<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Playboy's Q3 Earnings: Should You Buy the Numbers?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/playboys-q3-earnings-should-you-buy-the-numbers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/playboys-q3-earnings-should-you-buy-the-numbers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/playboys-q3-earnings-should-you-buy-the-numbers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/playboy-logo-240.jpg" />Playboy (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">PLA</a>) is going through a troubled period, one that has lasted a long time. And, quite frankly, I'm not sure when it will end. I guess it will end when the business eventually finds a buyer. Whether such a buyer turns out to be founder Hugh Hefner or some other entity, we'll have to wait and see (I would assume Hefner would have the obvious advantage).<br />
<br />
Shares of the stock are, as I write this, priced at $4.93. The 52-week low for the company is $2.73 while the 52-week high is $6.10. Yes, this has been a great trading vehicle. But don't underestimate the risk here, even though the latest quarterly report did bring some relatively good news.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/playboys-q3-earnings-should-you-buy-the-numbers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Playboy's Q3 Earnings: Should You Buy the Numbers?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/playboys-q3-earnings-should-you-buy-the-numbers/">Playboy's Q3 Earnings: Should You Buy the Numbers?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/playboy-enterprises-inc-announces-third-quarter-2010-results/rfid385006626/?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/playboys-q3-earnings-should-you-buy-the-numbers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19709583/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/playboys-q3-earnings-should-you-buy-the-numbers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>hugh hefner</category><category>inthenews</category><category>PLA</category><category>playboy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Playboy: Still a Risk]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/playboy-restructuring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/playboy-restructuring/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/playboy-restructuring/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/playboy-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />Playboy (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">PLA</a>) is a fascinating stock. As with every trade, there are two sides to the story. One side will argue that the stock has bounced nicely off the 52-week low of $2.30, and that it has room to run as the concern continues to alter its model for making money. At some point, the bull might say, the market will become excited and buy the shares.</p>
<p>Interesting thesis. My argument against speculating with this idea is simple: it's Playboy. You might do well; you might not. I don't know how much plainer it can be.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/playboy-restructuring/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Playboy: Still a Risk</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/playboy-restructuring/">Playboy: Still a Risk</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/playboy-restructuring/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19536274/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/playboy-restructuring/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>ICON</category><category>iconix</category><category>inthenews</category><category>licensing</category><category>PLA</category><category>playboy</category><category>Publishing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sex(y) Sells: Abercrombie Bringing Back Controversial Catalog]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/29/abercrombie-and-fitch-controversial-catalog/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/29/abercrombie-and-fitch-controversial-catalog/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/29/abercrombie-and-fitch-controversial-catalog/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/anf/" rel="tag">Abercrombie and Fitch (ANF)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><img border="1" align="right" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/anf-logo.jpg" alt="" />Ooh la la! Fans of the old-school Abercrombie &amp; Fitch (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/abercrombie-and-fitch-co/anf/nys" class="inlinked">ANF</a>) catalog have something to giggle about. After seven long years, the risque quarterly featuring scantily clad young adults is <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/06/25/BU871E4VCF.DTL&amp;feed=rss.business">being reinstated</a>. And even though the catalog is ostensibly just marketing itself -- advertising the clothes that the models are barely wearing -- it will cost you $10 (it is available for pre-order now at the Abercrombie website and will hit shelves July 17). <br />
<br />
