<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Investment Bloggers Are Bullish and ETFs Are Hot]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/investment-bloggers-are-bullish-and-etfs-are-hot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/investment-bloggers-are-bullish-and-etfs-are-hot/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/investment-bloggers-are-bullish-and-etfs-are-hot/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/etf/" rel="tag">ETF</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/investing.due-diligence.getty-rf2.jpg" alt="" />It comes as no surprise to me that current investment blogger consensus is bullish on the markets. They're not bullish by an extremely wide margin, but they are optimistic nonetheless. <br />
<br />
An ongoing <a href="http://tickersense.typepad.com/ticker_sense/">investment blogger survey</a>, conducted weekly by Ticker Sense from Birinyi Associates Inc., indicates that nearly 54% of the investment writers it surveys are holding a bullish stance for the S&amp;P 500 for the next 30 days. Meanwhile, just over 15% of the survey respondents are bearish on the S&amp;P 500, and approximately 30% are declaring a neutral position.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/investment-bloggers-are-bullish-and-etfs-are-hot/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Investment Bloggers Are Bullish and ETFs Are Hot</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/investment-bloggers-are-bullish-and-etfs-are-hot/">Investment Bloggers Are Bullish and ETFs Are Hot</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/investment-bloggers-are-bullish-and-etfs-are-hot/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19669896/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/investment-bloggers-are-bullish-and-etfs-are-hot/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ETF</category><category>exchange traded funds</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investment bloggers</category><category>investment blogs</category><category>IWM</category><category>QQQQ</category><category>SP 500</category><category>SPY</category><category>XLF</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google Pushes Newswire Services Away]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/google-financial news/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/google-financial news/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/google-financial news/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p>A big change has come<img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="Google GOOG logo"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/google-logo-240.gif" /> in the way we <a href="http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/14492841">receive financial news</a> from Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). The company recently announced that it was doing away with financial newswire releases, in favor of distributing company financial news through its own website(s). Google spokesperson Jane Penner stated it this way: "We felt it made a lot of sense, given that we're a technology company and that we announce virtually all of our company news on our<a href="http://www.google.com/press/blogs/directory.html#tab0"> blogs</a>."</p>
<p>The change is almost insignificant, really, when we consider that Google is a glass-walled corporation anyway. What news happens at Google comes out of Google and gets splattered every which way. There's almost no escaping it.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/google-financial news/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google Pushes Newswire Services Away</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/google-financial news/">Google Pushes Newswire Services Away</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 May 2010 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/google-financial news/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19461721/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/google-financial news/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>financial news</category><category>GOOG</category><category>google</category><category>google blogs</category><category>investor relations</category><category>newswire</category><category>press release</category><category>press releases</category><category>website</category><category>websites</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Former Lehman Executive Calls for Ouster of High School Teacher]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/former-lehman-executive-calls-for-ouster-of-high-school-teacher/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/former-lehman-executive-calls-for-ouster-of-high-school-teacher/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/former-lehman-executive-calls-for-ouster-of-high-school-teacher/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/lehman-brothers-logo.jpg" />The following story is overflowing with irony. The reason is partly because of one man's lack of irony: Hugh "Skip" McGee, the former head of investment banking at Lehman Brothers, sent a five-page screed to the board of trustees at his son's private Texas high school after a teacher referred to bankers as "sleazeballs". <em>DealBreaker</em> has <a href="http://dealbreaker.com/images/thumbs/Skip%20McGee%20Letter.pdf">published the letter in its entirety</a>. If you have a lot of time on your hands, read and look for Skip's complaints about the lack of cross-dressing at the pep rally, among other things.<br />
<br />
His demands? The teacher, the upper school principal, and the headmaster should all resign over the injustice. That's right: a former executive at Lehman Bros. is demanding accountability.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/former-lehman-executive-calls-for-ouster-of-high-school-teacher/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Former Lehman Executive Calls for Ouster of High School Teacher</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/former-lehman-executive-calls-for-ouster-of-high-school-teacher/">Former Lehman Executive Calls for Ouster of High School Teacher</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/former-lehman-executive-calls-for-ouster-of-high-school-teacher/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19339250/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/former-lehman-executive-calls-for-ouster-of-high-school-teacher/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Hugh McGee</category><category>HughMcgee</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is DirecTV's use of Chris Farley distasteful? Will it help the stock?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/is-directvs-use-of-chris-farley-distasteful-will-it-help-the-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/is-directvs-use-of-chris-farley-distasteful-will-it-help-the-s/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/is-directvs-use-of-chris-farley-distasteful-will-it-help-the-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/dtv-directtv-logo.jpg" />Very interesting story/rant over on <a href="http://www.walletpop.com/blog/2009/10/26/david-spade-brings-pal-chris-farley-back-from-the-dead-to-shill/?icid=main|aim|dl6|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fwww.walletpop.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F10%2F26%2Fdavid-spade-brings-pal-chris-farley-back-from-the-dead-to-shill%2F">WalletPop.com</a> about the latest in a line of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-directv-group-inc-cmn-stk/dtv/nas">DirecTV</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-directv-group-inc-cmn-stk/dtv/nas">DTV</a>) ads -- this one featuring Chris Farley. Jami Bernard, the rant's author, is upset that David Spade is using a famous clip from his and Farley's hit comedy <em>Tommy Boy</em> to advertise the satellite-television provider. Bernard argues that Farley would not have liked to be remembered for a minor fat joke.</p>
