<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Garmin Slumps After Patent Defeat]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/garmin-slumps-after-patent-defeat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/garmin-slumps-after-patent-defeat/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/garmin-slumps-after-patent-defeat/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/grmn/" rel="tag">Garmin Ltd (GRMN)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Garmin (GRMN)" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/08/garmin-1282751380.jpg" />Thursday morning, GPS specialist Garmin Ltd. (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/garmin-ltd/grmn/nas">GRMN</a>) said it <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSSGE6BM09820101223">lost a patent dispute</a> with Japanese firm Pioneer Corp. The District Court of Dusseldorf in Germany found that two patents owned by Pioneer were infringed by a certain functionality in Garmin's software.</p>
<p>However, Garmin says it has already worked out "minor software revisions that eliminate the narrow functionality at issue in the litigation." As a result, the company doesn't expect any significant impact on its ability to import and sell its navigational products.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/garmin-slumps-after-patent-defeat/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Garmin Slumps After Patent Defeat</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/garmin-slumps-after-patent-defeat/">Garmin Slumps After Patent Defeat</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/garmin-slumps-after-patent-defeat/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19775191/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/garmin-slumps-after-patent-defeat/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>District Court of Dusseldorf</category><category>featured</category><category>Garmin</category><category>Garmin lawsuit</category><category>Garmin patent</category><category>GRMN</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investor sentiment</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>options</category><category>patent</category><category>Pioneer</category><category>puts</category><category>short interest</category><category>short sellers</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[American Air Pulls Tickets from Orbiz]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/american-air-pulls-tickets-from-orbiz/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/american-air-pulls-tickets-from-orbiz/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/american-air-pulls-tickets-from-orbiz/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amr/" rel="tag">AMR Corp (AMR)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/aa-logo-240.gif" alt="American Airlines (AMR) logo" />AMR (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/amr-corporation/amr/nys" class="inlinked">AMR</a>) operating unit American Air pulled the ability to buy its tickets from travel site Orbitz. </p>
<p>"Effective December 21, 2010, schedules and fares for <a href="http://travel.aol.com/flights" class="inlinked">flights</a> on American Airlines and American Eagle are no longer available on Orbitz.com or websites powered by Orbitz.com", the <a href="http://www.aa.com/i18n/urls/orbitz.jsp">company said</a>. Tickets will still be sold through travel agencies and at the firm's own website -- AA.com.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/american-air-pulls-tickets-from-orbiz/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>American Air Pulls Tickets from Orbiz</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/american-air-pulls-tickets-from-orbiz/">American Air Pulls Tickets from Orbiz</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/american-air-pulls-tickets-from-orbiz/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19773227/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/american-air-pulls-tickets-from-orbiz/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aa</category><category>american airlines</category><category>AMR</category><category>Direct Connect</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>orbitz</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BP and Halliburton Face New Charges: Case Rests on Cement]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/bp-and-halliburton-face-new-charges/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/bp-and-halliburton-face-new-charges/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/bp-and-halliburton-face-new-charges/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hal/" rel="tag">Halliburton (HAL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="BP sign" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/09/bp240.jpg" /><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/816d2a44-e38d-11df-8ad3-00144feabdc0.html"><em>The Financial Times</em></a> reported on a U.S. investigation that claims that BP (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bp-p-l-c/bp/nys">BP</a>) and Halliburton (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/halliburton-company/hal/nys">HAL</a>) knew that the cement used to seal the failed well was unstable.</p>
<p>The lawyers suing BP and Halliburton call this evidence a "game changer" and says it opens up the companies to penalties and court awards running into the billions of dollars.</p>
