<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[New York Times Offers Bleak Q3 Guidance]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/new-york-times-q3-guidance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/new-york-times-q3-guidance/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/new-york-times-q3-guidance/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="New York Times (NYT)" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/01/nytimes.jpg" />The Old Grey Lady is ailing. Wednesday morning, New York Times Co. (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) warned that its <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100922-707249.html">third-quarter revenue will decline</a> by a wider-than-expected margin, due to slower growth in digital advertising. Speaking at an investor conference in New York, CEO Janet Robinson explained that digital ad revenue is expected to rise about 14%, compared to its earlier forecast for growth in the mid-to-high teens.<br />
<br />
As a result, the company expects to swallow a third-quarter operating loss of 5 cents to 7 cents per share. Excluding items, <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/earnings/">earnings</a> are expected to arrive at 3 cents to 5 cents per share, compared to Wall Street's <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Consensus Estimate">consensus estimate</a> of 4 cents per share.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/new-york-times-q3-guidance/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New York Times Offers Bleak Q3 Guidance</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/new-york-times-q3-guidance/">New York Times Offers Bleak Q3 Guidance</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/new-york-times-q3-guidance/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19643982/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/new-york-times-q3-guidance/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>digital advertising</category><category>earnings</category><category>forecast</category><category>guidance</category><category>inthenews</category><category>New York Times</category><category>NYT</category><category>NYT guidance</category><category>options</category><category>puts</category><category>revenue</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>third quarter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google CEO Schmidt: We See Profits in the Newspaper Industry Again]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/google-ceo-schmidt-we-see-profits-in-the-newspaper-industry-aga/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/google-ceo-schmidt-we-see-profits-in-the-newspaper-industry-aga/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/google-ceo-schmidt-we-see-profits-in-the-newspaper-industry-aga/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/google-logo-240.gif" alt="" />Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) has been the bain of the publishing industry -- both printed and  <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Google_CEO_Schmidt_We_See_Profits_in_the_Newspaper_Industry'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span> electronic -- for years. Its Google Books project scans books by the hundreds in order to make the content accessible online and for free. Have a newspaper website? Google probably scans it daily to aggregate pieces of your content at Google News (again, for free). Google CEO Eric Schmidt, though, thinks that newspapers can follow the Google model and make money using their content online, and not hide everything behind a pay wall.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/google-ceo-schmidt-we-see-profits-in-the-newspaper-industry-aga/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google CEO Schmidt: We See Profits in the Newspaper Industry Again</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/google-ceo-schmidt-we-see-profits-in-the-newspaper-industry-aga/">Google CEO Schmidt: We See Profits in the Newspaper Industry Again</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-20002227-93.html?tag=newsEditorsPicksArea.0>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/google-ceo-schmidt-we-see-profits-in-the-newspaper-industry-aga/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19435505/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/google-ceo-schmidt-we-see-profits-in-the-newspaper-industry-aga/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Eric Schmidt</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google CEO</category><category>inthenews</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Regal Cinemas Dips on Ticket Pricing Concerns]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/regal-cinemas-dips-on-ticket-pricing-concerns/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/regal-cinemas-dips-on-ticket-pricing-concerns/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/regal-cinemas-dips-on-ticket-pricing-concerns/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://investor.regmovies.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=222211&amp;p=irol-irhome"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="RGC logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/rgc-regal-entertainment-logo.jpg" /></a>Regal Entertainment Group (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/regal-entertainment-group/rgc/nys">RGC</a>) stock is trading lower today after <a target="_blank" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703416204575146350535215886.html">an article</a> over the weekend in the Wall Street Journal (subscription required) criticized a move by some cinema chains to raise ticket prices. The analyst wrote that raising the price of 3D movies would likely backfire and might drive away cost-conscious families. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on RGC.<br />
<br />