<p>How was that assumption exactly made? Farley made fun of his size. He made his money by being an oversized, clumsy, fish-out-of-water comedian, so how can we determine that a "minor fat joke" (which some may argue is the funniest part of a very funny movie) is how he would or would not like to be remembered? </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/is-directvs-use-of-chris-farley-distasteful-will-it-help-the-s/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is DirecTV's use of Chris Farley distasteful? Will it help the stock?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/is-directvs-use-of-chris-farley-distasteful-will-it-help-the-s/">Is DirecTV's use of Chris Farley distasteful? Will it help the stock?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/is-directvs-use-of-chris-farley-distasteful-will-it-help-the-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19211372/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/is-directvs-use-of-chris-farley-distasteful-will-it-help-the-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blogosphere</category><category>Blogs</category><category>Chris Farley</category><category>David Spade</category><category>DirecTV</category><category>DTV</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[James Altucher vs. Fred Wilson: Differing views on Internet investing]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/james-altucher-vs-fred-wilson-differing-views-on-internet-inve/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/james-altucher-vs-fred-wilson-differing-views-on-internet-inve/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/james-altucher-vs-fred-wilson-differing-views-on-internet-inve/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insider-blogging/" rel="tag">Insider Blogging</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/investing.jpg" />This weekend, financial writer and investor James Altucher published a controversial article, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124784696163158721.html">The Internet Is Dead (As An Investment)</a>, igniting a debate in the financial blogosphere by saying "...run for the hills when it comes to advising clients to invest in the Internet. The days of infinite margins, 1,000% productivity gains and growth of market throughout the universe are long over. Internet companies now should be treated, at best, like utility companies that get bought at about 10 times earnings and sold at 13 times earnings."<br /><br />It's an interesting point of view from someone so heavily invested in this space. (Altucher is an investor and partner in Social Leverage that funds Web businesses including <a href="http://www.bit.ly">Bit.ly</a>, <a href="http://www.stocktwits.com">Stocktwits</a>, <a href="http://www.tweetdeck.com">Tweetdeck</a> and <a href="http://www.ticketfly.com">Ticketfly</a>) <br /><br />Fred Wilson responded on his blog with a post entitled, <a href="http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/07/the-internet-is-alive-and-well-as-an-investment.html">The Internet Is Alive And Well (As An Investment)</a><br />saying "We (my partners and I at Union Square Ventures) think the Internet is one of those transformative technologies that changes everything."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/james-altucher-vs-fred-wilson-differing-views-on-internet-inve/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>James Altucher vs. Fred Wilson: Differing views on Internet investing</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/james-altucher-vs-fred-wilson-differing-views-on-internet-inve/">James Altucher vs. Fred Wilson: Differing views on Internet investing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/james-altucher-vs-fred-wilson-differing-views-on-internet-inve/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19103149/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/james-altucher-vs-fred-wilson-differing-views-on-internet-inve/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>altucher</category><category>internet investing</category><category>InternetInvesting</category><category>wilson</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daleela Farina]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Insights from top stock market bloggers around the Web]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/23/stock-market-insights-from-around-the-web/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/23/stock-market-insights-from-around-the-web/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/23/stock-market-insights-from-around-the-web/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/about-the-stock-bloggers/" rel="tag">About the Stock Bloggers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insider-blogging/" rel="tag">Insider Blogging</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/interviews/" rel="tag">Interviews</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><p>This is the market view from five prominent stock market bloggers. I asked them each one simple question: Where do you think the market is headed, and why? Here are their responses (listed in alphabetical order):<br /><br /><strong>James Altucher - </strong><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/"><strong>TheStreet.com</strong></a><br /><br />Altucher is a financial journalist for the <a href="http://www.ft.com/comment/columnists/jamesaltucher"><em>Financial Times</em></a><em>,</em> daily contributor to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thestreet-com-inc/tscm/nas">TheStreet.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thestreet-com-inc/tscm/nas">TSCM</a>), and founder of <a href="http://stockpickr.com/">Stockpickr</a>. His articles cover every angle of the market; he also stars in feature videos with other financial luminaries. He is the author of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Trade-Like-Hedge-Fund-Uncorrelated/dp/0471484857/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1240464206&amp;sr=1-1"><em>Trade like a Hedge Fund</em></a>, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Trade-Warren-Buffett-Wiley-Trading/dp/0471655848/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1240464180&amp;sr=1-1"><em>Trade Like Warren Buffett</em></a>, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/SuperCash-Hedge-Capitalism-Wiley-Trading/dp/0471745995/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1240464154&amp;sr=1-1"><em>SuperCa$h</em></a>, and<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Forever-Portfolio-Pick-Stocks-That/dp/1591842115/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1240464124&amp;sr=8-1"><em>The Forever Portfolio</em></a>.</p>