<p>The case rests on a finding by a U.S. federal panel that the cement used may have caused the fatal explosion on the Deepwater Horizon.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/bp-and-halliburton-face-new-charges/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>BP and Halliburton Face New Charges: Case Rests on Cement</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/bp-and-halliburton-face-new-charges/">BP and Halliburton Face New Charges: Case Rests on Cement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/816d2a44-e38d-11df-8ad3-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/bp-and-halliburton-face-new-charges/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19696432/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/bp-and-halliburton-face-new-charges/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BP</category><category>cement</category><category>Deepwater Horizon</category><category>featured</category><category>Gulf oil spill</category><category>HAL</category><category>Halliburton</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SEC, Asleep During the Financial Meltdown, Vows to Get Tough]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/sec-asleep-during-the-financial-meltdown-vows-to-get-tough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/sec-asleep-during-the-financial-meltdown-vows-to-get-tough/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/sec-asleep-during-the-financial-meltdown-vows-to-get-tough/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/08/sec-seal.jpg" alt="SEC" />The Securities and Exchange Commission pretty much fell asleep for the past two years. Now, there's talk that <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7d6da03e-b13f-11df-b899-00144feabdc0.html">the agency plans to get tough on violators</a> whose greed and recklessness took this country to its knees. The Federal Reserve had to pledge or spend $12.8 trillion to bail them out.</p>
<p>The $12.8 trillion is gone and we have a country with 17 million unemployed and underemployed. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke could have done much better just taking that $12.8 trillion and help those in need. All he had to do was use one good bank for Americans to switch their money into, and let the greedy ones take a hit. With $12.8 trillion Bernanke could have put this country back on its feet again.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/sec-asleep-during-the-financial-meltdown-vows-to-get-tough/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>SEC, Asleep During the Financial Meltdown, Vows to Get Tough</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/sec-asleep-during-the-financial-meltdown-vows-to-get-tough/">SEC, Asleep During the Financial Meltdown, Vows to Get Tough</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7d6da03e-b13f-11df-b899-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/sec-asleep-during-the-financial-meltdown-vows-to-get-tough/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19610361/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/sec-asleep-during-the-financial-meltdown-vows-to-get-tough/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bernanke</category><category>featured</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>insider trading</category><category>inthenews</category><category>sec</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fed Loses Appeal and Must Disclose Information on Bailouts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/23/fed-loses-appeal-and-must-disclose-information-on-bailouts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/23/fed-loses-appeal-and-must-disclose-information-on-bailouts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/23/fed-loses-appeal-and-must-disclose-information-on-bailouts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/federalreservebankofny.jpg" alt="" />Over a year ago, two Bloomberg reporters filed under the Freedom of Information Act to obtain information from the Federal Reserve on their bailout activities during the market crash of 2008-09. The Federal Reserve has blocked their attempts maintaining that disclosure would harm the financial institutions involved. The latest attempt at blockage was at the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-23/u-s-appeals-court-refuses-to-review-disclosure-ruling-on-fed-bailouts.html">U.S. Court Appeals Court.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/23/fed-loses-appeal-and-must-disclose-information-on-bailouts/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fed Loses Appeal and Must Disclose Information on Bailouts</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/23/fed-loses-appeal-and-must-disclose-information-on-bailouts/">Fed Loses Appeal and Must Disclose Information on Bailouts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-23/u-s-appeals-court-refuses-to-review-disclosure-ruling-on-fed-bailouts.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/23/fed-loses-appeal-and-must-disclose-information-on-bailouts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19604592/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/23/fed-loses-appeal-and-must-disclose-information-on-bailouts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bloomberg reporters</category><category>BloombergReporters</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HP CEO Hurd's Severance Could Total $40 Million]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/15/mark-hurd-40-million-severance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/15/mark-hurd-40-million-severance/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/15/mark-hurd-40-million-severance/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/mark-hurd.jpg" alt="HP Mark Hurd" />Mark Hurd, the former chief executive of Hewlett-Packard (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys" class="inlinked">HPQ</a>), could receive as much as <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/a04bb8ae-a706-11df-90e5-00144feabdc0.html">$40 million in severance benefits</a>.</p>
<p>A loophole in Hurd's contract could bring him this big payout. It seems that his contract did not include specific language that would permit the company to fire him "for cause." Most contracts for chief executive contain specific language that detail the conditions under which he could be fired, including breaches of the company's ethical code.