<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner's 'Sucker Punch' Loses to News Corp's 'Wimpy Kid']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/time-warners-sucker-punch-loses-to-news-corps-wimpy-kid/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/time-warners-sucker-punch-loses-to-news-corps-wimpy-kid/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/time-warners-sucker-punch-loses-to-news-corps-wimpy-kid/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Sucker Punch" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2011/03/sucker-punch-2011.jpg" />Time Warner (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) probably thought it had the weekend all wrapped up. <em>Sucker Punch</em> looked like it would debut at the top in its opening frame. I don't blame the execs behind this fantasy piece; in theory, it should have brought in all the youthful demographics hungry for a big spring hit to feast upon.</p>
<p>Didn't happen. Instead, News Corp.'s (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) <em>Diary of Wimpy Kid: Rodrick Rules</em> was number one with a gross of well over $23 million, according to domestic-theater data at <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Box Office Mojo</a>. <em>Punch</em> came in second with $19 million.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/time-warners-sucker-punch-loses-to-news-corps-wimpy-kid/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time Warner's 'Sucker Punch' Loses to News Corp's 'Wimpy Kid'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/time-warners-sucker-punch-loses-to-news-corps-wimpy-kid/">Time Warner's 'Sucker Punch' Loses to News Corp's 'Wimpy Kid'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/time-warners-sucker-punch-loses-to-news-corps-wimpy-kid/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19894485/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/time-warners-sucker-punch-loses-to-news-corps-wimpy-kid/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>diary of a wimpy kid: rodrick rules</category><category>inthenews</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>sucker punch</category><category>Time Warner TWX</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[It's Disney vs. Time Warner at the Multiplex]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/21/its-disney-vs-time-warner-at-the-multiplex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/21/its-disney-vs-time-warner-at-the-multiplex/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/21/its-disney-vs-time-warner-at-the-multiplex/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/timewarnerlogo.jpg" alt="" />According to <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?view=&amp;yr=2011&amp;wknd=07a&amp;p=">Box Office Mojo</a>'s early estimates for the four-day holiday weekend, Time Warner Inc.'s (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) thriller <em>Unknown</em> has taken the number-one position with a domestic haul of $25.6 million. The next two movies on the chart came close to that figure, but the more interesting thing about them is that they come courtesy of The Walt Disney Company (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>).</p>
<p>In second place is <em>Gnomeo and Juliet</em> with $24.8 million. Pretty cool, actually. I didn't think the cartoon would necessarily hold up as well as it has in the second weekend.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/21/its-disney-vs-time-warner-at-the-multiplex/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>It's Disney vs. Time Warner at the Multiplex</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/21/its-disney-vs-time-warner-at-the-multiplex/">It's Disney vs. Time Warner at the Multiplex</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?view=&amp;yr=2011&amp;wknd=07a&amp;p=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/21/its-disney-vs-time-warner-at-the-multiplex/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19853229/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/21/its-disney-vs-time-warner-at-the-multiplex/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>Gnomeo and Juliet</category><category>inthenews</category><category>justin bieber never say never</category><category>time warner</category><category>twx</category><category>Unknown</category><category>via.b</category><category>viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Viacom's Bieber Film Gives Sony's Sandler Project a Fight]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/14/viacoms-bieber-film-gives-sonys-sandler-project-a-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/14/viacoms-bieber-film-gives-sonys-sandler-project-a-fight/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/14/viacoms-bieber-film-gives-sonys-sandler-project-a-fight/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img alt="Justin Bieber Never Say Never" hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2011/02/never-say-never.jpg" />Based on what I was reading going into the weekend, I thought the multiplex was going to be an unexciting place. I was therefore rather surprised to see what I thought were relatively impressive numbers attached to the top films.</p>