<p><em>"The market sold off too much. S&amp;P 700 was anticipating the apocalypse, which is not happening. With $15 trillion in stimulus worldwide happening over the next one to four years there is only one hedge for inflation: owning a broad spectrum of stocks. Buy internets, nuclear energy </em>(Altucher mentions <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-shaw-group-inc/sgr/nys">Shaw Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-shaw-group-inc/sgr/nys">SGR</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cameco-corporation/ccj/nys">Cameco Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cameco-corporation/ccj/nys">CCJ</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/usec-incorporated/usu/nys">USEC Inc </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/usec-incorporated/usu/nys">USU</a>) in <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/video/10490289/go-nuclear-with-these-nuclear-stocks.html">THIS</a> video segment)<em>, gold producers, and healthcare stocks."</em><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/23/stock-market-insights-from-around-the-web/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Insights from top stock market bloggers around the Web</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/23/stock-market-insights-from-around-the-web/">Insights from top stock market bloggers around the Web</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/23/stock-market-insights-from-around-the-web/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1525536/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/23/stock-market-insights-from-around-the-web/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daleela Farina]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Arm candy: The ultimate executive compensation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/arm-candy-the-ultimate-executive-compensation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/arm-candy-the-ultimate-executive-compensation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/arm-candy-the-ultimate-executive-compensation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rich-in-america/" rel="tag">Rich in America</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/comic-relief/" rel="tag">Comic Relief</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/rich_at_gala.jpg" />I have to admit that I'm a little na&iuml;ve. While I've long since realized that rich men and pretty girls go together like frat parties and crab lice, I always assumed that the connection was tenuous and unformed. Basically, I imagined that it was a matter of overlapping social circles: bars, nightclubs and restaurants use financial sector employees to boost their bottom line by buying overpriced drinks and over-engineered food. In order to get these socially inept adrenaline junkies in the door, hot spots try to attract models by offering free crudite, well-appointed vomitoria, and... you guessed it, large numbers of financial sector employees. Thus, the models find their money men, the money men get their gold diggers, and the restaurants get a lot of money. <br /><br />Now, I'm not a total rube. I never thought for a second that this connection was the result of random chance or pure romance. After all, there is nothing like a model to enhance the reputation and self-image of a hedge fund manager. Conversely, after <em>Baywatch</em> went off the air, financial-sector employees became the ultimate means for aging models to parley their looks into long-term financial security. Both groups have something to offer the other; while this may not be the basis for true love, it certainly serves as a stable foundation for a business arrangement.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/arm-candy-the-ultimate-executive-compensation/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Arm candy: The ultimate executive compensation</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/arm-candy-the-ultimate-executive-compensation/">Arm candy: The ultimate executive compensation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/arm-candy-the-ultimate-executive-compensation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1443897/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/arm-candy-the-ultimate-executive-compensation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Craigs List</category><category>CraigsList</category><category>Dating a banker anonymous</category><category>DatingABankerAnonymous</category><category>Edward Hayes</category><category>EdwardHayes</category><category>HEGI</category><category>McSweeneys</category><category>New York Post</category><category>NewYorkPost</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Watson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bernard Madoff finally speaks his mind -- sort of]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/bernard-madoff-finally-speaks-his-mind-sort-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/bernard-madoff-finally-speaks-his-mind-sort-of/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/bernard-madoff-finally-speaks-his-mind-sort-of/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/madoffpicture.jpg" />Leave it to <a href="http://money.aol.com/madoff">some aspiring comedian</a> to come up with the <a href="http://www.bernard-madoff-scam.blogspot.com/">"official" blog of accused fraudster Bernard Madoff</a>.<br /><br />That's right someone writing under the pen name "Not the Devil" offers readers Madoff's "opinions" on the a variety of issues and Wall Street personalities. The results can be amusing, particularly if you did not lose money in Madoff's immense Ponzi scheme.<br /><br />The blog takes aim at the media's fascination with Madoff. "To whoever it was that managed to get yourself a bi-line in today's Sunday business section: You need to get more credible people to comment; a former FBI agent portrays me as a 'psychopath," the fake Madoff argues.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/bernard-madoff-finally-speaks-his-mind-sort-of/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bernard Madoff finally speaks his mind -- sort of</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/bernard-madoff-finally-speaks-his-mind-sort-of/">Bernard Madoff finally speaks his mind -- sort of</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bernard-madoff-scam.blogspot.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/bernard-madoff-finally-speaks-his-mind-sort-of/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1441167/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/bernard-madoff-finally-speaks-his-mind-sort-of/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bernard Madoff</category><category>BernardMadoff</category><category>john thain</category><category>JohnThain</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>madoff</category><category>ponzi scheme</category><category>PonziScheme</category><category>richard fuld</category><category>richard nixon</category><category>RichardFuld</category><category>RichardNixon</category><category>rod blagojevich</category><category>RodBlagojevich</category><category>SEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[An interview with a blogger who made $70,000 last month: Me!