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/15/mark-hurd-40-million-severance/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>HP CEO Hurd's Severance Could Total $40 Million</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/15/mark-hurd-40-million-severance/">HP CEO Hurd's Severance Could Total $40 Million</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/15/mark-hurd-40-million-severance/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19593979/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/15/mark-hurd-40-million-severance/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Hewlett-Packard</category><category>HP</category><category>HP CEO</category><category>HP CEO resignation</category><category>HPQ</category><category>Hurd resignation</category><category>Hurd severance</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Mark Hurd</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rambus Licenses Patents to NVIDIA]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/13/rambus-liceses-patents-to-nvidia/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/13/rambus-liceses-patents-to-nvidia/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/13/rambus-liceses-patents-to-nvidia/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/08/rambuslogo.jpg"  alt="Rambus (RMBS)" />Rambus (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/rambus-inc-del/rmbs/nas">RMBS</a> - <a target="_blank" href="http:// http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/rambus-inc-del/rmbs/nas/option-chains">option chain</a>) shares are rising today after the company announced it has signed a <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/rambus-and-nvidia-sign-patent-license-agreement/rfid357568715/?channel=pf">patent licensing agreement</a> with NVIDIA Corp. (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/nvidia-corporation/nvda/nas">NVDA</a>), under which RMBS grants NVDA a patent license for certain memory controllers at a 1% royalty rate for SDR memory controllers and a 2% royalty rate for other memory controllers. However, neither company has signed a release of liability or dismissed any litigation between them. RMBS had earlier charged that NVDA has infringed on some of its chip patents. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on RMBS.<br />
<br />
 </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/13/rambus-liceses-patents-to-nvidia/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rambus Licenses Patents to NVIDIA</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/13/rambus-liceses-patents-to-nvidia/">Rambus Licenses Patents to NVIDIA</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/13/rambus-liceses-patents-to-nvidia/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19592818/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/13/rambus-liceses-patents-to-nvidia/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>deal</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>NVDA</category><category>nVIDIA</category><category>options</category><category>patent</category><category>Rambus</category><category>RMBS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Facebook Ownership in Question as Man Claims 84% Stake]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/facebook-ownership-ceglia-claims-84-stake/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/facebook-ownership-ceglia-claims-84-stake/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/facebook-ownership-ceglia-claims-84-stake/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/facebook-logo-240.jpg" />Could it possibly be that someone other than Mark Zuckerberg is the <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE66C01L20100713">majority owner of Facebook</a> -- the largest social network in the world with nearly 500 million members? That would be incredible, but that is exactly what Paul Ceglia claims in a <a href="http://i.cdn.turner.com/money/2010/07/13/technology/facebook_lawsuit/facebook_filing.pdf">civil lawsuit</a> he filed in the Supreme Court of New York's Allegany County last month. Ceglia says he owns 84% of Facebook.<br />
<br />
According to the lawsuit, Paul Ceglia asserts he signed a contract with Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook co-founder, in 2003 to develop and design a website, which eventually was launched as thefacebook.com. The contract entitled Ceglia to a $1,000 fee and a 50% stake in the product.<br />
<br />
A major point in the contract also stipulated that Ceglia "would acquire an additional 1 percent interest in the business, per day, until the website was completed." By February 4, 2004, Ceglia's stake in Facebook totaled 84%, according to the suit.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/facebook-ownership-ceglia-claims-84-stake/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Facebook Ownership in Question as Man Claims 84% Stake</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/facebook-ownership-ceglia-claims-84-stake/">Facebook Ownership in Question as Man Claims 84% Stake</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/facebook-ownership-ceglia-claims-84-stake/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19553681/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/facebook-ownership-ceglia-claims-84-stake/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>facebook</category><category>featured</category><category>Mark Zuckerberg</category><category>new york federal court</category><category>Paul Ceglia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple-AT&amp;T Monopoly Suit Goes Class Action]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/12/apple-atandt-monopoly-suit-goes-class-action/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/12/apple-atandt-monopoly-suit-goes-class-action/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/12/apple-atandt-monopoly-suit-goes-class-action/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a></p><p><img width="240" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="160" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/07/aapl-1278943451.jpg" alt="Apple AAPL logo" />As Apple (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) continues to rack up huge profits, so are its attorneys. Hey, with a slowing economy, a smart idea is to sue growing companies, right?</p>