When the recession hit and allowances dried up, ANF suffered even more than most of its peers as teens and young adults offered for similarly trendy fashion at cheaper prices, turning to the Gap's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/gap-inc-del/gps/nys">GPS</a>) Old Navy, Aeropostale (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/aeropostale-inc/aro/nys" class="inlinked">ARO</a>), and American Eagle (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/american-eagle-outfitters-inc/aeo/nys" class="inlinked">AEO</a>) as substitutes. After months of resistance (or denial), ANF finally cut the prices on some items, but it is still facing lackluster sales and revenue numbers. The shares, meanwhile, are down 50% over the last two years.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/29/abercrombie-and-fitch-controversial-catalog/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sex(y) Sells: Abercrombie Bringing Back Controversial Catalog</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/29/abercrombie-and-fitch-controversial-catalog/">Sex(y) Sells: Abercrombie Bringing Back Controversial Catalog</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/06/25/BU871E4VCF.DTL&amp;feed=rss.business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/29/abercrombie-and-fitch-controversial-catalog/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19534536/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/29/abercrombie-and-fitch-controversial-catalog/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abercrombie and fitch</category><category>ANF</category><category>apparel</category><category>catalogs</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Retail sales</category><category>sex</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[An Interview with America's Sexiest CEO: Hilary Rowland]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/an-interview-with-americas-sexiest-ceo-hilary-rowland/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/an-interview-with-americas-sexiest-ceo-hilary-rowland/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/an-interview-with-americas-sexiest-ceo-hilary-rowland/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/interviews/" rel="tag">Interviews</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/hilary-rowland-pro.jpg" alt="" />Who is <a href="http://www.hilaryrowland.com/">Hilary Rowland</a>? <em>Buisness Insider</em> labeled her as <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/the-sexiest-ceos-alive-2009-8#hilary-rowland-28">one of the sexiest CEOs alive</a>, while <em>Wired</em> magazine calls her the <a href="http://reddit.wired.com/sexy_geeks_2009/?s=new&amp;offset=100">sexiest geek</a>. But she is more than just a pretty face. Hilary started out writing a very early form of a blog, and then learned code and web design to create the first women's magazine online. She plans to re-launch the magazine in 2010 as <em>Urbanette Magazine</em>, which she says better describes the focus as "A magazine for the smart, stylish and successful urban woman."<br />
<br />
<strong>BloggingStocks: What advice would you give to emerging internet entrepreneurs?</strong><br />
<br />
<strong>Hilary Rowland:</strong> I would say that they need a unique idea, and a solid revenue plan. Don't get discouraged. Starting a successful business takes more work than you think but it's doable if you have the will and determination to keep pushing yourself until you've reached your goal. Make sure you have a viable business plan that fills a gap in the market or is an innovative approach. Think everything out thoroughly.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/an-interview-with-americas-sexiest-ceo-hilary-rowland/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>An Interview with America's Sexiest CEO: Hilary Rowland</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/an-interview-with-americas-sexiest-ceo-hilary-rowland/">An Interview with America's Sexiest CEO: Hilary Rowland</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/an-interview-with-americas-sexiest-ceo-hilary-rowland/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19388813/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/an-interview-with-americas-sexiest-ceo-hilary-rowland/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ceo</category><category>entrepreneur</category><category>featured</category><category>hilary rowland</category><category>modeling</category><category>models</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daleela Farina]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Playboy Still Not Pretty Enough for My Portfolio]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/playboy-still-not-pretty-enough-for-my-portfolio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/playboy-still-not-pretty-enough-for-my-portfolio/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/playboy-still-not-pretty-enough-for-my-portfolio/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/playboy-logo-240.jpg"  alt="" />Playboy Enterprises, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">PLA</a>) published its quarterly numbers today, and while there were some positive developments, overall, I think it's safe to say that the stock is a risk that should be avoided. Unless, of course, you simply want to roll the dice and speculate.</p>
<p>Hey, nothing wrong with having a little fun, I suppose, although there surely are more attractive speculative bets out there. According to <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/media/playboy-shocks-world-with-lower-losses-and-magazine-profits/19363647/"></a>, Playboy lost 83 cents per share in Q4. Last year at this time, there was a loss of $4.40 per share.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/playboy-still-not-pretty-enough-for-my-portfolio/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Playboy Still Not Pretty Enough for My Portfolio</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/playboy-still-not-pretty-enough-for-my-portfolio/">Playboy Still Not Pretty Enough for My Portfolio</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/media/playboy-shocks-world-with-lower-losses-and-magazine-profits/19363647/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/playboy-still-not-pretty-enough-for-my-portfolio/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19364287/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/playboy-still-not-pretty-enough-for-my-portfolio/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>entertainment</category><category>featured</category><category>magazines</category><category>PLA</category><category>Playboy</category><category>publishing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[eBay Bans High Times]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/ebay-bans-high-times/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/ebay-bans-high-times/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/ebay-bans-high-times/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/ebay-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />There has recently been an interesting development at eBay (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>). It seems that at some point while the New Orleans Saints were winning their championship rings, someone snuck through the halls of eBay and pulled all the listings for back issues of that perennial herb magazine, <em>High Times</em>.