Posted Apr 20th 2009 5:20PM by Steven Mallas
Filed under: Earnings reports, Forecasts, Google (GOOG), Yahoo! (YHOO), Time Warner (TWX), New York Times'A' (NYT)
The New York Times (NYSE: NYT) is set to report Q1 earnings on Tuesday, April 21. Don't expect a profit. In fact, I wouldn't expect much of anything. After all, we are talking about a company that makes its money off newsprint. Sad as it might be to say, newspapers are fast becoming dinosaurs in the age of digital information.
According to this source, analysts think that the New York Times will lose about $0.04 per share. That's really bad, considering that the same source says that the company was profitable in the year-ago frame, generating $0.09 per share. It isn't surprising though, is it? Not only has the recession destroyed advertising growth in all forms of media, but newspapers simply aren't looked to anymore as the first source of news. The Internet has disrupted that reputation for good.
Continue reading Earnings preview: New York Times' first quarter not expected to be good
Posted Apr 5th 2009 10:00AM by Peter Cohan
Filed under: Management, Competitive strategy, Marketing and advertising, New York Times'A' (NYT)
The newspaper industry is in deep trouble. How so? It costs a lot to write, print, and deliver a newspaper, and with more people getting their news for free online and a plunge in advertising, costs are higher than revenues. The New York Times (NYSE: NYT) bought my local newspaper, The Boston Globe, in 1993 for $1.1 billion and is now threatening to shut it down unless its unions agree to $20 million in cost cuts. I don't think this is a viable plan -- instead The Boston Globe should stop producing its paper version and charge for access to its online content.
The Boston Globe is suffering from drops in circulation and advertising, and it has 13 unions propping up its costs. How bad is the pain? Its average weekday circulation fell 10% to 323,983 for the six months ending September 2008. Advertising revenues across the industry declined 16% in 2008. And the Boston Newspaper Guild -- whose members include 700 editorial, advertising, and business employees -- is being asked to take pay cuts and put an end to company pension contributions and lifetime job guarantees.
Continue reading How to save the Boston Globe
Posted Apr 2nd 2009 4:30PM by Alex Salkever
Filed under: Deals, Bad news, Newspapers, New York Times'A' (NYT), Morgan Stanley (MS), Economic data, Technology, Recession, Financial Crisis
Continue reading Doomsday Scenario: Higher unemployment, no IPOS, Twitter DOA -- already
Posted Mar 26th 2009 4:05PM by Douglas McIntyre
Filed under: After the bell, Apple Inc (AAPL), Intel (INTC), Citigroup Inc. (C), New York Times'A' (NYT), S and P 500, DJIA, NASDAQ
After being down 25% for the year in early March, the NASDAQ is back to even for 2009. It is an extraordinary rally which shows that tech can still dig the market out of a funk. The fact that shares in companies like Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC) and Apple, Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) are up for the year helps.
For the day:
Dow 7,908.55 +158.74 (2.05%)
S&P 500 832.72 +18.84 (2.31%)
Nasdaq 1,587.00 +58.05 (3.80%)
Continue reading Closing bell: another rally and Nasdaq gets back its 2009 losses (AAPL, INTC, C, WPO, NYT, JASO)
Posted Mar 15th 2009 4:40PM by Joseph Lazzaro
Filed under: Newspapers, Internet, Competitive strategy, New York Times'A' (NYT)
The industry standard in journalism, The New York Times, is revisiting the issue of charging for online content.
New York Times (NYSE: NYT) Chairman Authur Sulzberger, Jr., told a Stony Brook (N.Y.) University audience Thursday that the company is considering "incremental" charges for website users, while keeping most of its site free, Bloomberg News reported.
Continue reading Once again, New York Times will evaluate charging for online content
Posted Feb 27th 2009 12:25PM by Joseph Lazzaro
Filed under: Bad news, Newspapers, Internet, New York Times'A' (NYT), Media World

If it takes a good man to admit when he's wrong, then I'm up there.