<p>Well, one of the many suits involves Apple's exclusive relationship with AT&amp;T (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">T</a>) to provide the phone and broadband services for the iPhone. Basically, the contention is that the alliance was meant to keep higher prices with minimum two-year subscription agreements as well as restrictions on technology development for a five-year period. Oh, there are also claims that Apple has a monopoly on the app store and has made it incredibly difficult to move to another mobile phone provider.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/12/apple-atandt-monopoly-suit-goes-class-action/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple-AT&amp;T Monopoly Suit Goes Class Action</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/12/apple-atandt-monopoly-suit-goes-class-action/">Apple-AT&amp;T Monopoly Suit Goes Class Action</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/12/apple-atandt-monopoly-suit-goes-class-action/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19550411/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/12/apple-atandt-monopoly-suit-goes-class-action/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>AT and T</category><category>class action lawsuit</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>iPhone</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[McDonald's Facing Lawsuit over Happy Meal Toys, Parental Authority Flies out the Window]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/23/mcdonalds-facing-lawsuit-over-happy-meal-toys-parental-authori/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/23/mcdonalds-facing-lawsuit-over-happy-meal-toys-parental-authori/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/23/mcdonalds-facing-lawsuit-over-happy-meal-toys-parental-authori/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/mcd-logo-240x160.jpg" alt="" />Reportedly, Dow Jones fast-food behemoth McDonald's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">MCD</a>) is facing a lawsuit from the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI). The lawsuit surrounds MCD's Happy Meal toys, stating that the toys "<a target="_blank" href="http://www.upi.com/Business_News/2010/06/22/Happy-Meals-toys-provoke-lawsuit/UPI-34891277233012/">lure small children into McDonald's</a>" in a marketing ploy that is "illegal under various state consumer protection laws." Interesting, as I thought it was the responsibility of the parents to make sure that their children eat healthily. I mean, I am a father of three and I make sure that my kids eat healthy food. Do they have the occasional Happy Meal? Yes, but I am the one making the decision.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/23/mcdonalds-facing-lawsuit-over-happy-meal-toys-parental-authori/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>McDonald's Facing Lawsuit over Happy Meal Toys, Parental Authority Flies out the Window</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/23/mcdonalds-facing-lawsuit-over-happy-meal-toys-parental-authori/">McDonald's Facing Lawsuit over Happy Meal Toys, Parental Authority Flies out the Window</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/23/mcdonalds-facing-lawsuit-over-happy-meal-toys-parental-authori/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19528052/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/23/mcdonalds-facing-lawsuit-over-happy-meal-toys-parental-authori/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CSPI</category><category>frivolous lawsuit</category><category>Happy meal</category><category>Happy Meals</category><category>inthenews</category><category>McDonalds</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Operation Stolen Dreams Starts Mortgage Fraud Crackdown]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/18/operation-stolen-dreams-mortgage-fraud-crackdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/18/operation-stolen-dreams-mortgage-fraud-crackdown/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/18/operation-stolen-dreams-mortgage-fraud-crackdown/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/04/corbis.jpg" />Thursday, <em>BusinessWeek</em> reported that authorities have arrested 485 people since March in what is called <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-06-17/mortgage-fraud-crackdown-in-u-s-brings-485-arrests-update3-.html" target="_blank">Operation Stolen Dreams</a>.</p>
<p>The U.S. Justice Department is running Operation Stolen Dreams, which focuses on putting the squeeze on mortgage fraud. According to the report, the enforcement effort has net 1,215 criminal defendants responsible for $2.3 billion in losses face some sort of legal action. Operation Stolen Dreams also includes 191 civil cases that has recovered more than $147 million.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/18/operation-stolen-dreams-mortgage-fraud-crackdown/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Operation Stolen Dreams Starts Mortgage Fraud Crackdown</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/18/operation-stolen-dreams-mortgage-fraud-crackdown/">Operation Stolen Dreams Starts Mortgage Fraud Crackdown</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/18/operation-stolen-dreams-mortgage-fraud-crackdown/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19521778/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/18/operation-stolen-dreams-mortgage-fraud-crackdown/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Eric Holder</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgage</category><category>mortgage fraud</category><category>mortgage fraud schemes</category><category>operation stolen dreams</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BP Trades Lower as CEO Testifies Before Congress]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/bp-trades-lower-as-ceo-testifies-before-congress/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/bp-trades-lower-as-ceo-testifies-before-congress/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/bp-trades-lower-as-ceo-testifies-before-congress/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/from-the-boards/" rel="tag">From the Boards</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/06/gyi0060727711.jpg" alt="bp oil spill" />Shares of BP plc (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bp-p-l-c/bp/nys" class="inlinked">BP</a>) closed today's trading slightly lower, as the company's CEO, Tony Hayward, appeared before Congress today to discuss the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/company-news/bp-ceo-tony-hayward-i-wasnt-involved/19520899/">oil blowout in the Gulf of Mexico</a>.<br />
<br />
