FeedPosted Jun 16th 2008 2:09PM by Brent Archer (RSS feed)
Filed under: Bad News, McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP), Options, Technical Analysis
McGraw-Hill (NYSE:
MHP) shares opened lower today, but have rebounded as the day moved on after the European Union Internal Market Commissioner announced that bond and credit rating agencies, including MHP's Standard & Poor's, will
face mandatory new European Union regulation as a result of these agencies' roles in the U.S. sub-prime mortgage crisis. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on MHP.
After hitting a one-year high of $71.97 last June, the stock hit a one-year low of $33.91 in March. This morning, MHP opened at $42.87. So far today the stock has hit a low of $42.10 and a high of $43.65. As of 12:00, MHP is trading at $43.60, down $0.13 (-0.3%). The chart for MHPlooks bullish and steady.
For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider an August
bear-call credit spread above the $50 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. This particular trade will make an 11.1% return in two months as long as MHP is below $50 at August expiration. McGraw-Hill would have to rise by more than 14% before we would start to lose money.
MHP hasn't been above $50 since October and has shown resistance around $45 recently. This trade could be risky if the company's earnings (due out in late-July) are a positive surprise, but even if that happens, this position could be protected by resistance MHP might find at its 200 day moving average, which is currently around $44 and falling.
Brent Archer is an options analyst and writer at Investors Observer. At publication time, Brent neither owns nor controls positions in MHP.Posted May 13th 2008 12:12PM by Eric Buscemi (RSS feed)
Filed under: Analyst Reports, McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP), Analyst Initiations
MOST NOTEWORTHY: McGraw-Hill, Curis and Azure Dynamics were today's noteworthy initiations:
- Jefferies initiated McGraw-Hill (NYSE: MHP) with a Buy rating and $49 target. The firm believes the downturn in credit markets has already been fully priced into shares and expects the stock to gain momentum throughout 2008 in anticipation of liquidity returning to credit markets.
- RBC Capital initiated Curis (NASDAQ: CRIS) with an Outperform rating and $2.50 target based on the company's partnership with Genentech (NYSE: DNA) and potential upside from its pipeline.
- Merriman started Azure Dynamics (OTC: AZDDF) with a Buy rating. The firm believes the company's focus is where customers see the most benefit from a medium-duty hybrid or market-appropriate solutions and finds the stock attractively valued.
OTHER INITIATIONS:
Posted May 13th 2008 11:11AM by Eric Buscemi (RSS feed)
Filed under: Analyst Reports, Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades, Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI), McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP), RadioShack Corp (RSH)
MOST NOTEWORTHY: IberiaBank, Dynamic Materials and Barr Pharmaceuticals were today's noteworthy upgrades:
- Keefe Bruyette upgraded shares of IberiaBank (NASDAQ: IBKC) to Market Perform from Underperform after the company announced that Pulaski has assumed the insured deposits of ANB Financial of Bentonville, Arkansas.
- KeyBanc upgraded Dynamic Materials (NASDAQ: BOOM) to Buy from Hold citing stability in base business, valuation, and the added benefit associated with a European competitor being acquired.
- Cowen raised Barr Pharma (NYSE: BRL) to Outperform from Neutral citing the recent pullback.
OTHER UPGRADES:
- Goldman added McGraw-Hill (NASDAQ: MHP) to its Conviction Buy List.
- RBC Capital raised RadioShack (NYSE: RSH) to Sector Perform from Underperform.
- Sirius Satellite (NASDAQ: SIRI) was upgraded at Merrill Lynch to Neutral from Sell.
Posted Apr 22nd 2008 9:57AM by Peter Cohan (RSS feed)
Filed under: Market Matters, Federal Natl Mtge (FNM), McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP)
CNNMoney reports that McGraw-Hill Co.'s (NYSE: MHP) Standard & Poor's (S&P) forecasts the possibility of a $1 trillion bailout of Federal National Mortgage (NYSE: FNM) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage (NYSE: FRE) -- government sponsored purchasers of pools of loans which package them into securities. Specifically, S&P forecasts that a bailout of these two -- known as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- would cost -- in a worst case scenario -- between $420 billion and $1.1 trillion of taxpayer's money. This would represent several times the $250 billion Savings & Loan bailout by the first President Bush.