<br /> <br /> Of course, some well meaning souls immediately began complaining about First Amendment infringement. However, unless the eBay ban on <em>High Times</em> was initiated by government interests, there are no viable complaints on that score. eBay is an independent business and may ban whatever classes of goods it may so choose.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/ebay-bans-high-times/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>eBay Bans High Times</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/ebay-bans-high-times/">eBay Bans High Times</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.readthehook.com/blog/index.php/2010/02/15/buzz-kill-crozet-man-finds-ebay-yanks-high-times/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/ebay-bans-high-times/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19361079/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/ebay-bans-high-times/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>eBay</category><category>High Times</category><category>inthenews</category><category>listing policy</category><category>Meg Whitman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Magazine Sales Are In: 'Real Simple' Is Big Winner, 'Good Housekeeping' Is Biggest Loser]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/magazine-sales-are-in-real-simple-is-big-winner-good-housek/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/magazine-sales-are-in-real-simple-is-big-winner-good-housek/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/magazine-sales-are-in-real-simple-is-big-winner-good-housek/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/magazine_stand_pinkmoose.jpg" alt="" />The Audit Bureau of Circulations reported today that newstand circulation for magazines fell 9.1% in the second half of 2009. Overall circulation -- including subscriptions -- fell too, but newstand circulation is a better indicator of the health of the industry because it is a more timely reactor to economics changes, and many magazines have kept their circulation up with deep subscription discounting. For instance, a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Glamour-1-year/dp/B00005N7QC/ref=tpi_image_1?ie=UTF8&amp;pf_rd_t=101&amp;pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&amp;pf_rd_p=100924002&amp;pf_rd_s=center-3&amp;pf_rd_r=1MGR81XPZF8T3C8JPDF6&amp;pf_rd_i=599858">one-year subscription to <em>Glamour</em> is being offered for just $7 on Amazon.com</a>. Interestingly, the two-year rate is $14.97, a reversal of the usual "commit to 2-years and get a lower per-issue price" deal that publishers offer. That may be a sign of optimism on the part of the industry, suggesting a belief that greater pricing power will return as the economy improves.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/magazine-sales-are-in-real-simple-is-big-winner-good-housek/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Magazine Sales Are In: 'Real Simple' Is Big Winner, 'Good Housekeeping' Is Biggest Loser</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/magazine-sales-are-in-real-simple-is-big-winner-good-housek/">Magazine Sales Are In: 'Real Simple' Is Big Winner, 'Good Housekeeping' Is Biggest Loser</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/magazine-sales-are-in-real-simple-is-big-winner-good-housek/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19349124/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/magazine-sales-are-in-real-simple-is-big-winner-good-housek/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Glamour</category><category>Good Housekeeping</category><category>GoodHousekeeping</category><category>inthenews</category><category>magazine circulation</category><category>MagazineCirculation</category><category>Real Simple</category><category>RealSimple</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Before the Bell: Futures Pointing to a Higher Start]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/before-the-bell-futures-pointing-to-a-lower-start/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/before-the-bell-futures-pointing-to-a-lower-start/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/before-the-bell-futures-pointing-to-a-lower-start/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cit/" rel="tag">CIT Group (CIT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/has/" rel="tag">Hasbro Inc (HAS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/bell-green.jpg" alt="" />U.S. stock futures were <strike>lower</strike> higher Monday morning as concerns about the debt situation in Europe continued to weigh on sentiment. The Dow industrials, it seems, for now will continue to flirt with the 10,000 level, following general declines in U.S. stocks markets last week.<br />
<br />
[Update: So far this morning futures have changed direction several times as investors try to find a firm footing.]<br />
<br />
