<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Why Money Magazine Got It Right (Mostly)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/why-money-magazine-got-it-right-mostly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/why-money-magazine-got-it-right-mostly/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/why-money-magazine-got-it-right-mostly/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/coffee_stock.jpg" />As we move gradually closer to a stable economy where retail investors are again ready to enter the markets, we see a lot written about which stocks, sectors, and investment types are smart bets for future growth.</p>
<p>Money Magazine recently ran a piece in their Investor's Guide 2010 series entitled "<a href="http://money.cnn.com/2010/01/13/pf/stock_picks.moneymag/">10 Stocks That Can Keep Running</a>," which offers three areas in which the markets are likely to be solid in the coming years. This author's opinion is they were mostly right. But there needs to be a little more explanation for the average retail investor.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/why-money-magazine-got-it-right-mostly/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why Money Magazine Got It Right (Mostly)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/why-money-magazine-got-it-right-mostly/">Why Money Magazine Got It Right (Mostly)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/why-money-magazine-got-it-right-mostly/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19325087/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/why-money-magazine-got-it-right-mostly/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dividends</category><category>dowjones</category><category>economy</category><category>investing</category><category>markets</category><category>recession</category><category>stocks</category><category>trading</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Teeples]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