It's a bit ironic for S&P to be issuing this report. After all, it was among the ratings agencies that contributed to the problem in the first place. As I posted last August, the ratings agencies competed for enormous fees from investment banks to put their AAA ratings on issues of mortgage-backed securities (MBS). Those AAA ratings caused naive MBS buyers to skip the kind of detailed analysis of their purchases that might have stopped the flow of dumb money into the MBS bubble that is now putting Fannie and Freddie at risk.
How did S&P arrive at this scary conclusion? Both companies are forecast to report more losses this year due to declining home prices and rising mortgage defaults. And according to Yale professor, Robert Schiller, "The real fundamental problem is real estate prices have been falling and they might fall substantially more. The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) and Fannie and Freddie never considered the possibility of a massive real estate correction."
Continue reading Is a trillion bailout of Fannie/Freddie imminent?
Posted Apr 16th 2008 8:50AM by Zac Bissonnette (RSS feed)
Filed under: Law, Scandals, McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP)

Given that the big credit rating agencies --
Moody's (NYSE:
MCO) and
McGraw-Hill's (NYSE:
MHP) Standard & Poors -- completely failed in their assessment of risk when it came to mortgage-backed securities, it's no surprise that the SEC is being asked to take a look.
Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) has met with SEC Chairman Chris Cox to discuss conflicts of interest and disclosure problems.
The Wall Street Journal quotes (subscription required) the senator as saying that "There has to be a lot more done about conflicts of interest at the agencies."
Among the worst of the rating agency abusers has been
MBIA (NYSE:
MBI) which, back in March, had the gall to ask Fitch to drop its coverage of the firm because they didn't like Fitch's opinion. To its credit, Fitch stayed strong and later downgraded the company's credit rating.
But wait, there's more: In a devastating piece on Friday,
The Wall Street Journal reported (subscription required) on Moody's efforts to cozy up to issuers in exchange for more business, possibly at the expense of the integrity of their ratings.
This is essentially a replay of the issues involving conflicted analysts like Henry Blodget who, at the height of the internet stock bubble, sacrificed his research to the investment banking arm of his firm. It will take a tough regulator to clean up this mess, and I seriously doubt that Chris Cox is the man for job.
Posted Mar 14th 2008 8:47AM by Peter Cohan (RSS feed)
Filed under: Products and Services, McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP), Economic Data, Recession
Bloomberg News reports that McGraw Hill Co.'s (NYSE: MHP) Standard & Poor's (S&P) reportedly called the bottom of the subprime meltdown after estimating its toll at $285 billion, up from a previous forecast of $265 billion. It raised its estimate because of increased loss assumptions for collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). And it claims that, "The bulk of writedowns may have already been taken."
Maybe, maybe not. S&P is not exactly objective about this. It was among the ratings agencies that caused the problem in the first place. How so? As I posted, back when the $6.1 trillion MBS market was booming, investment banks would pit rating agencies against each other to see which one would give a AAA rating to the toxic waste they were brewing. If S&P won the contest, it would get the lucrative fee from the investment bank.
S&P and its peers made good money by lending their credibility to the firms they were supposed to rate objectively in exchange for those fees. And when the MBS market began to collapse, the ratings agencies suddenly realized that there was no more new ratings business to be had. So they had to go plan B -- trying to salvage their reputations by downgrading the MBSs that they had previously blessed. This reinforced the collapse of the MBS market.
Continue reading Was S&P right to call the bottom of the subprime collapse?
Posted Feb 8th 2008 9:50AM by Zac Bissonnette (RSS feed)
Filed under: Other Issues, Scandals, McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP), Recession

Standard & Poors, a division of
McGraw-Hill (NYSE:
MHP), has joined
Moody's (NYSE:
MCO) and Fitch in
announcing reforms in the wake of the criticism for their role in the subprime fiasco.
