<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Ann Taylor out of style with investors after Q3 report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/ann-taylor-out-of-style-with-investors-after-q3-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/ann-taylor-out-of-style-with-investors-after-q3-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/ann-taylor-out-of-style-with-investors-after-q3-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/anntaylorlogo-200x150.jpg" alt="" />I was wrong about Ann Taylor Stores Corp. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anntaylor-stores-corporation/ann/nys">ANN</a>). Thought it might make a possible earnings trade. Well, <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/ann-taylor-reports-third-quarter-2009-results/rfid272787584?channel=pf">Q3 earnings</a> are out, and it looks like the market has given a thumbs down to my thesis. At the time of this writing, shares were off by almost 4%. </p>
<p>It's funny, because Ann Taylor has done so well in 2009 as a stock that one could have supposed that a wide earnings beat would serve as a catalyst for capital appreciation. The retailer made 20 cents per share on an adjusted basis. According to my <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/ann-taylor-upgraded-should-you-ignore-stock-or-buy-it-ahead-of/">earnings preview</a>, 6 cents was the analyst number. I mean, come on, that's an example of solid performance, correct? </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/ann-taylor-out-of-style-with-investors-after-q3-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ann Taylor out of style with investors after Q3 report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/ann-taylor-out-of-style-with-investors-after-q3-report/">Ann Taylor out of style with investors after Q3 report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/ann-taylor-reports-third-quarter-2009-results/rfid272787584?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/ann-taylor-out-of-style-with-investors-after-q3-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19248346/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/ann-taylor-out-of-style-with-investors-after-q3-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ann taylor</category><category>AnnTaylor</category><category>holiday retail</category><category>HolidayRetail</category><category>retail</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Foot Locker has tough Q3, but does the dividend yield mean anything?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/foot-locker-has-tough-q3-but-does-the-dividend-yield-mean-anyth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/foot-locker-has-tough-q3-but-does-the-dividend-yield-mean-anyth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/foot-locker-has-tough-q3-but-does-the-dividend-yield-mean-anyth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/foot-locker-200.jpg" alt="" />Foot Locker (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/foot-locker-inc/fl/nys">FL</a>), which competes against Collective Brands (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/collective-brands-inc/pss/nys">PSS</a>) and Wal-Mart (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) for a share of the shoe industry, issued a <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/foot-locker-inc-reports-third-quarter-results/rfid272573482?channel=pf">Q3 report</a> on Thursday after the bell that was typical of many retailers: declining sales and dismal profits. Sometimes, the market is in the mood to ignore such grim news, but such indifference is usually predicated on an earnings beat. Unfortunately, this was not the case for the New York-based specialty athletic retailer. </p>
<p>On an adjusted basis, per-share profit dropped over 40% to 10 cents per share. Analysts were looking for 13 cents per share, according to <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=fl">Earnings.com</a>. Same-store sales took a dive of 8.2%. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/foot-locker-has-tough-q3-but-does-the-dividend-yield-mean-anyth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Foot Locker has tough Q3, but does the dividend yield mean anything?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/foot-locker-has-tough-q3-but-does-the-dividend-yield-mean-anyth/">Foot Locker has tough Q3, but does the dividend yield mean anything?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/foot-locker-inc-reports-third-quarter-results/rfid272573482?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/foot-locker-has-tough-q3-but-does-the-dividend-yield-mean-anyth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19247290/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/foot-locker-has-tough-q3-but-does-the-dividend-yield-mean-anyth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>collective brands</category><category>FL</category><category>Foot Locker</category><category>inthenews</category><category>PSS</category><category>retail</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sears Holdings beats estimates, but still has a bad trading day]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/sears-holdings-beats-estimates-but-still-has-a-bad-trading-day/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/sears-holdings-beats-estimates-but-still-has-a-bad-trading-day/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/sears-holdings-beats-estimates-but-still-has-a-bad-trading-day/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/sears-200x150.jpg" alt="" />Sears Holdings (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">SHLD</a>) was selling off close to 5% at the time of this writing in reaction to the company's <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/sears-holdings-reports-third-quarter-results/rfid272357584?channel=pf">Q3 report</a>. On an adjusted basis, the retailer lost 81 cents per share. That was better than the 90 cents lost in the comparable period, and it did beat the forecast as highlighted in our <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/the-week-in-preview-more-retail-earnings-gap-home-depot-sear/">earnings preview</a>. </p>