<p>According to early estimates for domestic grosses at <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Box Office Mojo</a>, Sony's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>) <em>Just Go With It</em>, starring Adam Sandler, is so far credited with a first-place showing; the movie is believed to have made about $31 million for the Friday-through-Sunday period. But Viacom's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-b/via.b/nys">VIA.B</a>) <em>Justin Bieber: Never Say Never </em>product isn't giving up without a fight. At the time of writing, it was in second place with $30.3 million. Essentially, it's a tie.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/14/viacoms-bieber-film-gives-sonys-sandler-project-a-fight/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Viacom's Bieber Film Gives Sony's Sandler Project a Fight</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/14/viacoms-bieber-film-gives-sonys-sandler-project-a-fight/">Viacom's Bieber Film Gives Sony's Sandler Project a Fight</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/14/viacoms-bieber-film-gives-sonys-sandler-project-a-fight/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19841859/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/14/viacoms-bieber-film-gives-sonys-sandler-project-a-fight/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Adam Sandler</category><category>box office</category><category>CMCSA</category><category>comcast</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>Focus Features</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>Gnomeo and Juliet</category><category>inthenews</category><category>just go with it</category><category>justin bieber never say never</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>The Eagle</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GE's 'Little Fockers' Beats Viacom's 'True Grit']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/27/ges-little-fockers-beats-viacoms-true-grit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/27/ges-little-fockers-beats-viacoms-true-grit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/27/ges-little-fockers-beats-viacoms-true-grit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><em><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/12/little-fockers-movie-poster.jpg" />Little Fockers</em>, the comedy sequel starring Ben Stiller and Robert DeNiro, distributed by General Electric's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal Pictures, came in first this past weekend. According to early estimates over at <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Box Office Mojo</a>, the film made $34 million for the Friday-through-Sunday frame (it opened last Wednesday, so its total is now approaching $50 million).<br />
<br />
That easily beat the other new movie in the marketplace, Viacom's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-b/via.b/nys">VIA.B</a>) <em>True Grit</em>. This one stars Jeff Bridges and was directed by Joel and Ethan Coen. <em>Grit</em> was second with roughly $25 million. It also opened last Wednesday; it has so far captured over $36 million.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/27/ges-little-fockers-beats-viacoms-true-grit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GE's 'Little Fockers' Beats Viacom's 'True Grit'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/27/ges-little-fockers-beats-viacoms-true-grit/">GE's 'Little Fockers' Beats Viacom's 'True Grit'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 27 Dec 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/27/ges-little-fockers-beats-viacoms-true-grit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19777178/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/27/ges-little-fockers-beats-viacoms-true-grit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ben stiller</category><category>box office</category><category>DIS</category><category>disney</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jeff Bridges</category><category>little fockers</category><category>robert deniro</category><category>tron: legacy</category><category>True Grit</category><category>VIA</category><category>viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Disney's 'Tron': Did the Mouse Win or Lose?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/disneys-tron-did-the-mouse-win-or-lose/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/disneys-tron-did-the-mouse-win-or-lose/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/disneys-tron-did-the-mouse-win-or-lose/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Tron Legacy" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/12/tron.jpg" />Disney (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) released <em>Tron: Legacy</em> this past weekend. I wrote down <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/17/disney-and-the-new-tron-are-investors-excited/">some of my thoughts</a> about the project ahead of the results. Well, the results are now in -- I dare any shareholder to say they weren't disappointing. </p>
<p>Actually, I'm sure there are some shareholders out there who possess the ability to skillfully spin the opening statistic to a more golden hue. I'm not one of them; in fact, I have no desire to do so. According to <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Box Office Mojo</a>, the <em>Tron</em> sequel made $44 million. You know what? A $44 million take from domestic theaters for the first three days is lousy when one juxtaposes the significant marketing investment put in place to support the film. Indeed, there was no way for anyone not to know that the picture was hitting theaters in the middle of December.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/disneys-tron-did-the-mouse-win-or-lose/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Disney's 'Tron': Did the Mouse Win or Lose?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/disneys-tron-did-the-mouse-win-or-lose/">Disney's 'Tron': Did the Mouse Win or Lose?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/disneys-tron-did-the-mouse-win-or-lose/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19771275/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/disneys-tron-did-the-mouse-win-or-lose/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>DIS</category><category>disney</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>tron: legacy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Disney and the New 'Tron': Are Investors Excited?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/17/disney-and-the-new-tron-are-investors-excited/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/17/disney-and-the-new-tron-are-investors-excited/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/17/disney-and-the-new-tron-are-investors-excited/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/06/03pixar.jpg" />Here we go again. It's another big movie weekend for The Walt Disney Company (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>). The sequel to a science-fiction classic from the early '80s hits theaters today. The marketing for <em>Tron: Legacy</em> is everywhere right now (or it appears that way, at least). There are many news pieces musing about the importance of the flick to the studio. Question is, what does Wall Street think?</p>