S&P says it will hire an ombudsman to investigate conflicts of interest and bring in an outside firm to look at compliance and ethics-related issues. Lead analysts will be rotated from time to time and the company will consider a slew of new factors: liquidity, volatility, correlation and recovery, and "worst-case scenarios."
But New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo isn't buying it: "The supposed reforms announced today by Standard & Poor's and by
Moody's on Tuesday are too little, too late. Both S.&P. and Moody's are attempting to make piecemeal change that seem more like public relations window-dressing than systemic reform."
From an investor's standpoint, I'm inclined to agree with Mr. Cuomo. Moody's carries a market cap of nearly $10 billion, but its entire business depends on the willingness of investors to take its ratings and analysis seriously.
But over the past year or so, the "work" of the ratings agencies has been exposed as pretty much a joke. It will take a lot more than this to recover the company's reputation.
Posted Jan 9th 2008 7:50AM by Melly Alazraki (RSS feed)
Filed under: Before the Bell, Major Movement, International Markets, Earnings Reports, Apple Inc (AAPL), Market Matters, AT and T (T), Alcoa Inc (AA), , duPont(E.I.)deNemours (DD), McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP), Economic Data

Stock futures were positive this morning, indicating U.S. stocks could be poised for a rebound today after suddenly plunging in late session trading Tuesday into correction. However, futures are now mixed, looking for direction. With no economic data on the docket, investors will focus on the start of earnings season and how a slowing U.S. economy could affect corporate profits. The market is very sensitive these days, though, and could react negatively to a number of news, including increasing oil prices.
On Tuesday, a late-day sell-off was caused by fears that Countrywide Financial (NYSE:
CFC) would file for bankruptcy (these were denied by CFC and this morning CFC shares are up over 10% in premarket trading), and AT&T (NYSE:
T)'s pessimistic outlook about consumer spending. The Dow industrials fell 238 points, or 1.86%, the Nasdaq Composite dropped nearly 59 points, or 2.35% -- this was the Nasdaq's eighth consecutive drop -- and the S&P 500 lost nearly 26 points, or 1.84%.
Oil prices rose to
mid $96 a barrel Wednesday ahead of the weekly crude inventories report due out today at 10:30 a.m. EST. Analysts are expecting the report will show crude oil stockpiles fell last week.
Continue reading Before the bell: Will stocks rebound today?
Posted Dec 20th 2007 12:00PM by Peter Cohan (RSS feed)
Filed under: McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP), Economic Data, , Housing
The New York Times reports that McGraw-Hill Co.'s (NYSE: MHP) Standard & Poor's (S&P) has downgraded bond insurer ACA Financial Guaranty Corporation from A to CCC, a sub-investment grade. S&P is saying that ACA's financial guarantee is worthless and thus bond holders must write-down the assets ACA insured.
As of September, ACA insured $7 billion in municipal and $43 billion in corporate debt. S&P's downgrade could cost Merrill Lynch & Co. (NYSE: MER) $3 billion and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (NYSE: CM) estimates it will take a $2 billion write-down.
A few decades from now when economic historians look back on the current financial market implosion, there will be books written about the role that ratings agencies played in blowing up the bubble and then bursting it. That's because the ratings agencies competed with each other to offer the highest ratings to bundles of loans such as Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs). Now that this market has collapsed, the ratings agencies see no profit in rating new CDOs so they're trying to salvage their reputations by bending over backwards to downgrade those same debt instruments.
Continue reading How ratings agencies could cost us trillions
Posted Dec 19th 2007 11:50AM by Steven Halpern (RSS feed)
Filed under: International Markets, Newsletters, McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP), S and P 500, Stocks to Buy, Best Stocks for 2008
For 25 years, Steven Halpern, editor of TheStockAdvisors.com, has surveyed the leading financial newsletter advisors asking for their favorite stocks for the coming year. This article is one of 100+ ideas in the Best Stocks for 2008 report.