<p>I'm sort of shocked that the market didn't bid Sears higher. Going into the earnings news, the stock was hanging out near a 52-week high. Let's see, Wall Street sends the stock to the high point of the range, the release comes out, the loss isn't as bad as analysts expected it to be, and everyone sells. The market sure is strange sometimes, isn't it?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/sears-holdings-beats-estimates-but-still-has-a-bad-trading-day/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sears Holdings beats estimates, but still has a bad trading day</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/sears-holdings-beats-estimates-but-still-has-a-bad-trading-day/">Sears Holdings beats estimates, but still has a bad trading day</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/sears-holdings-reports-third-quarter-results/rfid272357584?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/sears-holdings-beats-estimates-but-still-has-a-bad-trading-day/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19246650/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/sears-holdings-beats-estimates-but-still-has-a-bad-trading-day/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>retail</category><category>sears holdings</category><category>SearsHoldings</category><category>SHLD</category><category>Target</category><category>TGT</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GameStop: Not the greatest quarter, but a buy nonetheless?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/gamestop-not-the-greatest-quarter-but-a-buy-nonetheless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/gamestop-not-the-greatest-quarter-but-a-buy-nonetheless/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/gamestop-not-the-greatest-quarter-but-a-buy-nonetheless/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/atvi/" rel="tag">Activision Inc (ATVI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ntdoy/" rel="tag">Nintendo (NTDOY)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/gme-gamestop-logo.jpg" />GameStop (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gamestop-corp-new/gme/nys">GME</a>) posted what I thought was a mediocre <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/gamestop-reports-third-quarter-2009-results/rfid272403653?channel=pf">third quarter</a>. Total sales went up about 8%, and earnings per share increased a few pennies to 31 cents. When you think video games, you think growth. That doesn't feel like growth, does it? Not the kind that sends a stock to the moon, certainly. Furthermore, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/glossary/same%20store%20sales">same-store sales</a> saw a decrease of 7.8%, driven by lackluster hardware transactions. Indeed, we may be hitting a point in the console cycle where the demand for systems from Sony (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>), Microsoft (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), and Nintendo (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nintendo-co-ltd-unsp-adr/ntdoy/nao">NTDOY</a>) has essentially been satiated.
<p>Here's the big question on the mind of traders: unimpressive Q3 or not, should GameStop be bought now? </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/gamestop-not-the-greatest-quarter-but-a-buy-nonetheless/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GameStop: Not the greatest quarter, but a buy nonetheless?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/gamestop-not-the-greatest-quarter-but-a-buy-nonetheless/">GameStop: Not the greatest quarter, but a buy nonetheless?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/gamestop-reports-third-quarter-2009-results/rfid272403653?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/gamestop-not-the-greatest-quarter-but-a-buy-nonetheless/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19246584/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/gamestop-not-the-greatest-quarter-but-a-buy-nonetheless/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activision blizzard</category><category>ActivisionBlizzard</category><category>ATVI</category><category>gamestop</category><category>GME</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>nintendo</category><category>NTDOY</category><category>retail</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>video games</category><category>VideoGames</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jack in the Box may not be a trade after Q4 report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/jack-in-the-box-may-not-be-a-trade-after-q4-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/jack-in-the-box-may-not-be-a-trade-after-q4-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/jack-in-the-box-may-not-be-a-trade-after-q4-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yum/" rel="tag">Yum Brands (YUM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bkc/" rel="tag">Burger King Hldgs (BKC)</a></p><p><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/jack.png" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Jack in the Box (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jack-in-the-box-inc/jack/nas">JACK</a>) dropped in yesterday's after-hours session upon news of the company's <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/jack-in-the-box-inc-reports-fourth-quarter-and-fy-2009-earnings-issues-guidance-for-fy-2010/rfid272153575?channel=pf">Q4 results</a>. You can't blame the bottom line for the poor stock performance. The fast-food joint earned 70 cents per share from continuing operations versus the 45 cents per share from continuing operations earned in the comparable quarter. Did such a growth rate deserve a nearly 6% cut in share price? Analysts were only looking for 55 cents per share, according to <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=JACK">Earnings.com</a>.</p>
<p>Well, Wall Street apparently wasn't satisfied with the outlook, as this <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idUSBNG46758920091118">Reuters</a> article points out. Traders are obviously more concerned with where Jack in the Box may be heading as opposed to where it's been. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/jack-in-the-box-may-not-be-a-trade-after-q4-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jack in the Box may not be a trade after Q4 report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/jack-in-the-box-may-not-be-a-trade-after-q4-report/">Jack in the Box may not be a trade after Q4 report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/jack-in-the-box-inc-reports-fourth-quarter-and-fy-2009-earnings-issues-guidance-for-fy-2010/rfid272153575?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/jack-in-the-box-may-not-be-a-trade-after-q4-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19245595/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/jack-in-the-box-may-not-be-a-trade-after-q4-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BKC</category><category>burger king</category><category>BurgerKing</category><category>fast food</category><category>FastFood</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JACK</category><category>jack in the box</category><category>JackInTheBox</category><category>MCD</category><category>mcdonalds</category><category>qdoba mexican grill</category><category>QdobaMexicanGrill</category><category>YUM</category><category>yum brands</category><category>YumBrands</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BJ's posts Q3 report, stock drops ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/bjs-posts-q3-report-stock-drops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/bjs-posts-q3-report-stock-drops/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/bjs-posts-q3-report-stock-drops/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cost/" rel="tag">Costco Wholesale (COST)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bj_wholesale.jpg" />BJ's Wholesale Club (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bj-s-wholesale-club-inc/bj/nys">BJ</a>), whose competitive colleagues include Costco Wholesale Corporation (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/costco-wholesale-corporation/cost/nas">COST</a>) and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>), issued <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/bjand-x2019-s-wholesale-club-reports-third-quarter-results/rfid271970237?channel=pf">Q3 results</a> earlier today. According to <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10628262/1/bjs-wholesale-hurt-by-legal-charges.html?cm_ven=GOOGLEFI">TheStreet.com</a>, adjusted earnings of 45 cents per share met expectations. </p>