<p>At the moment (about ninety minutes away from the closing bell), shares of Disney are down a penny to $37. That's exactly one dollar away from the 52-week high. The market as a whole isn't too exciting this afternoon anyway, but still, I would have liked to have seen a little more buying interest in the stock ahead of the movie (I'm a shareholder of the company).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/17/disney-and-the-new-tron-are-investors-excited/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Disney and the New 'Tron': Are Investors Excited?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/17/disney-and-the-new-tron-are-investors-excited/">Disney and the New 'Tron': Are Investors Excited?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/17/disney-and-the-new-tron-are-investors-excited/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19768097/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/17/disney-and-the-new-tron-are-investors-excited/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>inthenews</category><category>tron: legacy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Would You Pay $20,000 for Movies in Your Home?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/would-you-pay-20-000-for-movies-in-your-home/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/would-you-pay-20-000-for-movies-in-your-home/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/would-you-pay-20-000-for-movies-in-your-home/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/08/movie-reel.jpg"  alt="" />Are you complaining about the high cost of movie tickets? If you think that's bad, try this one. The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704250704576005801366116290.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_tech">Wall Street Journal </a>reports that Prima Cinema Inc., a start up company, will provide first run movies in your home for a one time fee of $20,000 and an additional $500 per film. <br />
<br />
Obviously, the price of this service puts it out of reach for most people. Nevertheless, the company hopes to install its system in 250,000 homes within five years.<br />
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/would-you-pay-20-000-for-movies-in-your-home/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Would You Pay $20,000 for Movies in Your Home?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/would-you-pay-20-000-for-movies-in-your-home/">Would You Pay $20,000 for Movies in Your Home?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704250704576005801366116290.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_tech>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/best-buy-incorporated/bby/nys>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/would-you-pay-20-000-for-movies-in-your-home/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19751532/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/would-you-pay-20-000-for-movies-in-your-home/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bby</category><category>first run home movies</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Disney's 'Tangled' Did Well -- But Is It Enough?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/29/disneys-tangled-did-well-but-is-it-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/29/disneys-tangled-did-well-but-is-it-enough/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/29/disneys-tangled-did-well-but-is-it-enough/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/11/tangled-logo.jpg" />As a The Walt Disney Company (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) shareholder, I've been disappointed by the long-term price action of the stock (I've had the company in my portfolio since 1998). These days, I want every movie to hit it out of the park. <em>Tangled</em>, the latest cartoon from the Mouse, grossed a decent amount of money during the Thanksgiving frame. But, I have to ask: did it gross enough money for shareholders? <br />
<br />
Maybe not. And I know, I'm sounding greedy. After all, according to estimates at <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Box Office Mojo</a>, <em>Tangled</em> made almost $70 million at domestic locations for the Wednesday-through-Sunday period. That's not so bad, is it?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/29/disneys-tangled-did-well-but-is-it-enough/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Disney's 'Tangled' Did Well -- But Is It Enough?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/29/disneys-tangled-did-well-but-is-it-enough/">Disney's 'Tangled' Did Well -- But Is It Enough?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/29/disneys-tangled-did-well-but-is-it-enough/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19736973/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/29/disneys-tangled-did-well-but-is-it-enough/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>DIS</category><category>disney</category><category>inthenews</category><category>tangled</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Disney Looking to Triumph with 'Tangled']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/25/disney-looking-to-triumph-with-tangled/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/25/disney-looking-to-triumph-with-tangled/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/25/disney-looking-to-triumph-with-tangled/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Disney's Tangled"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/11/tangled-logo.jpg" />Shares of Disney (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) haven't strayed too far from where they were when the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/12/disney-down-then-up-following-earnings-release/">latest earnings report</a> was released. It would have been nice if the numbers had acted as a catalyst for the stock (which I own), pushing it above the $40 mark. Didn't happen. Hey, we move on, right? </p>