"McGraw-Hill (NYSE: MHP) is my top conservative pick for 2008," says Nathan Slaughter, editor of Half-Priced Stocks. "If you want to beat the market in 2008, then you might start with the one company that actually owns the market, or at least the S&P 500 Index; McGraw holds the keys to the widely used stock barometer, as well as other benchmarks from the ubiquitous Standard & Poor's family.
"From futures contracts to ETFs, there is a staggering $5 trillion of investable assets linked to these indices -- which generate piles of recurring royalty and licensing revenues.
"Elsewhere, the firm is also a leading provider of textbooks and other supplemental learning materials. There are roughly 55 million students enrolled in grades K-12, and state governments currently spend more than $8,500 per student each year -- a total that is forecast to hit $11,000 within the next seven years.
Continue reading Best Stocks for 2008: Value investor votes for McGraw-Hill (MHP)
Posted Oct 26th 2007 3:00PM by Peter Cohan (RSS feed)
Filed under: Bad News, Scandals, McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP)
Bloomberg News reports that Connecticut's attorney general has subpoenaed McGraw Hill (NYSE: MHP)'s Standard & Poor's related to an investigation into credit rating.
The legal question is whether S&P issued overly rosy credit ratings on subprime mortgage-backed securities (MBSs) that later lost more than half their value. S&P and its peers were competing for the lucrative ratings fees paid by the investment banks that underwrote the MBSs. And it has been alleged that the winning firms offered the highest ratings.
If the MBSs were indeed the financial equivalent of toxic waste -- then the AAA ratings that S&P and its peers awarded to the MBSs could be thought of as golden wrapping paper. This gold wrap was particularly useful to the investment banks when they visited MBS customers in Europe and Australia.
Rather than get into the details of what was inside the gold-wrapped boxes, these customers simply relied on the assurances of the MBS sales people that the "investment" had been blessed by S&P. No need to dirty themselves with unwrapping the box and exposing the toxic waste within.
Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned in this post.
Posted Oct 11th 2007 6:00PM by Tom Barlow (RSS feed)
Filed under: Products and Services, Consumer Experience, Magazines, Marketing and Advertising, McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP)
McGraw-Hill Companies' (NYSE:
MHP)
BusinessWeek, suffering under the same surfeit of advertising bedeviling the rest of the magazine industry, is going in for an extreme makeover, according to
Leon Lazaroff of Bloomberg. Look for more feature articles and less lifestyle coverage. Cosmetic changes will include typography, logo and graphics. Weight is not an issue, as it's already Kate Moss-thin.
The move comes in response to a
20% decline in ad sales in the first half of 2007, compared to the same duration in 2006. In contrast, the affiliated web site, BusinessWeek.com, continues to expand its ad revenue. The magazine slots in MHP's information & Media sector, which brought in $223.1 million in revenue in the second quarter of this year, with $14.7 million in operating profit for a margin of 5.9%.
McGraw-Hill will announce its third-quarter earnings next Thursday, which would be an excellent time for it to roll out the vamped-up version of
BusinessWeek.
Posted Sep 26th 2007 9:15AM by Jon Ogg (RSS feed)
Filed under: Scandals, McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP), Politics
Today should be an interesting day for the "independent" ratings agencies.
McGraw Hill's (NYSE:
MHP) Standard & Poor's and
Moody's Corp. (NYSE:
MCO) will be
speaking on Capitol Hilll today and tomorrow [subscription required].
Critics have become more vocal that the late summer downgrades on mortgage and derivative securities came too late. It goes without saying that the analysis the bond rating agencies were issuing seemed as if none had questioned the numbers given to them without finding the real exposure. The results were so good that S&P
canned its ratings agency head. Moody's
also made changes, but this was too little too late. If you have been keeping up with this, you'd know shares of both were hit and recently reached new 52-week lows.
Bond rating agencies have been in the soup before over their coverage of great companies like Enron and WorldCom. The difference is, this time they were not just duped by management being hellbent on fraud; this time they just didn't do their job.
But ... congress doesn't even know what it is looking for here, other than getting some air time and making it look like it wants to investigate. The ratings agencies definitely botched it here, but it's likely that nothing of major consequence will happen to them for it.
« Previous Page | Next Page »