<p>And apparently that wasn't good enough for the traders. As of this writing, shares of BJ's were trading down 3% on above-average volume. Was the BJ's story that bad?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/bjs-posts-q3-report-stock-drops/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>BJ's posts Q3 report, stock drops </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/bjs-posts-q3-report-stock-drops/">BJ's posts Q3 report, stock drops </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thestreet.com/story/10628262/1/bjs-wholesale-hurt-by-legal-charges.html?cm_ven=GOOGLEFI>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/bjs-posts-q3-report-stock-drops/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19244943/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/bjs-posts-q3-report-stock-drops/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BJ</category><category>bjs</category><category>COST</category><category>costco</category><category>inthenews</category><category>retail</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ann Taylor upgraded: Ignore the stock or buy ahead of earnings report?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/ann-taylor-upgraded-should-you-ignore-stock-or-buy-it-ahead-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/ann-taylor-upgraded-should-you-ignore-stock-or-buy-it-ahead-of/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/ann-taylor-upgraded-should-you-ignore-stock-or-buy-it-ahead-of/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst upgrades and downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/anf/" rel="tag">Abercrombie and Fitch (ANF)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/anntaylor.gif" alt="" />Ann Taylor (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anntaylor-stores-corporation/ann/nys">ANN</a>) was upgraded Monday, according to <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_aol/story/10627364/1/retail-winners-anntaylor-pacsun-surge.html?cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=Free&amp;cm_pla=Feed&amp;cm_ite=Feed">TheStreet.com</a>. Jesup &amp; Lamont calls the stock a buy now instead of a hold. You're never far from the analyst game when you trade on Wall Street. Question is, what should you do about this retailer? Should you give it a position in your own portfolio?</p>
<p>I'm not the biggest fan of Ann Taylor. I don't like the fundamentals. I made this amply clear back in August when I discussed the company's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/23/ann-taylor-beats-in-second-quarter-is-it-a-trade-or-an-invest/">second quarter</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/ann-taylor-upgraded-should-you-ignore-stock-or-buy-it-ahead-of/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ann Taylor upgraded: Ignore the stock or buy ahead of earnings report?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/ann-taylor-upgraded-should-you-ignore-stock-or-buy-it-ahead-of/">Ann Taylor upgraded: Ignore the stock or buy ahead of earnings report?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thestreet.com/_aol/story/10627364/1/retail-winners-anntaylor-pacsun-surge.html?cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=Free&amp;cm_pla=Feed&amp;cm_ite=Feed>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/ann-taylor-upgraded-should-you-ignore-stock-or-buy-it-ahead-of/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19242302/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/ann-taylor-upgraded-should-you-ignore-stock-or-buy-it-ahead-of/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abercrombie and fitch</category><category>AbercrombieAndFitch</category><category>ANF</category><category>ANN</category><category>Ann Taylor</category><category>AnnTaylor</category><category>earnings preview</category><category>EarningsPreview</category><category>inthenews</category><category>retail</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Disney's 'A Christmas Carol' didn't die off in second weekend]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/disneys-a-christmas-carol-didnt-die-off-in-second-weekend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/disneys-a-christmas-carol-didnt-die-off-in-second-weekend/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/disneys-a-christmas-carol-didnt-die-off-in-second-weekend/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lgf/" rel="tag">Lions Gate Entertainment (LGF)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/christmas-carol.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Last week, I discussed <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/disneys-a-christmas-carol-investors-not-in-a-merry-mood/">my disappointment</a> with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a>'s (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) <em>A Christmas Carol</em>. As a shareholder of the Mouse, I remain dissatisfied with the performance. However, this past weekend's theatrical take of the film makes me a little happier. </p>
<p>According to early estimates at <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Box Office Mojo</a>, <em>Carol</em> scored about $22 million at domestic theaters, making it the second most popular film of the three-day period. Sure, it wasn't number one, but given the fact that <em>Carol</em> made $30 million last weekend, I'd say you have to give it some credit for avoiding a significant percentage drop. So far, it has generated more than $60 million in revenue. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/disneys-a-christmas-carol-didnt-die-off-in-second-weekend/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Disney's 'A Christmas Carol' didn't die off in second weekend</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/disneys-a-christmas-carol-didnt-die-off-in-second-weekend/">Disney's 'A Christmas Carol' didn't die off in second weekend</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/disneys-a-christmas-carol-didnt-die-off-in-second-weekend/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19240218/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/disneys-a-christmas-carol-didnt-die-off-in-second-weekend/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>a christmas carol</category><category>AChristmasCarol</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>LCAPA</category><category>LGF</category><category>liberty capital group</category><category>LibertyCapitalGroup</category><category>lions gate entertainment</category><category>LionsGateEntertainment</category><category>overture films</category><category>OvertureFilms</category><category>Precious</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>the men who stare at goats</category><category>TheMenWhoStareAtGoats</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Abercrombie &amp; Fitch: A momentum play after Q3 release?