Stocks slumped last as worries mounted over debt problems in Greece, Portugal and Spain and a mixed bag of economic indicators in the U.S. Meanwhile, concerns over Greece abated somewhat as the government worked Monday on a <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/greece-readies-tax-change-to-fight/880748/">tax overhaul</a> aimed at getting its deficit under control.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/before-the-bell-futures-pointing-to-a-lower-start/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Before the Bell: Futures Pointing to a Higher Start</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/before-the-bell-futures-pointing-to-a-lower-start/">Before the Bell: Futures Pointing to a Higher Start</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/before-the-bell-futures-pointing-to-a-lower-start/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19348756/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/before-the-bell-futures-pointing-to-a-lower-start/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Glam's New Look: A $50 Million Capital Raise]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/glams-new-look-a-50-million-capital-raise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/glams-new-look-a-50-million-capital-raise/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/glams-new-look-a-50-million-capital-raise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/glam-media-logo.jpg" />Glam Media, an online content company focused on women, seems to grow in any kind of economic environment. In fact, it has shown revenue increases for the past 17 quarters.</p>
<p>And with the top-line poised to cross over $100 million, it only seems natural that investors have been clamoring to put money into Glam. So, this week, the company announced that it has <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/glam-media-raises-50-million-at-a-750-million-valuation-2010-2">raised $50 million</a> from an investor group that includes Aeris Capital, Burda Digital Holding and Mizuho Capital. This puts the total amount raised at $130 million.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/glams-new-look-a-50-million-capital-raise/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Glam's New Look: A $50 Million Capital Raise</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/glams-new-look-a-50-million-capital-raise/">Glam's New Look: A $50 Million Capital Raise</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/glams-new-look-a-50-million-capital-raise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19342461/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/glams-new-look-a-50-million-capital-raise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Glam Media</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Fashion Lead Magazines out of the Recession?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/26/will-fashion-lead-magazines-out-of-the-recession/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/26/will-fashion-lead-magazines-out-of-the-recession/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/26/will-fashion-lead-magazines-out-of-the-recession/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/shopping_coach_240.jpg" />It's been a long time since there's been any good news for the print media, but this is a start: ad pages at leading fashion magazines are significantly year over year. <br />
<br />
InStyle pulled off an incredible 33.5% jump in year over year ad pages for its March issue, and Vogue eked out a 0.6% increase. Harper's Bazaar was up 4.4%. Elle was up 4%. The big laggard was W, which saw its ad count fall 23.4%.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/26/will-fashion-lead-magazines-out-of-the-recession/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Fashion Lead Magazines out of the Recession?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/26/will-fashion-lead-magazines-out-of-the-recession/">Will Fashion Lead Magazines out of the Recession?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/fashion_mags_post_march_win_Y4xpvwHR6Ex0Dfa5jma9wO>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/26/will-fashion-lead-magazines-out-of-the-recession/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19332345/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/26/will-fashion-lead-magazines-out-of-the-recession/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Advertising</category><category>anna wintour</category><category>AnnaWintour</category><category>Fashion</category><category>france</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time, News Corp, Hearst, and others to compete with Kindle]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/time-news-corp-hearst-and-others-to-compete-with-kindle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/time-news-corp-hearst-and-others-to-compete-with-kindle/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/time-news-corp-hearst-and-others-to-compete-with-kindle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/amzn-kindle.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Five of the largest companies in the print business are testing the digital waters together. Rather than yield their content to alien formats, Time Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys" target="_blank">TWX</a>), News Corp. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">NWS</a>), Conde Nast, Hearst and Meredith Corp. <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34329485/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/" target="_blank">have announced plans to develop a digital content format of their own</a>. This new product would compete with the newly released Nook from Barnes &amp; Noble (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys" target="_blank">BKS</a>), as well as one from Sony (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys" target="_blank">SNE</a>) and the industry-leading Kindle from Amazon (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas" target="_blank">AMZN</a>). The new <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/ereader/">e-reader</a> content will come in color and in a format that would work across several devices.</p>