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/an-interview-with-a-blogger-who-made-70-000-last-month-me/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/an-interview-with-a-blogger-who-made-70-000-last-month-me/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/an-interview-with-a-blogger-who-made-70-000-last-month-me/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/about-the-stock-bloggers/" rel="tag">About the Stock Bloggers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/sykes_photo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />A little while back, I sat down and asked a few questions of $30,000/month blogger John Chow in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/a-30-000-per-month-blogger-shares-his-secrets/">this</a> post and it was a big hit. Few people realize there was so much money to be made from blogging.<br /><br />A few months later, everything's changed: John Chow isn't reporting his monthly numbers anymore and even if he was, my personal blog, <a href="http://www.timothysykes.com">TimothySykes.com</a>, would be blowing him away as just the other day, I detailed in <a href="http://timothysykes.com/2008/09/08/how-my-blog-made-70000-even-while-i-went-away-for-10-days-in-august/">this</a> post how my little blog earned $70,000 in August.<br /><br />Yes, you read that correctly, I might write for AOL and TradingMarkets.com, but I'm also an internet entrepreneur and judging from my blog's monetary growth -- $15,000 in May, $25,000 in June (both estimated since the figures weren't bragworthy), $45,000 in July (see detailed breakdown <a href="http://timothysykes.com/2008/08/06/suck-on-this-john-chow-my-blog-made-45000-last-month/">here</a>) and of course August's blowout month which is made even more impressive considering I took a trip to Japan for the last 10 days of the month (see itinerary <a href="http://timothysykes.com/2008/08/19/how-to-spend-tradingblogging-profits-my-7-day-11000-trip-to-japan/">here</a>), I'm succeeding rather nicely.<br /><br />So, in honor of my religion -- Judaism (at Passover we ask ourselves four questions) -- I asked myself the four questions that matter most about what's worked and what hasn't. Obviously I'm biased, but I'll try to be as brutally honest as possible, as usual.<br /><br /><strong>Q: Timothy, to what do you attribute your blog's astounding ability to make money even as traffic growth has flatlined somewhat?</strong><br /><strong>A: </strong>Good question (and I must say you're looking rather handsome as you write this). I'd say No. 1 it's not holding anything back. Brutal honesty. With a lot of joking around/sarcasm. In a word: real. <br /><br />I have no long one page sales sheets nor overly technical posts. It's all about writing from the heart -- whether some/many take offense or not. Considering I've been a profitable stock trader for the vast majority of my decade-long career, my experience and knowledge is worth something...especially considering that 90% of traders lose money!<br /><br /><br /><em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0979549701/timothysykes-20"></a></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/an-interview-with-a-blogger-who-made-70-000-last-month-me/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>An interview with a blogger who made $70,000 last month: Me!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/an-interview-with-a-blogger-who-made-70-000-last-month-me/">An interview with a blogger who made $70,000 last month: Me!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/an-interview-with-a-blogger-who-made-70-000-last-month-me/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1322874/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/an-interview-with-a-blogger-who-made-70-000-last-month-me/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blogging</category><category>featured</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy Sykes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mark Cuban on the cause of bank meltdowns -- it's not short-selling!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/20/mark-cuban-on-the-cause-of-bank-meltdowns-its-not-short-sell/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/20/mark-cuban-on-the-cause-of-bank-meltdowns-its-not-short-sell/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/20/mark-cuban-on-the-cause-of-bank-meltdowns-its-not-short-sell/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p>With theories flying about the cause of the problems in the financial sector, just about every possibility has been discussed. Unfortunately, the media has given tremendous attention to the "evil short-seller conspiracy" idea but, <a href="http://blogmaverick.com/2008/09/15/stock-market-meltdowns-why-they-will-happen-again-and-again-and-again/">on his blog</a>, billionaire Mark Cuban offers a more sane alternative: "Risk and reward have been decoupled for CEOs on Wall Street."</p>
<p>Cuban writes: "If you are the CEO of a major public company, once you qualify for your golden parachute there is absolutely no reason not to throw the Hail Mary pass, and do high risk deals every chance you get.... Lets just say for example, you run Fannie May or Freddie Mac. You basically f*** up the entire housing economy. Your punishment ? You walk away with 9mm and 14mm dollars as severance."</p>
<p>Instead of cracking down on short-selling, regulators and especially directors should be looking at the corporate governance issues that led executives at companies like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">Fannie Mae</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">FNM</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys">Lehman Brothers</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys">LEH</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">American International Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>). One possible solution that is already beginning to take hold at many companies is providing executives with restricted stock grants instead of options so that there is an incentive to retain value rather than betting the farm on growth.</p>
<p>While Cuban's analysis is probably overly simplistic -- the recent mayhem is not only a result of poorly structured CEO pay -- the huge unchecked risks and excessive leverage at so many companies should lead to a renewed call for changes in corporate America.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/20/mark-cuban-on-the-cause-of-bank-meltdowns-its-not-short-sell/">Mark Cuban on the cause of bank meltdowns -- it's not short-selling!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogmaverick.com/2008/09/15/stock-market-meltdowns-why-they-will-happen-again-and-again-and-again/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/20/mark-cuban-on-the-cause-of-bank-meltdowns-its-not-short-sell/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1319722/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/20/mark-cuban-on-the-cause-of-bank-meltdowns-its-not-short-sell/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>Fannie Mae</category><category>FNM</category><category>LEH</category><category>Lehman</category><category>Mark Cuban</category><category>short selling</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Media World: Yahoo! rumors spin out of control]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/media-world-yahoo-rumors-spin-out-of-control/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/media-world-yahoo-rumors-spin-out-of-control/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/media-world-yahoo-rumors-spin-out-of-control/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/yahoo_headquarters_victor_240.jpg" />Some people are so eager for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) to buy <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas"> YHOO</a>) that they will do anything to make it happen -- even spread rumors to gullible members of the media. I pity the investors who <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601213&amp;sid=aiRUs2bVzYEw&amp;refer=home">bought Yahoo!'s stock on this rumor</a>.</p>