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/abercrombie-and-fitch-a-momentum-play-after-q3-release/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/abercrombie-and-fitch-a-momentum-play-after-q3-release/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/abercrombie-and-fitch-a-momentum-play-after-q3-release/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aet/" rel="tag">Aetna Inc (AET)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gps/" rel="tag">Gap Inc (GPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kss/" rel="tag">Kohl's Corp (KSS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/anf/" rel="tag">Abercrombie and Fitch (ANF)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aeo/" rel="tag">American Eagle Outfitters (AEO)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/anf-abercrombie--fitch-logo.jpg" alt="" />Back in August, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/15/abercrombie-and-fitch-bid-higher-after-q2-report-why/">I discussed</a> my amazement at Abercrombie &amp; Fitch (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/abercrombie-and-fitch-co/anf/nys">ANF</a>). The stock just didn't seem to be acting in a manner which reflected the fundamentals of the business it represents. Well, my bout of amazement continues, because shares of the retailer are up 9% as of this writing on the latest earnings report. One that didn't impress me. </p>
<p>For the <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/abercrombie-and-fitch-reports-third-quarter-results/rfid270439846?channel=pf">third quarter</a>, Abercrombie made, on a reported basis, 44 cents per diluted share compared to 72 cents per diluted share in the year-ago period. After adjustments, earnings came in at 30 cents per share. Okay, that profit drop is bad enough, but wait till I get to the really bad stuff. Which would be revenues. Total sales declined 15%, but <a href="http://finance.aol.com/glossary/same%20store%20sales">same-store sales</a> were even worse: they plunged off the proverbial cliff, falling 22%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/abercrombie-and-fitch-a-momentum-play-after-q3-release/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Abercrombie &amp; Fitch: A momentum play after Q3 release?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/abercrombie-and-fitch-a-momentum-play-after-q3-release/">Abercrombie &amp; Fitch: A momentum play after Q3 release?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/abercrombie-and-fitch-reports-third-quarter-results/rfid270439846?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/abercrombie-and-fitch-a-momentum-play-after-q3-release/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19239110/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/abercrombie-and-fitch-a-momentum-play-after-q3-release/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abercrombie and fitch</category><category>AbercrombieAndFitch</category><category>AEO</category><category>american eagle outfitters</category><category>AmericanEagleOutfitters</category><category>ANF</category><category>fashion</category><category>Gap</category><category>GPS</category><category>Kohls</category><category>KSS</category><category>retail</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Blockbuster: A bomb of a quarter]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/blockbuster-a-bomb-of-a-quarter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/blockbuster-a-bomb-of-a-quarter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/blockbuster-a-bomb-of-a-quarter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nflx/" rel="tag">Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bbi/" rel="tag">Blockbuster Inc 'A' (BBI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img  hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/blockbusterlogo220.jpg" />Blockbuster (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/blockbuster-inc-class-a/bbi/nys">BBI</a>) is a terrible company and stock. After perusing the third-quarter report, published Friday after the bell, I don't see any reason to modify such a rough statement.</p>
<p>Sorry about that, but what else can I say about a huge revenue decline and a wider loss coupled with a story that continues to deteriorate? According to the <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/blockbuster-reports-third-quarter-2009-financial-results/rfid270228485?channel=pf">Q3 earnings release</a>, Blockbuster experienced a 21% drop on the top line. On an adjusted basis, the company lost 20 cents per share, compared to 9 cents per share in the comparable period a year ago. Helping to drive this abject performance was a 14% contraction in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/glossary/same%20store%20sales">same-store sales</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/blockbuster-a-bomb-of-a-quarter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Blockbuster: A bomb of a quarter</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/blockbuster-a-bomb-of-a-quarter/">Blockbuster: A bomb of a quarter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/blockbuster-reports-third-quarter-2009-financial-results/rfid270228485?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/blockbuster-a-bomb-of-a-quarter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19235606/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/blockbuster-a-bomb-of-a-quarter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BBI</category><category>Blockbuster</category><category>CMCSA</category><category>Coinstar</category><category>comcast</category><category>CSTR</category><category>DVD</category><category>home video</category><category>HomeVideo</category><category>inthenews</category><category>netflix</category><category>NFLX</category><category>Redbox</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Disney's Q4: Bob Iger beats Wall Street, but he needs a better plan for the studio]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/disneys-q4-bob-iger-beats-wall-street-but-he-needs-a-better-p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/disneys-q4-bob-iger-beats-wall-street-but-he-needs-a-better-p/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/disneys-q4-bob-iger-beats-wall-street-but-he-needs-a-better-p/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img border="1" align="right" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/nick-disney-200cs080708.jpg" alt="" />Disney (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>), the media company behind Mickey Mouse and Buzz Lightyear, and whose colleagues in the industry include CBS (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>), General Electric's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) NBC Universal, News Corp. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>), Sony Corporation (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>), Time<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys"> </a>Warner (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>), and Viacom (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>), reported results for <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/the-walt-disney-company-reports-earnings-for-fiscal-year-2009/rfid270226319?channel=pf">Q4 and the full fiscal year</a> on Thursday after the bell. While the bottom line came in ahead of expectations, I have to say that the release was disappointing to this shareholder. </p>