BP has been under fire for the April 20th explosion that has resulted in the nation's largest environmental disaster, and today the company's CEO was in front of Congress to answer allegations that the company took cost cutting measures on the oil rig that it knew resulted in safety risks.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/bp-trades-lower-as-ceo-testifies-before-congress/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>BP Trades Lower as CEO Testifies Before Congress</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/bp-trades-lower-as-ceo-testifies-before-congress/">BP Trades Lower as CEO Testifies Before Congress</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/bp-trades-lower-as-ceo-testifies-before-congress/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19521124/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/bp-trades-lower-as-ceo-testifies-before-congress/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BP</category><category>BP oil spill</category><category>gulf of mexico</category><category>Gulf of Mexico oil spill</category><category>gulf oil spill</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil</category><category>Tony Hayward</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google Intentions over the Street View Data Collection Now Questioned]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/10/google-street-view-intentions-questioned/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/10/google-street-view-intentions-questioned/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/10/google-street-view-intentions-questioned/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p><img hspace="4" alt="Google GOOG logo" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/google-logo-240.gif" />It's been a few weeks now that Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and its Street View mapping service has been in the spotlight after it was discovered that the search giant collected and stored personal data from unencrypted Wi-Fi networks. Now, Google's intentions are in question.</p>
<p>"This was a failure of communication between and within teams," the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/10278068.stm">BBC quotes a Google spokesperson</a>. It is the first line of defense in what has already become an international scandal striking directly at the heart of Google and allegations of serious misconduct by that company. The BBC report indicates that Google's actions of collecting and recording the personal data is in violation of the data interception laws of as many as 30 countries.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/10/google-street-view-intentions-questioned/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google Intentions over the Street View Data Collection Now Questioned</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/10/google-street-view-intentions-questioned/">Google Intentions over the Street View Data Collection Now Questioned</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/10278068.stm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/10/google-street-view-intentions-questioned/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19510235/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/10/google-street-view-intentions-questioned/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>encrypted</category><category>encryption</category><category>featured</category><category>Google</category><category>interception</category><category>international</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recording</category><category>Scotland Yard</category><category>Simon Davies</category><category>StreetView</category><category>StreetViewPrivacy</category><category>unencrypted</category><category>wi-fi</category><category>wire tap</category><category>wire tapping</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Criminal Investigation Launched over BP Oil Spill]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/criminal-investigation-launched-over-bp-oil-spill/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/criminal-investigation-launched-over-bp-oil-spill/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/criminal-investigation-launched-over-bp-oil-spill/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="BP logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/bp-logo-240.jpg" />It really is hard to believe that is has been six weeks since BP's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bp-p-l-c/bp/nys">BP</a>) oil well exploded and sank in the gulf, and even harder to believe that the company has still not been able to stop oil from leaking out into the ocean. <br />
<br />
Everyone wants answers to what exactly led to the to oil rig's explosion, and today the U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder stated that a <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-launches-investigation-into-bp-spill-reports-2010-06-01?reflink=MW_news_stmp">criminal investigation had been launched</a> into the matter to determine which, if any, laws were broken leading up to the disaster.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/criminal-investigation-launched-over-bp-oil-spill/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Criminal Investigation Launched over BP Oil Spill</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/criminal-investigation-launched-over-bp-oil-spill/">Criminal Investigation Launched over BP Oil Spill</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/criminal-investigation-launched-over-bp-oil-spill/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19499364/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/criminal-investigation-launched-over-bp-oil-spill/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>attorney general</category><category>BP</category><category>bp oil spill</category><category>gulf of mexico</category><category>inthenews</category><category>law</category><category>oil spill</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JockStocks: What Supreme Court's Antitrust Decision Means for the NFL]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/28/jockstocks-supreme-courts-antitrust-decision/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/28/jockstocks-supreme-courts-antitrust-decision/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/28/jockstocks-supreme-courts-antitrust-decision/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ua/" rel="tag">Under Armour'A' (UA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/01/superbowl.jpg" />Earlier this week, the Supreme Court rejected the NFL's request for "broad antitrust law protection," deciding that each team <a href="http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8184a051&amp;template=with-video-with-comments&amp;confirm=true" target="_blank">must be considered separate</a> when selling NFL branded items. This means that each team must be considered its own entity when it sells branded items like jerseys and caps.</p>