This morning, RGC opened at $17.87. So far today the stock has hit a high of $17.87 and a low of $17.11. As of 12:00, RGC is trading at $17.13, down $0.86 (-4.8%). The chart for RGC looks bullish.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/regal-cinemas-dips-on-ticket-pricing-concerns/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Regal Cinemas Dips on Ticket Pricing Concerns</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/regal-cinemas-dips-on-ticket-pricing-concerns/">Regal Cinemas Dips on Ticket Pricing Concerns</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/regal-cinemas-dips-on-ticket-pricing-concerns/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19418356/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/regal-cinemas-dips-on-ticket-pricing-concerns/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Investors Observer</category><category>options</category><category>regal entertainment</category><category>RGC</category><category>WSJ</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Internet: Enemy of Newspapers, But the Friend of T.V. (So Far)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/the-internet-enemy-of-newspapers-but-the-friend-of-t-v-so-fa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/the-internet-enemy-of-newspapers-but-the-friend-of-t-v-so-fa/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/the-internet-enemy-of-newspapers-but-the-friend-of-t-v-so-fa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/facebook-screen-240.jpg"  alt="" />The internet, the enemy of print newspapers, is, conversely, the friend of television, at least initially in the digital age. <br />
<br />
The phenomenon, <em>The New York Time</em>s (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) <a href="http:// http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/24/business/media/24cooler.html">reported Wednesday,</a> has to do with the promotional effect that the internet's social dimension has created for television. Specifically, the recent explosive growth and popularity of <a href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a> (with an astounding 400 million users), has created a new, de-facto 'office water-cooler chat' for television.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/the-internet-enemy-of-newspapers-but-the-friend-of-t-v-so-fa/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Internet: Enemy of Newspapers, But the Friend of T.V. (So Far)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/the-internet-enemy-of-newspapers-but-the-friend-of-t-v-so-fa/">The Internet: Enemy of Newspapers, But the Friend of T.V. (So Far)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/the-internet-enemy-of-newspapers-but-the-friend-of-t-v-so-fa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19372147/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/the-internet-enemy-of-newspapers-but-the-friend-of-t-v-so-fa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Facebook</category><category>internet</category><category>tv</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Most News Outlets Are Repetitive, New York Times Repeats]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/most-news-outlets-are-repetitive-new-york-times-repeats/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/most-news-outlets-are-repetitive-new-york-times-repeats/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/most-news-outlets-are-repetitive-new-york-times-repeats/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/scaredpaper200.jpg" alt="" />The <em>New York Times</em> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NYT</a>) reports today that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/11/business/media/11baltimore.html?ref=business" target="_blank">newspapers dominate the news creation business</a>. </p>
<p> <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Most_News_Outlets_Are_Repetitive_New_York_Times_Repeats'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>  This is an interesting twist -- instead of touting readers or paid circulation or ads or total revenue, it's talking about production. It's almost as if Ford (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys" target="_blank">F</a>) were to announce: "We make more cars than anyone else." Who the hell cares if they sell any, right? What's important is production, not sales! For the <em>Times</em>, and print media in general, it feels like yet another attempt to justify its existence and "prove" that it is more valuable than the more cost-effective and nimble online outlets.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/most-news-outlets-are-repetitive-new-york-times-repeats/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Most News Outlets Are Repetitive, New York Times Repeats</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/most-news-outlets-are-repetitive-new-york-times-repeats/">Most News Outlets Are Repetitive, New York Times Repeats</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/most-news-outlets-are-repetitive-new-york-times-repeats/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19311521/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/most-news-outlets-are-repetitive-new-york-times-repeats/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baltimore</category><category>ford</category><category>gannett</category><category>GCI</category><category>inthenews</category><category>journalism online</category><category>media</category><category>new york times</category><category>news</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NWS</category><category>ny times</category><category>nyt</category><category>pew research center</category><category>print media</category><category>washington post</category><category>WPO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Heartland Publications Files for Bankruptcy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/heartland-publications-files-for-bankruptcy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/heartland-publications-files-for-bankruptcy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/heartland-publications-files-for-bankruptcy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a></p><img align="right" width="258" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="172" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/heartlandnc.jpg" />Even the week of Christmas isn't enough to provide a reprieve for the ongoing rout in the newspaper industry.<br />
<br />
Heartland Publications, which publishes around 50 community newspapers in nine states, <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jcZmtu0MD3ZeWZNuXCSekES8UEYgD9CNV9UO0">filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on Monday</a>. The company is looking to restructure $156 million in secured debt, and blamed "significant liquidity challenges" and "weakened operating results" for the filing. Increases in the minimum wage have also been a problem.<br />
<br />