<p>Earnings on an adjusted basis for the quarter came in at 46 cents per share, higher <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/disney-to-report-on-thursday-should-investors-be-excited/">than the number</a> predicted by analysts. Unfortunately, as I go through the data, I don't think I'm too comforted by such income performance. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/disneys-q4-bob-iger-beats-wall-street-but-he-needs-a-better-p/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Disney's Q4: Bob Iger beats Wall Street, but he needs a better plan for the studio</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/disneys-q4-bob-iger-beats-wall-street-but-he-needs-a-better-p/">Disney's Q4: Bob Iger beats Wall Street, but he needs a better plan for the studio</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/the-walt-disney-company-reports-earnings-for-fiscal-year-2009/rfid270226319?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/disneys-q4-bob-iger-beats-wall-street-but-he-needs-a-better-p/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19235405/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/disneys-q4-bob-iger-beats-wall-street-but-he-needs-a-better-p/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bob Iger</category><category>BobIger</category><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>nbc universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>tom staggs</category><category>TomStaggs</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wal-Mart grows profit and cash flow in Q3, but comps still ailing]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/wal-mart-grows-profit-and-cash-flow-in-q3-but-comps-still-ailin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/wal-mart-grows-profit-and-cash-flow-in-q3-but-comps-still-ailin/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/wal-mart-grows-profit-and-cash-flow-in-q3-but-comps-still-ailin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cost/" rel="tag">Costco Wholesale (COST)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/walmartnewlogo240.jpg" alt="" />Wal-Mart (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>), which competes with chains such as Sears Holdings(<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">SHLD</a>), Costco (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/costco-wholesale-corporation/cost/nas">COST</a>), and Targe<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys">t</a> (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys">TGT</a>), reported results for the <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/walmart-third-quarter-earnings-per-share-exceeds-guidance-and-first-call-consensus/rfid270039537?channel=pf">third quarter</a> this morning. According to our <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/before-the-bell-stocks-to-open-lower-despite-wal-marts-beat/">Before the Bell</a> piece, the famous -- and oftentimes controversial -- retailer beat expectations by a few pennies, earnings 84 cents per share from continuing operations. This was 9% better than the per-share profit earned in the comparable period.
<p>Net sales went up only 1%. They were inhibited by the currency environment. But total sales aren't as relevant as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/glossary/same%20store%20sales">same-store sales</a> when it comes to this sector. If I were a shareholder of Wal-Mart, I would be very disappointed by the comps number, since it is the older locations which indicate how well a retailer is truly doing. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/wal-mart-grows-profit-and-cash-flow-in-q3-but-comps-still-ailin/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wal-Mart grows profit and cash flow in Q3, but comps still ailing</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/wal-mart-grows-profit-and-cash-flow-in-q3-but-comps-still-ailin/">Wal-Mart grows profit and cash flow in Q3, but comps still ailing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/before-the-bell-stocks-to-open-lower-despite-wal-marts-beat/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/walmart-third-quarter-earnings-per-share-exceeds-guidance-and-first-call-consensus/rfid270039537?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/glossary/same%20store%20sales>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/wal-mart-grows-profit-and-cash-flow-in-q3-but-comps-still-ailin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19235063/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/wal-mart-grows-profit-and-cash-flow-in-q3-but-comps-still-ailin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>COST</category><category>Costco</category><category>featured</category><category>retail</category><category>Sears</category><category>SHLD</category><category>Target</category><category>TGT</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Macy's tops estimates, but market not impressed]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/macys-tops-estimates-but-market-not-impressed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/macys-tops-estimates-but-market-not-impressed/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/macys-tops-estimates-but-market-not-impressed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/img_3950_9726_200_150.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/macy-s-inc/m/nys">Macy's</a> (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/macy-s-inc/m/nys">M</a>) reported <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/macyand-x2019-s-inc-reports-stronger-than-expected-third-quarter-results/rfid269666815?channel=pf">third-quarter numbers</a> on Wednesday, and although the bottom line beat estimates, shares of the retailer plunged over 8% on high volume. And I don't blame the market whatsoever for deciding to sell the company down.</p>