<p>Earlier today, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/sources-microsoft-and-yahoo-talks-back-on/">TechCrunch's Michael Arrington </a>reported that the talks were back on but also noted that "The information we have is thin, but what one source is saying that Microsoft is talking a price lower than the $33." Thin? So even Arrington was not sure whether he was being told the truth. Interesting.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9975467-7.html">CNET's Dawn Kawamoto </a>refuted TechCrunch's post, arguing that all Microsoft wanted to do was "sweeten its previous offer" of a partial buyout of Yahoo!'s search business, citing "one major investor who has been in contact without parties."</p>
<p>So, Kawamoto is taking the word of one person to make such a bold statement. This person must be very important if both Microsoft and Yahoo! are willing to confide their most inner-most confidences in him or her. Or maybe not. It's tough to tell. Dow Jones Newswires also denied Arrington's report but added that its sources "indicated the companies might be open to alternative transactions" whatever that means.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/media-world-yahoo-rumors-spin-out-of-control/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Media World: Yahoo! rumors spin out of control</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/media-world-yahoo-rumors-spin-out-of-control/">Media World: Yahoo! rumors spin out of control</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601213&amp;sid=aiRUs2bVzYEw&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/media-world-yahoo-rumors-spin-out-of-control/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1235641/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/media-world-yahoo-rumors-spin-out-of-control/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CNET</category><category>Dawn kawamoto</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mergers</category><category>michael arrington</category><category>msft</category><category>techcrunch</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Carl Icahn's blog goes live!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/carl-icahns-blog-goes-live/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/carl-icahns-blog-goes-live/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/carl-icahns-blog-goes-live/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a></p>The long-awaited blog of billionaire activist investor and sometime "corporate raider" Carl Icahn has gone live and the results are delightful. So far <a href="http://www.icahnreport.com/">The Icahn Report</a> has seven posts, none of which discuss his own holdings.<br /><br />Much of what's on <a href="http://www.icahnreport.com/">The Icahn Report</a> will be familiar to anyone who has followed Icahn's grumblings about corporate governance in the past. Here's a great quote:<em> "Poor corporate governance now threatens more than just potential shareholder value; it threatens this country's very economic survival."</em><br /><br />The name of the post? "Corporate democracy is a myth."<br /><br />The stuff on the site so far is classic Icahn -- nothing new, but a refreshing expose of corporate America nonetheless and talk you won't hear anywhere else. Normally talk about compensation gone wild is addressed as a populist issue, but Icahn discusses it the way it should be addressed: as a corporate governance issue.<br /><br />If Icahn can keep up his blogging, the site could well become one of the most important financial blogs going. To learn more about the early part of Icahn's career, check out <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/15/book-review-king-icahn-the-biography-of-a-renegade-capitalist/">King Icahn</a> -- one of the best out-of-print business books I've found.<br /><br />I'd be thrilled to see future posts lashing out at management teams and directors at specific companies.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/carl-icahns-blog-goes-live/">Carl Icahn's blog goes live!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.icahnreport.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/carl-icahns-blog-goes-live/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1230778/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/carl-icahns-blog-goes-live/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activist investing</category><category>activist investors</category><category>ActivistInvesting</category><category>ActivistInvestors</category><category>Carl Icahn</category><category>CarlIcahn</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Associated Press puts bloggers on notice]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/associated-press-put-bloggers-on-notice/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/associated-press-put-bloggers-on-notice/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/associated-press-put-bloggers-on-notice/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/about-the-stock-bloggers/" rel="tag">About the Stock Bloggers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/computer-keyboard-by-bennylin0724.jpg" alt="keyboard" />Associated Press has made it quite clear that the organization intends to put the hammer down on bloggers who quote that news service. As one who routinely quotes and links to Associated Press content, all I can say is, "Yeah, good luck with that."<br /><br />At first, AP took a hard-line stance, demanding that one particular blog should remove seven pieces of content which featured quotes from AP articles and stating that bloggers across the internet should curtail the use of AP content. However, when faced with a swift backlash from a cross section of well-known and heavily-read bloggers, the news service took a big step back. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/16/business/media/16ap.html?_r=2&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&amp;adxnnlx=1213614564-aQGDFj2SvkMy5BPEgdNHjw&amp;oref=slogin"><em>The New York Times</em> reported</a> that Jim Kennedy, vice president and strategy director of The A.P., stated in an interview that the agency was "heavy-handed" and that A.P. would "rethink its policies toward bloggers."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/associated-press-put-bloggers-on-notice/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Associated Press puts bloggers on notice</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/associated-press-put-bloggers-on-notice/">Associated Press puts bloggers on notice</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/16/business/media/16ap.html?