<p>But Disney has another chance to prove to its investors that it's a great long-term holding. The Mouse's latest cartoon, <em>Tangled</em>, opened on Wednesday. The idea is to capture some value from the crowds that will be out at the multiplex during the Thanksgiving weekend. I sort of have a good feeling about this film.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/25/disney-looking-to-triumph-with-tangled/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Disney Looking to Triumph with 'Tangled'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/25/disney-looking-to-triumph-with-tangled/">Disney Looking to Triumph with 'Tangled'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/25/disney-looking-to-triumph-with-tangled/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19732827/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/25/disney-looking-to-triumph-with-tangled/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bob iger</category><category>box office</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Marvel</category><category>pixar</category><category>tangled</category><category>time warner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner's Latest 'Potter' Doesn't Surprise]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/22/time-warners-latest-potter-doesnt-surprise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/22/time-warners-latest-potter-doesnt-surprise/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/22/time-warners-latest-potter-doesnt-surprise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dwa/" rel="tag">DreamWorks Animation (DWA)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/timewarnerlogo.jpg" />I don't think anyone can be shocked by the latest results from the movie world. The fact that Time Warner Inc.'s (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) <em>Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1</em> captured the top spot was a predestined event. And the fact that it made the most money of any <em>Potter</em> film in its debut, as many news reports have mentioned, is also, frankly, not a surprise. <br />
<br />
According to <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Box Office Mojo</a>, <em>Hallows Part 1 </em>grossed $125 million at domestic theaters. This <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=harrypotter.htm">data set</a> shows how that figure compares to the opening performance of the other entries in the series. It's impressive, certainly, but again, considering that the <em>Potter</em> projects have almost reached a conclusion (presumably, anyway), it seems fitting that there's a lot of excitement surrounding the release.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/22/time-warners-latest-potter-doesnt-surprise/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time Warner's Latest 'Potter' Doesn't Surprise</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/22/time-warners-latest-potter-doesnt-surprise/">Time Warner's Latest 'Potter' Doesn't Surprise</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/22/time-warners-latest-potter-doesnt-surprise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19729284/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/22/time-warners-latest-potter-doesnt-surprise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>Dreamworks Animation</category><category>DWA</category><category>Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part I</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Megamind</category><category>time warner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DreamWorks Animation's 'Megamind' Retains Top Spot]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/dreamworks-animations-megamind-retains-top-spot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/dreamworks-animations-megamind-retains-top-spot/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/dreamworks-animations-megamind-retains-top-spot/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dwa/" rel="tag">DreamWorks Animation (DWA)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Megamind"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/11/megamind-logo.jpg" />DreamWorks Animation's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nas">DWA</a>) <em>Megamind</em> movie didn't have such a great debut last weekend, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/market-down-on-dreamworks-animation-after-megamind-debut/">in my opinion</a>. This weekend, however, I have to give it at least some credit: It once again captured the top spot at domestic theaters. <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Box Office Mojo</a> says that the project made $29 million from Friday through Sunday, bringing the total gross so far to nearly $89 million. </p>