<p>Macy's said it lost, on an adjusted basis, 3 cents per share. The call was for a loss of 7 cents per share, according to <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=m">Earnings.com</a>. Okay, I guess we can say losing less money than expected is a good thing. However, looking at the sales numbers really makes me pause. Total sales declined 3.9%, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/glossary/same%20store%20sales">same-store sales</a> contracted 3.6%. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/macys-tops-estimates-but-market-not-impressed/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Macy's tops estimates, but market not impressed</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/macys-tops-estimates-but-market-not-impressed/">Macy's tops estimates, but market not impressed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/macyand-x2019-s-inc-reports-stronger-than-expected-third-quarter-results/rfid269666815?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=m>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.thestreet.com/story/10625100/1/macys-outlook-disappoints-shares-slip.html?cm_ven=GOOGLEN>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/macys-tops-estimates-but-market-not-impressed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19234107/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/macys-tops-estimates-but-market-not-impressed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>M</category><category>macys</category><category>retail</category><category>Target</category><category>TGT</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Weight Watchers sees lighter sales in Q3]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/weight-watchers-sees-lighter-sales-in-q3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/weight-watchers-sees-lighter-sales-in-q3/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/weight-watchers-sees-lighter-sales-in-q3/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a></p><p>Weight Watchers (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/weight-watchers-international-inc/wtw/nys">WTW</a>), the well-known provider of solutions to those who want to shed a few extra pounds, issued Q3 numbers on Tuesday. While losing inches is always a popular activity, that doesn't mean that the company will always see growth.</p>
<p>According to the corporate <a href="http://www.weightwatchersinternational.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=130178&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;ID=1353843&amp;highlight=">press release</a>, Weight Watchers saw an 8% decline in net sales. Earnings per share came in at 68 cents on a diluted basis. That was only a penny better than the year prior. Management is certainly making the most of its revenues by keeping costs and expenses down, but it is obviously disappointing to shareholders when income expansion is dependent on belt-tightening. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/weight-watchers-sees-lighter-sales-in-q3/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Weight Watchers sees lighter sales in Q3</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/weight-watchers-sees-lighter-sales-in-q3/">Weight Watchers sees lighter sales in Q3</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.weightwatchersinternational.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=130178&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;ID=1353843&amp;highlight=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idUSBNG46599920091110?sp=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.weightwatchersinternational.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=130178&amp;p=irol-dividends>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/weight-watchers-sees-lighter-sales-in-q3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19233003/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/weight-watchers-sees-lighter-sales-in-q3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diet</category><category>inthenews</category><category>weight management</category><category>weight watchers</category><category>WTW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Disney to report earnings Thursday: Should investors be excited?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/disney-to-report-on-thursday-should-investors-be-excited/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/disney-to-report-on-thursday-should-investors-be-excited/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/disney-to-report-on-thursday-should-investors-be-excited/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/disney_logo.jpg" />Disney (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>), a media business that competes with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp.</a> (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) NBC Universal, will be talking up its fourth-quarter numbers on Thursday after the bell. Are you a shareholder? If so, are you excited? Well, don't get too excited, because we might not be getting any growth, even if the Mouse beats on the bottom line. According to <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=dis">Earnings.com</a>, the call is for 40 cents per share versus the 43 cents per share made in the comparable period.</p>
<p>You know what, though? For the most part, I'm not so concerned with exactly how much Disney makes this quarter. I'm a shareholder, and I want to see management at least come in at the estimate, of course, but I'll be more interested in the conference call. Way more interested this time around, in fact.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/disney-to-report-on-thursday-should-investors-be-excited/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Disney to report earnings Thursday: Should investors be excited?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/disney-to-report-on-thursday-should-investors-be-excited/">Disney to report earnings Thursday: Should investors be excited?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-zoradi10-2009nov10,0,1714256.story>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/disney-to-report-on-thursday-should-investors-be-excited/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19231998/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/disney-to-report-on-thursday-should-investors-be-excited/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bob Iger</category><category>BobIger</category><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>earnings preview</category><category>EarningsPreview</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>nbc universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Electronic Arts not popular with investors after Q2 report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/electronic-arts-not-popular-with-investors-after-q2-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/electronic-arts-not-popular-with-investors-after-q2-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/electronic-arts-not-popular-with-investors-after-q2-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/erts/" rel="tag">Electronic Arts (ERTS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/atvi/" rel="tag">Activision Inc (ATVI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ntdoy/" rel="tag">Nintendo (NTDOY)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/erts-electronic-arts-logo.jpg" alt="" />While the big news today may be the release of Activision Blizzard's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-blizzard-inc/atvi/nas">ATVI</a>) new <em>Call of Duty</em> title, there's other stuff going on in the world of video games for investors to ponder. Electronic Arts (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/electronic-arts-inc/erts/nas">ERTS</a>) issued its <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/ea-reports-record-q2-non-gaap-net-revenue-of-1-15-billion/rfid269068015?channel=pf">Q2 report</a> yesterday after the bell. The numbers weren't too bad, but the market was not excited at all by them, probably because it knows that EA still has a lot of work to do in terms of better positioning itself for the future.