_r=2&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&amp;adxnnlx=1213614564-aQGDFj2SvkMy5BPEgdNHjw&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/associated-press-put-bloggers-on-notice/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1226741/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/associated-press-put-bloggers-on-notice/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Associated Press</category><category>AssociatedPress</category><category>blogging</category><category>fair use</category><category>FairUse</category><category>inthenews</category><category>quote</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Shorting energy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/shorting-energy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/shorting-energy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/shorting-energy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a></p><div><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/todd_harrison.jpg" />Editor's Note: In Toddo's honor, this post comes from Ag and Energy specialist Ryan Krueger. Please see more at </em><a href="http://www.minyanville.com"><em>www.minyanville.com</em></a><em>.</em><br /><br />In the first six months of 2008, the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-states-oil-fund-lp/uso/ase"><strong>United States Oil Fund</strong></a> (AMEX: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-states-oil-fund-lp/uso/ase">USO</a>) has seen short interest rise 140%, or two times the total float. For its part, the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/powershares-db-commodity-index-tracking-fund/dbc/ase"><strong>Powershares DB Commodity Index</strong></a> (AMEX: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/powershares-db-commodity-index-tracking-fund/dbc/ase">DBC</a>) has watched its short interest climb more than 500% this year. According to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys"><strong>Morgan Stanley</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>), the average short interest among exchange-traded funds (ETF) in the U.S. is 10%. </div>
<p>I'll alert <a target="_blank" href="http://minyanville.com/">Minyanville.com</a> readers when Congressional hearings are scheduled to address this other form of speculation, which includes windfall losses. </p>
<p>As for the market, it would seem the largest institutions are equally hopeful -- for the sake of their relative performance -- that this simply can't be: According to some reports I've seen, they're roughly 500 basis points underweight energy. </p>
<p>I'd imagine both will continue to be long shaking heads.</p>
<em>Positions in Energy, Futures and Equities.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/shorting-energy/">Shorting energy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/shorting-energy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1226796/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/shorting-energy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>agriculture</category><category>agriculture stocks</category><category>AgricultureStocks</category><category>morgan stanley</category><category>MorganStanley</category><category>oil</category><category>uso</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Billionaire Mark Cuban addresses CEO pay]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/03/billionaire-mark-cuban-addresses-ceo-pay/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/03/billionaire-mark-cuban-addresses-ceo-pay/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/03/billionaire-mark-cuban-addresses-ceo-pay/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p>My perennial near-hero Mark Cuban recently examined the issue of CEO pay, over on his handy soapbox, The Blog Maverick. In his blog post titled <a href="http://www.blogmaverick.com/2008/04/15/my-2-cents-on-ceo-pay/">"My 2 Cents on CEO Pay,"</a> Mr. Cuban outlined his position on the subject and tossed some ideas around. The post makes a good read, and the author makes some good points. Additionally, the 65 or so comments by the readers are well worth the time to cruise them.</p>
<p>I'd like to discuss and expand upon an idea someone presented in addition to those discussed by Mark Cuban. It's actually a reverse scenario to what Mr. Cuban describes as moving chief executive officers into "the cash zone." In the Cuban scenario, the CEO would be paid cash, without additional compensation through stock grants, in order to make their pay more tangible and visible as a business expenditure. Mr. Cuban also asserts that this might more closely align CEO compensation with company performance. It's an admirable idea, but I doubt that it will ever happen.</p>
<p>In this alternate approach, we give the CEO all the stock certificates he or she can swallow. Then we provide an equal number to be divided among all other employees of the company. In this manner of compensation, <em>all</em> employees have their hands on the ball. The concept of laboring to line the pockets of someone else with gold would become extinct. The CEO would suddenly become a real person in the eyes of the rank-and-file laborers. Likewise, the labor force would be inextricably linked to the financial success of the CEO. If labor is to share the risk, they should also share the reward.</p>
<p>A further stop-gap to this scenario would be if upper management deemed that labor cuts were needed to create profitability, or for any reason other than "cause," they and the CEO would be required to surrender share holdings equal to the holdings of the displaced workers. These surrendered shares would then be distributed to the pink-slipped workforce members, with the company paying all applicable taxes on the transfer. Additionally, no party would be allowed to liquidate more than 5% of their holdings in any one year, as long as they were employed by the company, and upper management would be required to maintain holdings at least equal to those of the workforce.</p>
<p>I know it's a lofty scenario, but it sure would beat the heck out of what we have going on now.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/03/billionaire-mark-cuban-addresses-ceo-pay/">Billionaire Mark Cuban addresses CEO pay</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 03 May 2008 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.blogmaverick.com/2008/04/15/my-2-cents-on-ceo-pay/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/03/billionaire-mark-cuban-addresses-ceo-pay/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1185198/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/03/billionaire-mark-cuban-addresses-ceo-pay/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Blog Maverick</category><category>CEO</category><category>compensation</category><category>down size</category><category>Mark Cuban</category><category>pay</category><category>profitability</category><category>stock grant</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Overstock earnings questioned by ex-con]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/overstock-earnings-questions-by-ex-con/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/overstock-earnings-questions-by-ex-con/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/overstock-earnings-questions-by-ex-con/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p>Former Crazy Eddie CFO and sometime <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/overstock-com-inc-del/ostk/nas">Overstock.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/overstock-com-inc-del/ostk/nas">OSTK</a>) critic Sam E. Antar has posted an item on his blog accusing that company of a "stock market manipulation scheme."