The company reached a restructuring deal with its first-lien lenders, and will continue to operate.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/heartland-publications-files-for-bankruptcy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Heartland Publications Files for Bankruptcy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/heartland-publications-files-for-bankruptcy/">Heartland Publications Files for Bankruptcy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jcZmtu0MD3ZeWZNuXCSekES8UEYgD9CNV9UO0>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/heartland-publications-files-for-bankruptcy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19290383/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/heartland-publications-files-for-bankruptcy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Heartland Publications</category><category>HeartlandPublications</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[You can profit from James Altucher's insanity]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/12/you-can-profit-from-james-altuchers-insanity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/12/you-can-profit-from-james-altuchers-insanity/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/12/you-can-profit-from-james-altuchers-insanity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/interviews/" rel="tag">Interviews</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/forever-buffett-2.jpg" alt="" />James Altucher is a financial journalist for <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> and founder of Stockpickr.com. His articles cover every angle of the market; he also stars in feature videos with other financial luminaries. He is the author of <em>Trade Like a Hedge Fund, Trade Like Warren Buffett, SuperCa$h,</em> and <em>The Forever Portfolio.</em></p>
<p>He has taken a controversial path lately with numerous articles in the <em>New York Post</em> and Huffington Post. Some articles include: "Global Warming Is a Myth," "Should Insider Trading Be Made Legal?" "School of Hard Cash," "The Internet Is Dead (as an Investment)," and "5 Myths the Recession Taught Us."</p>
<p>Rumors of a new addition to the James Altucher library have entered the blogosphere, so I met with James to discuss a possible new book and the response from his recent aggressive views on finance and the stock market.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/12/you-can-profit-from-james-altuchers-insanity/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>You can profit from James Altucher's insanity</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/12/you-can-profit-from-james-altuchers-insanity/">You can profit from James Altucher's insanity</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/12/you-can-profit-from-james-altuchers-insanity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19243099/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/12/you-can-profit-from-james-altuchers-insanity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon.com</category><category>AMZN</category><category>AOL</category><category>Cameco</category><category>capitalism</category><category>CCJ</category><category>climate change</category><category>DailyFinance</category><category>day trading</category><category>Facebook</category><category>Forever Portfolio</category><category>Fred Wilson</category><category>GlaxoSmithKline</category><category>global warming</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>GSK</category><category>hedge funds</category><category>Huffington Post</category><category>insider trading</category><category>institutional investing</category><category>James Altucher</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>naked short selling</category><category>naked shorting</category><category>New York Post</category><category>News Corp. NWS</category><category>PCLN</category><category>Priceline</category><category>recession</category><category>SanofiAventis</category><category>SNY</category><category>swine flu</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>Trade Like a Hedge Fund</category><category>Trade Like Warren Buffett</category><category>Twitter</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daleela Farina]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Washington Times set to lay off at least 40% of its workers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/washington-times-set-to-lay-off-at-least-40-of-its-workers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/washington-times-set-to-lay-off-at-least-40-of-its-workers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/washington-times-set-to-lay-off-at-least-40-of-its-workers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/washingtontimes.jpg" alt="" />Like most newspapers, The Unification Church-controlled <em>Washington Times</em> is experiencing significant financial problems.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/03/business/media/03paper.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business"><em>The New York Times</em> reports</a> that the far-right wing newspaper will lay off at least 40% of its 370 employees, citing a memo sent to workers. That hardly seems appropriate for a newspaper that was founded by a guy (Syun Myung Moon) believed by himself and his followers to be the second coming of Jesus Christ.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/washington-times-set-to-lay-off-at-least-40-of-its-workers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Washington Times set to lay off at least 40% of its workers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/washington-times-set-to-lay-off-at-least-40-of-its-workers/">Washington Times set to lay off at least 40% of its workers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/03/business/media/03paper.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/washington-times-set-to-lay-off-at-least-40-of-its-workers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19263673/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/washington-times-set-to-lay-off-at-least-40-of-its-workers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Miami Herald</category><category>Washington Times</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google gives newspapers what they want]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/google-logo-200x150.jpg" alt="" />Free content's getting locked down. Google (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>), which has been criticized by the newspaper industry for <strike>sending them traffic</strike> making it easy for readers to find the stories they want without forcing them to make a purchase, is <a href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/technologylive/2009/12/google-to-limit-free-newspaper-articles.html" target="_blank">starting to play ball with the print industry</a>. </p>