<p>The court's decision was unanimous, and it reversed a lower court's ruling that threw out an antitrust suit filed against the NFL by American Needle, which lost its contract for making official NFL hats to Reebok International.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/28/jockstocks-supreme-courts-antitrust-decision/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JockStocks: What Supreme Court's Antitrust Decision Means for the NFL</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/28/jockstocks-supreme-courts-antitrust-decision/">JockStocks: What Supreme Court's Antitrust Decision Means for the NFL</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 28 May 2010 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/28/jockstocks-supreme-courts-antitrust-decision/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19495233/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/28/jockstocks-supreme-courts-antitrust-decision/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>American Needle</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NFL</category><category>NFLPA</category><category>Supreme Court</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Visa Execs Launch Full-Court Press on Japanese Government]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/24/visa-execs-launch-full-court-press-on-japanese-government/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/24/visa-execs-launch-full-court-press-on-japanese-government/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/24/visa-execs-launch-full-court-press-on-japanese-government/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/v/" rel="tag">Visa Inc. (V)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Visa logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/05/visa-logo.jpg" />Last week's ratification of the Durbin Amendment by U.S. lawmakers seemed to put Visa (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/visa-inc-visa-inc/v/nys">V</a>) on edge, with the credit card company now facing the prospect of curtailed interchange fees. (Of course, <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/visa-inc-statement-senate-passage-of-s-3217/rfid331276203?channel=pf">the firm's written statement</a> cited concerns about potential harm to <em>consumers</em> -- a nice touch.)</p>
<p>So, with the forecast looking gloomy on the home front, perhaps it's no surprise that Visa is now trying to woo another major world power. According to Japan's <em>The Nikkei</em>, Visa "will urge the Japanese government to <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/37314540">use credit cards for all of its purchases</a>, from stationery items to parts for fighter jets, saying it would save the country a lot of money."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/24/visa-execs-launch-full-court-press-on-japanese-government/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Visa Execs Launch Full-Court Press on Japanese Government</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/24/visa-execs-launch-full-court-press-on-japanese-government/">Visa Execs Launch Full-Court Press on Japanese Government</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 24 May 2010 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/24/visa-execs-launch-full-court-press-on-japanese-government/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19488865/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/24/visa-execs-launch-full-court-press-on-japanese-government/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>calls</category><category>Durbin Amendment</category><category>implied volatility</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Japan</category><category>Nikkei</category><category>options</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>V</category><category>Visa</category><category>volatility</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Home Depot Slammed for $20 Million]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/home-depot-slammed-for-20-million/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/home-depot-slammed-for-20-million/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/home-depot-slammed-for-20-million/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/hd-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />The balance sheet over at Home Depot (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">HD</a>) has just taken a serious hit after a Florida judge ordered the giant home retailer to pay some $20 million to an inventor. But don't expect this judgment to affect the stock price in any way.<br />
<br />
A few years back, when the company attempted to find a solution to employees being injured while using power saws to size material for customers, it turned to Michael Powell. According to <a href="http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/home-depot-called-arrogant-ordered-to-pay-ex-680890.html"><em>The Palm Beach Post</em></a>, Powell, an inventor in his own right, came up with an effective "safe hands" device. He offered to retrofit the company's saws with the device for $2,000 a piece.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/home-depot-slammed-for-20-million/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Home Depot Slammed for $20 Million</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/home-depot-slammed-for-20-million/">Home Depot Slammed for $20 Million</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 13 May 2010 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/home-depot-called-arrogant-ordered-to-pay-ex-680890.