<p>The five media companies are equal partners in this joint venture, which will allow publishers to set their own prices for their content -- an obvious response to what they see as unfavorable revenue share deals offered by Amazon earlier this year. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/RupertMurdoch/">Rupert Murdoch</a> has been particularly vocal on this issue, particularly about the fact that News Corp. only receives a little more than a third of the $14.99 a month it costs to subscribe to the <em><a href="http://www.wsj.com" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal</a></em> on a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Kindle/">Kindle</a>. He says of the device that it's "a fantastic invention for reading books. It is not much of an experience for newspapers."<br /><br /><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/time-news-corp-hearst-and-others-to-compete-with-kindle/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time, News Corp, Hearst, and others to compete with Kindle</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/time-news-corp-hearst-and-others-to-compete-with-kindle/">Time, News Corp, Hearst, and others to compete with Kindle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34329485/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/time-news-corp-hearst-and-others-to-compete-with-kindle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19271034/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/time-news-corp-hearst-and-others-to-compete-with-kindle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amazon</category><category>Amazon Kindle</category><category>amazon.com</category><category>barnes and noble</category><category>Barnes and Noble Nook</category><category>conde nast</category><category>CondeNast</category><category>e-readers</category><category>hearst</category><category>HearstCorp</category><category>inthenews</category><category>kindle</category><category>Meredith Corp.</category><category>news corp</category><category>nook</category><category>print media</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>smartphones</category><category>sne</category><category>SONY</category><category>tablet computers</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Valeant Pharma (VRX) falls on bearish Barron's coverage]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/valeant-pharma-vrx-falls-on-bearish-barrons-coverage/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/valeant-pharma-vrx-falls-on-bearish-barrons-coverage/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/valeant-pharma-vrx-falls-on-bearish-barrons-coverage/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=119269&amp;p=irol-irhome"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="VRX logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/vrx-valeant-phamraceuticals-logo.jpg" /></a>Valeant Pharmaceuticals (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valeant-pharmaceuticals-international/vrx/nys">VRX</a> - <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valeant-pharmaceuticals-international/vrx/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) stock is trading lower today after <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB125876941033858585.html">an article in Barron's</a> (subscription required) over the weekend said the company could see trouble ahead if its experimental epilepsy drug, which is undergoing the regulatory review process, is not profitable enough to offset declining royalties from its hepatitis C treatment. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on VRX.<br /><br />This morning, VRX opened at $32.15. So far today the stock has hit a high of $32.95 and a low of $31.88. As of 11:30, VRX is trading at $32.07, down $1.21 (-3.6%). The chart for VRX looks bullish.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/valeant-pharma-vrx-falls-on-bearish-barrons-coverage/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Valeant Pharma (VRX) falls on bearish Barron's coverage</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/valeant-pharma-vrx-falls-on-bearish-barrons-coverage/">Valeant Pharma (VRX) falls on bearish Barron's coverage</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/valeant-pharma-vrx-falls-on-bearish-barrons-coverage/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19250790/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/valeant-pharma-vrx-falls-on-bearish-barrons-coverage/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barrons</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investors observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>options</category><category>Valeant Pharmaceuticals</category><category>ValeantPharmaceuticals</category><category>VRX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Teradata (TDC) ripe for a bullish trade?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/teradata-tdc-ripe-for-a-bullish-trade/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/teradata-tdc-ripe-for-a-bullish-trade/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/teradata-tdc-ripe-for-a-bullish-trade/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=215054&amp;p=irol-irhome"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="TDC logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/tdc-teradata-logo.jpg" /></a><a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/teradata-corporation/tdc/nys">Teradata</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/teradata-corporation/tdc/nys">TDC</a> - <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/teradata-corporation/tdc/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) shares are rising today after <a target="_blank" href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB125634798237805309.html">the stock received positive coverage in Barron's</a> (subscription required) over the weekend. An analyst wrote in the magazine that the stock could rise by as much as 80 percent over the next two years, helped by the company's high cash reserves, good client roster, and technical advantages. This could be a good sign for TDC. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on TDC.<br /><br />TDC opened this morning at $29.58. So far today the stock has hit a low of $29.11 and a high of $29.75. As of 11:25, TDC is trading at $29.36 up $1.03 (3.6%). The chart for TDC looks neutral and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives TDC a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold ranking.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/teradata-tdc-ripe-for-a-bullish-trade/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Teradata (TDC) ripe for a bullish trade?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/teradata-tdc-ripe-for-a-bullish-trade/">Teradata (TDC) ripe for a bullish trade?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/teradata-tdc-ripe-for-a-bullish-trade/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19209736/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/teradata-tdc-ripe-for-a-bullish-trade/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barrons</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>options</category><category>TDC</category><category>Teradata</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barron's: Assured Guaranty (AGO) could thrive]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/barrons-assured-guaranty-ago-could-thrive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/barrons-assured-guaranty-ago-could-thrive/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/barrons-assured-guaranty-ago-could-thrive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><a href="http://www.assuredguaranty.com/Content/ContentDisplay.aspx?ContentID=2649" target="_blank"><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="AGO logo" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/ago-assured-guaranty-logo.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/assured-guaranty-ltd/ago/nys">Assured Guaranty</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/assured-guaranty-ltd/ago/nys">AGO</a> - <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/assured-guaranty-ltd/ago/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) shares rose Monday after <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB125453517291161261.html" target="_blank">the stock received positive coverage in <em>Barron's</em></a> over the weekend. An analyst wrote in the magazine that shares of the stock could appreciate quickly since it is the only bond insurer among its competitors that still has the credit rating and financial strength to write insurance on new issues of municipal bonds and bond securitizations. Barron's also said that Assured Guaranty could have smaller-than-expected losses from claims. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on AGO.</p>
<p>AGO opened at $18.70. In morning trading, the stock hit a low of $18.70 and a high of $19.63. As of 11:05, AGO was trading at $19.53 up 1.38 (7.6%). The chart for AGO looks neutral and <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline" target="_blank">S&amp;P</a> gives AGO a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold ranking.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/barrons-assured-guaranty-ago-could-thrive/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Barron's: Assured Guaranty (AGO) could thrive</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/barrons-assured-guaranty-ago-could-thrive/">Barron's: Assured Guaranty (AGO) could thrive</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/barrons-assured-guaranty-ago-could-thrive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19184615/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/barrons-assured-guaranty-ago-could-thrive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AGO</category><category>Assured Guaranty</category><category>Barrons</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>options</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner to sell magazine unit 'eventually']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/time-warner-media-logo-design.jpg" width="160" height="87" />Eventually, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys" target="_blank">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys" target="_blank">TWX</a>) will just be <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE58P1JK20090926" target="_blank">Warner Brothers, HBO, and Turner Networks</a>, says Gordon Crawford, managing director of The Capital Group. </p>
<p>Why does this guy's opinion matter? Well, his company is Time Warner's biggest shareholder. He sees the coming divestiture of <a href="http://www.aol.com" target="_blank">AOL</a> (to which <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com" target="_blank">BloggingStocks</a> belongs) as part of a broader effort that will eventually include the sale of its print division.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time Warner to sell magazine unit 'eventually'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/">Time Warner to sell magazine unit 'eventually'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19175280/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>america online</category><category>aol</category><category>inthenews</category><category>magazine industry</category><category>print magazines</category><category>print media</category><category>publishing</category><category>time inc</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Vibe and Creative Loafing: Private equity moves in on print publishing]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/vibe-and-creative-loafing-private-equity-moves-in-print-publish/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/vibe-and-creative-loafing-private-equity-moves-in-print-publish/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/vibe-and-creative-loafing-private-equity-moves-in-print-publish/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/creativeloafing_logo.jpg" alt="" />Vibe Media Group, publisher of hip-hop magazine <em>Vibe</em>, shut down in June, as the poor economy led to declining advertising revenue. Vibe has since been acquired for an undisclosed price by InterMedia Partners, a private equity firm.</p>