<p>Adjusted revenues were up a scant 2%. Earnings per share, excluding items, actually showed a profit of 6 cents. This was a lot better than the loss of 6 cents per share seen in the year-ago frame. The company also managed to generate a small amount of cash from operations in the quarter instead of using a whole bunch like it did last time around. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/electronic-arts-not-popular-with-investors-after-q2-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Electronic Arts not popular with investors after Q2 report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/electronic-arts-not-popular-with-investors-after-q2-report/">Electronic Arts not popular with investors after Q2 report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thestreet.com/_aol/story/10624685/1/electronic-arts-stock-falls-after-outlook.html?cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=Free&amp;cm_pla=Feed&amp;cm_ite=Feed>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/ea-reports-record-q2-non-gaap-net-revenue-of-1-15-billion/rfid269068015?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/activision-blizzards-q3-am-i-right-to-be-bearish/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/electronic-arts-not-popular-with-investors-after-q2-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19231001/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/electronic-arts-not-popular-with-investors-after-q2-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activision blizzard</category><category>ActivisionBlizzard</category><category>ATVI</category><category>call of duty</category><category>CallOfDuty</category><category>electronic arts</category><category>ElectronicArts</category><category>ERTS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Nintendo</category><category>NTDOY</category><category>video games</category><category>VideoGames</category><category>Wii</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lions Gate Entertainment: Still waiting for cash flow]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/lions-gate-entertainment-still-waiting-for-cash-flow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/lions-gate-entertainment-still-waiting-for-cash-flow/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/lions-gate-entertainment-still-waiting-for-cash-flow/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lgf/" rel="tag">Lions Gate Entertainment (LGF)</a></p><div style="DISPLAY: block" id="imageResults"><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/lionsgate.jpg" width="200" height="118" alt="" /></div>
<p>When I discussed Lions Gate Entertainment's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys">LGF</a>) first-quarter results, I noted the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/lionsgate-reports-q1-profit-smashing-estimates/">disappointing statement of cash flows</a>. Unfortunately, the company didn't do much better in the <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/lionsgate-reports-net-income-of-317-million-and-adjusted-ebitda-of-544-million-for-second-quarter-of-fiscal-2010-compared-to-net-loss-of-518-million-and-adjusted-ebitda-of-negative-359-million-in-prior-years-second-quart-69595237.html">second quarter</a>. For the six-month period, Lions Gate used over $160 million for operations compared to the roughly $40 million used in the similar frame one year ago.</p>
<p>Of course, cash flow doesn't always get the most coverage. Investors tend to get more excited by a swing to profitability. On that count, Lions Gate scored admirably, earning 26 cents per diluted share versus losing 44 cents per diluted share twelve months prior. <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=lgf">Earnings.com</a> indicates that analysts were really underestimating the Q2 income potential here: the call was for 6 cents per share. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/lions-gate-entertainment-still-waiting-for-cash-flow/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lions Gate Entertainment: Still waiting for cash flow</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/lions-gate-entertainment-still-waiting-for-cash-flow/">Lions Gate Entertainment: Still waiting for cash flow</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/lionsgate-reports-net-income-of-317-million-and-adjusted-ebitda-of-544-million-for-second-quarter-of-fiscal-2010-compared-to-net-loss-of-518-million-and-adjusted-ebitda-of-negative-359-million-in-prior-years-second->Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/lions-gate-entertainment-still-waiting-for-cash-flow/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19229654/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/lions-gate-entertainment-still-waiting-for-cash-flow/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>featured</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>LGF</category><category>lions gate entertainment</category><category>LionsGateEntertainment</category><category>nbc universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Disney's 'A Christmas Carol': Investors not in a merry mood?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/disneys-a-christmas-carol-investors-not-in-a-merry-mood/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/disneys-a-christmas-carol-investors-not-in-a-merry-mood/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/disneys-a-christmas-carol-investors-not-in-a-merry-mood/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/christmas-carol.jpg" />Disney (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) had high hopes for <em>A Christmas Carol.</em> It was supposed to be an unqualified blockbuster. Unfortunately, the film's first weekend at the box office was nothing short of a disaster.</p>
<p>Too strong? Hardly. According to early estimates at <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=2009&amp;wknd=45&amp;p=.htm">Box Office Mojo</a>, <em>Carol</em> took in little more than $30 million at domestic screenings. It was wasn't supposed to be like this. <em>Carol</em> was supposed to be light-years ahead of the competition. Sony's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>) <em>Michael Jackson's This Is It</em> came in second. <em>The Men Who Stare at Goats</em>, distributed by Liberty Capital Group's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/liberty-media-corporation-capital-common-series-a/lcapa/nas">LCAPA</a>) Overture Films, was third. And <em>The Fourth Kind</em>, from General Electric's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal, is currently ranked, aptly enough, in fourth place. Each of the latter three pictures had a gross of somewhere between $12 million and $14 million. To me, <em>Carol</em>'s take didn't seem as disproportionate as it should have been.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/disneys-a-christmas-carol-investors-not-in-a-merry-mood/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Disney's 'A Christmas Carol': Investors not in a merry mood?