<p>What's the harm? The way things are going, Google will only have to be nice for a little while. Then, this latest defensive measure by the newspaper industry will have run its course, and Google will be free to do what it wants.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google gives newspapers what they want</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/">Google gives newspapers what they want</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19261078/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>GoogleNews</category><category>inthenews</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NWS</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Washington Post closes the last of its U.S. bureaus]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/washington-post-closes-the-last-of-its-u-s-bureaus/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/washington-post-closes-the-last-of-its-u-s-bureaus/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/washington-post-closes-the-last-of-its-u-s-bureaus/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/07/rsz_1post.jpg" />As print media continues its prolonged death throes, The Washington Post Company (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-washington-post-company/wpo/nys">WPO</a>) announced late Tuesday that it will <a href="http://www.seattlepi.com/business/1310ap_us_washington_post_bureau_closings.html">shut down its U.S. bureaus</a> in New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago. Six journalists will be affected by the closures, and all will be offered jobs in Washington. Three news aides in the bureaus will be offered severance.</p>
<p>As a result of the move, the Post will no longer have any journalists on staff outside its home base of Washington, D.C. In a memo to staffers, Executive Editor Marcus Brauchli explained that the newspaper must focus its journalistic efforts on its own turf.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/washington-post-closes-the-last-of-its-u-s-bureaus/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Washington Post closes the last of its U.S. bureaus</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/washington-post-closes-the-last-of-its-u-s-bureaus/">Washington Post closes the last of its U.S. bureaus</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/washington-post-closes-the-last-of-its-u-s-bureaus/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19253885/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/washington-post-closes-the-last-of-its-u-s-bureaus/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Marcus Brauchli</category><category>MarcusBrauchli</category><category>news bureau</category><category>NewsBureau</category><category>short sellers</category><category>ShortSellers</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><category>Washington Post</category><category>WashingtonPost</category><category>WPO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Valeant Pharma (VRX) falls on bearish Barron's coverage]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/valeant-pharma-vrx-falls-on-bearish-barrons-coverage/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/valeant-pharma-vrx-falls-on-bearish-barrons-coverage/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/valeant-pharma-vrx-falls-on-bearish-barrons-coverage/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=119269&amp;p=irol-irhome"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="VRX logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/vrx-valeant-phamraceuticals-logo.jpg" /></a>Valeant Pharmaceuticals (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valeant-pharmaceuticals-international/vrx/nys">VRX</a> - <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valeant-pharmaceuticals-international/vrx/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) stock is trading lower today after <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB125876941033858585.html">an article in Barron's</a> (subscription required) over the weekend said the company could see trouble ahead if its experimental epilepsy drug, which is undergoing the regulatory review process, is not profitable enough to offset declining royalties from its hepatitis C treatment. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on VRX.<br /><br />This morning, VRX opened at $32.15. So far today the stock has hit a high of $32.95 and a low of $31.88. As of 11:30, VRX is trading at $32.07, down $1.21 (-3.6%). The chart for VRX looks bullish.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/valeant-pharma-vrx-falls-on-bearish-barrons-coverage/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Valeant Pharma (VRX) falls on bearish Barron's coverage</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/valeant-pharma-vrx-falls-on-bearish-barrons-coverage/">Valeant Pharma (VRX) falls on bearish Barron's coverage</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/valeant-pharma-vrx-falls-on-bearish-barrons-coverage/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19250790/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/valeant-pharma-vrx-falls-on-bearish-barrons-coverage/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barrons</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investors observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>options</category><category>Valeant Pharmaceuticals</category><category>ValeantPharmaceuticals</category><category>VRX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper ad revenue of 28%, 8 quarters of double-digit drops]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img border="1" align="right" width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="163" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/teapaper.jpg" alt="" />We've put three quarters behind us in 2009, and the most recent one was merely another miserable step downward for the beleaguered newspaper industry. Total ad revenue plummeted in the third quarter to $6.4 billion for the print jockeys, a decline of 28%. <a href="http://www.naa.org/TrendsandNumbers/Advertising-Expenditures.aspx" target="_blank">This info from the Newspaper Association of America</a> drives home the notion that conditions will only worsen for the newspaper industry. So, if you're hoping those shares of New York Times Company (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NYT</a>), Gannett (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys" target="_blank">GCI</a>) and Washington Post Company (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-washington-post-company/wpo/nys" target="_blank">WPO</a>), holding your breath will leave you little more than dizzy.</p>