<p>Don't expect me to jump up and down for joy, though -- and I highly doubt shareholders of the studio are happy that the film didn't at least crack the $100 million mark by this point.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/dreamworks-animations-megamind-retains-top-spot/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>DreamWorks Animation's 'Megamind' Retains Top Spot</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/dreamworks-animations-megamind-retains-top-spot/">DreamWorks Animation's 'Megamind' Retains Top Spot</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/dreamworks-animations-megamind-retains-top-spot/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19719177/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/dreamworks-animations-megamind-retains-top-spot/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>Dreamworks Animation</category><category>DWA</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Megamind</category><category>Skyline</category><category>universal pictures</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Market Down on DreamWorks Animation After 'Megamind' Debut]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/market-down-on-dreamworks-animation-after-megamind-debut/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/market-down-on-dreamworks-animation-after-megamind-debut/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/market-down-on-dreamworks-animation-after-megamind-debut/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lgf/" rel="tag">Lions Gate Entertainment (LGF)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dwa/" rel="tag">DreamWorks Animation (DWA)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/dreamworkslogo.jpg" />I'm sure execs at DreamWorks Animation (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nas">DWA</a>) know it's tough to be a publicly-traded content company that is more directly tied to the film business than a huge conglomerate is; if they didn't, they know it today. No matter how great management thinks the next project is, moviegoers may simply not send it into the stratosphere in terms of the first-weekend gross.<br />
<br />
Such is the case with DreamWorks Animation's latest project, <em>Megamind</em>. At first glance, it seems like an awesome hit. According to estimates over at <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Box Office Mojo</a>, the cartoon came in first place at domestic theaters over the three-day period, beating out other new films from Time Warner (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) and Lions Gate Entertainment (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys">LGF</a>).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/market-down-on-dreamworks-animation-after-megamind-debut/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Market Down on DreamWorks Animation After 'Megamind' Debut</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/market-down-on-dreamworks-animation-after-megamind-debut/">Market Down on DreamWorks Animation After 'Megamind' Debut</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/market-down-on-dreamworks-animation-after-megamind-debut/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19707792/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/market-down-on-dreamworks-animation-after-megamind-debut/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>brad pitt</category><category>Dreamworks Animation</category><category>DWA</category><category>inthenews</category><category>LGF</category><category>Lions Gate Entertainment</category><category>Megamind</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>will ferrell</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Saw 3D: Final Attempt Does the Trick for Lions Gate]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/saw-3ds-final-trap-does-the-trick-for-lions-gate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/saw-3ds-final-trap-does-the-trick-for-lions-gate/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/saw-3ds-final-trap-does-the-trick-for-lions-gate/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lgf/" rel="tag">Lions Gate Entertainment (LGF)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/11/saw-3d-poster2.jpg" alt="" />A year ago, a fierce battle was being waged between two Hollywood studios for the dominance of the Halloween movie marketplace. Lions Gate Entertainment (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys">LGF</a>) was high on its latest gory sequel, <em>Saw VI</em>, while Viacom (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-b/via.b/nys">VIA.B</a>) was pinning its hopes on a low-budget film entitled <em>Paranormal Activity</em>. It was something of a David-and-Goliath situation; certainly the bloody brand equity of the <em>Saw</em> franchise could not be bested by some goofy found-footage-themed piece of celluloid? <br />
<br />
Haven't the Goliaths of this world learned anything? <em>Saw VI</em> <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/viacoms-paranormal-activity-plays-jigsaws-game-and-wins/">ended up the loser</a> of the competition. I was amazed. Lions Gate, however, wanted to give it another shot. So, <em>Saw 3D</em>, which supposedly may be the final one of the series (yeah, we'll see), declared war on the sequel to Viacom's demon tale, <em>Paranormal Activity 2, </em>this past weekend; Jigsaw apparently is out for a little revenge.