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/home-depot-slammed-for-20-million/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19475215/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/home-depot-slammed-for-20-million/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Direct Stock Purchase Plan</category><category>Home Depot</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Michael Powell</category><category>safe hands</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs in Settlement Talks with the SEC]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/goldman-sachs-in-settlement-talks-with-the-sec/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/goldman-sachs-in-settlement-talks-with-the-sec/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/goldman-sachs-in-settlement-talks-with-the-sec/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/goldman-sachs/"><strong><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goldman-sachs-logo-240.jpg" />Goldman Sachs</strong></a><strong> Group Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) may be in <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704370704575228232487804548.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEFTWhatsNews">settlement talks</a> with the Securities and Exchange Commission, according to a report in the <em>Wall Street Journal. </em>As it now stands, both sides are far apart.<br />
<br />
Goldman is being pressured on several fronts and shareholders are losing money. Goldman stock has dropped more than 20% since the start of the SEC civil charges and a shareholder meeting is scheduled for Friday. Goldman directors are expected to discuss revisions in some of the company's practices.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/goldman-sachs-in-settlement-talks-with-the-sec/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Sachs in Settlement Talks with the SEC</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/goldman-sachs-in-settlement-talks-with-the-sec/">Goldman Sachs in Settlement Talks with the SEC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 07 May 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704370704575228232487804548.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEFTWhatsNews>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/goldman-sachs-in-settlement-talks-with-the-sec/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19468571/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/goldman-sachs-in-settlement-talks-with-the-sec/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>sec</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Goldman Sachs Face Criminal Charges Soon?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/will-goldman-face-criminal-charges/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/will-goldman-face-criminal-charges/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/will-goldman-face-criminal-charges/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goldman-sachs-logo-240.jpg" />Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/gs/nys">GS</a>) has been under investigation by the SEC for alleged securities fraud. The alleged violations against Goldman Sachs are civil charges. Now the Goldman Sachs saga is taking a more deadly turn. The US Attorney's Office in New York is looking into the case <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/784f0b16-543c-11df-b75d-00144feab49a.html">to determine if criminal charges are warranted.</a><br />
<br />
This changes the whole dynamic of the case. Civil charges usually involve a fine and bar from trading. However, if you remember Enron, criminal charges can include not only fines but also jail time.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/will-goldman-face-criminal-charges/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Goldman Sachs Face Criminal Charges Soon?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/will-goldman-face-criminal-charges/">Will Goldman Sachs Face Criminal Charges Soon?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 May 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/784f0b16-543c-11df-b75d-00144feab49a.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://nce.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/will-goldman-face-criminal-charges/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19461746/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/will-goldman-face-criminal-charges/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>civil charges</category><category>enron</category><category>goldman sachs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman's Legal Defense: Blame a Scapegoat?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/21/goldmans-legal-defense-blame-a-scapegoat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/21/goldmans-legal-defense-blame-a-scapegoat/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/21/goldmans-legal-defense-blame-a-scapegoat/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goldman-sachs-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />Goldman Sachs (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) is plotting its legal defense against the SEC's charges, and the point man is <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601010&amp;sid=a4wQK24j3.Mo">co-general counsel Greg Palm</a>.</p>
<p>So far Palm's legal strategy is to place all the blame on one employee: Fabrice Tourre. In a statement, Palm said: "If we had evidence that someone here was trying to mislead someone, that's not something we'd continue at all and we'd be the first to take action."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/21/goldmans-legal-defense-blame-a-scapegoat/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman's Legal Defense: Blame a Scapegoat?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/21/goldmans-legal-defense-blame-a-scapegoat/">Goldman's Legal Defense: Blame a Scapegoat?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/21/goldmans-legal-defense-blame-a-scapegoat/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19448428/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/21/goldmans-legal-defense-blame-a-scapegoat/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Fabrice Tourre</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>Greg Palm</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