<p>Of the total advertising revenue generated in the third quarter of 2009, $5.8 million came from print, the lowest quarterly amount this year. The $623 million in online advertising sold by America's newspapers was also 2009's worst. Both are down substantially from the same quarter in 2008, when the newspapers posted print ad revenue of $8.2 million and online ad revenue of $750 million, according to NAA data. At this time last year, we lamented year-over-year declines approaching 20%. Now, we have the same feelings as ad revenue drops approach 30%.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Newspaper ad revenue of 28%, 8 quarters of double-digit drops</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/">Newspaper ad revenue of 28%, 8 quarters of double-digit drops</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19248391/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ad revenue</category><category>AdRevenue</category><category>advertising</category><category>featured</category><category>gannett</category><category>gannett co gci</category><category>GannettCo.</category><category>GannettCoGci</category><category>GCI</category><category>new york times</category><category>New York Times Co</category><category>new york times company</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper advertising</category><category>newspaper association of america</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspaper stocks</category><category>NewspaperAdvertising</category><category>NewspaperAssociationOfAmerica</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NewspaperStocks</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NewYorkTimesCo</category><category>NewYorkTimesCompany</category><category>nyt</category><category>online ads</category><category>online advertising</category><category>OnlineAds</category><category>OnlineAdvertising</category><category>print ads</category><category>print advertising</category><category>PrintAds</category><category>PrintAdvertising</category><category>washington post</category><category>Washington Post Co.</category><category>WashingtonPost</category><category>WashingtonPostCo.</category><category>WPO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Washington Post Company increases income, but shares sell off]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/the-washington-post-company-increases-income-but-shares-sell-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/the-washington-post-company-increases-income-but-shares-sell-of/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/the-washington-post-company-increases-income-but-shares-sell-of/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/wpo.jpg" width="220" height="43" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-washington-post-company/wpo/nys">The Washington Post Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-washington-post-company/wpo/nys">WPO</a>) published data for the <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/the-washington-post-company-reports-third-quarter-earnings/rfid265928963?channel=pf">third quarter</a> earlier today. Can't say I was mightily impressed by the numbers. Sure, there was a profit increase, but the top line wasn't exciting, and the newspaper division, as you might have expected, experienced a sharp decline in sales. </p>
<p>Net revenues rose 2%. Earnings per share came in at $1.81. That was sharply higher than the $1.08 per share recorded in the comparable period. Yet, I think you have to be careful in terms of reading too much positive spin into the growth rate.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/the-washington-post-company-increases-income-but-shares-sell-of/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Washington Post Company increases income, but shares sell off</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/the-washington-post-company-increases-income-but-shares-sell-of/">The Washington Post Company increases income, but shares sell off</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/the-washington-post-company-reports-third-quarter-earnings/rfid265928963?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/the-washington-post-company-increases-income-but-shares-sell-of/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19216900/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/the-washington-post-company-increases-income-but-shares-sell-of/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gannett</category><category>GCI</category><category>new york times</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NYT</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>StevenHalpern</category><category>washington post</category><category>WashingtonPost</category><category>WPO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New York Times to cut 100 newsroom positions]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/nyt-new-york-times-logo.jpg" />The folks in the news business are probably growing to hate Mondays. <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">Gannett</a>'s (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">GCI</a>) profits are off by more than 50%, and the <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com">New York Times</a></em> announced that it's chopping 100 jobs from the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newsroom/">newsroom</a>, along with an unspecified number elsewhere in the newspaper. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/">Like Gannett</a>, the <em>New York Times</em> cites declines in ad revenue as the reason for the decision. The company is hoping that employees will take voluntary buyouts where offered, but <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33384551/ns/business-media_biz/">it is prepared to conduct a round of layoffs if necessary</a>.</p>
<p>The newspaper, which is the flagship property of the <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">New York Times Company</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>), cut 100 newsroom positions last year, mostly through voluntary buyouts, before a "relatively small" round of layoffs. This year's 100-job cut is approximately 8% of the newsroom, but the paper will still have the largest in the United States. Approximately 1,150 reporters and editors will remain. Already, 100 jobs have been slashed on the business side, leaving it now staffed at 1,850.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New York Times to cut 100 newsroom positions</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/">New York Times to cut 100 newsroom positions</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33384551/ns/business-media_biz/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19201837/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gannett</category><category>gannett co gci</category><category>gannettco.</category><category>GannettCoGci</category><category>gci</category><category>inthenews</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper advertising</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperAdvertising</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>newsroom</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NewYorkTimesCo.