<p>InterMedia said it plans to <a href="http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/content_display/photo-news/editorial/e3i793637a126d62172ee5129f659a6d77a">resume publication of <em>Vibe</em></a> in November as a quarterly magazine. The operations of <em>Vibe</em> are to be integrated with those of <em>Uptown</em>, another urban lifestyle magazine InterMedia owns. Publishing veteran Jermaine Hall has been named as the new editor-in-chief of <em>Vibe,</em> and the new business will be known as the Vibe Lifestyle Network.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/vibe-and-creative-loafing-private-equity-moves-in-print-publish/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Vibe and Creative Loafing: Private equity moves in on print publishing</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/vibe-and-creative-loafing-private-equity-moves-in-print-publish/">Vibe and Creative Loafing: Private equity moves in on print publishing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/vibe-and-creative-loafing-private-equity-moves-in-print-publish/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19140256/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/vibe-and-creative-loafing-private-equity-moves-in-print-publish/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Atalaya Capital Management</category><category>Ben Eason</category><category>Chicago Reader</category><category>Creative Loafing</category><category>InterMedia Partners</category><category>inthenews</category><category>private equity</category><category>Uptown</category><category>Vibe Lifestyle Network</category><category>Vibe Media Group</category><category>Washington City Paper</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Playboy's second quarter: Not centerfold material ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/playboys-second-quarter-not-centerfold-material/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/playboys-second-quarter-not-centerfold-material/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/playboys-second-quarter-not-centerfold-material/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/playboy-pla-logo.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">Playboy Enterprises</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">PLA</a>) is still around? I was surprised to hear that it was, according to a news article from Reuters detailing the <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/earningsSeason/idUSN047443620090804">struggling media company</a>'s second-quarter results. Unfortunately, Playboy remains a puzzle. How in the world is management going to turn the ship around? </p>
<p>Playboy's top line fell by 15%. The bottom line booked a loss of 26 cents per share. Expectations were for 23 cents per share to be lost. In the year-ago period, Playboy lost 10 cents per share. I think it's plainly obvious that Playboy just isn't the force it once was. Pretty sad to see this icon slowly fade into irrelevance as the digital revolution continues to devalue its historic brand equity. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/playboys-second-quarter-not-centerfold-material/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Playboy's second quarter: Not centerfold material </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/playboys-second-quarter-not-centerfold-material/">Playboy's second quarter: Not centerfold material </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/earningsSeason/idUSN047443620090804>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/playboy-enterprises-inc-reports-second-quarter-2009-results/rfid238374061?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/playboy-pla-speculative-bet-on-the-bunny/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/playboys-second-quarter-not-centerfold-material/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19119440/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/playboys-second-quarter-not-centerfold-material/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>magazine</category><category>PLA</category><category>Playboy</category><category>publishing</category><category>steven halpern</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MasterCard (MA) seen a bargain by Barron's]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/mastercard-ma-seen-a-bargain-by-barrons/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/mastercard-ma-seen-a-bargain-by-barrons/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/mastercard-ma-seen-a-bargain-by-barrons/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ma/" rel="tag">MasterCard Inc'A' (MA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/v/" rel="tag">Visa Inc. (V)</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://investorrelations.mastercardintl.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=148835&amp;p=irol-irhome"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="MA logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/ma-mastercard-logo.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mastercard-incorporated/ma/nys">MasterCard</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mastercard-incorporated/ma/nys">MA</a> - <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mastercard-incorporated/ma/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) shares are rising today after an analyst writing in this week's Barron's said <a target="_blank" href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB124848545719280723.html#mod=BOL_hpp_mag">the company's stock might be a better bargain</a> than that of competitor <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/visa-inc/v/nys">Visa</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/visa-inc/v/nys">V</a>). If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on MA.