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/saw-3ds-final-trap-does-the-trick-for-lions-gate/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Saw 3D: Final Attempt Does the Trick for Lions Gate</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/saw-3ds-final-trap-does-the-trick-for-lions-gate/">Saw 3D: Final Attempt Does the Trick for Lions Gate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Nov 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/saw-3ds-final-trap-does-the-trick-for-lions-gate/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19695921/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/saw-3ds-final-trap-does-the-trick-for-lions-gate/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>LGF</category><category>Lions Gate Entertainment</category><category>paranormal activity 2</category><category>Saw 3D</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IMAX: Is It Too High to Buy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/30/imax-too-high-to-buy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/30/imax-too-high-to-buy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/30/imax-too-high-to-buy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="IMAX logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/imax-logo.jpg" />IMAX (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/imax-corporation/imax/nas">IMAX</a>) has been a wonderful stock to own. Admit it, you wish you had this one displayed on your broker's positions page (I know I do). On Friday, it closed at $21.65, not far from the new 52-week high of $21.95, which was reached during the intraday session. The <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/charts/imax-corporation/imax/nas/tech-chart">one-year chart</a> is an amazing image to behold for a couple reasons. First, there is the simple matter of the uptrend. Second, the stock already experienced a pullback before breaking through to fresh heights.</p>
<p>However, this brings to mind a valid concern: is the stock now a sell? Has it gone too far? You can't help but ask such questions. In fact, <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/permalinks/entry.php/IMAXid1321361/IMAX-IMAX-downgraded-to-Accumulate-from-Buy-at-CraigHallum">Theflyonthewall</a> reported Friday that Craig-Hallum issued a downgrade on the shares. On the other hand, Theflyonthewall also mentioned some good news from Wedbush: that firm <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/permalinks/entry.php/IMAXid1320643/IMAX-IMAX-upgraded-to-Outperform-from-Neutral-at-Wedbush">raised its rating</a> for the theater entity.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/30/imax-too-high-to-buy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>IMAX: Is It Too High to Buy?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/30/imax-too-high-to-buy/">IMAX: Is It Too High to Buy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 30 Oct 2010 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thestreet.com/story/10903536/1/imax-surges-on-earnings.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/30/imax-too-high-to-buy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19695903/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/30/imax-too-high-to-buy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>IMAX</category><category>IMAX downgrade</category><category>IMAX earnings</category><category>IMAX rally</category><category>Inception</category><category>inthenews</category><category>time warner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DreamWorks Animation's Q3: Buy on the Numbers?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/29/dreamworks-animations-q3-buy-on-the-numbers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/29/dreamworks-animations-q3-buy-on-the-numbers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/29/dreamworks-animations-q3-buy-on-the-numbers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dwa/" rel="tag">DreamWorks Animation (DWA)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/dreamworkslogo.jpg"  alt="" />DreamWorks Animation (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nas">DWA</a>) reported third-quarter earnings earlier in the week. It's one of those fun stocks that investors like to check out (I like checking it out, at least). I'm sure a lot of market participants would love to find an excuse to add the stock to a trading portfolio, mostly because the idea that it will be purchased by some bigger entity is perhaps too big to ignore. <br />
<br />
At the time of this writing, shares were exchanging hands at a quote of $35.23, which meant that they were down less than 1%. The 52-week low is $26.61 while the 52-week high is $44.77. As the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/charts/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nas/tech-chart">one-year chart</a> shows, the technical story is not as attractive as the computer-generated images produced by the company. <br />
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/29/dreamworks-animations-q3-buy-on-the-numbers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>DreamWorks Animation's Q3: Buy on the Numbers?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/29/dreamworks-animations-q3-buy-on-the-numbers/">DreamWorks Animation's Q3: Buy on the Numbers?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/dreamworks-animation-reports-third-quarter-2010-financial-results/rfid380666018/?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/29/dreamworks-animations-q3-buy-on-the-numbers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19695329/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/29/dreamworks-animations-q3-buy-on-the-numbers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>DIS</category><category>disney</category><category>Dreamworks Animation</category><category>DWA</category><category>How to Train Your Dragon</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Megamind</category><category>Shrek Forever After</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Viacom Dominates Theaters with 'Paranormal Activity 2']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/25/viacom-dominates-theaters-with-paranormal-activity-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/25/viacom-dominates-theaters-with-paranormal-activity-2/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/25/viacom-dominates-theaters-with-paranormal-activity-2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lgf/" rel="tag">Lions Gate Entertainment (LGF)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/10/paranormal2.jpg" />Last time around, Viacom (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-b/via.b/nys">VIA.B</a>) had the number-one film of the weekend with <em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/viacoms-jackass-franchise-makes-triumphant-return/">Jackass 3D</a></em>. Well, the studio has done it again, this time with a project more suited for the upcoming holiday dedicated to ghosts, goblins, and low-budget celluloid horrors.<br />