My error: the speed of the decline of print newspapers. They're not dropping slowly: they're dropping like flies. And the metro dailies appear to be among the weakest: Detroit, Philadelphia, Chicago, San Francisco, Seattle, Denver. Who's next?
A journalism colleague called from Washington, D.C.: his reporter sister was laid off in Denver, whose ex-college roommate, the editor, got the axe in Seattle, and on and on it goes.
The big error in news/editorial conference rooms (and in this space, I might add): the failure to anticipate the speed of the decline of revenue. It's crumbling, due to the internet and the pronounced recession. (And here's hoping it's just a pronounced recession.) The online operations of many print dailies are doing OK-to-good, but the problem is they've started from such a low base and the ad market has become so fragmented/dispersed on the web that the web sites can't increase revenue fast enough to support the increasing losses from the print daily. The solution? Obviously, stop the print bleeding. In other words, shut down the print newspaper. And down they go. It is so sad. As noted earlier, some print dailies will survive with niches/specialization, but their overall operations will be smaller, due to the considerably lower gross annual revenue (at least initially) on the web.
Continue reading Print daily newspapers are going, going ...
Posted Feb 20th 2009 10:00AM by Alex Salkever
Filed under: Newspapers, New York Times'A' (NYT), News Corp'B' (NWS)

Yesterday the
New York Times (NYSE:
NYT) suspended its dividend, following other struggling newspaper giants like McClatchy in a desperate move to save cash amidst the Perfect Storm buffeting their industry. A deep recession, sinking paid subscription rolls, and crashing classified and display ad sales caused by competition with the Internet have all conspired to put the entire newspaper business on life support far faster than almost anyone imagined possible.
A number of financial bloggers and
technology titans are now saying the Times won't survive the year. Even after suspending the dividend, NYT will struggle to be cash-flow positive, particularly considering it has to service a crushing 14% interest burden on the recent Hail Mary $250 million loan package from Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim Helu.
Continue reading New York Times Deathwatch: Will the Gray Lady make it through the year?
Posted Feb 20th 2009 8:00AM by Zac Bissonnette
Filed under: Newspapers, New York Times'A' (NYT)
The New York Times Co. (NYSE:
NYT) has finally announced that it will eliminate its quarterly dividend to conserve cash and decrease debt. In a
press release, chairman Arthur Sulzberger Jr. said that "Today's decision provides the Company with additional financial flexibility given the current economic environment and the uncertain business outlook."
The New York Times Co. has been struggling with declining profitability and a weak balance sheet, and recently secured a loan from Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim on extremely punishing terms:
14% interest and warrants to acquire 16 million of the company's A shares.
By continuing to pay significant dividends even as the company's balance sheet declined, the Times forced itself into a deal of desperation with very high costs to shareholders.
Continue reading New York Times eliminates dividend
Posted Feb 14th 2009 1:40PM by Douglas McIntyre
Filed under: New York Times'A' (NYT), News Corp'B' (NWS)
Rupert Murdoch, the CEO of News Corp. (NYSE: NWS) paid what most people thought was the limit of the rational price when he bought Dow Jones over a year ago for $5 billion. His company has already been forced to write-down a part of that in its earnings report for 2008. But, Dow Jones might be only worth $500 million or $1 billion if it were still public today.
A quick look at the Saturday Wall Street Journal shows a paper in four sections, each very thin. When all the ads for Dow Jones products are subtracted, there are about three paid pages of advertising left. That has to create a really large loss.
Continue reading Note to Rupert Murdoch: Dow Jones would have been cheaper this year
Posted Feb 9th 2009 10:30AM by Douglas McIntyre
Filed under: New York Times'A' (NYT)
There has been a great deal of concern that The New York Times Company (NYSE: NYT) will have trouble paying its long-term debt this year. On top of that, its advertising is falling, even at its Internet unit. Shareholders at the company doesn't have much good news to look forward to.
But, an article in The New York Times says things may not be so bad for its parent company. It is an odd place for the piece to run. It makes it look like the company is trying to convince itself and its shareholders that it will be OK.
Continue reading The New York Times loves itself
Next Page »