<br /><br />Read <em>Overstock.com and Patrick Byrne: Anatomy of a Stock Market Manipulation Scheme - First Quarter Earnings Release</em> <a href="http://whitecollarfraud.blogspot.com/2008/04/overstockcom-and-patrick-byrne-anatomy.html">here</a>.<br /><br />In the post, Antar alleges that the first quarter earnings press release issued on Friday was "intentionally timed with expiration of options to manipulate the market (i.e., as a "short squeeze") and to bury and downplay grave news of a criminal investigation in California."<br /><br />Analyzing the company's numbers, Antar points out that the company's revenue from its auction business declined more than 44% year-over-year, in spite of CEO Patrick Byrne's claim as recently as January that "things look better from here" for the auction site.<br /><br />Antar accuses the company of violations of SEC rule 10b-5: interesting given that the company is currently the target of an SEC investigation.<br /><br />Here are a few of my past posts on the company that one securities lawyer affectionately refers to as OverSchlock.com:<br /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/19/shop-at-overstock-support-cyberstalking/"><br />Shop at Overstock, Support Cyberstalking.</a> <br /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/overstocks-patrick-byrne-hypocrite/">Patrick Byrne, Hypocrite</a><br /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/is-overstock-ceo-patrick-byrne-defending-the-universal-express-f/">Patrick Byrne Defending USXP Fraud?</a><br /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/overstock-com-continues-an-unprecedented-run-of-loopy-press-rele/">More Goofy Press Releases</a><br /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/overstock-com-ceo-patrick-byrne-overpaid-at-0/">Byrne overpaid at $0?</a><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/overstock-earnings-questions-by-ex-con/">Overstock earnings questioned by ex-con</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://whitecollarfraud.blogspot.com/2008/04/overstockcom-and-patrick-byrne-anatomy.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/overstock-earnings-questions-by-ex-con/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1173120/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/overstock-earnings-questions-by-ex-con/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Antar</category><category>OSTK</category><category>Overstock</category><category>Pat Byrne</category><category>PatByrne</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Perez Hilton hits the airwaves -- good move!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/09/perez-hilton-hits-the-airwaves-good-move/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/09/perez-hilton-hits-the-airwaves-good-move/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/09/perez-hilton-hits-the-airwaves-good-move/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/perezhilton_logo.jpg" />The indefatigable Perez Hilton has built a bigger career out of blogging than anyone else I can think of. Starting as just a regular guy blogging about celebrities from his bedroom, Mr. Hilton -- whose real name is Mario Lavandeira --has turned PerezHilton.com into the 752nd most visited website in the world, <a href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/perezhilton.com">according</a> to Alexa. And he's done it with semi-literate commentary on celebrity gossip, writing words like "busted" and drawing "&lt;3s" on photos of stars. I say this, by the way, as a huge fan of his site. Then he parlayed that into a show on VH1 and now, he'll be hitting the airwaves with a twice-daily, three-minute celebrity update, launching in major markets soon.<br /><br />This is perfect. Perez Hilton would likely be overexposed with a full radio show -- he just isn't that talented. But he'll be funny for about three minutes, driving tremendous traffic to his site.<br /><br /><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120771264446600937.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace">According</a> (subscription required) to the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, "Mr. Lavandeira said he draws inspiration from other celebrities who carefully cultivate public images and business deals, such as Paris Hilton."<br /><br />Given all the traffic he generates, I wonder how much one of the big media companies would pay for his site. Alternatively, I would absolutely kill to see a Perez Hilton IPO.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/09/perez-hilton-hits-the-airwaves-good-move/">Perez Hilton hits the airwaves -- good move!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120771264446600937.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/09/perez-hilton-hits-the-airwaves-good-move/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1162350/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/09/perez-hilton-hits-the-airwaves-good-move/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Perez Hilton</category><category>PerezHilton</category><category>radio</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Biovail settles charges with SEC]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/biovail-settles-charges-with-sec/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/biovail-settles-charges-with-sec/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/biovail-settles-charges-with-sec/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p>Naked short selling whiner <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/biovail-corporation/bvf/nys">Biovail</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/biovail-corporation/bvf/nys">BVF</a>) has settled accounting fraud charged with the SEC, agreeing to pay a fine of $10 million. According to the SEC's complaint:<br /><em><br />The SEC's complaint alleges that present and former senior Biovail executives, obsessed with meeting quarterly and annual earnings guidance, repeatedly overstated earnings and hid losses in order to deceive investors and create the appearance of achieving earnings goals. When it ultimately became impossible to continue concealing the company's inability to meet its own earnings guidance, Biovail actively misled investors and analysts about the reasons for the company's poor performance.</em><br /><br />The SEC adds that former chairman and chief executive officer Eugene Melnyk, former chief financial officer Brian Crombie, current controller John Miszuk; and current chief financial officer Kenneth G. Howling still face charges.<br /><br />Biovail's allegations of a naked short selling conspiracy and menacing antics intimidated analysts, convincing Banc of America Securities, which had been negative about the company, to drop coverage of the stock. <a href="http://garyweiss.blogspot.com/2008/03/sec-nails-biovail-will-60-minutes-issue.html">On his blog</a>, financial journalist Gary Weiss writes that "Despite all the post-Enron rhetoric about the sanctity of independent analysts, the SEC has done woefully little against companies like Biovail and Overstock that want analysts to be obedient little puppies."<br /><br />It seems like every few weeks, another naked short selling poster child is exposed as a securities fraud. Back in 2006, then-CEO Eugene Melnyk<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/24/60minutes/main1438812.shtml"> told 60 Minutes</a> that "When you've got these companies, these people out there trying to bring you down, we're lucky we survived."