<br /><br />MA opened this morning at $187.94. So far today the stock has hit a low of $187.35 and a high of $192.44. As of 11:45, MA is trading at $191.62 up $6.15 (3.3%). The chart for MA looks bullish and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives MA a positive 5 STARS (out of 5) strong buy ranking.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/mastercard-ma-seen-a-bargain-by-barrons/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>MasterCard (MA) seen a bargain by Barron's</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/mastercard-ma-seen-a-bargain-by-barrons/">MasterCard (MA) seen a bargain by Barron's</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/mastercard-ma-seen-a-bargain-by-barrons/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19110779/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/mastercard-ma-seen-a-bargain-by-barrons/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barrons</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>MA</category><category>MasterCard</category><category>options</category><category>V</category><category>Visa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BusinessWeek could be yours for $1]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/businessweek-could-be-yours-for-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/businessweek-could-be-yours-for-1/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/businessweek-could-be-yours-for-1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a></p><img width="177" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="258" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/deathequities.jpg" alt="" />A subscription to BusinessWeek will cost you $46 for $46 issues -- <a href="https://w1.buysub.com/pubs/BW/BWK/4page_split_page3_020609_50_46.jsp?cds_page_id=60000&amp;cds_mag_code=BWK&amp;id=1247595481151&amp;lsid=91951318011044170&amp;vid=1&amp;cds_response_key=I0903SSG2">an 80% savings off the newsstand price!</a><br /><br />Or you could just buy the company and have done with it. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcgraw-hill-companies-incorporat/mhp/nys">McGraw-Hill</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcgraw-hill-companies-incorporat/mhp/nys">MHP</a>) is exploring a sale of the beleaguered icon, but the magazine's huge operating losses could mean it will fetch just $1, according to some experts.<br /><br />The reason? With annual losses estimated at anywhere from $10 million to $75 million, acquiring the business would cost huge sums of money for at least a few years -- even if a miraculous turnaround can be engineered. Time Inc., Forbes and Conde Nast are reportedly not seen as suitors.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/businessweek-could-be-yours-for-1/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>BusinessWeek could be yours for $1</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/businessweek-could-be-yours-for-1/">BusinessWeek could be yours for $1</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/businessweek-could-be-yours-for-1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19097649/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/businessweek-could-be-yours-for-1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BusinessWeek</category><category>McGraw-Hill</category><category>MHP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Music magazine raises cash with donations]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/music-magazine-raises-cash-with-donations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/music-magazine-raises-cash-with-donations/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/music-magazine-raises-cash-with-donations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a></p><p><img width="166" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="227" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/benpastecover2008.jpg" alt="" />With persistent rumors about top newspapers shifting toward nonprofit models, the "beg your readers for cash" plan is working for at least one smaller outlet. </p>
<p>A week ago, <em>Paste</em>, a music magazine, began asking its readers for donations. The Associated Press <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/media/2009-05-21-paste-donations_N.htm">reports</a> that "Editor-in-chief Josh Jackson said Thursday the suburban Atlanta-based monthly has raised $166,000 in donations. The magazine focusing on music, film and culture is struggling after a sharp decline in advertising revenue."<br /><br />In an <a href="http://www.medialifemagazine.com/artman2/publish/Magazines_22/Paste_s_pitch_to_readers_Help_save_us.asp">interview with <em>Media Life</em></a>, Jackson explained that the magazine has been able to drum up support by offering exclusive bonus tracks donated by artists like the Indigo Girls, Robyn Hitchcock, and The Decemberists. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/music-magazine-raises-cash-with-donations/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Music magazine raises cash with donations</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/music-magazine-raises-cash-with-donations/">Music magazine raises cash with donations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 May 2009 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/music-magazine-raises-cash-with-donations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1553429/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/music-magazine-raises-cash-with-donations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Josh Jackson</category><category>Magazines</category><category>Paste</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