<br />
According to early estimates at <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Box Office Mojo</a>, <em>Paranormal Activity 2</em> obliterated the competition at domestic theaters. It took in well over $40 million, more than enough for first place. Of course, the company behind the picture that came in second isn't crying: <em>Jackass 3D</em>, which captured another $20 million and is now on its way to passing $100 million in total gross, is also from Viacom.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/25/viacom-dominates-theaters-with-paranormal-activity-2/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Viacom Dominates Theaters with 'Paranormal Activity 2'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/25/viacom-dominates-theaters-with-paranormal-activity-2/">Viacom Dominates Theaters with 'Paranormal Activity 2'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/25/viacom-dominates-theaters-with-paranormal-activity-2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19687047/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/25/viacom-dominates-theaters-with-paranormal-activity-2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>disney</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jackass 3D</category><category>LGF</category><category>Lions Gate Entertainment</category><category>paranormal activity 2</category><category>Saw 3D</category><category>time warner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Viacom's 'Jackass'  Franchise Makes Triumphant Return]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/viacoms-jackass-franchise-makes-triumphant-return/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/viacoms-jackass-franchise-makes-triumphant-return/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/viacoms-jackass-franchise-makes-triumphant-return/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/10/jackass3dposterd.jpg" alt="" />Viacom (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-b/via.b/nys">VIA.B</a>) scored this past weekend with Johnny Knoxville and his self-abusing colleagues. The film <em>Jackass 3D </em>came out on top, making $50 million at domestic theaters in its debut, according to early estimates at <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Box Office Mojo</a>. Viacom beat out high-profile products from various media companies: Summit Entertainment's <em>Red</em>, Sony's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>) <em>The Social Network</em>, Time Warner's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) <em>Life As We Know It</em>, and Disney's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) <em>Secretariat</em> all had to step aside and watch as multiplexes filled with fans eager to see the comedy saturated with a series of painful stunts. <br />
<br />
It isn't too surprising. The promotional campaign for the movie seemed to have hit its target demographic, creating an appropriate amount of excitement that eventually translated into copious ticket sales. Plus, except for <em>Red</em>, the other movies mentioned were already out in the marketplace, making them not as much of a threat to the energetic new kid on the block.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/viacoms-jackass-franchise-makes-triumphant-return/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Viacom's 'Jackass'  Franchise Makes Triumphant Return</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/viacoms-jackass-franchise-makes-triumphant-return/">Viacom's 'Jackass'  Franchise Makes Triumphant Return</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/viacoms-jackass-franchise-makes-triumphant-return/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19676910/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/viacoms-jackass-franchise-makes-triumphant-return/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>DIS</category><category>disney</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jackass 3D</category><category>johnny knoxville</category><category>Life As We Know It</category><category>Red</category><category>secretariat</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>Summit Entertainment</category><category>the social network</category><category>time warner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Disney's 'Secretariat' Disappoints]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/11/disneys-secretariat-disappoints/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/11/disneys-secretariat-disappoints/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/11/disneys-secretariat-disappoints/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/10/secretariat.jpg" />As a Disney (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) shareholder, I was disappointed by the third-place showing for the company's latest film, <em>Secretariat</em>. According to <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Box Office Mojo</a>, it took in an estimated $12.6 million over the Friday to Sunday weekend. We still have the Monday holiday to go, but I don't think it'll make much difference. <br />
<br />