<br /><br />Moral of story: when a company starts complaining about naked short sellers conspiring to drive down the share price, sell the stock and ask questions after.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/biovail-settles-charges-with-sec/">Biovail settles charges with SEC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-50.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/biovail-settles-charges-with-sec/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1147824/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/biovail-settles-charges-with-sec/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Biovail</category><category>BVF</category><category>Gary Weiss</category><category>GaryWeiss</category><category>inthenews</category><category>naked short</category><category>naked short selling</category><category>NakedShort</category><category>NakedShortSelling</category><category>short</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A $30,000 per month blogger shares his secrets]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/a-30-000-per-month-blogger-shares-his-secrets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/a-30-000-per-month-blogger-shares-his-secrets/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/a-30-000-per-month-blogger-shares-his-secrets/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/about-the-stock-bloggers/" rel="tag">About the Stock Bloggers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a></p>Even though I just recently started blogging in October 2007-- after <a href="http://timothysykes.com/2007/10/03/the-end-is-the-beginning/">I closed</a> my hedge fund -- I first began to understand that there was some real money to be made when Jeremy Schoemaker of <a href="http://www.shoemoney.com">Shoemoney.com</a> posted<a href="http://www.shoemoney.com/gallery/v/misc/adsensecheck.jpg.html?g2_imageViewsIndex=1"> THIS</a> picture of a check for $132,994.97 from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) as his AdSense income in August 2005.<br /><br />Later that year, John Chow of <a href="http://www.johnchow.com">JohnChow.com</a> also started blogging about ways to make money online and now he, too, regularly earns $30,000 per month from blogging, all <a href="http://www.johnchow.com/blog-income-report-february-2008/ ">broken down and detailed</a> on his site. Since my monthly blog income on my own personal blog is just a few thousand dollars, I decided to ask John Chow for some pearls of wisdom, here's the interview:<br /><strong><br />1. What have been some of the keys to your success? </strong><br /><br />I think one of the biggest reasons for my blogging success has been consistency. There has never been a single day that has gone by where I did not have a new blog post for people to read. One of the biggest mistakes a new blogger makes is by being an on again off again blogger. You can't build a blog this way. <br /><br />Another key is just being myself. I show the good and the bad and let the chips fall where they may. A blog is not CNN or News.com. Your readers are there to read your opinion. You should give it to them instead of just giving the news without an opinion. <br /><br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/a-30-000-per-month-blogger-shares-his-secrets/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A $30,000 per month blogger shares his secrets</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/a-30-000-per-month-blogger-shares-his-secrets/">A $30,000 per month blogger shares his secrets</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/a-30-000-per-month-blogger-shares-his-secrets/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1142649/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/a-30-000-per-month-blogger-shares-his-secrets/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>make-money-online blogs</category><category>Make-money-onlineBlogs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy Sykes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Billionaire Mark Cuban offers opinions on blogging]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/15/billionaire-mark-cuban-offers-opinions-on-blogging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/15/billionaire-mark-cuban-offers-opinions-on-blogging/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/15/billionaire-mark-cuban-offers-opinions-on-blogging/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><p><img width="240" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/computer-keyboard-by-bennylin0724.jpg" alt="keyboard" />I often spend a little time over at <a href="http://www.blogmaverick.com/2008/03/13/blogging-and-newspapers-a-lesson-in-how-not-to-brand-and-market/">Blogmaverick.com</a>, where Mark Cuban recently sought to give the world of blogging a little of his insightful perspective. It seems that Mr. Cuban finds little to respect in the world of blogging, or at least in the world of slipshod ,cookie-cutter blogging. Though I found Mark's blog entry a trifle difficult to read, which is quite unusual coming from him, I nonetheless agree with most of the body of his post. I especially agree with his assertion that just because a blog is backed by the name of a well-known media organization does not in itself render that blog worthy of special notice.</p>
<p>Mark Cuban wrote, "<em>...newspapers having 'bloggers' is easily one of the many bad decisions that newspapers have made over the past 10 years."</em> If newspapers are going in a wrong direction by producing blogs, perhaps they need to reinstall the title <em>reporter</em> and drop the title <em>blogger </em>to give a different perspective to the reader. If newspapers are using the term <em>blog</em> simply as a culture hook, then they have it all wrong and they're just selling their reporters short. I believe that I'm in agreement with Mark Cuban when I say that true reporters should be releasing content within some format other than blogs. Blogging is what I do, and I'll be the first to tell you that I'm no reporter. The titles are <em>absolutely</em> <em>not</em> interchangeable, though they may sometimes be used correctly in tandem.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/15/billionaire-mark-cuban-offers-opinions-on-blogging/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Billionaire Mark Cuban offers opinions on blogging</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/15/billionaire-mark-cuban-offers-opinions-on-blogging/">Billionaire Mark Cuban offers opinions on blogging</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.blogmaverick.com/2008/03/10/bloggers-in-the-mavs-locker-room/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/15/billionaire-mark-cuban-offers-opinions-on-blogging/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1139990/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/15/billionaire-mark-cuban-offers-opinions-on-blogging/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advice</category><category>blog</category><category>Blog Maverick</category><category>bloggers</category><category>blogging</category><category>branding</category><category>locker room</category><category>Mark Cuban</category><category>media</category><category>New York Times</category><category>NY Times</category><category>reporter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
