p>
<p>And the depressed economy will lead to depressed earnings next year, which means the market will be even more overvalued than it is at current levels. </p>
<p>This will be made clear with October earnings announcements.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/sign-5-earnings-will-disappoint/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sign #5: Earnings will disappoint</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/sign-5-earnings-will-disappoint/">Sign #5: Earnings will disappoint</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/sign-5-earnings-will-disappoint/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19166096/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/sign-5-earnings-will-disappoint/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings reports</category><category>michael shulman</category><category>October market crash</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sign #4: No positive catalysts on the horizon]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/sign-4-no-positive-catalysts-on-the-horizon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/sign-4-no-positive-catalysts-on-the-horizon/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/sign-4-no-positive-catalysts-on-the-horizon/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="october market crash" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/frame2.jpg" width="160" height="213" />The current drivers of the market -- commodity speculation, green shoots euphoria, and enthusiasm over China thanks to <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/2009/08/how-to-play-the-great-china-crash.html?cp=bloggingstocks&amp;cc=synd&amp;cs=optionszone" target="_blank">fabricated Chinese economic data</a> -- will be played out in the next few weeks.</p>
<p>Absent these drivers, there are no positive catalysts left to underpin a rising market.</p>
<p><strong>Next: <a title="View Sign #5: Earnings will disappoint on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/sign-5-earnings-will-disappoint/" target="_blank">Sign #5: Earnings will disappoint</a></strong></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/sign-4-no-positive-catalysts-on-the-horizon/">Sign #4: No positive catalysts on the horizon</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/sign-4-no-positive-catalysts-on-the-horizon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19166099/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/sign-4-no-positive-catalysts-on-the-horizon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>china</category><category>market catalyst</category><category>michael shulman</category><category>October market crash</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>