I suppose one could say it did all right in its debut considering the type of movie it is and the time of year; this isn't the summer, certainly, so we're not necessarily going to observe supercharged grosses. But I think Disney has a lot to prove with each of its films these days since CEO Bob Iger has been focusing on finding the right strategy for growth in a division that hasn't always pulled its weight.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/11/disneys-secretariat-disappoints/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Disney's 'Secretariat' Disappoints</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/11/disneys-secretariat-disappoints/">Disney's 'Secretariat' Disappoints</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/11/disneys-secretariat-disappoints/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19668336/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/11/disneys-secretariat-disappoints/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bob iger</category><category>box office</category><category>DIS</category><category>disney</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Life As We Know It</category><category>Rich Ross</category><category>secretariat</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>the social network</category><category>time warner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[News Corp.'s 'Wall Street' Sequel: Should It Have Done Better?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/news-corp-s-wall-street-sequel-should-it-have-done-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/news-corp-s-wall-street-sequel-should-it-have-done-better/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/news-corp-s-wall-street-sequel-should-it-have-done-better/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/09/wallstreetsleeps.jpg" alt="" />Last weekend's box-office race went to News Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>). The media conglomerate released the sequel to <em>Wall Street</em>. The project, entitled <em>Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps</em>, stars Michael Douglas and Shia LaBeouf. When you think of the iconic equity the original possesses, and combine it with the current financial zeitgeist (maybe I should have written current negative financial zeitgeist, considering the state we're in), you might have expected a huge hit. </p>
<p>I did. And I was wrong. Sure, according to <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=2010&amp;wknd=39&amp;p=.htm">Box Office Mojo</a>, the second <em>Wall Street</em> captured the top spot. But take a look at the actual domestic gross for the three-day debut: $19 million. Does that sound like a blockbuster? Even in the more sedate September period, I had higher hopes for a more exciting debut.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/news-corp-s-wall-street-sequel-should-it-have-done-better/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>News Corp.'s 'Wall Street' Sequel: Should It Have Done Better?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/news-corp-s-wall-street-sequel-should-it-have-done-better/">News Corp.'s 'Wall Street' Sequel: Should It Have Done Better?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=2010&amp;wknd=39&amp;p=.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/news-corp-s-wall-street-sequel-should-it-have-done-better/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19652666/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/news-corp-s-wall-street-sequel-should-it-have-done-better/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Michael Douglas</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Shia LaBeouf</category><category>Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner's 'Town' Craftier Than Shyamalan's Latest Project]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/20/time-warners-town-craftier-than-shyamalans-latest-project/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/20/time-warners-town-craftier-than-shyamalans-latest-project/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/20/time-warners-town-craftier-than-shyamalans-latest-project/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/boxoffice.jpg"  alt="" />No one can truly predict the movie business. I can't, certainly. If you had asked me what film would turn out to be the most popular among movie patrons this past weekend, I would have told you that <em>Devil</em>, distributed by General Electric's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal Pictures, stood the best chance of slithering its evil celluloid self to the top of the heap. As it turns out, I was wrong. Time Warner's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) <em>The Town</em>, directed by and starring Ben Affleck, was the winner at domestic theaters, according to <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Box Office Mojo</a>. <br />
<br />
<em>Town</em> brought in over $23 million as of estimates available at the time of this writing. In second place was <em>Easy A</em>, from Sony (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>), with $18 million. <em>Devil</em> made about $12 million. The <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2010/sep/17/business/la-fi-0917-ct-projector-20100917">Los Angeles Times</a> says that all of these projects didn't cost an exorbitant amount to produce.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/20/time-warners-town-craftier-than-shyamalans-latest-project/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time Warner's 'Town' Craftier Than Shyamalan's Latest Project</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/20/time-warners-town-craftier-than-shyamalans-latest-project/">Time Warner's 'Town' Craftier Than Shyamalan's Latest Project</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/20/time-warners-town-craftier-than-shyamalans-latest-project/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19640002/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/20/time-warners-town-craftier-than-shyamalans-latest-project/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ben affleck</category><category>box office</category><category>Devil</category><category>Easy A</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Legendary Pictures</category><category>m. night shyamalan</category><category>Media Rights Capital</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>The Town</category><category>time warner</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