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/disneys-a-christmas-carol-investors-not-in-a-merry-mood/">Disney's 'A Christmas Carol': Investors not in a merry mood?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=2009&amp;wknd=45&amp;p=.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/disneys-a-christmas-carol-investors-not-in-a-merry-mood/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19228027/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/disneys-a-christmas-carol-investors-not-in-a-merry-mood/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>a christmas carol</category><category>AChristmasCarol</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>jim carrey</category><category>JimCarrey</category><category>LCAPA</category><category>liberty capital group</category><category>LibertyCapitalGroup</category><category>michael jacksons this is it</category><category>MichaelJacksonsThisIsIt</category><category>overture films</category><category>OvertureFilms</category><category>robert zemeckis</category><category>RobertZemeckis</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>The Fourth Kind</category><category>the men who stare at goats</category><category>TheFourthKind</category><category>TheMenWhoStareAtGoats</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CBS challenged in Q3, waiting for better advertising climate]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/cbs-challenged-in-q3-waiting-for-better-advertising-climate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/cbs-challenged-in-q3-waiting-for-better-advertising-climate/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/cbs-challenged-in-q3-waiting-for-better-advertising-climate/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/cbs.jpg" />Shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>) are no longer rolling around in the pits of equity hell. Do you recall when they were trading around $3 per share? Nasty time it was. Amazingly, as I write this, CBS is hovering near a 52-week high. They are well over $12 in value.
<p>Yet, when I look at the latest earnings report, I don't feel as upbeat as the market. According to the <a href="http://www.cbscorporation.com/assets/documents/Q309EarningsRelease.pdf">press release</a> (the link goes to a .pdf file), revenues were flat for the third quarter and adjusted income dropped to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ADVERT/idUSN0514043120091106">25 cents</a> per share from the year-ago figure of 39 cents per share. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/cbs-challenged-in-q3-waiting-for-better-advertising-climate/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CBS challenged in Q3, waiting for better advertising climate</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/cbs-challenged-in-q3-waiting-for-better-advertising-climate/">CBS challenged in Q3, waiting for better advertising climate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cbscorporation.com/assets/documents/Q309EarningsRelease.pdf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/glossary/free%20cash%20flow%20-%20FCF>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ADVERT/idUSN0514043120091106>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/cbs-challenged-in-q3-waiting-for-better-advertising-climate/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19226826/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/cbs-challenged-in-q3-waiting-for-better-advertising-climate/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>FOX</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NBC</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Activision Blizzard's Q3: Am I right to be bearish?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/activision-blizzards-q3-am-i-right-to-be-bearish/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/activision-blizzards-q3-am-i-right-to-be-bearish/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/activision-blizzards-q3-am-i-right-to-be-bearish/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/erts/" rel="tag">Electronic Arts (ERTS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/atvi/" rel="tag">Activision Inc (ATVI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ntdoy/" rel="tag">Nintendo (NTDOY)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/activision_160.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-blizzard-inc/atvi/nas">Activision Blizzard</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-blizzard-inc/atvi/nas">ATVI</a>) published <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/prnewswire/200911051614PR_NEWS_USPR_____LA05042.htm">third-quarter results</a> on Thursday after the bell. I can't say I was wholly taken with them. I know the best is probably yet to come once the Christmas shopping season really gets under way, but I was a little disappointed that the company saw a decline in adjusted profit. </p>
<p>Excluding items, Activision Blizzard made 4 cents per share this quarter versus the 7 cents per share made in last year's similar period. Well, did I say I was a <em>little</em> disappointed? Make that a <em>lot</em> disappointed. After all, this is supposed to be the publisher with the best pipeline on the block, the one with the <em>Guitar Hero</em> franchise and a great portfolio of licensed intellectual properties. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/activision-blizzards-q3-am-i-right-to-be-bearish/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Activision Blizzard's Q3: Am I right to be bearish?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/activision-blizzards-q3-am-i-right-to-be-bearish/">Activision Blizzard's Q3: Am I right to be bearish?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/prnewswire/200911051614PR_NEWS_USPR_____LA05042.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=a0cWn5opNBe8>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=25917>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/wii-dethroned-nintendo-profit-halved/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/11/video-game-sales-fall-for-a-sixth-straight-month/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/activision-blizzards-q3-am-i-right-to-be-bearish/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19225618/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/activision-blizzards-q3-am-i-right-to-be-bearish/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activision blizzard</category><category>ActivisionBlizzard</category><category>ATVi</category><category>call of duty</category><category>CallOfDuty</category><category>dj hero</category><category>DjHero</category><category>electronic arts</category><category>ElectronicArts</category><category>ERTS</category><category>guitar hero</category><category>GuitarHero</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Nintendo</category><category>NTDOY</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>THQ</category><category>THQI</category><category>video games</category><category>VideoGames</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>