</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gannett profit falls by more than half]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/gannett-co-gci-logo.jpg" /><a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">Gannett</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">GCI</a>) lost more than half its third-quarter profits year-over-year, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/earnings/2009-10-19-gannett_N.htm">as the newspaper industry shows yet another sign of decline</a>. A substantial drop in ad revenue was the primary reason for the plunge.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newspaper/">newspaper</a> giant was able to stay in the black because of aggressive cost cutting, a move that can work for only so long. For now, it's the most popular option available to the beleaguered industry, as evidenced by a <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">New York Times</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) announcement that it would <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33384551/ns/business-media_biz/">slash another 100 positions from the newsroom</a>, and more positions elsewhere.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Gannett profit falls by more than half</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/">Gannett profit falls by more than half</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/earnings/2009-10-19-gannett_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19201830/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gannett</category><category>gannett co gci</category><category>gannett co layoffs</category><category>gannett co.</category><category>GannettCo.</category><category>GannettCoGci</category><category>GannettCoLayoffs</category><category>gci</category><category>inthenews</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper advertising</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperAdvertising</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>newsprint</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NewYorkTimesCo.</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>usa today</category><category>UsaToday</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boston Globe's future remains uncertain]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/bostonglobelogo.gif" alt="" />The next step remains uncertain for what will go down in history as among the worst newspaper acquisitions. </p>
<p>On Friday, the deadline for submitting bids for the <em><a href="http://www.boston.com" target="_blank">Boston Globe</a></em>, which is owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">The New York Times Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NYT</a>), passed. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/10/business/media/10globe.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business">Two major contenders</a> were expected to write figures on slips of paper and slide them across the proverbial desk: Platinum Equity, a Beverly Hills-based private equity firm and owner of the <em>San Diego Union-Tribune</em>, and Stephen E. Taylor, whose family sold the Globe in 1993.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Boston Globe's future remains uncertain</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/">Boston Globe's future remains uncertain</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19191707/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>beverly hills</category><category>boston</category><category>boston globe</category><category>goldman sachs group</category><category>gs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>ny times</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>platinum equity</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barron's: Assured Guaranty (AGO) could thrive]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/barrons-assured-guaranty-ago-could-thrive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/barrons-assured-guaranty-ago-could-thrive/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/barrons-assured-guaranty-ago-could-thrive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><a href="http://www.assuredguaranty.com/Content/ContentDisplay.aspx?ContentID=2649" target="_blank"><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="AGO logo" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/ago-assured-guaranty-logo.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/assured-guaranty-ltd/ago/nys">Assured Guaranty</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/assured-guaranty-ltd/ago/nys">AGO</a> - <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/assured-guaranty-ltd/ago/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) shares rose Monday after <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB125453517291161261.html" target="_blank">the stock received positive coverage in <em>Barron's</em></a> over the weekend. An analyst wrote in the magazine that shares of the stock could appreciate quickly since it is the only bond insurer among its competitors that still has the credit rating and financial strength to write insurance on new issues of municipal bonds and bond securitizations. Barron's also said that Assured Guaranty could have smaller-than-expected losses from claims. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on AGO.</p>
<p>AGO opened at $18.70. In morning trading, the stock hit a low of $18.70 and a high of $19.63. As of 11:05, AGO was trading at $19.53 up 1.38 (7.6%). The chart for AGO looks neutral and <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline" target="_blank">S&amp;P</a> gives AGO a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold ranking.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/barrons-assured-guaranty-ago-could-thrive/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Barron's: Assured Guaranty (AGO) could thrive</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/barrons-assured-guaranty-ago-could-thrive/">Barron's: Assured Guaranty (AGO) could thrive</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/barrons-assured-guaranty-ago-could-thrive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19184615/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/barrons-assured-guaranty-ago-could-thrive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AGO</category><category>Assured Guaranty</category><category>Barrons</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>options</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. media loses $10 billion in advertising]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/u-s-media-loses-10-billion-in-advertising/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/u-s-media-loses-10-billion-in-advertising/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/u-s-media-loses-10-billion-in-advertising/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/magazine_stand_pinkmoose.jpg" />We've heard a lot about the auto industry and how bad things are. Yet right under our noses, <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/59069098-9732-11de-83c5-00144feabdc0.html">U.S. media advertising</a> lost $10 billion in the first half of this year.</p>
<p>We all know that newspapers are hurting badly. But it's not only newspapers, the losses fall across the advertising spectrum. Let's look at some numbers:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Nielsen reports a 15.4% decline in U.S. advertising revenues. This is the largest drop since this tally began. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/u-s-media-loses-10-billion-in-advertising/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. media loses $10 billion in advertising</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/u-s-media-loses-10-billion-in-advertising/">U.S. media loses $10 billion in advertising</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/59069098-9732-11de-83c5-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/u-s-media-loses-10-billion-in-advertising/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19147957/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/u-s-media-loses-10-billion-in-advertising/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>featured</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Vibe and Creative Loafing: Private equity moves in on print publishing]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/vibe-and-creative-loafing-private-equity-moves-in-print-publish/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/vibe-and-creative-loafing-private-equity-moves-in-print-publish/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/vibe-and-creative-loafing-private-equity-moves-in-print-publish/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/creativeloafing_logo.jpg" alt="" />Vibe Media Group, publisher of hip-hop magazine <em>Vibe</em>, shut down in June, as the poor economy led to declining advertising revenue. Vibe has since been acquired for an undisclosed price by InterMedia Partners, a private equity firm.</p>
<p>InterMedia said it plans to <a href="http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/content_display/photo-news/editorial/e3i793637a126d62172ee5129f659a6d77a">resume publication of <em>Vibe</em></a> in November as a quarterly magazine. The operations of <em>Vibe</em> are to be integrated with those of <em>Uptown</em>, another urban lifestyle magazine InterMedia owns. Publishing veteran Jermaine Hall has been named as the new editor-in-chief of <em>Vibe,</em> and the new business will be known as the Vibe Lifestyle Network.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/vibe-and-creative-loafing-private-equity-moves-in-print-publish/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Vibe and Creative Loafing: Private equity moves in on print publishing</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/vibe-and-creative-loafing-private-equity-moves-in-print-publish/">Vibe and Creative Loafing: Private equity moves in on print publishing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/vibe-and-creative-loafing-private-equity-moves-in-print-publish/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19140256/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/vibe-and-creative-loafing-private-equity-moves-in-print-publish/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Atalaya Capital Management</category><category>Ben Eason</category><category>Chicago Reader</category><category>Creative Loafing</category><category>InterMedia Partners</category><category>inthenews</category><category>private equity</category><category>Uptown</category><category>Vibe Lifestyle Network</category><category>Vibe Media Group</category><category>Washington City Paper</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boston Globe remains in limbo as auction is delayed]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/boston-globe-remains-in-limbo-as-auction-is-delayed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/boston-globe-remains-in-limbo-as-auction-is-delayed/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/boston-globe-remains-in-limbo-as-auction-is-delayed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a></p><img height="188" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/bostonglobe.jpg" width="188" align="right" vspace="4" /><em>The Boston Globe</em> is burning through cash like an arsonist in an abandoned warehouse and the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">The New York Times Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>), its parent, doesn't have much cash to burn. So now the company is looking to sell the <em>Globe</em>.<br /><br />The <em>New York Times</em> -- in a fit of editorial freedom -- <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/business/media/08globe.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business">cites unnamed sources</a> who report that the deadline for the first round of bidding has been extended to allow potential buyers to await the outcome of a July 20 vote by members of the Boston Newspaper Guild.<br /><br />But there's more to it. According to the <em>Times</em>, "They said possible buyers, wary of taking on the respected but money-losing newspaper, were also looking for signs that a deep slump in advertising was beginning to level off, as some industry executives had predicted it would."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/boston-globe-remains-in-limbo-as-auction-is-delayed/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Boston Globe remains in limbo as auction is delayed</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/boston-globe-remains-in-limbo-as-auction-is-delayed/">Boston Globe remains in limbo as auction is delayed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/business/media/08globe.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/boston-globe-remains-in-limbo-as-auction-is-delayed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19090073/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/boston-globe-remains-in-limbo-as-auction-is-delayed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Boston Globe</category><category>BostonGlobe</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NYT</category><category>The New York Times Co.</category><category>TheNewYorkTimesCo.</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
